Page 11 of 56

Re: Kansas

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 9:56 pm
by Bangkok Wildcat
Chicat wrote:
Olsondogg wrote:
Chicat wrote:I have to give Kansas a lot of credit . . . . . . . .



. . . . . . . . . at least their coach didn't get orca fat like WVU's coach did.
Yet
Good call.
I still can't get the pic of him in those assless chaps out of my head....from a few years back, lol....

Re: Kansas

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 11:15 pm
by salim'sheadband
Good showing by the second-best team in Kansas, coming back at home against a West Virginia team without its best player, Juwan Staten.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 11:23 pm
by enfuego
That's how champions roll. Without two cornerstones of their rotation (Ellis and Alexander) we just win.

West Virginia would finish 3rd in the Pac12.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 11:37 pm
by Chicat
Comes to crow less than 2 hours after a win.
Slinks back 4 days after a loss.

I'm no mathematician but there seems to be a slight disparity there.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 12:18 am
by Bosy Billups
Feels like Arizona is on a different level than Kansas right now, it's not even that fun, kind of like going toe to toe with UCLA.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 4:26 am
by Puerco
enfuego wrote:That's how champions roll. Without two cornerstones of their rotation (Ellis and Alexander) we just win.

West Virginia would finish 3rd in the Pac12.
Alexander is a cornerstone of your rotation? God, you must really miss Danny Manning's player development skills.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 8:51 am
by UAdevil
enfuego wrote:That's how champions roll. Without two cornerstones of their rotation (Ellis and Alexander) we just win.

West Virginia would finish 3rd in the Pac12.
Nope. Technical loss.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 9:00 am
by Longhorned
UAdevil wrote:
enfuego wrote:That's how champions roll. Without two cornerstones of their rotation (Ellis and Alexander) we just win.

West Virginia would finish 3rd in the Pac12.
Nope. Technical loss.
Another L in Kansas's record. Expect the committee to view it as such.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 9:07 am
by Bear Down Vegas
Honest question here - how streaky is Kansas in-game this year??

They were down 18 at home last night? Won in OT

They were blowing out Utah earlier this year - maybe up 20? I'm not exactly sure, but then barely won. Get blown out by Kentucky & Temple - def shouldn't have been blown out in one of those games. I feel like there are even more examples but I'm not going to go dig them up.

Talk about a contrast to our team. Self & Miller could not be more fundamentally different as coaches.

Is Kansas always like this with the huge runs both ways? Or is this specific to this year.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 9:21 am
by Olsondogg
West Virginia would probably finish 3rd in the PAC. What's the point of that comment?

I'd probably not be running my mouth about KU this year...just my personal opinion. I think the addition of another year on the Big XII banner will be the highlight of this year for KU.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 12:25 pm
by dirtbags
enfuego wrote:That's how champions roll. Without two cornerstones of their rotation (Ellis and Alexander) we just win.

West Virginia would finish 3rd in the Pac12.
Olsondogg wrote:West Virginia would probably finish 3rd in the PAC. What's the point of that comment?
i think it means that oregon, the third best team in the pac, would give ku all they could handle on the road at afh :lol:

Re: Kansas

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 12:30 pm
by azcat34
enfuego wrote:That's how champions roll. Without two cornerstones of their rotation (Ellis and Alexander) we just win.

West Virginia would finish 3rd in the Pac12.
Neither did WVU's starting backcourt :lol: :lol:

Re: Kansas

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 5:12 pm
by Zero
Don't be logical.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 11:22 pm
by salim'sheadband

Re: Kansas

Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 9:27 pm
by 84Cat
Oops:

Re: Kansas

Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 9:58 pm
by gumby
Cliff who?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 10:15 pm
by KaibabKat
California would win the Big 12.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2015 11:24 pm
by Bosy Billups
84Cat wrote:Oops:
That's crazy, I would never have guessed, these clowns look fresh out of church:

Image

Re: Kansas

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:45 am
by enfuego
Bosy Billups wrote:
84Cat wrote:Oops:
That's crazy, I would never have guessed, these clowns look fresh out of church:

Image
I'll admit. That made me laugh. I'm glad Arizona has Tarczewski.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 7:43 pm
by az91
84Cat wrote:Oops:
Wow, maybe Illinois dodged a bullet?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 8:04 pm
by Longhorned
az91 wrote:
84Cat wrote:Oops:
Wow, maybe Illinois dodged a bullet?
Okay, that's a fine observation. Still, fuck Illinois.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 8:13 pm
by etank34
Papa wiping the boog on his shirt is classic.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 8:14 pm
by Chicat
etank34 wrote:Papa wiping the boog on his shirt is classic.
I like the "We gettin' PAID!!!" arms raised in triumph.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 4:27 pm
by UAdevil
Ku. 7 losses. Lol! 3 seed at best

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 4:28 pm
by dirtbags
oh hi, kansas. what's up? :D

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 4:29 pm
by ASUHATER!
3 seed at best

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 4:38 pm
by 3goggles
Nice to see Kansas isn't worth a court storming

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 4:42 pm
by azgreg
Technical win.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 5:51 pm
by cats101
Lol so which 14 seed will the Chicken hawks lose to this year?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:03 pm
by dirtbags
Chicat wrote:I like the "We gettin' PAID!!!" arms raised in triumph.
he must've learned it from cliff's mom. OHHHHHHhhhhhhh! :o

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:11 pm
by Chicat
Oh, did Kansas lose? Cool...

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:19 pm
by KaibabKat
Oklahoma would win the NBA.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:20 pm
by dirtbags
illinois state would win the big 12

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 6:38 pm
by Longhorned
Technical win for Kansas, technical loss for Arizona. That's how the committee will view it.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:23 pm
by salim'sheadband
I see Alexander and Ellis didn't play. That's what happens when you cheat. And when you're 50.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:29 pm
by UAEebs86
Another quality loss.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:34 pm
by Chicat
Their RPI ranking shows the flaw in that metric. It's all well and good to play a ton of great teams, but the "#2" team in the country should have beaten more than a handful of them.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:46 pm
by SCCats
Chicat wrote:Their RPI ranking shows the flaw in that metric. It's all well and good to play a ton of great teams, but the "#2" team in the country should have beaten more than a handful of them.
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketb ... s-jayhawks

Looking at who they beat, where they beat them and and when they beat them (at least as far as ranked teams go), I would probably rank them around #15 in the country. For someone to make the argument they are the #2 team in the country (and I know that's where RPI has them) feels pretty insane.

I'll go a little further: as a 3 seed they're probably overrated. Four is probably more appropriate so you don't get an unbalanced bracket.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 8:55 pm
by UAEebs86
I'm trying to figure out how they would win the PAC-12 like the mighty enflamo said. They would lose at Arizona just like the last 38 teams, and at Utah (only won by 3 on a "neutral" court). Both are higher in almost every metric ( Sagarin, BPI, and Kenpom)

Apparently they would sweep their other 16 games and be co-champs with UofA.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 11:04 pm
by enfuego
Unbiased opinion... OU would win the Pac-12.

Are you all really criticizing Kansas when two starters and a rotation player (on the road) didn't play and another starter is playing on a bad ankle and we lost on a tip in with 0.02 seconds left on the clock to a top 20 team? Fyi - Arizona has only played one team in the top 25 since the beginning of Pac-12 play.

Let that sink in....

Let that sink in...

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 11:10 pm
by SCCats
enfuego wrote:Unbiased opinion... OU would win the Pac-12.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

4 seed

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 11:17 pm
by UAEebs86
Whoever beats Kansas <insert team here> would win the PAC-12. Unless it's Stanford.

#enfuegologic

Nothing you post is unbiased. With RockyRaccoon gone you are back to being the dumbest poster and biggest troll. Congrats fuegs!

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 11:22 pm
by enfuego
UAEebs86 wrote:Whoever beats Kansas <insert team here> would win the PAC-12. Unless it's Stanford.

#enfuegologic

Nothing you post is unbiased. With RockyRaccoon gone you are back to being the dumbest poster and biggest troll. Congrats fuegs!
Not true. I said Texas and K-State would place third in the Pac-12.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 11:24 pm
by SCCats
enfuego wrote:
Not true. I said Texas and K-State would place third in the Pac-12.
So just for fun, what seed will Kansas get in the tourney?

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 11:42 pm
by ASUHATER!
enfuego wrote:
UAEebs86 wrote:Whoever beats Kansas <insert team here> would win the PAC-12. Unless it's Stanford.

#enfuegologic

Nothing you post is unbiased. With RockyRaccoon gone you are back to being the dumbest poster and biggest troll. Congrats fuegs!
Not true. I said Texas and K-State would place third in the Pac-12.
Kansas would be fighting asu for 5th in the Pac 12

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2015 11:57 pm
by enfuego
SCCats wrote:
enfuego wrote:
Not true. I said Texas and K-State would place third in the Pac-12.
So just for fun, what seed will Kansas get in the tourney?
A 2 seed.

And we'd be fighting for first in the Pac12 and would probably sweep Arizona.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 12:01 am
by scumdevils86
It is weird enfuego gets so much pleasure from saying the same troll message that he doesn't even mean over and over again. For a decade.

I really think Kansas is below Oregon and Utah in the Pac. Maybe on ucla's level.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 12:16 am
by SCCats
enfuego wrote:
SCCats wrote:
enfuego wrote:
Not true. I said Texas and K-State would place third in the Pac-12.
So just for fun, what seed will Kansas get in the tourney?
A 2 seed.
Good. I assume you'd be willing to bet on that?

Post here before the end of Monday 3/09/15 if you accept. You take Kansas as a 2 or better, I take Kansas as a 3 or worse. You bet you will never come back here again (site ban). I bet $100.

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 12:49 am
by catgrad97
Sweep? :lol: Arizona beat far better teams than Kansas going back its last 38 home games, dufus.

OU wouldn't do jack sh*t in the Pac-12 except finish third at best btw.

Let that sink in...

Re: Kansas

Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 12:57 am
by SCCats
catgrad97 wrote:How about a side bet that a seven-loss team isn't getting a 2 seed.
Of course for Kansas that's the bet I'm proposing. But Enfuego will say he didn't come back today or tomorrow or whatever other day he needs to say to not technically be a part of the bet because he knows what will happen.

The important lesson here actually is for the lower boards: when you know what a person's disposition is, when you know what a nation is going to do, you can use that against them. Here, there, wherever: I know what your disposition is, and I can use it against you to trap you. To put you in an untenable place.

Here Enfuego will NEVER respond to my bet. He can't; he's in a lose/lose spot. And what's the worse case for me? I lose $100?

I've won before he's even responded because I've trapped him into saying Kansas is a 2 seed.