UCLA Basketball in trouble!

Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns

User avatar
Irish27
Posts: 4700
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 6:30 pm
Reputation: 345

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Irish27 »

I thought Brown was going to UCLA. Watch him end up at Cal.
2019 & 2021 Basketball RAP Winner/2022 Football RAP Winner
Spaceman Spiff
Posts: 14664
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
Reputation: 1150

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Spaceman Spiff »

Chicat wrote:
gumby wrote: Were those both possibilities?
If there was a time machine that Dan Guerrero could jump in and make the right hire to lead that program . . . maybe.
Mississippi State just signed a guy who has a good track record of success on the West Coast. You have to think they could pry him away from Starkville.
Image
Beachcat97
Posts: 8552
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 464
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Beachcat97 »

It's taken a little longer than I expected, but most elite recruits are finally realizing that UCLA is a terrible place to play college basketball, especially if you have no interest in earning a degree.
dirtbags

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by dirtbags »

wtf ucla?

is alfraud still complaining about how fatigued and annoyed he is with recruiting?
dirtbags

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by dirtbags »

is alfraud still complaining about how fatigued and annoyed he is with recruiting?
err, make that fatigued and irritated...
Beachcat97
Posts: 8552
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 464
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Beachcat97 »

Reality and despair are setting in for UCLA fans, as they should.

It's just not an attractive program.

Good timing for Cal to be on the rise.
MrBug708
Posts: 3776
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 439

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by MrBug708 »

Steve Alford gave the team defensive player award to Isaac Hamilton.
User avatar
Coop Cat
Posts: 965
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:28 am
Reputation: 0
Location: On the Tee Box

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Coop Cat »

Yikes
Beachcat97
Posts: 8552
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 464
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Beachcat97 »

Coop Cat wrote:Yikes
It's not a man's schedule if they go 0-4 in those games.

Heh.
User avatar
Chicat
Posts: 45105
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
Reputation: 3345
Location: Your mother's basement

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Chicat »

It's a man's schedule no matter what. Whether it's a losing man's or a winning man's remains to be seen.

Unfortunately for the PAC, much of its OOC rep will be determined by Bryce Alford.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
SCCats
Posts: 8831
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:35 am
Reputation: 156

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by SCCats »

Steve going through round 2 of "I dare you to fire me."
Beachcat97
Posts: 8552
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 464
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Beachcat97 »

Chicat wrote:It's a man's schedule no matter what. Whether it's a losing man's or a winning man's remains to be seen.

Unfortunately for the PAC, much of its OOC rep will be determined by Bryce Alford.
F*** OOC rep. We just need to win games and the rest will take care of itself. Our conference RPI will be higher next season, so it's a wash. If we're Pac champs again, we'll be positioned well for March.

Looking forward to winning (at least) two more games vs. UCLA next season.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 41377
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1355
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Merkin »

Never thought I would see the day where Duke would play a harder OOC schedule than Arizona. Besides UA playing no games east of Tucson.
MrBug708
Posts: 3776
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 439

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by MrBug708 »

Alford managed to land Jalen Hill, 5* C from Corona
Beachcat97
Posts: 8552
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 464
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Beachcat97 »

MrBug708 wrote:Alford managed to land Jalen Hill, 5* C from Corona
Not a 5 star. But nice try, loser.

The only Bruin, current or future, who is even remotely "Arizona good" is probably Welsh.
User avatar
ASUHATER!
Posts: 18121
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:21 pm
Reputation: 185
Location: tucson, az

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by ASUHATER! »

Hill is a 4 star pf, not a 5 star center. Still a good pickup for ucla.
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.

i'll just go with fuck asu.
User avatar
Chicat
Posts: 45105
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
Reputation: 3345
Location: Your mother's basement

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Chicat »

Beachcat97 wrote:
MrBug708 wrote:Alford managed to land Jalen Hill, 5* C from Corona
Not a 5 star. But nice try, loser.

The only Bruin, current or future, who is even remotely "Arizona good" is probably Welsh.
Scout 5
Rivals 4

And any way you slice it, he's a really good player and Arizona was definitely interested. Sorry to break that news to you BC.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Beachcat97
Posts: 8552
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 464
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Beachcat97 »

Chicat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:
MrBug708 wrote:Alford managed to land Jalen Hill, 5* C from Corona
Not a 5 star. But nice try, loser.

The only Bruin, current or future, who is even remotely "Arizona good" is probably Welsh.
Scout 5
Rivals 4

And any way you slice it, he's a really good player and Arizona was definitely interested. Sorry to break that news to you BC.
If he's ever on a team that beats Arizona, we can revisit this.

If Miller and Alford go after the same player, all other things being equal (ie: time invested in the recruit, etc.), that player is picking Arizona. It's been this way for a while.
User avatar
Chicat
Posts: 45105
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
Reputation: 3345
Location: Your mother's basement

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Chicat »

Beachcat97 wrote:
Chicat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:
MrBug708 wrote:Alford managed to land Jalen Hill, 5* C from Corona
Not a 5 star. But nice try, loser.

The only Bruin, current or future, who is even remotely "Arizona good" is probably Welsh.
Scout 5
Rivals 4

And any way you slice it, he's a really good player and Arizona was definitely interested. Sorry to break that news to you BC.
If he's ever on a team that beats Arizona, we can revisit this.

If Miller and Alford go after the same player, all other things being equal (ie: time invested in the recruit, etc.), that player is picking Arizona. It's been this way for a while.
Your qualifier, "all other things being equal" is a non-starter. Things are never equal. There are pros and cons for all players considering both schools and how those line up usually determines where they go.

Sean Miller was recruiting Jalen Hill. Steve Alford got his commitment. It's ok BC, it happens. I'm sure Sean and the other coaches are on to the next target, and don't have this silly notion in their minds that they can get any recruit in California and the southwest they want just by snapping their fingers like you seem to. Recruiting is hard work. Kudos to Alford for bagging a big time recruit.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Beachcat97
Posts: 8552
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 464
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Beachcat97 »

Chicat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:
Chicat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:
MrBug708 wrote:Alford managed to land Jalen Hill, 5* C from Corona
Not a 5 star. But nice try, loser.

The only Bruin, current or future, who is even remotely "Arizona good" is probably Welsh.
Scout 5
Rivals 4

And any way you slice it, he's a really good player and Arizona was definitely interested. Sorry to break that news to you BC.
If he's ever on a team that beats Arizona, we can revisit this.

If Miller and Alford go after the same player, all other things being equal (ie: time invested in the recruit, etc.), that player is picking Arizona. It's been this way for a while.
Your qualifier, "all other things being equal" is a non-starter. Things are never equal. There are pros and cons for all players considering both schools and how those line up usually determines where they go.

Sean Miller was recruiting Jalen Hill. Steve Alford got his commitment. It's ok BC, it happens. I'm sure Sean and the other coaches are on to the next target, and don't have this silly notion in their minds that they can get any recruit in California and the southwest they want just by snapping their fingers like you seem to. Recruiting is hard work. Kudos to Alford for bagging a big time recruit.
I just don't think UCLA/Aflord has the same appeal these days as Arizona/Miller, so if a guy picks UCLA, I can only think it's because the former was showing up to more events, making more calls, etc. And if Miller and his staff were putting in less time with Hill, then he wasn't as high a priority as guys like Jackson and Hands, both of whom I expect to end up at AZ.
User avatar
Chicat
Posts: 45105
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
Reputation: 3345
Location: Your mother's basement

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Chicat »

Beachcat97 wrote:I just don't think UCLA/Aflord has the same appeal these days as Arizona/Miller, so if a guy picks UCLA, I can only think it's because the former was showing up to more events, making more calls, etc. And if Miller and his staff were putting in less time with Hill, then he wasn't as high a priority as guys like Jackson and Hands, both of whom I expect to end up at AZ.
That is some impressive logic.

Sean Miller simply couldn't have been putting in the same amount of effort into Hill because Alford got the commitment and since he obviously wasn't putting in the effort Hill wasn't a high priority. Do I have that right? But you have no facts to base this on except that Hill chose UCLA. Right?

Dude, we recently lost a highly ranked recruit to Cal of all places. A program with about 1/100th the prestige and history of UCLA. Not every recruiting battle is going to be won by Sean Miller simply because you think he's some sort of god on the recruiting trail.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Beachcat97
Posts: 8552
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 464
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Beachcat97 »

Chicat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:I just don't think UCLA/Aflord has the same appeal these days as Arizona/Miller, so if a guy picks UCLA, I can only think it's because the former was showing up to more events, making more calls, etc. And if Miller and his staff were putting in less time with Hill, then he wasn't as high a priority as guys like Jackson and Hands, both of whom I expect to end up at AZ.
That is some impressive logic.

Sean Miller simply couldn't have been putting in the same amount of effort into Hill because Alford got the commitment and since he obviously wasn't putting in the effort Hill wasn't a high priority. Do I have that right? But you have no facts to base this on except that Hill chose UCLA. Right?

Dude, we recently lost a highly ranked recruit to Cal of all places. A program with about 1/100th the prestige and history of UCLA. Not every recruiting battle is going to be won by Sean Miller simply because you think he's some sort of god on the recruiting trail.
That's true. Miller's recruiting success is greatly overstated. AG, Stanley, Rondae, Zeus, Trier, Smith, Simon, Jerrett, Ashley, NJ...these were aberrations.

Miller is most certainly not a god on the recruiting trail.
User avatar
Chicat
Posts: 45105
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
Reputation: 3345
Location: Your mother's basement

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Chicat »

Beachcat97 wrote:
Chicat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:I just don't think UCLA/Aflord has the same appeal these days as Arizona/Miller, so if a guy picks UCLA, I can only think it's because the former was showing up to more events, making more calls, etc. And if Miller and his staff were putting in less time with Hill, then he wasn't as high a priority as guys like Jackson and Hands, both of whom I expect to end up at AZ.
That is some impressive logic.

Sean Miller simply couldn't have been putting in the same amount of effort into Hill because Alford got the commitment and since he obviously wasn't putting in the effort Hill wasn't a high priority. Do I have that right? But you have no facts to base this on except that Hill chose UCLA. Right?

Dude, we recently lost a highly ranked recruit to Cal of all places. A program with about 1/100th the prestige and history of UCLA. Not every recruiting battle is going to be won by Sean Miller simply because you think he's some sort of god on the recruiting trail.
That's true. Miller's recruiting success is greatly overstated. AG, Stanley, Rondae, Zeus, Trier, Smith, Simon, Jerrett, Ashley, NJ...these were aberrations.

Miller is most certainly not a god on the recruiting trail.
Do you live in a fantasy world where guys like Justise Winslow, Ivan Rabb, and Jalen Hill cease to exist as soon as they commit elsewhere?

No one is a god on the recruiting trail. Even Calipari loses recruits to other schools. Time to grow up and come to grips with that. Or don't, and live in a reality of your own creation where all Sean Miller has to do is make eye contact with a recruit and they swoon at his feet. If he picks them up, they are Arizona Good. If he steps over their inert body and keeps walking, then they're trash.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
MrBug708
Posts: 3776
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 439

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by MrBug708 »

Beachcat97 wrote:
MrBug708 wrote:Alford managed to land Jalen Hill, 5* C from Corona
Not a 5 star. But nice try, loser.

The only Bruin, current or future, who is even remotely "Arizona good" is probably Welsh.
ASUHATER! wrote:Hill is a 4 star pf, not a 5 star center. Still a good pickup for ucla.
http://www.scout.com/college/basketball ... terest=Low
User avatar
ASUHATER!
Posts: 18121
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:21 pm
Reputation: 185
Location: tucson, az

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by ASUHATER! »

i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.

i'll just go with fuck asu.
MrBug708
Posts: 3776
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 439

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by MrBug708 »

You said he wasn't a 5 star, which was obviously wrong. I know his rankings, but I've been using BRO since forever and the lead west coast analyst for scout is basically why this board exists, so I used scout.

Stick to following Machina around instead of trying to policing everyone. Acting like RC97 doesn't help your cause
Beachcat97
Posts: 8552
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 464
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Beachcat97 »

Chicat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:
Chicat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:I just don't think UCLA/Aflord has the same appeal these days as Arizona/Miller, so if a guy picks UCLA, I can only think it's because the former was showing up to more events, making more calls, etc. And if Miller and his staff were putting in less time with Hill, then he wasn't as high a priority as guys like Jackson and Hands, both of whom I expect to end up at AZ.
That is some impressive logic.

Sean Miller simply couldn't have been putting in the same amount of effort into Hill because Alford got the commitment and since he obviously wasn't putting in the effort Hill wasn't a high priority. Do I have that right? But you have no facts to base this on except that Hill chose UCLA. Right?

Dude, we recently lost a highly ranked recruit to Cal of all places. A program with about 1/100th the prestige and history of UCLA. Not every recruiting battle is going to be won by Sean Miller simply because you think he's some sort of god on the recruiting trail.
That's true. Miller's recruiting success is greatly overstated. AG, Stanley, Rondae, Zeus, Trier, Smith, Simon, Jerrett, Ashley, NJ...these were aberrations.

Miller is most certainly not a god on the recruiting trail.
Do you live in a fantasy world where guys like Justise Winslow, Ivan Rabb, and Jalen Hill cease to exist as soon as they commit elsewhere?

No one is a god on the recruiting trail. Even Calipari loses recruits to other schools. Time to grow up and come to grips with that. Or don't, and live in a reality of your own creation where all Sean Miller has to do is make eye contact with a recruit and they swoon at his feet. If he picks them up, they are Arizona Good. If he steps over their inert body and keeps walking, then they're trash.
Chi, Chi, Chi...all I'm saying is that Miller tends to not whiff on guys he's making high priorities, Rabb being the only real exception in the last several years. And with Rabb, it was a situation where the guy wanted to play close to home, so I don't consider it a slight against Miller/AZ.

Every year, as you know, there are *several* guys Miller's staff is tracking and recruiting. We can't spend the same amount of time and resources on *every* guy, so there's a prioritization that emerges, either intentionally or unintentionally. Given the astonishing (and yes, "godlike") recruiting success that Miller has had recently, I tend to think that we are *getting* the guys who are top priorities, again Rabb being the only major exception. So if Hill committed this early, I have to think he wasn't prioritized as highly as others in the '17 class.

But I do respect your opinion.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 41377
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1355
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Merkin »

Nothing wrong in playing closer to home. Pretty long horrible drive to the games though from Corona to Westwood.

His stats seem a little underwhelming though: averaging 6.5 points per game, 5.8 rebounds per game and 1.3 blocks per game.

but he is only 15, so who knows how much he is going to blow up.
MrBug708
Posts: 3776
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 439

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by MrBug708 »

Nah, no traffic in LA
User avatar
ASUHATER!
Posts: 18121
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:21 pm
Reputation: 185
Location: tucson, az

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by ASUHATER! »

MrBug708 wrote:
You said he wasn't a 5 star, which was obviously wrong. I know his rankings, but I've been using BRO since forever and the lead west coast analyst for scout is basically why this board exists, so I used scout.

Stick to following Machina around instead of trying to policing everyone. Acting like RC97 doesn't help your cause
247 sports averages all recruiting service rankings and ratings. 4 stars. That is the average accepted rating. Scout is the outlier. So no, I wasn't wrong at all.
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.

i'll just go with fuck asu.
MrBug708
Posts: 3776
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 439

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by MrBug708 »

ASUHATER! wrote:
MrBug708 wrote:
You said he wasn't a 5 star, which was obviously wrong. I know his rankings, but I've been using BRO since forever and the lead west coast analyst for scout is basically why this board exists, so I used scout.

Stick to following Machina around instead of trying to policing everyone. Acting like RC97 doesn't help your cause
247 sports averages all recruiting service rankings and ratings. 4 stars. That is the average accepted rating. Scout is the outlier. So no, I wasn't wrong at all.
lol

Never change
User avatar
97cats
Posts: 3482
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 7:34 am
Reputation: 1035

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by 97cats »

it just never ends
User avatar
ASUHATER!
Posts: 18121
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:21 pm
Reputation: 185
Location: tucson, az

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by ASUHATER! »

MrBug708 wrote:
ASUHATER! wrote:
MrBug708 wrote:
You said he wasn't a 5 star, which was obviously wrong. I know his rankings, but I've been using BRO since forever and the lead west coast analyst for scout is basically why this board exists, so I used scout.

Stick to following Machina around instead of trying to policing everyone. Acting like RC97 doesn't help your cause
247 sports averages all recruiting service rankings and ratings. 4 stars. That is the average accepted rating. Scout is the outlier. So no, I wasn't wrong at all.
lol

Never change
Literally all I did was post a link to 247. If you disagree with their methods and only want to use scout, then so be it. Take your whining to 247 sports. I just posted a link that contradicts your link because it takes into account all information..not just some. Shrug
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.

i'll just go with fuck asu.
Beachcat97
Posts: 8552
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 464
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Beachcat97 »

97cats wrote:it just never ends
That Miller is a witch on the recruiting trail?
MrBug708
Posts: 3776
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 439

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by MrBug708 »

97cats wrote:it just never ends
Does ucla land Cody Riley and Jaylen Hands?
enfuego
Posts: 832
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2014 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by enfuego »

It's fun to watch UA and UCLA fans argue over KU's scraps :P
"Arizona got uppercutted out of the 2018 tournament by No. 13 Buffalo, which delivered one of the most overwhelming, lopsided upsets by a double-digit seed in tournament history (89-68). "
User avatar
Chicat
Posts: 45105
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
Reputation: 3345
Location: Your mother's basement

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Chicat »

enfuego wrote:It's fun to watch UA and UCLA fans argue over KU's scraps :P
It's fun to watch you puff out your chest about your once proud program and hang recruiting championship banners in your own mind.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
User avatar
ASUHATER!
Posts: 18121
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:21 pm
Reputation: 185
Location: tucson, az

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by ASUHATER! »

enfuego wrote:It's fun to watch UA and UCLA fans argue over KU's scraps :P
This post makes no sense at all. It's like he doesn't realize Arizona has had 5 straight top 5 classes. We sure do only get recruiting scraps alright!
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.

i'll just go with fuck asu.
azcat49
Posts: 11095
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 4:33 pm
Reputation: 964
Location: Gilbert Az

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by azcat49 »

Can hardly remember the last recruiting battle we lost to asschaps?
Waiting at the Rose Bowl patiently for the cats to arrive
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
enfuego
Posts: 832
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2014 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by enfuego »

azcat49 wrote:Can hardly remember the last recruiting battle we lost to asschaps?
Carlton Bragg.

Looks like Rivals moved Lonzo Ball up to #5 in the 2016 class. Looks like Alford is killing it when it comes to PAC 16 recruiting.
"Arizona got uppercutted out of the 2018 tournament by No. 13 Buffalo, which delivered one of the most overwhelming, lopsided upsets by a double-digit seed in tournament history (89-68). "
User avatar
3goggles
Posts: 2183
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:54 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by 3goggles »

enfuego wrote:
azcat49 wrote:Can hardly remember the last recruiting battle we lost to asschaps?
Carlton Bragg.

Looks like Rivals moved Lonzo Ball up to #5 in the 2016 class. Looks like Alford is killing it when it comes to PAC 16 recruiting.
Try again on Bragg!
Beachcat97
Posts: 8552
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 464
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Beachcat97 »

enfuego wrote:
azcat49 wrote:Can hardly remember the last recruiting battle we lost to asschaps?
Carlton Bragg.

Looks like Rivals moved Lonzo Ball up to #5 in the 2016 class. Looks like Alford is killing it when it comes to PAC 16 recruiting.
Be sure to let us know when Alford has a single recruiting class ranked ahead of one of Miller's. Hasn't happened yet, and won't.
dirtbags

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by dirtbags »

so sad to see ku's inferiority complex with ucla rear its head. as if enfuego's constant hang-wringing over UofA wasn't bad enough...
Beachcat97
Posts: 8552
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 464
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by Beachcat97 »

dirtbags wrote:so sad to see ku's inferiority complex with ucla rear its head. as if enfuego's constant hang-wringing over UofA wasn't bad enough...
KU is in no way inferior to UCLA, but I get your point.
enfuego
Posts: 832
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2014 8:50 pm
Reputation: 1

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by enfuego »

Beachcat97 wrote:
enfuego wrote:
azcat49 wrote:Can hardly remember the last recruiting battle we lost to asschaps?
Carlton Bragg.

Looks like Rivals moved Lonzo Ball up to #5 in the 2016 class. Looks like Alford is killing it when it comes to PAC 16 recruiting.
Be sure to let us know when Alford has a single recruiting class ranked ahead of one of Miller's. Hasn't happened yet, and won't.
He's in the lead for 2016. :D
"Arizona got uppercutted out of the 2018 tournament by No. 13 Buffalo, which delivered one of the most overwhelming, lopsided upsets by a double-digit seed in tournament history (89-68). "
User avatar
3goggles
Posts: 2183
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:54 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by 3goggles »

enfuego wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:
enfuego wrote:
azcat49 wrote:Can hardly remember the last recruiting battle we lost to asschaps?
Carlton Bragg.

Looks like Rivals moved Lonzo Ball up to #5 in the 2016 class. Looks like Alford is killing it when it comes to PAC 16 recruiting.
Be sure to let us know when Alford has a single recruiting class ranked ahead of one of Miller's. Hasn't happened yet, and won't.
He's in the lead for 2016. :D
If we only land Jackson, Leaf it's a better class
MrBug708
Posts: 3776
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 439

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by MrBug708 »

http://sportsworld.nbcsports.com/steve- ... ags%20=srm[sport%20%E2%80%93%20ncaab%2Ccontent%20-%20text-based]

Bryce is coming for you guys. Top 50 player in all of college
User avatar
ASUHATER!
Posts: 18121
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:21 pm
Reputation: 185
Location: tucson, az

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by ASUHATER! »

...Alford?
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.

i'll just go with fuck asu.
SCCats
Posts: 8831
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:35 am
Reputation: 156

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by SCCats »

MrBug708 wrote:http://sportsworld.nbcsports.com/steve- ... ags%20=srm[sport%20%E2%80%93%20ncaab%2Ccontent%20-%20text-based]

Bryce is coming for you guys. Top 50 player in all of college
:lol:

Lonzo Ball better watch out!
MrBug708
Posts: 3776
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 7:19 pm
Reputation: 439

Re: UCLA Basketball in trouble?

Post by MrBug708 »

ASUHATER! wrote:...Alford?
Yessir

The author is in a twitter war for a few people
Post Reply