Conference Realignment

Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns

User avatar
CardiacCats97
Posts: 1227
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2022 6:55 pm
Reputation: 349

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by CardiacCats97 »

I mean, you could have the entire states of Colorado, Utah, and Arizona as your markets, or you could have Fresno. 😂
PHXCATS
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 7:29 pm
Reputation: -35

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by PHXCATS »

The idea that Canzano makes shit up is so stupid. Completely telling on yourself being a Scheer and Luke fanboy
2018 Bear Down Wildcats Conference Championship Challenge Champion
AzCatFan2
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:45 pm
Reputation: 309

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by AzCatFan2 »

CardiacCats97 wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 4:15 pm
AzCatFan2 wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 3:45 pm It's wants and desires based on actions, statements, and in some cases, inside information. It's no secret UW and Oregon want out of the PAC. Heck, they petitioned to join the B1G. It was denied.
You keep talking like you’ve got something besides your gut emotions. UW and Oregon petitioned to join the B1G? When? Can you provide the text of the document, letter, statement… anything?

The only thing we ever heard was that the B1G was no longer interested in pursuing any other teams except maybe Notre Dame after they added USC/UCLA. You have now created a story in your mind where UO/UW “petitioned” to join as well and were turned down flat.

It’s all in your head, but you’ll come back talking like you know what Oregon wants. What Phil Knight wants. What the B1G Commissioner wants (pssst… there isn’t one). What prominent people are lobbying for. How Amazon views the current marketplace. Whether Sasquatch is a UW or WSU fan and if he’ll accept them splitting up into different conferences.

It’s not real. It’s just your synapses misfiring.
It was reported Washington and Oregon met with B1G representatives about joining the league. The numbers didn't work out and B1G Presidents decided to stand pat at the moment.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/100 ... 2-collapse

https://www.si.com/college/stanford/foo ... conference

Rumor is, the math didn't work out. UW and Oregon wouldn't add value. Not would they dilute B1G value.

There have been zero meetings between Oregon and or UW and the BIG12. There likely never be any.
User avatar
KillerKlown
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:55 pm
Reputation: 206
Location: South Tucson

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by KillerKlown »

PHXCATS wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 4:40 pm The idea that Canzano makes shit up is so stupid. Completely telling on yourself being a Scheer and Luke fanboy
Of course you don't like people that are for leaving the PAC. It goes against the narrative you are for. Yeah Big12 is totally in talks with Fresno. The fact that you automatically start to spaz out with every mention or even a little hint of Scheer is telling.

Lets see if you can control yourself this time...
Mike Luke's burner account.
PHXCATS
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 7:29 pm
Reputation: -35

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by PHXCATS »

You are so incredibly wrong it is incredible. I have zero narrative. I have zero desire except for wanting to have all options on the table when Robins and Heeke make their decision. That is it.

Luke and Scheer have hated on Canzano for months now. Canzano does not make shit up. He is told things from his sources and he reports on that. You can say it is biased towards the PAC-12 since it is coming from AD and Presidents who want to stay in the PAC-12 but he aint making shit up or "getting it wrong". The hate for Canzano is just proof of fanboying those two and not actually thinking rationally or independently
2018 Bear Down Wildcats Conference Championship Challenge Champion
User avatar
CardiacCats97
Posts: 1227
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2022 6:55 pm
Reputation: 349

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by CardiacCats97 »

AzCatFan2 wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 4:52 pm
CardiacCats97 wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 4:15 pm
AzCatFan2 wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 3:45 pm It's wants and desires based on actions, statements, and in some cases, inside information. It's no secret UW and Oregon want out of the PAC. Heck, they petitioned to join the B1G. It was denied.
You keep talking like you’ve got something besides your gut emotions. UW and Oregon petitioned to join the B1G? When? Can you provide the text of the document, letter, statement… anything?

The only thing we ever heard was that the B1G was no longer interested in pursuing any other teams except maybe Notre Dame after they added USC/UCLA. You have now created a story in your mind where UO/UW “petitioned” to join as well and were turned down flat.

It’s all in your head, but you’ll come back talking like you know what Oregon wants. What Phil Knight wants. What the B1G Commissioner wants (pssst… there isn’t one). What prominent people are lobbying for. How Amazon views the current marketplace. Whether Sasquatch is a UW or WSU fan and if he’ll accept them splitting up into different conferences.

It’s not real. It’s just your synapses misfiring.
It was reported Washington and Oregon met with B1G representatives about joining the league. The numbers didn't work out and B1G Presidents decided to stand pat at the moment.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/100 ... 2-collapse

https://www.si.com/college/stanford/foo ... conference

Rumor is, the math didn't work out. UW and Oregon wouldn't add value. Not would they dilute B1G value.

There have been zero meetings between Oregon and or UW and the BIG12. There likely never be any.
You said they “petitioned” to join. Nowhere was that ever reported. You made that shit up. Stop making shit up. Just stop.
AzCatFan2
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:45 pm
Reputation: 309

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by AzCatFan2 »

CardiacCats97 wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 5:05 pm
AzCatFan2 wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 4:52 pm
CardiacCats97 wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 4:15 pm
AzCatFan2 wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 3:45 pm It's wants and desires based on actions, statements, and in some cases, inside information. It's no secret UW and Oregon want out of the PAC. Heck, they petitioned to join the B1G. It was denied.
You keep talking like you’ve got something besides your gut emotions. UW and Oregon petitioned to join the B1G? When? Can you provide the text of the document, letter, statement… anything?

The only thing we ever heard was that the B1G was no longer interested in pursuing any other teams except maybe Notre Dame after they added USC/UCLA. You have now created a story in your mind where UO/UW “petitioned” to join as well and were turned down flat.

It’s all in your head, but you’ll come back talking like you know what Oregon wants. What Phil Knight wants. What the B1G Commissioner wants (pssst… there isn’t one). What prominent people are lobbying for. How Amazon views the current marketplace. Whether Sasquatch is a UW or WSU fan and if he’ll accept them splitting up into different conferences.

It’s not real. It’s just your synapses misfiring.
It was reported Washington and Oregon met with B1G representatives about joining the league. The numbers didn't work out and B1G Presidents decided to stand pat at the moment.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/100 ... 2-collapse

https://www.si.com/college/stanford/foo ... conference

Rumor is, the math didn't work out. UW and Oregon wouldn't add value. Not would they dilute B1G value.

There have been zero meetings between Oregon and or UW and the BIG12. There likely never be any.
You said they “petitioned” to join. Nowhere was that ever reported. You made that shit up. Stop making shit up. Just stop.
Maybe petitioned was too strong a word. But there were definite talks between the PAC NW schools and B1G representatives.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 41041
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1323
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by Merkin »

ChooChooCat wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 4:20 pm Yeah that Fresno State/Big 12 shenanigans is coming from the PAC 12 offices. There’s literally nothing to it.
Exclusive look at that meeting:

Image



I can't imagine any P5 conference ever even talking about inviting FSU.
User avatar
KillerKlown
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:55 pm
Reputation: 206
Location: South Tucson

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by KillerKlown »

PHXCATS wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 5:03 pm You are so incredibly wrong it is incredible. I have zero narrative. I have zero desire except for wanting to have all options on the table when Robins and Heeke make their decision. That is it.

Luke and Scheer have hated on Canzano for months now. Canzano does not make shit up. He is told things from his sources and he reports on that. You can say it is biased towards the PAC-12 since it is coming from AD and Presidents who want to stay in the PAC-12 but he aint making shit up or "getting it wrong". The hate for Canzano is just proof of fanboying those two and not actually thinking rationally or independently
I never said he was lying. But his sources are extremely biased. So when I see Canzano, I skip. The fact you even said his sources are biased and have a narrative to push and you still fight for his honor is kinda funny. But please continue.
Whos not actually thinking rationally or independently again?
Mike Luke's burner account.
GlobalCat
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 10:35 pm
Reputation: 97

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by GlobalCat »

AzCatFan2 wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 3:12 pm From Canzano, the BIG12 is talking with Boise St and Fresno St., plus Gonzaga for basketball only. But at best, only believe 50% of the rumors that are floating out there when it comes to conference talks (https://www.ksl.com/article/50582096/ca ... c-12-plots)
Hating on Canzano is fair game, but the information he reported makes perfect sense. Yomarck is a Corp Dev guy - he's going to take meetings with schools he has no interest in because it's a chance to learn more about what they are thinking, hearing, etc. You learn from your team, your advisors, and what others are saying in the market. Guys with his background feel negligent if they aren't engaged in folks looking to do deals as that's one of the best times to find out competitive intel.
GlobalCat
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 10:35 pm
Reputation: 97

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by GlobalCat »

From the article: "• For the Pac-12, the expansion decision will be driven by media value. The conference needs to add TV households and inventory to replace the loss of USC and UCLA. San Diego's TV market would add 1.13 million households. DFW would add nearly 3 million TV households. Yes, I know that neither school traditionally brings huge ratings, but again, expansion is about adding media markets."


"On that note, Houston has 2.45 million television households. It's why I keep thinking about Rice University as a possible Pac-12 addition. The academic profile of Rice fits. If the Pac-12 is serious about SMU, I wonder if Rice becomes the travel partner."

1.This is also how media guys thing about the market. Tradition, rivalries, etc. are great, but potential household viewership matters more (and is often wildly miscalculated).

2. Schools like Stanford & Cal likely see SMU and Rice as acceptable peers - not commuter schools like SDSU and UNLV.
PHXCATS
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 7:29 pm
Reputation: -35

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by PHXCATS »

Hating on Canzano the way some media guys are really makes our alumni base look awful
2018 Bear Down Wildcats Conference Championship Challenge Champion
ChooChooCat
Posts: 8569
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:47 pm
Reputation: 1059

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by ChooChooCat »

PHXCATS wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 4:40 pm The idea that Canzano makes shit up is so stupid. Completely telling on yourself being a Scheer and Luke fanboy
Canzano writes what he’s told to write.

The Fresno State stuff is pure comedy.
ChooChooCat
Posts: 8569
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:47 pm
Reputation: 1059

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by ChooChooCat »

GlobalCat wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 7:13 pm
AzCatFan2 wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 3:12 pm From Canzano, the BIG12 is talking with Boise St and Fresno St., plus Gonzaga for basketball only. But at best, only believe 50% of the rumors that are floating out there when it comes to conference talks (https://www.ksl.com/article/50582096/ca ... c-12-plots)
Hating on Canzano is fair game, but the information he reported makes perfect sense. Yomarck is a Corp Dev guy - he's going to take meetings with schools he has no interest in because it's a chance to learn more about what they are thinking, hearing, etc. You learn from your team, your advisors, and what others are saying in the market. Guys with his background feel negligent if they aren't engaged in folks looking to do deals as that's one of the best times to find out competitive intel.
Fresno State has a sport in the Big 12.
GlobalCat
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 10:35 pm
Reputation: 97

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by GlobalCat »

ChooChooCat wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 10:00 pm
GlobalCat wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 7:13 pm
AzCatFan2 wrote: Fri Feb 17, 2023 3:12 pm From Canzano, the BIG12 is talking with Boise St and Fresno St., plus Gonzaga for basketball only. But at best, only believe 50% of the rumors that are floating out there when it comes to conference talks (https://www.ksl.com/article/50582096/ca ... c-12-plots)
Hating on Canzano is fair game, but the information he reported makes perfect sense. Yomarck is a Corp Dev guy - he's going to take meetings with schools he has no interest in because it's a chance to learn more about what they are thinking, hearing, etc. You learn from your team, your advisors, and what others are saying in the market. Guys with his background feel negligent if they aren't engaged in folks looking to do deals as that's one of the best times to find out competitive intel.
Fresno State has a sport in the Big 12.
Lol, today I learned Yormack has covered everything from ROC to the rodeo.

(And yes, I know equestrian is different than rodeo)

https://big12sports.com/news/2019/5/2/211802356.aspx
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 41041
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1323
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by Merkin »

Do they do rifle, which is an NCAA sport?

PAC-12 does the same thing. Cal Poly SLO, CSU Bakersfield and UALR all wrestle in the PAC. Tough to field all those teams from member institutions due to Title IX.
User avatar
azgreg
Posts: 25752
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:01 pm
Reputation: 1333

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by azgreg »

The BIG-12 has meat judging.
User avatar
azgreg
Posts: 25752
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:01 pm
Reputation: 1333

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by azgreg »

User avatar
azgreg
Posts: 25752
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:01 pm
Reputation: 1333

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by azgreg »

Whoops

Image
User avatar
Macho Grande
Posts: 498
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 10:44 am
Reputation: 24

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by Macho Grande »

PHXCATS
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 7:29 pm
Reputation: -35

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by PHXCATS »

I am not doubting Scheer but that makes zero sense for an AD to say that in that setting
2018 Bear Down Wildcats Conference Championship Challenge Champion
User avatar
KillerKlown
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:55 pm
Reputation: 206
Location: South Tucson

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by KillerKlown »

Awesome! They can take our spot.
Mike Luke's burner account.
azcat49
Posts: 11052
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 4:33 pm
Reputation: 956
Location: Gilbert Az

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by azcat49 »

I thought it was interesting that both Utah and CU had their AD’s Traveling with them to ASSU and AZ. That couldn’t be a coincidence could it?
Last edited by azcat49 on Mon Feb 20, 2023 8:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Waiting at the Rose Bowl patiently for the cats to arrive
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 41041
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1323
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by Merkin »

Told "people"? What people? No one else is reporting that.

PAC presidents haven't even voted yet, and they need 8 out of 10 votes to get in.
ChooChooCat
Posts: 8569
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:47 pm
Reputation: 1059

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by ChooChooCat »

Pretty damning article from Pete Thamel, who works for ESPN, the network we're supposed to be primary partners with on this upcoming deal.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 41041
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1323
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by Merkin »

For those of us not willing to give ESPN any money, what is the executive summary? It's behind a paywall.
ChooChooCat
Posts: 8569
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:47 pm
Reputation: 1059

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by ChooChooCat »

Merkin wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 8:30 am For those of us not willing to give ESPN any money, what is the executive summary? It's behind a paywall.
Basically this along with the fact ESPN and Amazon could be working together on an expanded Big 12.
User avatar
Alieberman
Posts: 13375
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
Reputation: 2544
Location: I can't find my pants

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by Alieberman »

So to recap, according to sources.... its looking like AZ is either:

Staying in the Pac as is
Staying in the Pac adding teams like SDSU, SMU, UNLV
Moving to the Big 12
Merging the Pac with the Big 12
Merging the Pac with the ACC

I'm glad this is clear
User avatar
pc in NM
Posts: 4930
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:33 am
Reputation: 578
Location: Roswell, NM

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by pc in NM »

azgreg wrote: Sat Feb 18, 2023 6:01 pm
What this would mean for Arizona - Back to the Wac
“If you have the choice between humble and cocky, go with cocky. There's always time to be humble later, once you've been proven horrendously, irrevocably wrong.”

― Kinky Friedman
User avatar
SabinoDrifter
Posts: 380
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:52 am
Reputation: 78
Location: Tucson

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by SabinoDrifter »

How does this lineup not fire you up as an Arizona football fan on August 31, 2024!?

Noon - UCLA @ Michigan (FOX)
Noon - Oklahoma @ Georgia (ESPN)
3:30pm - Penn State @ Wisconsin (CBS)
4pm - TCU v. Clemson (ESPN)
7:30pm - Ohio State @ USC (NBC)
7:30pm - LSU @ Texas (ESPN)
11:00pm - SMU @ Arizona (Amazon)
ChooChooCat
Posts: 8569
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:47 pm
Reputation: 1059

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by ChooChooCat »

SabinoDrifter wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:19 am How does this lineup not fire you up as an Arizona football fan on August 31, 2024!?

Noon - UCLA @ Michigan (FOX)
Noon - Oklahoma @ Georgia (ESPN)
3:30pm - Penn State @ Wisconsin (CBS)
4pm - TCU v. Clemson (ESPN)
7:30pm - Ohio State @ USC (NBC)
7:30pm - LSU @ Texas (ESPN)
11:00pm - SMU @ Arizona (Amazon)
The ratings will be through the roof!!!!
azcat49
Posts: 11052
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 4:33 pm
Reputation: 956
Location: Gilbert Az

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by azcat49 »

Just don’t get all these rumors. First the Presidents meet in Tempe and GK gives them info which seems to point at needed expansion.

Then he goes to Dallas to meet with SMU after having met in December with SDST. Now reports are that these two schools can’t get enough votes to enter? Why have him go on the goose chase if they didn’t want them in the first place.

Next was reports GK offered an olive brand to BY to talk mergers with the BIG 12 but Furd and Cal want no part of it supposedly. Could this thing be more F’ed up?
Waiting at the Rose Bowl patiently for the cats to arrive
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
GlobalCat
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 10:35 pm
Reputation: 97

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by GlobalCat »

ChooChooCat wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:20 am
SabinoDrifter wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:19 am How does this lineup not fire you up as an Arizona football fan on August 31, 2024!?

Noon - UCLA @ Michigan (FOX)
Noon - Oklahoma @ Georgia (ESPN)
3:30pm - Penn State @ Wisconsin (CBS)
4pm - TCU v. Clemson (ESPN)
7:30pm - Ohio State @ USC (NBC)
7:30pm - LSU @ Texas (ESPN)
11:00pm - SMU @ Arizona (Amazon)
The ratings will be through the roof!!!!

For many of us not living in Arizona, streaming is the only option to watch games.
User avatar
EastCoastCat
Posts: 6327
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 11:25 am
Reputation: 1892

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by EastCoastCat »

I don't live in Arizona and I don't have to stream.

It may be your decision, but to say it's the "only option" is untrue.
User avatar
azgreg
Posts: 25752
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:01 pm
Reputation: 1333

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by azgreg »

GlobalCat wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:34 am For many of us not living in Arizona, streaming is the only option to watch games.
I think any deal that includes the Pac-12 Network remaining can be good for the network. Nothing says that it would operate the same way it's operating now. The Pac should think about reducing it down to maybe just two channels and do what they can to get them on streaming platforms.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 41041
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1323
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by Merkin »

That is correct, you can get the PAC-12 Network on Dish, but I prefer streaming over satellite. I just turn Sling TV on for football and basketball season, then turn it off. I stream everything outside of UA sports and the local news, since I hate commercials.
ChooChooCat
Posts: 8569
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:47 pm
Reputation: 1059

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by ChooChooCat »

GlobalCat wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:34 am
ChooChooCat wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:20 am
SabinoDrifter wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:19 am How does this lineup not fire you up as an Arizona football fan on August 31, 2024!?

Noon - UCLA @ Michigan (FOX)
Noon - Oklahoma @ Georgia (ESPN)
3:30pm - Penn State @ Wisconsin (CBS)
4pm - TCU v. Clemson (ESPN)
7:30pm - Ohio State @ USC (NBC)
7:30pm - LSU @ Texas (ESPN)
11:00pm - SMU @ Arizona (Amazon)
The ratings will be through the roof!!!!

For many of us not living in Arizona, streaming is the only option to watch games.
So for those of you not living in Arizona, you can't get ESPN/ESPN2/ESPNU/ABC/CBS/FOX/FS1 without streaming? Am I supposed to believe that, although I get all those networks without living in Arizona?

I get streaming Pac 12 Network, hell I stream our games illegally when on that network, but the majority of our games and our most consequential games on our current TV deal are on the networks I listed above.
User avatar
84Cat
Posts: 18730
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:17 pm
Reputation: 934
Location: Boise

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by 84Cat »

GlobalCat wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:34 am
ChooChooCat wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:20 am
SabinoDrifter wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:19 am How does this lineup not fire you up as an Arizona football fan on August 31, 2024!?

Noon - UCLA @ Michigan (FOX)
Noon - Oklahoma @ Georgia (ESPN)
3:30pm - Penn State @ Wisconsin (CBS)
4pm - TCU v. Clemson (ESPN)
7:30pm - Ohio State @ USC (NBC)
7:30pm - LSU @ Texas (ESPN)
11:00pm - SMU @ Arizona (Amazon)
The ratings will be through the roof!!!!

For many of us not living in Arizona, streaming is the only option to watch games.
How about ESPN +, would that work for you?
ChooChooCat
Posts: 8569
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:47 pm
Reputation: 1059

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by ChooChooCat »

azcat49 wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:28 am Just don’t get all these rumors. First the Presidents meet in Tempe and GK gives them info which seems to point at needed expansion.

Then he goes to Dallas to meet with SMU after having met in December with SDST. Now reports are that these two schools can’t get enough votes to enter? Why have him go on the goose chase if they didn’t want them in the first place.

Next was reports GK offered an olive brand to BY to talk mergers with the BIG 12 but Furd and Cal want no part of it supposedly. Could this thing be more F’ed up?
Don't take anything that MHver guy says at gospel or factual stuff. Only pay attention to the actual numerous media outside of Pac 12 country that's reporting the TV deal on the table for the Pac 12 is bad. Also what intrigues me is Mandel saying there's a possibility that ESPN/Amazon team up on the Big 12 expansion foot as opposed to going with the Pac 12.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 41041
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1323
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by Merkin »

PHXCATS
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 7:29 pm
Reputation: -35

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by PHXCATS »

Again not questioning or challenging Scheer but isn't it crazy no national people have mentioned the SDSU AD saying that?
2018 Bear Down Wildcats Conference Championship Challenge Champion
User avatar
azgreg
Posts: 25752
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:01 pm
Reputation: 1333

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by azgreg »

User avatar
84Cat
Posts: 18730
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:17 pm
Reputation: 934
Location: Boise

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by 84Cat »

User avatar
CardiacCats97
Posts: 1227
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2022 6:55 pm
Reputation: 349

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by CardiacCats97 »

So the behind-the-scenes PR blitz is now trying to make it seem like Apple is an actual player in negotiations to drive up the numbers?

Good luck with all that…
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 41041
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1323
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by Merkin »

Gotta laugh at Stanford and Cal going to the Mountain West. That is the least plausible scenario I have seen yet. They have a better chance to go to the Big 10.
AzCatFan2
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:45 pm
Reputation: 309

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by AzCatFan2 »

Stanford and CAL would rather go independent before they aligned themselves with Mountain West Schools. And while athletically, Stanford isn't worth as much as UW and Oregon, and CAL, a far distance back, academically, the Bay Areas have a lot of clout. If the B1G could get the two Bays and Oregon and UW at a discount, I think they take all four.

I've also heard that NBC isn't completely out either. Their contract with Notre Dame runs out in 2024, and no guarantee NBC re-ups for the cost. They could pay less for a PAC-12 game and get a lot more content. NBC might also be looking at games on USA, which already airs Premiere League Soccer games and some other sports.
User avatar
CardiacCats97
Posts: 1227
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2022 6:55 pm
Reputation: 349

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by CardiacCats97 »

I have no idea why NBC would re-sign Notre Dame.

Of course I said the same thing the last time negotiations came up.

In fact, I think I wondered as a child why they signed them in the first place.
PHXCATS
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 7:29 pm
Reputation: -35

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by PHXCATS »

CardiacCats97 wrote: Tue Feb 21, 2023 3:36 pm So the behind-the-scenes PR blitz is now trying to make it seem like Apple is an actual player in negotiations to drive up the numbers?

Good luck with all that…
No. Apple is legit in the running
2018 Bear Down Wildcats Conference Championship Challenge Champion
PHXCATS
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 7:29 pm
Reputation: -35

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by PHXCATS »

Merkin wrote: Tue Feb 21, 2023 3:52 pm Gotta laugh at Stanford and Cal going to the Mountain West. That is the least plausible scenario I have seen yet. They have a better chance to go to the Big 10.
At what? 25% share?

Cal and Stanford don't bring close to the revenue needed for a full share.
2018 Bear Down Wildcats Conference Championship Challenge Champion
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 41041
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1323
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Conference Realignment

Post by Merkin »

PHXCATS wrote: Tue Feb 21, 2023 5:06 pm At what? 25% share?

Cal and Stanford don't bring close to the revenue needed for a full share.
I didn't say they were going to the Big 10. Just that they had a better chance of going to the Big 10 than the MWC.

So even a 1% chance of getting in the B1G is still greater than a 0.0001% chance for the MWC.

Stanford has had a lock or near lock on the Director's Cup for the most championships in all sports for many years. Even the 2 years they didn't get it they came in 2nd.

Also the academics of both Bay Area schools are well renowned, and the Big 10 has the best academic rating of any major conference.
Post Reply