Bear Down Wildcats

Temple says hi. Remember Temple? The team that just lost 3 in a row to Tulsa, SMU, and Cincy? That Temple?

bad loss /bad lôs, bad läs/
noun
the fact or process of losing something or someone in embarrassing fashion.
for example: http://espn.go.com/ncb/recap?gameId=400586748

Another monster big for Will Self and the incredible Daniel Manning:

Cliff Alexander, the one and done top 5 pre-season top 5 recruit, coming in at 2 + 7...

Oh no, not 9....27!

A marginal first rounder

http://hoopshype.com/galleries/thelight ... Idslide-20


Funny how life works out, The Alexander's played a mean trick on these poor fans, but turned out to be a blessing in disguise.

That's how you beat Stanford.

What a disgusting fan base. This doesn't deserve linking, but we should all know what Kansas fans are like...could be worse than ASU?

http://kansas.scout.com/forums/2481-hoo ... ford?s=172

What happened to them?

Plus, lol, they don't even mention the final score or how the team played? Just haters.

Kansas is not a good team.

salim'sheadband wrote:Kansas is not a good team.

Our record, says otherwise.

enfuego wrote:

salim'sheadband wrote:Kansas is not a good team.

Our record, says otherwise.

All I can see are blowout losses

What trash rails on a coach like they did Olson. Flat out ASSUish. There comments were dispicable.

Bosy Billups wrote:What a disgusting fan base. This doesn't deserve linking, but we should all know what Kansas fans are like...could be worse than ASU?

http://kansas.scout.com/forums/2481-hoo ... ford?s=172

What happened to them?

Plus, lol, they don't even mention the final score or how the team played? Just haters.

Thanks Bosy for reminding me how much I hate KU and many of their fans!!! Wow, they think it's funny to bag on Lute that way? Living most of my adult life here in Asia, I really love their high level of respect for elders.....noting these KU clowns nasty comments/jokes about Lute's health really embarasses me as an American. Disgusting.

Additionally, as a Wildcat, if any of our fans pulled crap like this, I'd be all over them....didn't notice one KU fan over there who called that Dbag out for his nasty comment.

enfuego wrote:

salim'sheadband wrote:Kansas is not a good team.

Our record, says otherwise.

Now I beleve you when you called yourself a 'tool' Enfuego.....you didn't even have the class to 'police' your own fanbase' disgusting comments. I guess you are a good rep of KU then???

I didn't realize Phog.net was the Kansas equivalent of PGU. Or maybe all Kansas fans are low rent assholes. I can't say I've ever met any other type.

Well, in their defense, they learned it from their coach.

Chicat wrote:I didn't realize Phog.net was the Kansas equivalent of PGU. Or maybe all Kansas fans are low rent assholes. I can't say I've ever met any other type.

The Phog is awful. The shiver or whatever it's called was worse. Their obsession with Miller 2-3 years ago was at an all time high when he was beating them out for recruits. I think the conclusion is Kansas fans are just annoying as fuck. Even their conference recognizes then as such. Basketball only, of course.

I'm looking forward to watching Texas curb stomp KU.

This Kansas/Texas game has been pretty good, game of spurts.

Texas' zone may be one of the worst I have ever seen

Texas falling apart.

man, KU winning is reaching ASU winning status for me...

Kansas looks good taking total control over Texas this second half. Iowa State is their only their in the Big 12, and not all that dependable of one.

Really good win for Kansas, beating the #17 team on their home court.

Kansas does only two things reasonably well: shoot threes and offensive rebound. So what does Texas do? Zone the whole game. Rick Barnes everyone!

CalStateTempe wrote:I'm looking forward to watching Texas curb stomp KU.

Another quality win against a top 25 team by the Jayhawks. Repeat...ANOTHER quality road win.

salim'sheadband wrote:Kansas does only two things reasonably well: shoot threes and offensive rebound. So what does Texas do? Zone the whole game. Rick Barnes everyone!

I told Machina before the season started Texas wouldn't be a Top 10 team this year, and he said how do you know that? Before I could even respond, somebody posted a picture of Rick Barnes.

UAEebs86 wrote:

salim'sheadband wrote:Kansas does only two things reasonably well: shoot threes and offensive rebound. So what does Texas do? Zone the whole game. Rick Barnes everyone!

I told Machina before the season started Texas wouldn't be a Top 10 team this year, and he said how do you know that? Before I could even respond, somebody posted a picture of Rick Barnes.

Does anyone know if Texas usually zones or did Barnes just decide to be particularly stupid this game?

In Rick Barnes defense, he is getting REALLY OLD.

#donttellrecruits

Didn't Stanford beat Texas on the road?

Because here's the reality: the Big 12's big eight (Kansas, Kansas State, Iowa State, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Baylor, Texas and West Virginia) were a pedestrian 12-11 against the RPI top 50 in the nonconference. The "signature" wins? Utah, Georgetown, Michigan State, Tennessee, Alabama, Arkansas, Iowa (twice), Butler, Tulsa (twice) and NC State.

Of those 12 teams, only one -- Utah -- is even in the Top 25 right now.

http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketba ... -big-12-is

Ouch.

I remember the Big 12 was also "the best conference in the country" last year, and they put two teams in the Sweet Sixteen and none in the Elite Eight.

UAEebs86 wrote:

salim'sheadband wrote:Kansas does only two things reasonably well: shoot threes and offensive rebound. So what does Texas do? Zone the whole game. Rick Barnes everyone!

I told Machina before the season started Texas wouldn't be a Top 10 team this year, and he said how do you know that? Before I could even respond, somebody posted a picture of Rick Barnes.

That was actually me, I was the one that posted that picture. Confusing me with someone else.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1116#p36958

What Would Tharpe Do?

Machina wrote:

UAEebs86 wrote:

salim'sheadband wrote:Kansas does only two things reasonably well: shoot threes and offensive rebound. So what does Texas do? Zone the whole game. Rick Barnes everyone!

I told Machina before the season started Texas wouldn't be a Top 10 team this year, and he said how do you know that? Before I could even respond, somebody posted a picture of Rick Barnes.

That was actually me, I was the one that posted that picture. Confusing me with someone else.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1116#p36958

My bad-thought it was you because I was responding to your post about how tough Kentucky's schedule was because of how many Top 10 teams they were playing.

Maybe next time you know a team is overrated you shouldn't use them as evidence of a tough schedule.

Don't look now but Arizona has played and beaten two top 5 teams in KenPom, top 7 in Sagarin.

salim'sheadband wrote:Kansas does only two things reasonably well: shoot threes and offensive rebound. So what does Texas do? Zone the whole game. Rick Barnes everyone!

Their zone is definitely not any better tonight. I can believe they stay in it and have no clue how they are ranked 12 in ADJD according to kenpom

Rick Barnes has no trouble recruiting talented big men, so why the hell would he need to zone KU anyway?

It's not that he's that stupid of an individual. I just don't think Rick Barnes has the conviction to make the hard moves in-game that sometimes need to be made to make his talent play to its potential.

Look no further than Zach Peters on that score.

A traditional like any other, Kansas struggles at TCU.

azcat34 wrote:A traditional like any other, Kansas struggles at TCU.

That is the craziest stat ever...50 shots - could you imagine if they had won doing that? LOL

The only dudes from KU creepier than Enfuego.


http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/fea ... 212?page=2


http://deadspin.com/report-markieff-and ... 1682483180

Kansas looking good again against another ranked team, #11 Iowa State.

Irish27 wrote:Kansas looking good again against another ranked team, #11 Iowa State.

Kansas looking good at home against a team that plays no defense. Unfortunately they can't take AFH with them.

A home win.


Hrrrrrrrumph

Irish27 wrote:Kansas looking good again against another ranked team, #11 Iowa State.

Yes they are......so disappointing

salim'sheadband wrote:

Irish27 wrote:Kansas looking good again against another ranked team, #11 Iowa State.

Kansas looking good at home against a team that plays no defense. Unfortunately they can't take AFH with them.

Iowa State would contend for the Pac-12 title. We've won all our road games except our second game of the season against Kentucky. A loss at Temple in a game where the team played like they didn't give a crap and just wanted to go on vacation and against an Iowa State team who has final 4 potential.

You lost to UNLV (an NIT team), Oregon State (an NIT team) and Gonzaga at home (a loss in my book, as the no call over the back that would have sent Gonzaga to the line in regulation to win the game). Unfortunately, Arizona can't take McKale on the road either?

You have one more game against a top 25 team on the road and maybe 4 games in total all year.

I'm counting Kansas' games against Utah, Baylor, and TCU as losses. So technically you're team is 16-6 and would finish a distant fourth in the Pac-12.

enfuego wrote:

salim'sheadband wrote:

Irish27 wrote:Kansas looking good again against another ranked team, #11 Iowa State.

Kansas looking good at home against a team that plays no defense. Unfortunately they can't take AFH with them.

Iowa State would contend for the Pac-12 title. We've won all our road games except our second game of the season against Kentucky. A loss at Temple in a game where the team played like they didn't give a crap and just wanted to go on vacation and against an Iowa State team who has final 4 potential.

You lost to UNLV (an NIT team), Oregon State (an NIT team) and Gonzaga at home (a loss in my book, as the no call over the back that would have sent Gonzaga to the line in regulation to win the game). Unfortunately, Arizona can't take McKale on the road either?

You have one more game against a top 25 team on the road and maybe 4 games in total all year.

I don't know what you mean by your second sentence. And I don't know how Kansas getting blown out by Temple by 25 points equates to "the team played like they didn't give a crap and just wanted to go on vacation", and yet Arizona's loss at UNLV on the night before Christmas vacation doesn't. Nobody can understand your rule about Arizona's wins counting as losses. But let's get one thing straight: Iowa State wouldn't "contend for" a PAC-12 championship. Iowa State would win the PAC-12 championship.

Chicat wrote:I'm counting Kansas' games against Utah, Baylor, and TCU as losses. So technically you're team is 16-6 and would finish a distant fourth in the Pac-12.

I'm calling a "foul" on that logic. Those games were not decided by an obvious last second no call to lead to a Kansas win. We won those legit.

enfuego calling a "foul" on logic.

Longhorned wrote:

enfuego wrote:

salim'sheadband wrote:

Irish27 wrote:Kansas looking good again against another ranked team, #11 Iowa State.

Kansas looking good at home against a team that plays no defense. Unfortunately they can't take AFH with them.

Iowa State would contend for the Pac-12 title. We've won all our road games except our second game of the season against Kentucky. A loss at Temple in a game where the team played like they didn't give a crap and just wanted to go on vacation and against an Iowa State team who has final 4 potential.

You lost to UNLV (an NIT team), Oregon State (an NIT team) and Gonzaga at home (a loss in my book, as the no call over the back that would have sent Gonzaga to the line in regulation to win the game). Unfortunately, Arizona can't take McKale on the road either?

You have one more game against a top 25 team on the road and maybe 4 games in total all year.

I don't know what you mean by your second sentence. And I don't know how Kansas getting blown out by Temple by 25 points equates to "the team played like they didn't give a crap and just wanted to go on vacation", and yet Arizona's loss at UNLV on the night before Christmas vacation doesn't. Nobody can understand your rule about Arizona's wins counting as losses. But let's get one thing straight: Iowa State wouldn't "contend for" a PAC-12 championship. Iowa State would win the PAC-12 championship.

Didn't realize it was played on Christmas eve. I didn't want to be so bold as to predict an Iowa State Pac-12 championship, but wanted to give Arizona at least some odds to win. It's hard to measure how good Arizona is, since there are no NCAA teams on your schedule outside of Gonzaga and Utah.

enfuego wrote:

Chicat wrote:I'm counting Kansas' games against Utah, Baylor, and TCU as losses. So technically you're team is 16-6 and would finish a distant fourth in the Pac-12.

I'm calling a "foul" on that logic. Those games were not decided by an obvious last second no call to lead to a Kansas win. We won those legit.

I almost gave Kansas a loss in the KSU game too because Self's hairpiece looked crooked after halftime.

I'll use my logic, you use yours.

enfuego wrote:

Longhorned wrote:

enfuego wrote:

salim'sheadband wrote:

Irish27 wrote:Kansas looking good again against another ranked team, #11 Iowa State.

Kansas looking good at home against a team that plays no defense. Unfortunately they can't take AFH with them.

Iowa State would contend for the Pac-12 title. We've won all our road games except our second game of the season against Kentucky. A loss at Temple in a game where the team played like they didn't give a crap and just wanted to go on vacation and against an Iowa State team who has final 4 potential.

You lost to UNLV (an NIT team), Oregon State (an NIT team) and Gonzaga at home (a loss in my book, as the no call over the back that would have sent Gonzaga to the line in regulation to win the game). Unfortunately, Arizona can't take McKale on the road either?

You have one more game against a top 25 team on the road and maybe 4 games in total all year.

I don't know what you mean by your second sentence. And I don't know how Kansas getting blown out by Temple by 25 points equates to "the team played like they didn't give a crap and just wanted to go on vacation", and yet Arizona's loss at UNLV on the night before Christmas vacation doesn't. Nobody can understand your rule about Arizona's wins counting as losses. But let's get one thing straight: Iowa State wouldn't "contend for" a PAC-12 championship. Iowa State would win the PAC-12 championship.

Didn't realize it was played on Christmas eve. I didn't want to be so bold as to predict an Iowa State Pac-12 championship, but wanted to give Arizona at least some odds to win. It's hard to measure how good Arizona is, since there are no NCAA teams on your schedule outside of Gonzaga and Utah.

I'm not letting you get away with some odds to win. Whoever Kansas loses to or beats would take the PAC-12.


Longhorned for President
Not in Our Tomorrow