Re: World Cup 2014
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:03 am
If he isn't kicked off the Uruguay team, this is a complete farce.
He absolutely did it.SCCat wrote:
Suarez seriously bit a person at the World Cup?
I mean that can't be true. I have to find the video. Can a person really be that stupid?
Uruguay won't kick him off. This is who he is and Uruguay knows they need him to win.Alieberman wrote:If he isn't kicked off the Uruguay team, this is a complete farce.
At least their round of 16 game? Are you kidding me?SCCat wrote:Uruguay won't kick him off. This is who he is and Uruguay knows they need him to win.Alieberman wrote:If he isn't kicked off the Uruguay team, this is a complete farce.
But FIFA should suspend him for at least their round of 16 game.
Luis is a biter.Alieberman wrote:At least their round of 16 game? Are you kidding me?SCCat wrote:Uruguay won't kick him off. This is who he is and Uruguay knows they need him to win.Alieberman wrote:If he isn't kicked off the Uruguay team, this is a complete farce.
But FIFA should suspend him for at least their round of 16 game.
He bit someone
That was in league right?MrBug708 wrote:His last bite got him 10 games though that one looked a lot worse. They should suspend him for the remaining WC and the Copa
http://www.espnfc.com/blog/world-cup-ce ... vs-uruguayIf it is determined that Suarez did indeed bite Chiellini -- and current replays weren't entirely conclusive -- FIFA will no doubt come down hard on the Liverpool striker. The Italian defender was certainly in no doubt as to what happened, telling Sky Italia:
"Suarez is a sneak and he gets away with it because FIFA want their stars to play in the World Cup. I'd love to see if they have the courage to use video evidence against him. The referee saw the bite mark too, but he did nothing about it."
Not entirely conclusive? Other than appearing to bite someone who immediately has a bite mark in the place it appeared he was bitten?SCCat wrote:http://www.espnfc.com/blog/world-cup-ce ... vs-uruguayIf it is determined that Suarez did indeed bite Chiellini -- and current replays weren't entirely conclusive -- FIFA will no doubt come down hard on the Liverpool striker. The Italian defender was certainly in no doubt as to what happened, telling Sky Italia:
"Suarez is a sneak and he gets away with it because FIFA want their stars to play in the World Cup. I'd love to see if they have the courage to use video evidence against him. The referee saw the bite mark too, but he did nothing about it."
They're not conclusive in that you don't see the whites of his teeth chomp into Chellini's skin.Merkin wrote: and current replays weren't entirely conclusive
What?
It's possible that Chellini had some pasta sauce on his neck that was too irresistible not to taste.ASUHATER! wrote:is this guy a cannibal or what
I think that might be racist.Alieberman wrote:It's possible that Chellini had some pasta sauce on his neck that was too irresistible not to taste.ASUHATER! wrote:is this guy a cannibal or what
ha!Katzenfreund wrote:
Chellini is a bit of a grinderNYCat wrote:I can't resist biting an Italian sub either.
Or they'll give him due process that conveniently delays a verdict until his team is eliminated because they're corrupt as the day is long.Katzenfreund wrote:Italian Corriere dello Sport newspaper offers an alternative angle of the bite. He's done.
The funniest Suarez shop I've seen so far...
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/world-cup ... 20283.htmlThe big worry for the United States men's national team is that the physical and mental fatigue of the 2-2 draw against Portugal will be too much to overcome Germany.
The U.S. and Portugal played in Manaus — an oppressively hot, humid outpost in a remote part of the Amazon.
In this World Cup, the four teams who have played there (Italy, England, Croatia, Cameroon) have all gotten destroyed once they left.
They all lost their next games, and went 0-1-5 in tournament games overall after playing in Manaus.
Well I had a couple of my Vegas friends look yesterday and today for this bet and they were unable to find it.SCCat wrote:Is there a betting service where I can fade this number and get 3-1+ that we don't go through?77HoyaCat4Ever wrote:76% according to Nate Silver
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/how- ... ment-odds/
In Vegas do they have real time odds on moving on to the knockout rounds?
Actually, that was the first time I've EVER seen any player kick the ball on goal two kicks in a row....SCCat wrote:Unsurprisingly, giving Messi a second try at a kick (just one minute apart from the first try) is generally not a winning strategy.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-di ... 39830.htmlWith an unrepentant person biter terrorizing World Cup matches, FIFA has reportedly also found time to launch an investigation into Neymar's underpants.
If there's one thing that the governing body cares above all else, it's the protection of its high-paying sponsors' exclusivity. After all, you don't become a non-profit organization with a rainy day fund of $1.4 billion in cash by being concerned with players biting each other. You do it by making sure players don't have underpants made by non-FIFA sponsors peeking out of their shorts.
According to UOL, the underwear alarm went off at FIFA headquarters when Neymar's were partially exposed after he swapped shirts following Brazil's 4-1 win over Cameroon. And if you think that this is all a big joke, consider that Denmark's Nicklas Bendtner was fined €100,000 ($125,797) by UEFA (European football's governing body) when he celebrated a goal by lifting up his shirt to reveal the name of a betting firm on the waistband of his underpants at Euro 2012. For the sake of comparison, the Croatian federation was fined less for its fans' combination of racial abuse aimed at opposing players and flare throwing at the same tournament.
But not by much.CalStateTempe wrote:We are all Portugese today.
The FIFA Disciplinary Committee has reached a decision in the case related to Luis Suárez of Uruguay following an incident that occurred during the FIFA World Cup™ match between Italy and Uruguay played on 24 June 2014.
The FIFA Disciplinary Committee has decided that:
· The player Luis Suárez is regarded as having breached art. 48 par. 1 lit. d of the FIFA Disciplinary Code (FDC) (assault), and art. 57 of the FDC (an act of unsporting behaviour towards another player).
· The player Luis Suárez is to be suspended for nine (9) official matches. The first match of this suspension is to be served in the upcoming FIFA World Cup™ fixture between Colombia and Uruguay on 28 June 2014. The remaining match suspensions shall be served in Uruguay’s next FIFA World Cup match(es), as long as the team qualifies, and/or in the representative team’s subsequent official matches in accordance with art. 38 par. 2a) of the FDC.
· The player Luis Suárez is banned from taking part in any kind of football-related activity (administrative, sports or any other) for a period of four (4) months in accordance with art. 22 of the FDC.
· A stadium ban is pronounced against the player Luis Suárez in accordance with art. 21 of the FDC as follows: the player Luis Suárez is prohibited from entering the confines of any stadium during the period of the ban (point 3). The player Luis Suárez is prohibited from entering the confines of any stadium in which the representative team of Uruguay is playing while he has to serve the nine-match suspension (point 2).
· The player Luis Suárez is ordered to pay a fine in the amount of CHF 100,000.
The decision was notified to the player and the Uruguayan FA today.
“Such behaviour cannot be tolerated on any football pitch, and in particular not at a FIFA World Cup when the eyes of millions of people are on the stars on the field. The Disciplinary Committee took into account all the factors of the case and the degree of Mr Suárez’s guilt in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Code. The decision comes into force as soon it is communicated,” said Claudio Sulser, chairman of the FIFA Disciplinary Committee.