Page 2 of 56

Re: Kansas

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:16 pm
by enfuego
salim'sheadband wrote:1. Since the start of 2011, in the very heart of Self's "Woodenesque" run, Kansas has won only eight more games than us and lost only six fewer. Most of those eight games can be explained by Kansas's typically lucky 2012 run where they beat a double digit seed, beat a double digit seed, beat a double digit seed (which, for Kansas, is actually pretty shocking), beat the one seed whose best player broke his wrist, and didn't have to play the other one seed on their half of the bracket because their center was academically ineligible. (Why not include 2010? Well Miller wasn't fortunate enough to inherit a team that returned 10/12 players from a title-game team, like Self was when he took over the Kansas job, so I figured that year could probably get cut off.)

2. Besides 2012 they've never advanced further in the tournament than us in that time. In those three years they've had two losses to double-digit seeds and an all-timer choke-job against Michigan (true story: Kansas's KenPom win probability in that game was, best as I can tell, as high as it could go without actually winning). And we will be going farther in the tournament. Again.

3. As far as personnel, Kansas's stud wing recruit is playing fewer minutes than Landen Lucas. Of course, this won't stop him from going pro, along with Alexander, one of Kansas's only two meaningful players over 6'7". Wayne Selden and Brannen Greene still have not decided that they want to be full-time basketball players but I'm sure they'll be around for a couple more years to frustrate and disappoint Kansas fans. As far as when Oubre and Alexander leave, hey, at least they'll be replaced by Kansas's 2015 recruiting class, which at the moment, um, looks like...
4. Meanwhile, Arizona's got three five-stars and a four-star locked up for 2015 even assuming we don't get Ivan Rabb
. Those players will go nicely next year with our returning sophomore center (didn't he play in Kansas?), our sophomore power forward, our senior shooting guard, our junior wing who might be our best returning player, and our sophomore point guard who is a star in the making.

But that's none of my business.
1. That is quite the arbitrary starting point.
2. Yeah, beside the year we played in the national title game, yeah besides that. When was the last time Arizona played in that game or a Final Four for that matter?
3. I'm not worried about our personnel. Our wings are young, but more talented and versatile than what Arizona tosses out there (Johnson being the exception).
4. Is recruiting done for 2015? We are targeting the cream of the crop. We are in the hunt for bigger fish that typically commit during the late period. I wouldn't be surprised to see a class of one of Dorsey or Newman to go with Jaylen Brown, Diallo and one of Bragg or Maker. We are an elite program and go after the big fish.

Not your best effort.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:21 pm
by Main Event
enfuego wrote:
salim'sheadband wrote:1. Since the start of 2011, in the very heart of Self's "Woodenesque" run, Kansas has won only eight more games than us and lost only six fewer. Most of those eight games can be explained by Kansas's typically lucky 2012 run where they beat a double digit seed, beat a double digit seed, beat a double digit seed (which, for Kansas, is actually pretty shocking), beat the one seed whose best player broke his wrist, and didn't have to play the other one seed on their half of the bracket because their center was academically ineligible. (Why not include 2010? Well Miller wasn't fortunate enough to inherit a team that returned 10/12 players from a title-game team, like Self was when he took over the Kansas job, so I figured that year could probably get cut off.)

2. Besides 2012 they've never advanced further in the tournament than us in that time. In those three years they've had two losses to double-digit seeds and an all-timer choke-job against Michigan (true story: Kansas's KenPom win probability in that game was, best as I can tell, as high as it could go without actually winning). And we will be going farther in the tournament. Again.

3. As far as personnel, Kansas's stud wing recruit is playing fewer minutes than Landen Lucas. Of course, this won't stop him from going pro, along with Alexander, one of Kansas's only two meaningful players over 6'7". Wayne Selden and Brannen Greene still have not decided that they want to be full-time basketball players but I'm sure they'll be around for a couple more years to frustrate and disappoint Kansas fans. As far as when Oubre and Alexander leave, hey, at least they'll be replaced by Kansas's 2015 recruiting class, which at the moment, um, looks like...
4. Meanwhile, Arizona's got three five-stars and a four-star locked up for 2015 even assuming we don't get Ivan Rabb
. Those players will go nicely next year with our returning sophomore center (didn't he play in Kansas?), our sophomore power forward, our senior shooting guard, our junior wing who might be our best returning player, and our sophomore point guard who is a star in the making.

But that's none of my business.
1. That is quite the arbitrary starting point.
2. Yeah, beside the year we played in the national title game, yeah besides that. When was the last time Arizona played in that game or a Final Four for that matter?
3. I'm not worried about our personnel. Our wings are young, but more talented and versatile than what Arizona tosses out there (Johnson being the exception).
4. Is recruiting done for 2015? We are targeting the cream of the crop. We are in the hunt for bigger fish that typically commit during the late period. I wouldn't be surprised to see a class of one of Dorsey or Newman to go with Jaylen Brown, Diallo and one of Bragg or Maker. We are an elite program and go after the big fish.

Not your best effort.
LOL!

Re: Kansas

Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 5:28 pm
by CBCat
salim'sheadband wrote:Since the start of 2011, in the very heart of Self's "Woodenesque" run, Kansas has won only eight more games than us and lost only six fewer. Most of those eight games can be explained by Kansas's typically lucky 2012 run where they beat a double digit seed, beat a double digit seed, beat a double digit seed (which, for Kansas, is actually pretty shocking), beat the one seed whose best player broke his wrist, and didn't have to play the other one seed on their half of the bracket because their center was academically ineligible. (Why not include 2010? Well Miller wasn't fortunate enough to inherit a team that returned 10/12 players from a title-game team, like Self was when he took over the Kansas job, so I figured that year could probably get cut off.)

Besides 2012 they've never advanced further in the tournament than us in that time. In those three years they've had two losses to double-digit seeds and an all-timer choke-job against Michigan (true story: Kansas's KenPom win probability in that game was, best as I can tell, as high as it could go without actually winning). And we will be going farther in the tournament. Again.

As far as personnel, Kansas's stud wing recruit is playing fewer minutes than Landen Lucas. Of course, this won't stop him from going pro, along with Alexander, one of Kansas's only two meaningful players over 6'7". Wayne Selden and Brannen Greene still have not decided that they want to be full-time basketball players but I'm sure they'll be around for a couple more years to frustrate and disappoint Kansas fans. As far as when Oubre and Alexander leave, hey, at least they'll be replaced by Kansas's 2015 recruiting class, which at the moment, um, looks like...

Image

Meanwhile, Arizona's got three five-stars and a four-star locked up for 2015 even assuming we don't get Ivan Rabb. Those players will go nicely next year with our returning sophomore center (didn't he play in Kansas?), our sophomore power forward, our senior shooting guard, our junior wing who might be our best returning player, and our sophomore point guard who is a star in the making.

But that's none of my business.
Great read, great post

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:27 am
by enfuego
5 point win on the road against a terrible (Kenpom 71) UTEP team? My point has been proven. Solid 6 point outing by Hollis-Jefferson (stud). Again, my point is proven. Sweet 16 is beginning to look like the ceiling for this squad.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:31 am
by Main Event
Stopped reading at UNLV

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:35 am
by azcat49
That 5 point road win was better than your 5 point win over Michigan St

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:36 am
by enfuego
azcat49 wrote:That 5 point road win was better than your 5 point win over Michigan St
Kenpom disagrees with you. It's okay to admit that Arizona is overrated and Kansas is underrated.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:38 am
by UAEebs86
You can't fix stupid.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:38 am
by Katzenfreund
.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:43 am
by azcat49
Road wins far greater than neutral court wins over teams as vastly overhyped as MSU.

Your best win is probably over Santa Barbara or Utah. You were lucky that you caught all your marquee teams in a down cycle and the one you caught in an up cycle (like with Gonzaga) destroyed you

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:52 am
by enfuego
azcat49 wrote:Road wins far greater than neutral court wins over teams as vastly overhyped as MSU.

Your best win is probably over Santa Barbara or Utah. You were lucky that you caught all your marquee teams in a down cycle and the one you caught in an up cycle (like with Gonzaga) destroyed you
Kenpom #21 Georgetown says, "Your tears taste delicious."

Fyi - Second game of the season, Kentucky would have beat Arizona by 40. Look to see Arizona slip in Monday's polls.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:57 am
by UAEebs86
Vegas said Arizona by 5.

Sagarin said Arizona by 5.

Arizona won by 5.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 11:10 am
by azgreg
UTEP's Hunter would start for Kansas.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 11:28 am
by enfuego
azgreg wrote:UTEP's Hunter would start for Kansas.
Conjecture. However, we do know that UTEP's Hunter would start for Arizona, based on yesterday's performance. Probably Cooper too.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 11:44 am
by UAEebs86
Conjecture is what you do here every day enflamo.
Without it you would have no material.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 12:04 pm
by 77HoyaCat4Ever
Hunter would start almost anywhere

Kansas (both team and state) are largely irrelevant

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 12:05 pm
by Chicat
enfuego wrote:Sweet 16 is beginning to look like the ceiling for this squad.
Last year you said Kansas would make it to the championship game.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 12:19 pm
by azcat49
enfuego wrote:
azcat49 wrote:Road wins far greater than neutral court wins over teams as vastly overhyped as MSU.

Your best win is probably over Santa Barbara or Utah. You were lucky that you caught all your marquee teams in a down cycle and the one you caught in an up cycle (like with Gonzaga) destroyed you
Kenpom #21 Georgetown says, "Your tears taste delicious."

Fyi - Second game of the season, Kentucky would have beat Arizona by 40. Look to see Arizona slip in Monday's polls.

You can't be serious about GTown, the one team other than KU that goes out early in the tourney each and every year.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 1:26 pm
by Longhorned
enfuego wrote:
azgreg wrote:UTEP's Hunter would start for Kansas.
Conjecture. However, we do know that UTEP's Hunter would start for Arizona, based on yesterday's performance. Probably Cooper too.
Am I reading that right? You of all posters are calling "conjecture" on someone?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 1:47 pm
by cats101
enfuego wrote:
azcat49 wrote:Road wins far greater than neutral court wins over teams as vastly overhyped as MSU.

Your best win is probably over Santa Barbara or Utah. You were lucky that you caught all your marquee teams in a down cycle and the one you caught in an up cycle (like with Gonzaga) destroyed you
Kenpom #21 Georgetown says, "Your tears taste delicious."

Fyi - Second game of the season, Kentucky would have beat Arizona by 40. Look to see Arizona slip in Monday's polls.
Slip to...#3?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 1:57 pm
by enfuego
Kansas doing to Lafayette what Arizona couldn't do to UTEP.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 1:58 pm
by enfuego
cats101 wrote:
enfuego wrote:
azcat49 wrote:Road wins far greater than neutral court wins over teams as vastly overhyped as MSU.

Your best win is probably over Santa Barbara or Utah. You were lucky that you caught all your marquee teams in a down cycle and the one you caught in an up cycle (like with Gonzaga) destroyed you
Kenpom #21 Georgetown says, "Your tears taste delicious."

Fyi - Second game of the season, Kentucky would have beat Arizona by 40. Look to see Arizona slip in Monday's polls.
Slip to...#3?
Fair question. I cold see the rankings drop you to 7 or 8 based on performance against strength of schedule.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 1:59 pm
by salim'sheadband
Image

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 2:00 pm
by UAEebs86
I love enflamo comparing a home game to a road game.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 2:02 pm
by Frybry02
enfuego wrote:
cats101 wrote:
enfuego wrote:
azcat49 wrote:Road wins far greater than neutral court wins over teams as vastly overhyped as MSU.

Your best win is probably over Santa Barbara or Utah. You were lucky that you caught all your marquee teams in a down cycle and the one you caught in an up cycle (like with Gonzaga) destroyed you
Kenpom #21 Georgetown says, "Your tears taste delicious."

Fyi - Second game of the season, Kentucky would have beat Arizona by 40. Look to see Arizona slip in Monday's polls.
Slip to...#3?
Fair question. I cold see the rankings drop you to 7 or 8 based on performance against strength of schedule.
Hmmmm . . . I'm gonna assume you are talk about winning.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 2:04 pm
by UAEebs86
enfuego wrote:
Fair question. I cold see the rankings drop you to 7 or 8 based on performance against strength of schedule.
Want to put your money where your mouth is troll?

I'll make that bet. How much? $100 $500?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 2:11 pm
by salim'sheadband
Well at least Kentucky finally made SOMEONE look worse than Kansas. Although Kansas should definitely still be way more embarrassed about that loss.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 2:19 pm
by enfuego
salim'sheadband wrote:Well at least Kentucky finally made SOMEONE look worse than Kansas. Although Kansas should definitely still be way more embarrassed about that loss.
Yes. Second game of the season turd, versus 10th game of the season turd. Your logic is impeccable.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 2:22 pm
by UAEebs86
First it was conjecture, now enflamo is calling out other people's logic. :lol:

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 2:34 pm
by salim'sheadband
Maybe UCLA and Kansas should combine their teams. The resulting team would only lose to Kentucky by 15.

Other characteristics of this "super" team:

Make one Sweet Sixteen every 5 years. Lose to a double digit seed when you get there.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 2:38 pm
by salim'sheadband
Probably a 14 seed.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 3:01 pm
by enfuego
salim'sheadband wrote:Maybe UCLA and Kansas should combine their teams. The resulting team would only lose to Kentucky by 15.

Other characteristics of this "super" team:

Make one Sweet Sixteen every 5 years. Lose to a double digit seed when you get there.
Hilarious. UCLA is a scoring machine compared to Arizona. I'd be curious to see if Arizona could drop double digits on Kentucky in 40 minutes.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:58 am
by azcat34
salim'sheadband wrote:Image
Is that a picture of Kansas' 2015 recruiting class for hoops?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 11:27 am
by Bosy Billups
How is this guy doing? Is he the next Selby?


Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 11:32 am
by ASUHATER!
enfuego wrote:
salim'sheadband wrote:Maybe UCLA and Kansas should combine their teams. The resulting team would only lose to Kentucky by 15.

Other characteristics of this "super" team:

Make one Sweet Sixteen every 5 years. Lose to a double digit seed when you get there.
Hilarious. UCLA is a scoring machine compared to Arizona. I'd be curious to see if Arizona could drop double digits on Kentucky in 40 minutes.
Ucla scores 77.8 a game. Arizona scores 77.1
Kansas scores 72 a game.


Huh?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:01 pm
by Longhorned
I've seen them play three times this season and I won't lie, Kansas is good when they're not playing one of the best teams in the country. They'll have a solid season and a Sweet 16 finish, bumps in the road aside.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:04 pm
by enfuego
Longhorned wrote:I've seen them play three times this season and I won't lie, Kansas is good when they're not playing one of the best teams in the country. They'll have a solid season and a Sweet 16 finish, bumps in the road aside.
Kansas #9 SOS (thanks MSU)
Arizona #224 SOS

That's a huge amount of trash talk for a team who is barely beating mid majors.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:21 pm
by Longhorned
enfuego wrote:
Longhorned wrote:I've seen them play three times this season and I won't lie, Kansas is good when they're not playing one of the best teams in the country. They'll have a solid season and a Sweet 16 finish, bumps in the road aside.
Kansas #9 SOS (thanks MSU)
Arizona #224 SOS

That's a huge amount of trash talk for a team who is barely beating mid majors.
Trash talk? I just complimented Kansas. Apparently you want me to use a December Kenpom SOS rating (!) to support Kansas as something other than a team that, as of today, has demonstrated that it can't compete at all with a future 1-seed, but otherwise can win at Georgetown and beat the teams it should at home. What part of your belief in crazy shit requires me to say untruthful things?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 12:34 pm
by azcat49
So both teams have played 1 true road game and each has won by 5. Of course UTEP's crowd and environment far exceeded Gtowns and in reality the 2 teams schedule are quite similar

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 1:11 pm
by HibachiZero
Every year it's the same thing: Talk all year about how great Kansas is, then come tournament time we watch them flame out in the early rounds.

Is there really a point to all this? We all know how this story will end.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 1:34 pm
by salim'sheadband
If Kansas and Georgetown ever combined teams the committee would have to invent new double-digit seeds for them to lose to.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 4:00 pm
by enfuego
salim'sheadband wrote:If Kansas and Georgetown ever combined teams the committee would have to invent new double-digit seeds for them to lose to.
Do you really want to walk down that road?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 4:08 pm
by ASUHATER!
The road of truth?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 4:14 pm
by UAEebs86
Paging SHB...

Our redheaded stepchild is ready for his beating.

And Chicat, get enfuego's picture from TOS ready.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 11:38 pm
by salim'sheadband
And of course that doesn't even include Kansas's loss to Northern Illinois which is arguably the worst loss of all of them.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 11:43 pm
by cats101
enfuego wrote:
Longhorned wrote:I've seen them play three times this season and I won't lie, Kansas is good when they're not playing one of the best teams in the country. They'll have a solid season and a Sweet 16 finish, bumps in the road aside.
Kansas #9 SOS (thanks MSU)
Arizona #224 SOS

That's a huge amount of trash talk for a team who is barely beating mid majors.
Kentucky made Kansas look like a mid major

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 11:54 pm
by cats101
enfuego wrote:
azcat49 wrote:That 5 point road win was better than your 5 point win over Michigan St
Kenpom disagrees with you. It's okay to admit that Arizona is overrated and Kansas is underrated.
Texas Southern disagrees with you.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 7:16 am
by azcat34
I heard it's going to be quite an emotional night at the Phog when they raise their 5th straight OOC SOS National Championship banner.

Kansas fans evidently take those very seriously.

Maybe they can even use the positive momentum to convince someone to play for them next season.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 5:46 pm
by Frybry02
I hope the cats are watching the Kansas game. Kansas is completely flat. This is what not to do on the road before Christmas break

Re: Kansas

Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 5:51 pm
by AZCatGirl
So how many Temple players would start for Kansas? :)