Page 2 of 3

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 2:42 pm
by CalStateTempe
Carson? What a joke.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 2:44 pm
by TucsonClip
TucsonClip wrote:Rams alone to Inglewood pulled off the ballot today... That leaves Rams and Chargers to Inglewood or Chargers and Raiders to Carson.
Now reports saying Rams + team TBD to Inglewood is up for vote and not specifically the Chargers.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 2:55 pm
by Alieberman
Either Stadium will look really nice half empty every week.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 2:57 pm
by ASUHATER!
Alieberman wrote:Either Stadium will look really nice half empty every week.
It's pretty much guaranteed that for at least the first couple seasons every game would sellout

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 3:18 pm
by Chicat
Adios Whale's Vagina....

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:37 pm
by Merkin

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:06 pm
by Chicat
I'm so fucking psyched the Rams are coming home.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:14 pm
by ASUHATER!
So when does the move happen? This year? Or in like 2-5 years when the stadium is built?

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:16 pm
by Chicat
ASUHATER! wrote:So when does the move happen? This year? Or in like 2-5 years when the stadium is built?
They will play at the Coliseum for three years then play in Inglewood starting in 2019.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:18 pm
by ASUHATER!
That's a lot of play in the coliseum. At least one college or pro game every weekend

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:46 pm
by Chicat
That old bitch can handle it.

The nice thing is that just as the novelty of having a team again begins to fade, the new stadium will open. Hopefully by then the Rams will be a contender.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:27 am
by MrBug708
They should fire Fisher now.

Maybe this will get me on board. I wish they'd change the name

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:32 am
by ASUHATER!
MrBug708 wrote:They should fire Fisher now.

Maybe this will get me on board. I wish they'd change the name
To what?

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:33 am
by azgreg
ASUHATER! wrote:
MrBug708 wrote:They should fire Fisher now.

Maybe this will get me on board. I wish they'd change the name
To what?
The Inglewood Ingrates.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:34 am
by catgrad97
The Los Angeles Trafficjams?

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:41 am
by Chicat
Change the name??

They were the LA Rams from 1946 to 1994. They were the first professional franchise to call Los Angeles home. Their history in that city is long and proud. From Kenny Washington (the first African American NFL player) to Fred Gehrke (the halfback who painted horns on his helmet in 1948 and thus was the first team to have an emblem on their helmet) to Bob Waterfield to Norm Van Brocklin to Elroy Hirsch to Tom Fears to the Fearsome Foursome to Roman Gabriel to Jack Youngblood to Jackie Slater to Eric Dickerson. All wore the Rams name and uniform with excellence and pride.

Why would you change the name? Makes no sense whatsoever. Dumb take is really dumb.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 9:03 am
by catgrad97
Not sure why they left in the first place, honestly, beyond stadium politics. Totally changed the Orange County dynamic.

The interesting thing to me is now, what is St. Louis' response? "Never again"? "We were used"?

Or does the city just say F- it and make it all about baseball again?

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 9:08 am
by MrBug708
Chicat wrote:Change the name??

They were the LA Rams from 1946 to 1994. They were the first professional franchise to call Los Angeles home. Their history in that city is long and proud. From Kenny Washington (the first African American NFL player) to Fred Gehrke (the halfback who painted horns on his helmet in 1948 and thus was the first team to have an emblem on their helmet) to Bob Waterfield to Norm Van Brocklin to Elroy Hirsch to Tom Fears to the Fearsome Foursome to Roman Gabriel to Jack Youngblood to Jackie Slater to Eric Dickerson. All wore the Rams name and uniform with excellence and pride.

Why would you change the name? Makes no sense whatsoever. Dumb take is really dumb.
I have no loyalty to the rams and would prefer a fresh take. I know they won't, I just prefer they would. I associate them with st. Louis

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 9:09 am
by Coop Cat
What's funny about all this is not too many people seem to really care, not even the networks. NFL Network was covering it with people that I have never seen before and kept running the same segment over and over again. Sportscenter opened talking for about 3 minutes about it with Shelley Smith doing a live hit then then moved onto basketball. No Mortensen or Schefter or anyone of importance. Just another day in the sports world.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 9:18 am
by Chicat
MrBug708 wrote:
Chicat wrote:Change the name??

They were the LA Rams from 1946 to 1994. They were the first professional franchise to call Los Angeles home. Their history in that city is long and proud. From Kenny Washington (the first African American NFL player) to Fred Gehrke (the halfback who painted horns on his helmet in 1948 and thus was the first team to have an emblem on their helmet) to Bob Waterfield to Norm Van Brocklin to Elroy Hirsch to Tom Fears to the Fearsome Foursome to Roman Gabriel to Jack Youngblood to Jackie Slater to Eric Dickerson. All wore the Rams name and uniform with excellence and pride.

Why would you change the name? Makes no sense whatsoever. Dumb take is really dumb.
I have no loyalty to the rams and would prefer a fresh take. I know they won't, I just prefer they would. I associate them with st. Louis
St. Louis was a pit-stop. They always have been and always will be the Los Angeles Rams. Screw Cleveland and St. Louis.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 9:22 am
by Merkin
MrBug708 wrote:
Chicat wrote:Change the name??

They were the LA Rams from 1946 to 1994. They were the first professional franchise to call Los Angeles home. Their history in that city is long and proud. From Kenny Washington (the first African American NFL player) to Fred Gehrke (the halfback who painted horns on his helmet in 1948 and thus was the first team to have an emblem on their helmet) to Bob Waterfield to Norm Van Brocklin to Elroy Hirsch to Tom Fears to the Fearsome Foursome to Roman Gabriel to Jack Youngblood to Jackie Slater to Eric Dickerson. All wore the Rams name and uniform with excellence and pride.

Why would you change the name? Makes no sense whatsoever. Dumb take is really dumb.
I have no loyalty to the rams and would prefer a fresh take. I know they won't, I just prefer they would. I associate them with st. Louis
Must be an age thing. I always think of the Rams being an LA team going back to the Roman Gabriel days.

Image

Merlin Olsen too.

Image

Tucsonans may remember Merlin from his Father Murphy days, which was filmed in Old Tucson.


Image

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 9:27 am
by Alieberman
I still think of of the Cardinals as the Chicago Cardinals.

;) (I'm not that old)

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 9:32 am
by MrBug708
I haven't cared about professional football and the rams left when I was 12 so I didn't have an opinion about it. I was pro expansion

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 9:39 am
by Chicat
I went to an LA Rams/St. Louis Cardinals game at the Big A in 1984. I was seven years old and I brought a terrible homemade sign that said "Pluck Them Birds".

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:01 am
by ghostwhitehorse
St. Louis and San Diego fans are. . .unhappy: http://deadspin.com/a-special-message-f ... 1752701018" target="_blank

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:17 am
by baycat93
ghostwhitehorse wrote:St. Louis and San Diego fans are. . .unhappy: http://deadspin.com/a-special-message-f ... 1752701018" target="_blank
Easy to relate.

I grew up in So Cal and was a Rams fan. Met Jim Youngblood a couple of times. Ferragamo, Dickerson, even Chrissy bring back great memories at the BIGA.

Then that greedy *unt ( Fronta..Fronta.. Fronta ohh fuck never could say her name) moved them to St. Louis. Have barely followed Pro Football since. Had short romance with the Patriots when I lived in NY (rooting for PAC10 Bledsoe). Have mildly rooted for the 49ers, but only because I have lived in the Bay Area for 20 years. Sadly, only thing keeps me interested is Fantasy.

I don't know how those who still live in OC/LA and experienced the move will respond... but I won't be Buying a Ram's Jersey anytime soon.

Thankfully we are a football school. :-)

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 12:53 pm
by Longhorned
MrBug708 wrote:
I have no loyalty to the rams and would prefer a fresh take. I know they won't, I just prefer they would. I associate them with st. Louis
If you have no loyalty to the Rams then who cares that you associate them with the city that Georgia Frontieri dropped them in after ripping out everyone's hearts? This is a great day for those of us who associate the Rams with Los Angeles, which is 100% of all Rams fans born before about 1985.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:39 pm
by Chicat

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2016 3:08 pm
by Merkin
Oakland Raiders: NFL Team Withdraws Bid to Move to Los Angeles

Oakland pulled its bid before the vote that approved the St. Louis Rams for a move to California. The Raiders will receive $100 million from the NFL to put toward a new stadium, ESPN reports.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 7:20 pm
by azgreg

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 7:27 pm
by ASUHATER!
Should go back to the white and blue jerseys
Image

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:58 pm
by Longhorned
No way. Have to get rid of that midwesternized gold and bring back the original SoCal gold, though I don't mind keeping the navy blue.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 3:31 pm
by Merkin
Was I was going to school in Tucson, AZ didn't have a NFL team yet. So they showed the Chargers games every Sunday on TV, which was the closest NFL team.

Dan Fouts and Air Coryell was some fun football to watch, so OK with this, if they ask me. Although I couldn't name a single player on the Chargers today, same with the Rams.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:43 pm
by UAEebs86
The Chargers have already announced they are staying in SD one more year and hope to stay there long term.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14674 ... worked-out

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:57 am
by Coop Cat
What needs to happen, and quick, is Spanos needs to give up the land that he purchased in Santa Ana for the temporary practice facility and team offices in addition to making a more public statement that he wants to be in San Diego for years to come. Another one year in San Diego and we will see is just not going to cut it. Chargers and San Diego need to get together and get something done quickly, not soon, quickly! If it is perceived that the Chargers are a lame duck team after this upcoming season the fan turnout is going to be pretty brutal for the 2016 season.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 10:06 am
by Chicat
The problem Coop is that San Diego is no closer to a solution to the stadium issue and isn't interested in a publicly financed option (not that I blame them).

So whether it's 2016, 2017, 2020, or 2030, they are going to lose the team.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 12:40 pm
by Coop Cat
Chicat wrote:The problem Coop is that San Diego is no closer to a solution to the stadium issue and isn't interested in a publicly financed option (not that I blame them).

So whether it's 2016, 2017, 2020, or 2030, they are going to lose the team.
Oh, trust me I know. I wake up to the headlines on my sports page everyday and have for the past 10+ years the Chargers have been trying to get a stadium deal done with the city. In the end, both the city and the team is at fault. It has been becoming more and more difficult to root for this team and for this city. I will be a fan as long as they are in San Diego. Once they leave, all bets are off.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:29 am
by Merkin
St. Louis all butthurt over this:

http://www.stlmag.com/news/sports/rams- ... -st-louis/" target="_blank


Image

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:55 am
by azgreg
Not in barbecue it ain't.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:35 pm
by Chicat
Coop Cat wrote:
Chicat wrote:The problem Coop is that San Diego is no closer to a solution to the stadium issue and isn't interested in a publicly financed option (not that I blame them).

So whether it's 2016, 2017, 2020, or 2030, they are going to lose the team.
Oh, trust me I know. I wake up to the headlines on my sports page everyday and have for the past 10+ years the Chargers have been trying to get a stadium deal done with the city. In the end, both the city and the team is at fault. It has been becoming more and more difficult to root for this team and for this city. I will be a fan as long as they are in San Diego. Once they leave, all bets are off.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:33 am
by TucsonClip
From what I know (people inside the organization), this has been in the works for a week or so. Laughable the NFL made "one last pitch" today, and the need to extend the deadline two additional days.

I still believe the saddest part is the voters in the city not really knowing what a TOT tax is, and that it doesnt apply to them in, especially by using it to help fund a stadium. You can make the case that we dont need to build a stadium for billionaire owners, but dont complain about not having a team if you cannt pass a proposal that makes sense.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:08 am
by Jefe

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:42 am
by Chicat
Jefe wrote:
Looks like something that was put together in a week.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:07 pm
by baycat93
Chicat wrote:
Jefe wrote:
Looks like something that was put together in a week at junior high graphics design class.
fixed it for you.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:15 pm
by azgreg
So, what do you think Chi? You're in the business.....sort of. What did a firm make on that logo? $100,000?

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:40 pm
by the real dill

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:01 pm
by Chicat
baycat93 wrote:
Chicat wrote:
Jefe wrote:
Looks like something that was put together in a week at junior high graphics design class.
fixed it for you.
Appreciate that.
azgreg wrote:So, what do you think Chi? You're in the business.....sort of. What did a firm make on that logo? $100,000?
I'm guessing they had some in-house junior person make that. If they farmed it out to an agency they would have asked for a 60 day turnaround. Maybe they could have pushed it to 30, but they'd have wanted to do some focus group tests and provided multiple options.

So in all likelihood they asked Sally the jn-house junior marketing assistant who took a couple graphic design classes at CSUN to mock something up quickly and there you have your really shitty logo. They probably pay her $34k and she probably spent two hours on it, soooooooo about $50 all in.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:03 pm
by azgreg
It looks like something from the USFL.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:22 pm
by ASUHATER!
I don't think it looks that bad. kinda old school looking. not complicated or too fancy.

Re: Rams back to LA?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:25 pm
by azgreg