Page 6 of 10

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 3:26 pm
by PieceOfMeat
ND gagging a little bit in their game, but there's no way they completely choke.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 3:29 pm
by UAEebs86
F$U is going to completely roll ND next week.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 3:33 pm
by PieceOfMeat
that didnt look like roughing the snapper to me. guess the refs have some cash on ND

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 3:39 pm
by CalStateTempe
Magic of the Irish makes homer calls at Autzen look fair.

Seriously the amount of pull refs give the Irish in South Bend is in another level.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:30 pm
by Merkin
PieceOfMeat wrote:I really wouldn't mind if ND choked at home
I would, along with several other posters.
azgreg wrote: OSUCat - (Old Dominion, California, Florida, Arizona, TCU, Ole Miss) Florida St
UAEebs86 - (E Carolina, Rutgers, Notre Dame, N Carolina St, TCU, Marshall) Arizona
CatnapTom - (Purdue, Arizona St, Oregon, N Carolina St, TCU) Notre Dame
Merkin - (N Carolina St, Arizona St, Baylor, Penn St, TCU, Marshall) Notre Dame
carcassdragger - (Arizona, Arizona St, Ole Miss, Washington, TCU, Marshall) Florida St
NYCat - (Akron, Louisiana-Monroe, Marshall, N Carolina St, TCU, Baylor) Notre Dame
dc4azcats - (Utah, California, Mississippi St, Washington, TCU, Marshall) Notre Dame

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:39 pm
by Alieberman
Miss St. just beat 3 top top teams in a row.

They should be the unanimous #1 team.

They are for real.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:19 pm
by CalStateTempe
Alieberman wrote:Miss St. just beat 3 top top teams in a row.

They should be the unanimous #1 team.

They are for real.
Agree. That team is for real.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 6:00 pm
by PieceOfMeat
i go out to run an errand, and tcu is up huge, I come back, and they lost?

lmfao

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 6:01 pm
by PieceOfMeat
Merkin wrote:
PieceOfMeat wrote:I really wouldn't mind if ND choked at home
I would, along with several other posters.
lol well you're still safe!

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 6:09 pm
by ASUHATER!
CalStateTempe wrote:
Alieberman wrote:Miss St. just beat 3 top top teams in a row.

They should be the unanimous #1 team.

They are for real.
Agree. That team is for real.
Before last week msu had never been in the top 5 of the ap poll and only ever spent 9 weeks in the top 10(3 of which were in 1940 and 1965)

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 6:13 pm
by OSUCat
I guess I am just waiting for Arkansas to really screw this up.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 6:56 pm
by AZCatGirl
Alabama made a lot of silly mistakes. Better teams will take advantage of that, then ESPN can promote all they want, but they won't be going anywhere.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 6:58 pm
by azgreg
Ole Miss is rolling 21-0 early. The state of Mississippi is going to be hopping tonight.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 7:08 pm
by waysouthcat
Alieberman wrote:Miss St. just beat 3 top top teams in a row.

They should be the unanimous #1 team.

They are for real.
Maybe so, but were they really "top top teams" or maybe a function of the preseason SEC ranking nonsense? I do agree that MSU is top 5 this year though.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 7:38 pm
by Sage&Silver
waysouthcat wrote:
Alieberman wrote:Miss St. just beat 3 top top teams in a row.

They should be the unanimous #1 team.

They are for real.
Maybe so, but were they really "top top teams" or maybe a function of the preseason SEC ranking nonsense? I do agree that MSU is top 5 this year though.
Yes, two of those teams could have three losses tomorrow.

TAMU's best win was against a now un-ranked 3-3 South Carolina.

LSU's best win was against a now un-ranked Wisconsin.





If Florida holds on, LSU drops to 4-3 AND Florida will likely be ranked... Because, SEC

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 9:02 am
by Merkin

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 10:21 am
by Chicat
Merkin wrote:Ball State "Poo Dollar" prank: http://deadspin.com/ball-state-football ... socialflow
Thanks for the reminder not to put money in my mouth. The tiny cocaine buzz is just not worth it.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 12:59 pm
by PieceOfMeat
buh bye baylor and oklahoma.


...

gah I wish we had beaten usc. such a wasted opportunity

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 2:42 pm
by CalStateTempe
PieceOfMeat wrote:buh bye baylor and oklahoma.


...

gah I wish we had beaten usc. such a wasted opportunity
Typical Arizona.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 2:50 pm
by illcat
Baylor #4??????? Didn't look that good against RR's old team.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 3:22 pm
by waysouthcat
"Ranked" A&M losing to Alabama 52-0 in the 3rd quarter. They should go up in the rankings after this for having to play such a good team on the road.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 5:36 pm
by CalStateTempe
Lets go IRISH!

So sick, done, and over FSU and Jamais.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 7:03 pm
by SCCat
I thought you were supposed to schedule a team you can beat for homecoming?

Missou 42, Florida 7 with 11 min still left in the 4th. Where's the puke/you're fired emoticon?

EDIT-Wow this is an amazing box score. Jeff Driskel 7/19, 50 yards 2 picks before he's finally benched. Through 3.5 quarters 36 rushes for 72 yards for Florida? Real nice.

But that isn't even close to the most amazing thing. Through 3.5 quarters Missou has 20 yards passing and 101 yards rushing (and 11 penalties for 74 yards for good measure). Not so amazing if you're getting crushed by 35; fairly amazing when you're up by 35 at Florida.

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=400548362

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 8:26 pm
by Chicat

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 8:48 pm
by CalStateTempe
What a horseshoe*t flag on ND.

That was a block, not a hold. horseshit.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 8:48 pm
by UAEebs86
CalStateTempe wrote:What a horseshoe*t flag on ND.

That was a block, not a hold. horseshit.
You can't block until the pass is caught.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 8:56 pm
by azcat49
Yea thought that was an easy call for the ref and I was hoping they both could lose

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:02 pm
by Chicat
Seemed obvious to me. It's either holding or PI. The receiver was pretty blatant about it. You can't let that shit slide if you're a ref.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:23 pm
by PieceOfMeat
....and with ND going down.....I again lament our inability to beat usc last week.

damn you arizona football for raising my hopes and then dashing them! :lol:

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 2:35 pm
by Salty
I thought WRs could block, even before a ball is caught.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 2:55 pm
by UAEebs86
Salty wrote:I thought WRs could block, even before a ball is caught.
Only if the ball is thrown behind the line of scrimmage.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:05 pm
by ASUHATER!
Yeah if we had beaten usc we might be in the top 5 this week

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:00 am
by the real dill
Chicat wrote:Seemed obvious to me. It's either holding or PI. The receiver was pretty blatant about it. You can't let that shit slide if you're a ref.
When I saw it live, I agreed. I've watched it like 10 times now, and the DB actually engages the WR and holds onto him for the whole play. Watch the video below. It sure likes like the DB grabs him and never lets go.

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=11726052


Image

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:23 am
by Chicat
I hadn't watched any replays until just now, but I see what you're saying. What you can't see from that angle is what is going on with the WR's right hand when the DB realizes where the pass is going and tries to disengage from him. That's where I thought the hold was. The DB looked like he was trying to disengage but was being held onto.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:27 am
by Merkin
Good call on offense, looks like they would have scored anyway.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 10:42 am
by Coop Cat

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 11:11 am
by Chicat
From that angle it doesn't look like he's running a route. Just blocking.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 12:38 pm
by the real dill
Chicat wrote:From that angle it doesn't look like he's running a route. Just blocking.
In your previous post you mentioned his right hand....from this angle you can see his right hand is tucked inside while the DB is bear hugging him around both shoulders. How is this not defensive holding? I agree he seems to be content moving forward....probably because it is a designed pass to the outside and the DB is trying to tackle him.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 1:11 pm
by Coop Cat
Ummmmmmm, Lou?


Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 1:15 pm
by Chicat
the real dill wrote:
Chicat wrote:From that angle it doesn't look like he's running a route. Just blocking.
In your previous post you mentioned his right hand....from this angle you can see his right hand is tucked inside while the DB is bear hugging him around both shoulders. How is this not defensive holding? I agree he seems to be content moving forward....probably because it is a designed pass to the outside and the DB is trying to tackle him.
The only thing I can guess is that since they are within the five yards of the line of scrimmage where DBs can make contact with receivers, the contact on the defensive side is legal. Although I would say that the DB does wrap up.

Tough call there. Probably not one I would have made. I can't tell who is getting the advantage of the contact except for the result of the play. And maybe that's what the ref was looking at. The guy is so wide open that you almost convince yourself it was the result of an illegal pick or block.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 1:33 pm
by the real dill
Chicat wrote:
the real dill wrote:
Chicat wrote:From that angle it doesn't look like he's running a route. Just blocking.
In your previous post you mentioned his right hand....from this angle you can see his right hand is tucked inside while the DB is bear hugging him around both shoulders. How is this not defensive holding? I agree he seems to be content moving forward....probably because it is a designed pass to the outside and the DB is trying to tackle him.
The only thing I can guess is that since they are within the five yards of the line of scrimmage where DBs can make contact with receivers, the contact on the defensive side is legal. Although I would say that the DB does wrap up.

Tough call there. Probably not one I would have made. I can't tell who is getting the advantage of the contact except for the result of the play. And maybe that's what the ref was looking at. The guy is so wide open that you almost convince yourself it was the result of an illegal pick or block.
No doubt. Obviously the ref doesn't have the luxury of looking at screen caps and youtube slow motion 10 times. When I watched it live I said out loud "that's a pick, pass interference."

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 1:36 pm
by Chicat
the real dill wrote:No doubt. Obviously the ref doesn't have the luxury of looking at screen caps and youtube slow motion 10 times. When I watched it live I said out loud "that's a pick, pass interference."
Me too. Saw the play live plus one replay and it looked like the right call. Watching it again and again, now I'm not sure. I can definitely see why the ref would throw the flag. And I don't think it's some kind of blatant screw job like all of the ND fans around here are saying. They would like a Watergate-style investigation of who paid off the ref.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 1:41 pm
by CalStateTempe
Shit, Chi, I just remembered where you live. It must be turrible right now dealing with the whiny Irish fans.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 1:49 pm
by Chicat
CalStateTempe wrote:Shit, Chi, I just remembered where you live. It must be turrible right now dealing with the whiny Irish fans.
It was worse before this weekend.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 1:50 pm
by Machina
Watching live I thought it was the right call.

Now that I have seen in again and again, I think it should have been a no call (although I get why it was called).

To me looking at it again, #8 for FSU for sure holds #20 NDU the entire time. Now the tricky part. It looks like #7 NDU is blocking #3 FSU, but it appears that #3 FSU engages first and grabs first.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 3:07 pm
by SCCat
Teams are 147-2 over the last 10 years when allowing less than 120 yards of offense.

Both losses are by Muschamp at UF.

(See :20 to :30 for the stat)

http://espn.go.com/college-football/sto ... -plays-out

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 3:34 pm
by scumdevils86
good lord. a kickoff return td, punt return td, fumble return td, and a int return td.

good job gators!

Image

Image

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 4:42 pm
by Gladiator Cat
I think its safe to say that you can stick a fork in Will Muschamp. Dan Mullen will be roaming the UF sidelines next year. I don't think MSU can match Florida's pay package.

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 2:33 pm
by the real dill

Re: 2014 Non Conf Game Discussion

Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 6:05 pm
by azgreg
I don't know how Boise St fans can watch game after game on this blue turf. Damn.