Re: $2.61
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:27 pm
The gas stations around me (West LA/Sawtelle/Brentwood) are $3.00-3.40, unfortunately.ASUHATER! wrote:No idea why it's so expensive there. In everywhere else in LA it's $2.50-2.80
The gas stations around me (West LA/Sawtelle/Brentwood) are $3.00-3.40, unfortunately.ASUHATER! wrote:No idea why it's so expensive there. In everywhere else in LA it's $2.50-2.80
Just looked at the gas price map in LA and nothing is above like 2.80. You just happen to only drive by the most expensive stations in the county.Bruins01 wrote:The gas stations around me (West LA/Sawtelle/Brentwood) are $3.00-3.40, unfortunately.ASUHATER! wrote:No idea why it's so expensive there. In everywhere else in LA it's $2.50-2.80
Bruins01 wrote:The gas stations around me (West LA/Sawtelle/Brentwood) are $3.00-3.40, unfortunately.ASUHATER! wrote:No idea why it's so expensive there. In everywhere else in LA it's $2.50-2.80
What? When?? You must be confusing me with LK or something.scumdevils86 wrote:Bruins has always made it well known he is loaded and likes to rub it in everyone's face.
I'm often loaded, but don't brag about it either.Bruins01 wrote:What? When?? You must be confusing me with LK or something.scumdevils86 wrote:Bruins has always made it well known he is loaded and likes to rub it in everyone's face.
It's about damn time the gas tax was increased or an oil tax is levied.Merkin wrote:Not if Obama gets his way with a $10 barrel oil tax.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli ... /79838620/" target="_blank
It would have a tremendous impact on the quality of everyone's transportation and infrastructure.ASUHATER! wrote:With current prices a $10 a barrel tax won't be that bad.
Is that Azlax04, after the boom when bust?Merkin wrote:I'm often loaded, but don't brag about it either.Bruins01 wrote:What? When?? You must be confusing me with LK or something.scumdevils86 wrote:Bruins has always made it well known he is loaded and likes to rub it in everyone's face.
Hell just froze over.Salty wrote:It's about damn time the gas tax was increased or an oil tax is levied.Merkin wrote:Not if Obama gets his way with a $10 barrel oil tax.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli ... /79838620/" target="_blank
It's the right thing to do. And now is a great time.
Fuckin' Repubs in Congress, short sighted as usual, will kill this instead of allowing this country to successfully improve our infrastructure and transportation quality.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/sau ... -industry/" target="_blankRecently, though, there have been signs that the Saudis’ strategy might be working after all. On Monday, Chesapeake Energy, once the highest flier of the U.S. oil boom, had to deny publicly that it was preparing to file for bankruptcy; some 60 oil companies have already done so, and the research firm IHS estimates that as many as 150 companies could follow suit. On Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal reported that private-equity giant KKR & Co. was backing away from risky bets on oil companies. Industry leaders are starting to sound desperate: The New York Times quoted the head of a Texas oil group as telling his members that “today our goal is to survive.”
It's actually pretty funny. All those guys agreed that they will only pump at the massive amount they're currently pumping and basically tried to pressure Iran to agree to keep pumping at the level Iran's currently pumping, which is basically zero due to sanctions.Merkin wrote:Not sure how effective this will be with Iran coming online.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/17/busin ... share&_r=0" target="_blank
MOSCOW — In a sign of tentative cooperation among major oil producers, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela announced a plan on Tuesday to freeze output at current levels, a move intended to help bolster energy prices.
And you got a great example of how hard it is to get things done between the countries that matter in the current environment with the Saudi Oil Minister's comments today.SCCats wrote:It's actually pretty funny. All those guys agreed that they will only pump at the massive amount they're currently pumping and basically tried to pressure Iran to agree to keep pumping at the level Iran's currently pumping, which is basically zero due to sanctions.Merkin wrote:Not sure how effective this will be with Iran coming online.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/17/busin ... share&_r=0" target="_blank
MOSCOW — In a sign of tentative cooperation among major oil producers, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela announced a plan on Tuesday to freeze output at current levels, a move intended to help bolster energy prices.
Iran laughed.
It's all basically a PR stunt to try and hurt/isolate Iran while getting a couple dollar pop they can sell into.
Sell any pop on an "agreement to cut production" and you'll make some cash.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/02/23/al-naimi ... es-us.html" target="_blankSaudi oil minister Ali Ibrahim Naimi said Tuesday producers will hopefully meet in March to negotiate an output freeze, but production cuts will not happen...
"It is not like cutting production. That is not going to happen because not many countries are going to deliver even if they say they will cut production — they will not deliver. So there is no sense in wasting our time seeking production cuts," he added.
There is now less trust than normal among the world's oil exporters, he said.
I remember it being like ~$.85-1.10 in the East valley growing up in the mid to late 90s even until like 2001-2002.Catintheheat wrote:I just filled up my tank from empty and cost me under $20. The price at Costco for $1.29/gallon. I haven't seen prices like that since the mid 80s.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-shales- ... nance.html" target="_blankNEW YORK (Reuters) - For leading U.S. shale oil producers, $40 is the new $70.
Less than a year ago major shale firms were saying they needed oil above $60 a barrel to produce more; now some say they will settle for far less in deciding whether to crank up output after the worst oil price crash in a generation.
Their latest comments highlight the industry's remarkable resilience, but also serve as a warning to rivals and traders: a retreat in U.S. oil production that would help ease global oversupply and let prices recover may prove shorter than some may have expected.
I filled up for $0.51 last weekend. 80 cent discount.azgreg wrote:Used my Fry's fuel points the other morning.
I've actually planned our summer road trip to Disney World around a Costco-to-Costco daisy chain.Chicat wrote:There goes the Costco membership Little Sally Middle America got with her tax cut. Which sucks because that’s where she got cheap gas. And her prescriptions filled...
Same problem, only worse, as Arco is a Western chain. One El Paso location, then nothing at all east of Odessa, TX.Merkin wrote:Arco is tier one gas and about the same price as Costco, so I generally look for them also.
There's the Costco right by i-10 and Kinocatgrad97 wrote:I've actually planned our summer road trip to Disney World around a Costco-to-Costco daisy chain.Chicat wrote:There goes the Costco membership Little Sally Middle America got with her tax cut. Which sucks because that’s where she got cheap gas. And her prescriptions filled...
The I-10 route is actually pretty well-populated...with the exception of that infamous 547-mile stretch from El Paso to San Antonio. No Costco west of there until you get to the one at Thornydale/Orange Grove roads, either.
We drive a Chevy Traverse with a 350-mile capacity at about 32 mpg. Filling up at Fort Stockton's gonna hurt.
The Arco price is usually a lie. They charge like $.45 to use a debit card and that usually negates the cheaper price.Merkin wrote:Arco is tier one gas and about the same price as Costco, so I generally look for them also.
Definitely more competition in Tucson than the Central Coast, but you save at least 10 cents a gallon over the major chains, so the 35 cent charge is made up in the first 4 gallons. My truck holds 25 gallons, and my wife's Trailblazer 17.ASUHATER! wrote:The Arco price is usually a lie. They charge like $.45 to use a debit card and that usually negates the cheaper price.Merkin wrote:Arco is tier one gas and about the same price as Costco, so I generally look for them also.
Funny. I went to that Costco a couple of times when I used to teach south of 22nd Ave. and Columbus. But it didn't initially show up on the locator, so I passed it right over. Probably use it next month.ASUHATER! wrote:There's the Costco right by i-10 and Kinocatgrad97 wrote:I've actually planned our summer road trip to Disney World around a Costco-to-Costco daisy chain.Chicat wrote:There goes the Costco membership Little Sally Middle America got with her tax cut. Which sucks because that’s where she got cheap gas. And her prescriptions filled...
The I-10 route is actually pretty well-populated...with the exception of that infamous 547-mile stretch from El Paso to San Antonio. No Costco west of there until you get to the one at Thornydale/Orange Grove roads, either.
We drive a Chevy Traverse with a 350-mile capacity at about 32 mpg. Filling up at Fort Stockton's gonna hurt.
ASUHATER! wrote:Here the Arco is only like 5-7 cents cheaper. So in my car I have to get a full tank for it to be any cheaper. Either that or I pay for gas with cash, but what is this, 1957? Who carries cash anymore?
This is funny because I filled up my tank for the first time in California before the rise and when I went to the gas station today, I had to question my memory. I said "man, I do t remember gas being $4/gallon when I filled up last time". Others agreed when I talked to them. Crazy.Merkin wrote:![]()
Thanks Obama!84Cat wrote:Oil is trading at 2009 levels this week at around $38/barrel. Prices will stay low through 2016. The oil countries are not happy.