Page 1 of 2
USC
Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2017 2:03 am
by Bangkok Wildcat
They need their own thread IMO.
zonagrad wrote:And of course by the time they come to McKale, USC will play the game of their lives. They are far and away the biggest disappointment this season. They returned everyone from a year ago and had a schedule that really favored them being a top 5 team. Prior to this season there was chatter that Enfield was the top up and coming coach in the Pac, ready to challenge for conference supremacy. What a disaster it's been for them.
Well not exactly everyone is back from last year.... De’Anthony Melton was being held out but has been declared ineligible per the LA Times
http://beta.latimes.com/sports/sportsno ... story.html...I believe he was a starter last year as a Freshman, 27 mpg, 44% FG, 28% 3P% (crappy but only 2 attempts / game), 3.5 assists to 1.8 TOs, 2 steals and 1 block...they refer to him as their ‘glue guy’.......and 3 of their guys (2 studs) are injured as of now; Boatwright (STUD), Jonah Matthews (deadly shooter and significant contributor) and Derryck Thornton (Duke Transfer).....They only had 7 players for that OT loss if you don’t count the scrub who played 2 minutes.
Anyways, their losses, except for Princeton, aren’t that bad so far; A&M at home, @SMU (who looks pretty good and we lost to them), Oklahoma at home by only 2....before the Princeton debacle in OT. Not sure I’d count them out yet but agree that it’s been disappointing so far mostly with this last loss though as A&M and Oklahoma look like FF caliber teams at this point.
This Princeton loss is a huge black eye though and unless they pull out some major wins by advancing in Maui at the Diamonhead Classic, there only chances for quality wins going forward will be at ‘Guard U’ (lmao of at that ironic nickname) and at McKale.....so that will be their Super Bowl Game for sure......not sure they will go dancing at this point as I expect ASU to have fallen back to earth by then and they won’t beat us at home....Also not sure their 2 games vs UCLA will help or hurt their RPI as I expect UCLA to be a middling P12 Team.
Strange year so far......
PS. Can you imagine where we would be with a 4 year stud PG like Jordan McLaughlin??? Damn.
Re: USC
Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2017 1:12 pm
by az91
It is interesting that according to the article, the ruling on Melton being ineligible is not related to the $5,000 that a family friend received to steer him to Dawkins and Sood, but new information, which has not been disclosed.
Re: USC
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 5:44 pm
by Bangkok Wildcat
USC showing some signs of life after advancing to the Diamond Head Final by beating Akron the Middle Tennessee....oddly enough some of their board thought there was no way they could beat them....not sure why but good to see them advance.
Re: USC
Posted: Mon Dec 25, 2017 11:43 am
by dovecanyoncat
Bangkok Wildcat wrote:USC showing some signs of life after advancing to the Diamond Head Final by beating Akron the Middle Tennessee....oddly enough some of their board thought there was no way they could beat them....not sure why but good to see them advance.
.
Agreed. But now I'm in a quandary. I've always liked the Aggies. Hoping for a good close game today.
Re: USC
Posted: Mon Dec 25, 2017 6:37 pm
by Bangkok Wildcat
Congrats to USC winning the Diamond Head Classic 77-72 over NMSU.....good for the P12. Sorry dovecanyoncat.
Re: USC
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2017 6:06 pm
by dovecanyoncat
Really enjoyed the contest. The Aggies punched above their weight class; Boatwright had a great game.
Re: USC
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 8:42 pm
by Bangkok Wildcat
USC suspending Metu for only half a game as well as removing him from being a captain as punishment for intentionally punching a player in the nuts is unbelievable IMO and reeks of desperation from Andy Enfield.....I can’t believe the PAC 12 is ok with this.....seems a bit weak especially considering he has a ‘Grayson Allen’ kind of history already. Smh.
Re: USC
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 6:47 pm
by Chicat
Re: USC
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 8:35 pm
by dovecanyoncat
Watching the Condoms against the Aggies: Shorts' game against us was waay better than the last two he's had. Seems like that happens all the time.
Re: USC
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2019 8:54 pm
by Irish27
Re: USC
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 12:15 pm
by Newportcat
He cussed out enfield on the Oregon trip and was suspended
I bet enfield deserved it too
Re: USC
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:12 pm
by Beachcat97
How much longer does Enfield have? His recruiting's been solid, but his results have been abysmal. Very Alfordian.
Re: USC
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 9:36 am
by CatsbyAZ
Not exactly basketball related, but everything else going on at USC is worth the long read from Los Angeles Magazine on How USC Became The Most Scandal Plagued Campus in America - from Los Angeles Magazine:
https://www.lamag.com/citythinkblog/usc-scandals-cover/" target="_blank
A brief timeline:
Sept 2014: Fund manager Steve Cohen buys his daughter’s admission for $5 Million
Oct 2015: Steve Sarkisian fired for public intoxication at football team events and pep rally’s
Mar 2016: The Medical School Dean resigns after investigation reveals his hosting of Meth and Ecstasy fueled parties for associates, one of whom ODed in his presence
Jun 2016: AD Pat Haden steps down after investigation reveals his pocketing of $2.4 Million in charitable donations from foundation for underserved youth
Jun 2017: Campus building named after OJ Simpson’s getaway driver
Oct 2017: Vice President Carrera forced to step down amid multiple claims of sexually harassing female colleagues
Oct 2017: Replacement Medical School dean is ousted after surfacing of sexual harassment case from 2003
May 2018: USC gynecologist George Tyndall resigns with hefty payout amidst investigations into three decades of sexually abusing patients; Settlements are expected to cost USC upwards of $500 Million
Feb 2019: And, of course, we all know about USC finding itself at the center of the FBI’s admissions bribery case
Re: USC
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 9:40 am
by UAEebs86
U$C = Undeniably Second Class
My sister went there so the hate is strong with me.
Re: USC
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 1:06 pm
by 84Cat
Peace out Lynn Swann
Re: USC
Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:20 pm
by azcat49
How does USC play Villanova in an exhibition game. I thought you could only play D-2 or play another D-1 team without fans? What am I missing here
Re: USC
Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:27 pm
by UAEebs86
azcat49 wrote:How does USC play Villanova in an exhibition game. I thought you could only play D-2 or play another D-1 team without fans? What am I missing here
I think it's for charity if that makes a difference.
Re: USC
Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:30 pm
by azgreg
azcat49 wrote:How does USC play Villanova in an exhibition game. I thought you could only play D-2 or play another D-1 team without fans? What am I missing here
https://www.dailynews.com/2019/10/17/us ... ball-test/" target="_blank
The Trojans will host Villanova on Friday in a full, 40-minute exhibition that will raise money for the California Fire Foundation.
Both athletic departments worked together to set up the exhibition. Villanova was looking for the chance for a West Coast trip and contacted USC. The NCAA rule for public exhibitions is the proceeds must go to charity, and the teams agreed to the cause that supports firefighters and their families.
Re: USC
Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:39 pm
by azcat49
Well then we need to go home and home with North Carolina instead of messing around with a closed scrimmage in Phoenix
Re: USC
Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:55 pm
by ASUHATER!
We still need revenge against UNC for that 92-64 home loss in Lute's last season. Haven't played them since. Still the worst in person basketball game experience I've ever had. Waiting for hours outside in like 25-30 degree weather in Tucson for a seat in McKale and getting blown out.
Re: USC
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:17 pm
by YoDeFoe
ASUHATER! wrote:We still need revenge against UNC for that 92-64 home loss in Lute's last season. Haven't played them since. Still the worst in person basketball game experience I've ever had. Waiting for hours outside in like 25-30 degree weather in Tucson for a seat in McKale and getting blown out.
Fucking same dude.
Re: USC
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:27 pm
by Merkin
YoDeFoe wrote:ASUHATER! wrote:We still need revenge against UNC for that 92-64 home loss in Lute's last season. Haven't played them since. Still the worst in person basketball game experience I've ever had. Waiting for hours outside in like 25-30 degree weather in Tucson for a seat in McKale and getting blown out.
Fucking same dude.
When Miller canceled the UNC game early in his tenure at Arizona, he said the series might resume once UA gets competitive again.
Still waiting...
Although home and home series are getting pretty rare and most teams want a neutral venue now.
Re: USC
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2021 9:09 am
by UAEebs86
Re: USC
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2021 10:21 am
by Merkin
Re: USC
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2021 10:46 am
by Chicat
This was the NCAA and not the IARP, right?
Re: USC
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2021 11:14 am
by azgreg
Chicat wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 10:46 am
This was the NCAA and not the IARP, right?
Correct.
Re: USC
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2021 4:04 am
by U.P. Zona Fan
Hopefully the IARP looks at the penalties the ncaa is handing out and makes similar decisions.
Re: USC
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 8:11 am
by Merkin
Re: USC
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 10:25 am
by Beachcat97
Merkin wrote: ↑Sat Sep 11, 2021 8:11 am
Amazing. I mean, it's hard to fault a historically mediocre program for celebrating something like this, but I wonder if the players are actually beaming with pride over winning three games in the tournament. Maybe it says more about our "trophy culture."
Re: USC
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2021 3:52 pm
by dovecanyoncat
'Smatter Andy Boy. Condoms better unsheathe their game plan.
Re: USC
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2021 5:05 pm
by dovecanyoncat
One would expect USC to break 80 on their home court against The Beach. What's the matter Andy Boy?
Re: USC
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:30 pm
by dovecanyoncat
The Condoms had better unsheathe their game plan against the Ducks.
Re: USC
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:29 pm
by dovecanyoncat
Do the Condoms have a couple of spurts left in them?
Re: USC
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2022 1:32 pm
by azgreg
Re: USC
Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2023 10:06 am
by arizonawildcats
Re: USC
Posted: Sat May 06, 2023 3:45 pm
by CatsbyAZ
Re: USC
Posted: Sat May 06, 2023 4:08 pm
by TheCatInTheHat
Obviously he's a great player. But I'd anticipate the zoo of having his father hanging around and expecting to be deferred to is going to be a distraction kind of like LaVar Ball, and the LA media will be all over it. Bronny's team played a tough schedule, but they lost 11 games. It'll definitely be interesting.
Re: USC
Posted: Sat May 06, 2023 6:28 pm
by Beachcat97
TheCatInTheHat wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 4:08 pm
Obviously he's a great player. But I'd anticipate the zoo of having his father hanging around and expecting to be deferred to is going to be a distraction kind of like LaVar Ball, and the LA media will be all over it. Bronny's team played a tough schedule, but they lost 11 games. It'll definitely be interesting.
This is gonna make LaVar look like a silent fan in the upper colonnade seats.
Re: USC
Posted: Sat May 06, 2023 6:32 pm
by CardiacCats97
His commitment was mentioned on the NBA playoff pre-game.
There’s something to be said for that kind of publicity.
Re: USC
Posted: Sun May 07, 2023 8:14 am
by Beachcat97
CardiacCats97 wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 6:32 pm
His commitment was mentioned on the NBA playoff pre-game.
There’s something to be said for that kind of publicity.
It’s a flash in the pan for USC. They’re not going anywhere, not in the bigger scheme of things. Anyone remember OJ Mayo? He was a much better player than Bronny. Trojans will be good next season, their final in the Pac, and they’ll then proceed to become a second/third tier basketball program in the Big 10.
Re: USC
Posted: Sun May 07, 2023 8:34 am
by 84Cat
USC also getting the #1 recruit in the class so it's a pretty good class for them
Re: USC
Posted: Sun May 07, 2023 8:38 am
by EastCoastCat
Is there any team in the country that does less with so much talent?
Re: USC
Posted: Sun May 07, 2023 8:43 am
by 84Cat
EastCoastCat wrote: ↑Sun May 07, 2023 8:38 am
Is there any team in the country that does less with so much talent?
Kentucky but I get your point. Problem is Enfield doesn't seem capable of building a team that can win against the top teams in the conference
Re: USC
Posted: Sun May 07, 2023 10:02 am
by TheCat
To be fair he just has trouble with Arizona. I think his record against UCLA is respectable.
Re: USC
Posted: Sun May 07, 2023 10:16 am
by Beachcat97
Does anyone actually think Bronny is a future first rounder? I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, but so far, in the games I've watched him, he looks like a solid player, not a star. His future is a marginal NBA player at best. Hopefully the Lakers can sign him next year, and we'll get to see him play with his dad for a couple years.
Re: USC
Posted: Sun May 07, 2023 1:51 pm
by Merkin
Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Sun May 07, 2023 10:16 am
Does anyone actually think Bronny is a future first rounder?
I have never seen Bronny play, not even highlight reels, but I imagine some team will take a flyer on him in the first round just so the Lakers have to trade for him. Give up two future 1st round picks or something like that.
Re: USC
Posted: Sun May 07, 2023 10:07 pm
by Beachcat97
Merkin wrote: ↑Sun May 07, 2023 1:51 pm
Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Sun May 07, 2023 10:16 am
Does anyone actually think Bronny is a future first rounder?
I have never seen Bronny play, not even highlight reels, but I imagine some team will take a flyer on him in the first round just so the Lakers have to trade for him. Give up two future 1st round picks or something like that.
Yeah, could see that.
Re: USC
Posted: Mon May 08, 2023 7:28 am
by CatsbyAZ
Merkin wrote: ↑Sun May 07, 2023 1:51 pm
Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Sun May 07, 2023 10:16 am
Does anyone actually think Bronny is a future first rounder?
I have never seen Bronny play, not even highlight reels, but I imagine some team will take a flyer on him in the first round just so the Lakers have to trade for him. Give up two future 1st round picks or something like that.
This was my exact thoughts as well. Lebron wants to play with his son and there'll be an NBA team willing to draft Bronny undeservedly high to sway him over.
However, there are what should be two increasing points of hesitation when it comes to drafting Bronny to get Lebron:
1) Bronny isn't that good. He's not a one-and-done. He'll need several years in college to develop into a propect worth drafting, likley as a role player off the bench.
2) The longer it takes for Bronny improve, the older his Dad gets. At some point age will fully catch up to Lebron and willing NBA teams won't be excited or see the novelty in bringing Lebron aboard.
When you see pictures of Bronny next to his Dad, he has nowhere near the imposing physical presence. That right there is a buzzkill for most of the NBA.
Re: USC
Posted: Mon May 08, 2023 7:54 am
by pc in NM
Fact. USC basketball just became a "hot ticket" for the TV market merely with the addition of Bronny. Fact.
It's likely that Arizona, and other Pac-12 teams will get less nationally broadcast games as a consequence next season.
Ironically, Bronny might not even be a starter his frosh year.
And, if he does, in fact, develop as many project, he'll be worthy of USC's TV time when USC is in the BIG.
OTOH, Enfield is going to be operating under a spotlight that could easily become lose/lose for the coach.
Re: USC
Posted: Mon May 08, 2023 7:57 am
by EastCoastCat
He's not even the best James kid when all is said and done.