Page 2 of 14

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 2:50 pm
by Main Event
I feel like our O is a juggernaut compared to some of the teams I've seen today

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 2:58 pm
by cats101
Watching old fart and his SDSU teams typically puts me to sleep.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 3:03 pm
by UAEebs86
Main Event wrote:I feel like our O is a juggernaut compared to some of the teams I've seen today
The Cal Poly Pomona O or the "new" offense Miller unleashed in the last two games? ;)

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 3:25 pm
by CalStateTempe
Some fun games tonight.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 3:43 pm
by KOQSTRONG
Utah will be lucky to break 35. Wow both teams look horrible offensively. Chol has 8 for SDSU right now though.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 3:56 pm
by Chicat
KOQSTRONG wrote:Utah will be lucky to break 35. Wow both teams look horrible offensively. Chol has 8 for SDSU right now though.
Delon Wright 0-9? Ouch...

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 4:02 pm
by KaibabKat
After the last 24 hours of basketball I have learned two things:

1. I need a nap.
2. Arizona is an offensive juggernaut.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 5:56 pm
by CalStateTempe
watching mich st v duke...

both these fan bases suck. just imagining how loud it would be if arizona was playing in this joke of a soiree

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:44 pm
by cats101
Dook looks good

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:46 pm
by cats101
My bet is if Kentucky loses, the voters will promptly move Dook to #1. Having to watch on mute, Dukie V is loving this year's team.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:51 pm
by cats101
Also, Michigan Stateisn't that great and is probably rranked based on reputation.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:36 pm
by jsbowl16
This is the second time I watched Kentucky this year and I already can't stand hearing about the white and blue platoons or teams. Why don't they just wear different color jerseys so it is easier to keep track of them?

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:48 pm
by SCCat
Oubre and Alexander both with 2 six minutes into the game? Uh oh

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:00 pm
by Irish27
Kentucky looks scary tonight against Kansas.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:01 pm
by SCCat
SCCat wrote:Oubre and Alexander both with 2 six minutes into the game? Uh oh
It was about 10-7 when the second of those two guys went out.

Now 24-9.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:05 pm
by pokinmik
Irish27 wrote:Kentucky looks scary tonight against Kansas.
Def. Compared to KU, UK looks like men against boys at almost every position.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:13 pm
by Bosy Billups
Calipari quote: "You guys are looking too much into this platoon concept. If it works, it works, if it doesn't, we'll adjust. I talked to another coach in a competitive league today and he said 'we play 10 too, and no one is talking about platoon'".

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:17 pm
by Chicat
I think Kentucky has stolen the "Massive" moniker from us.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:18 pm
by UAEebs86
Anybody miss enfuego telling us how 1 year of Embiid (which turned into half a season) was better than 3 or 4 seasons of Tarc?


Yeah, me neither.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:18 pm
by Alieberman
Kentucky is scary good.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:19 pm
by CalStateTempe
Bosy, think that might be Miller he's referencing?

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:25 pm
by gumby
Kentucky is longer than Moby Dick and deeper, too.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:25 pm
by Irish27
UAEebs86 wrote:Anybody miss enfuego telling us how 1 year of Embiid (which turned into half a season) was better than 3 or 4 seasons of Tarc?


Yeah, me neither.
I actually sent him a private message tonight over at Phog.net letting know we have a new forum.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:27 pm
by SCCat
Irish27 wrote:I actually sent him a private message tonight over at Phog.net letting know we have a new forum.

Ass!

I know you're kidding but I still couldn't keep that in...

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:27 pm
by UAEebs86
Irish27 wrote:
UAEebs86 wrote:Anybody miss enfuego telling us how 1 year of Embiid (which turned into half a season) was better than 3 or 4 seasons of Tarc?


Yeah, me neither.
I actually sent him a private message tonight over at Phog.net letting know we have a new forum.
Well, he was kind of our little good luck charm. Last year, every time he made a prediction, it turned out the opposite. The George Costanza of the board.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:30 pm
by Chicat
UAEebs86 wrote:
Irish27 wrote:
UAEebs86 wrote:Anybody miss enfuego telling us how 1 year of Embiid (which turned into half a season) was better than 3 or 4 seasons of Tarc?


Yeah, me neither.
I actually sent him a private message tonight over at Phog.net letting know we have a new forum.
Well, he was kind of our little good luck charm. Last year, every time he made a prediction, it turned out the opposite. The George Costanza of the board.
It was like clockwork. He might have even been responsible for Embiid going down.

Enfuego has the reverse Midas touch. Everything he touched turned to shit.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:57 pm
by Chicat
Bill Self is getting buttfucked right in his assless chaps on national television and I love it.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:09 pm
by SCCat
Well this has been pretty impressive. 57-36 UK

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:18 pm
by az91
Kansas looks helpless against Kentucky.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:21 pm
by az91
KOQSTRONG wrote:Utah will be lucky to break 35. Wow both teams look horrible offensively. Chol has 8 for SDSU right now though.
Is that more than Chol scored in a game in his short, forgettable career as a Wildcat?

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:26 pm
by az91
Kansas needs Nadir Thaarpe.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:30 pm
by azcat49
Is it Kentucky looking dominate or KU looking like they usually do....overrated? I think the latter

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:34 pm
by Pop McKale
UK is just a cut above everyone else. They'll give the 2012 version a run for their money.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:36 pm
by cats101
az91 wrote:Kansas needs Nadir Thaarpe.
Not sure if sarcasm, but sadly, I think I agree.

Is Buffalo better than Kansass? :lol:

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:55 pm
by Olsondogg
UK was impressive...but I would have rather have seen a UK-Dook matchup. That would have been a good barometer...

And MSU and KU seem at the same level currently.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:19 pm
by Lute4God
Alieberman wrote:Kentucky is scary good.
I was looking for a good game and this just depressed me. No team should be allowed to be this good.

Not great on offense maybe but 7 turnovers for the game. Add transition points off turnovers and points off putbacks and thats pretty much all this team needs to go undefeated for a long time.

Not expecting UA to be number one anytime soon now :(

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:27 pm
by PieceOfMeat
Didn't watch any game tonight, but saw some scores.
That kentucky box score was impressive. Lots of minutes spread around, and of course the final score.

For as much hate as Calipari gets, he sure does get results (and, yes, ncaa violations too lol)

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 5:35 am
by michcat
I don't see us better than UK right now but we will get better and UK will get worse throughout the year.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 7:09 am
by Alieberman
Kentucky played 10 guys with minutes ranging from 17-22 minutes. Their 2nd unit would be top 5. If Cal can convince all of his guys that they don't need to put up big numbers, or get big minutes to get drafted high, they are going to be on auto-pilot to the Final 4.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 7:30 am
by cats101
The minutes were spread out because of the "platoon" systemthat well have to hear about all season. Believe he subs every 5 minutes or something like that.

To be honest, as much as I hate Bill Self his team's usually improve vastly over the...until the tournament. :lol: Oddly enough Kansas usually has size to match up with a team like Kentucky, not last night.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 7:33 am
by CalStateTempe
I like Cal.

Wish Miller would runs something akin to a 40 min press, but you know that won't happen.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 8:01 am
by Chicat
cats101 wrote:To be honest, as much as I hate Bill Self his team's usually improve vastly over the...until the tournament.
That "improvement" is really just them beating up on shitty teams in the BigXII.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 9:18 am
by cats101
This is true but Kansas has lost to some mediocre teams in the beginning of the season in the past.

This year might be different though. No PG (Mason is worse than Tharpe), and no post presence.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 10:05 am
by Beachcat97
Gonna take some lights-out shooting to beat that UK team in March. Jeezus.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 10:15 am
by Olsondogg
People are putting way too much stock into one game.

When you think about March, remember that your bracket sucks every year cause you didn't expect or see "so and so" getting that far...

It is November 19th. Looooong season fellas, anything can happen.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 10:58 am
by jsbowl16
Kentucky was good last night but I think that head to head we push them around in the paint. They have some great size height wise but nobody that is built like SJ, RHJ or Zeus. The only team that really scares me is still Wisconsin because they can shoot it from all five positions.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 11:15 am
by Olsondogg
Frankly, if things go as planned the worry/concerns/questions that people have over playing UK are really only debatable on April 4th & 5th...

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 12:06 pm
by pokinmik
Olsondogg wrote:People are putting way too much stock into one game.

When you think about March, remember that your bracket sucks every year cause you didn't expect or see "so and so" getting that far...

It is November 19th. Looooong season fellas, anything can happen.
Yep I was gonna post something similar. They looked good vers an overrated, worse-than-usual KU team in November, good for them, I'm not shaking in my boots and never will this season. I'm still confident AZ can beat anyone in our path.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 1:59 pm
by dirtbags
the real dill wrote:https://vine.co/v/O5O23XurHgw

haha, i just saw this. the opposite of getting posterized!

the ref makes it perfect.

Re: non conference game thread

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 4:17 pm
by gumby
az91 wrote:Kansas needs Nadir Thaarpe.
And Jo Jo White and Paul Pierce.