Page 3 of 5
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:00 pm
by ghostwhitehorse
First down, Zach Green.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:00 pm
by 3goggles
cordera89 wrote:3goggles wrote:cordera89 wrote:Fishclamps wrote:Merkin wrote:Giving up 24 points in the 1Q?
CFB needs a mercy rule like softball has.
There is a mercy rule as long as the 2 coaches agree to it.
You really think RR will go that low to give up.
We're not far away from it buddy
That sound like a lack of faith.
Are you watching the same fucking game as the rest of us or are you watching the reply from 2014?
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:01 pm
by UAdevil
Pathetic all the way around
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:01 pm
by ghostwhitehorse
Fumble. . .
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:02 pm
by dmjcat
azcat49 wrote:We are so poorly coached and prepared that it is flat out embarrassing
Respectfully disagree (other than special teams).
This is a simple matter of really bad recruiting.......we have 2 walk on DL's and 2 walk on OL's playing today. Add to that a
group of smurf WR's with average speed and the slowest secondary in the PAC12 and its a really, really toxic mix which has led to the dumpster fire we are suffering through today.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:02 pm
by dirtbags
no effing way.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:02 pm
by 3goggles
How about the woman's volleyball team sweeping the la schools
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:03 pm
by dmjcat
Oh Yeahhhhhhhhhhhhh this 3 man Defensive front is really working well today.............for WSU
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:03 pm
by 3goggles
Bring a fucking a blitz we are already losing by 24 fuck it
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:04 pm
by ghostwhitehorse
3goggles wrote:How about the woman's volleyball team sweeping the la schools
I'll dirty old man for some men's beach vollyeball. . .
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:04 pm
by 3goggles
cordea faith?????
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:04 pm
by Chicat
I had no interest in even knowing what time this game started. Assumed it was a night game. Just accidentally flipped to PAC-12 Network to see we are being completely housed. Laughed, shook my head, and flipped to a better game.
Greg Byrne, you've got a problem.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:04 pm
by Merkin
The point of the 3 man rush is what? Didn't that cost Casteel his job, besides not having to recruit.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:05 pm
by cordera89
3goggles I'm watching the same game as you, seeing our team getting their ass kick.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:05 pm
by 3goggles
Faith????
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:06 pm
by dmjcat
Merkin wrote:The point of the 3 man rush is what? Didn't that cost Casteel his job, besides not having to recruit.
And its now 31 points and RRod is STILL stubbornly stuck in it.
The 2 hallmarks of RRods career at the UA: Bad recruiting and stubborness
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:06 pm
by dirtbags
this is totally a practice scrimmage for wazzu
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:06 pm
by 3goggles
Merkin wrote:The point of the 3 man rush is what? Didn't that cost Casteel his job, besides not having to recruit.
To not get pressure on the QB and give up touchdowns duh!!!!!!
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:08 pm
by ghostwhitehorse
On a good news front, Navy beat the Domers.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:08 pm
by 3goggles
I haven't felt this down on a football team since the mackovic days can we bring back stoops?
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:08 pm
by OSUCat
Heck, the players have given up. Not getting to the line before the snap. Just going through the motion.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:08 pm
by cordera89
3goggles wrote:Merkin wrote:The point of the 3 man rush is what? Didn't that cost Casteel his job, besides not having to recruit.
To not get pressure on the QB and give up touchdowns duh!!!!!!
Does Yates knows how to run and put in the best personal on the field or is RR holding him Handicapp.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:09 pm
by ghostwhitehorse
3goggles wrote:I haven't felt this down on a football team since the mackovic days can we bring back stoops?
If you are gonna be nostalgic. . .do it right. TOMEY!!!!!!
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:10 pm
by ghostwhitehorse
Dawk back in. Hrmmm. . .
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:10 pm
by 3goggles
cordera89 wrote:3goggles wrote:Merkin wrote:The point of the 3 man rush is what? Didn't that cost Casteel his job, besides not having to recruit.
To not get pressure on the QB and give up touchdowns duh!!!!!!
Does Yates knows how to run and put in the best personal on the field or is RR holding him Handicapp.
This is the best personal cordera your looking at the best we have!!!
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:10 pm
by dmjcat
Chicat wrote:I had no interest in even knowing what time this game started. Assumed it was a night game. Just accidentally flipped to PAC-12 Network to see we are being completely housed. Laughed, shook my head, and flipped to a better game.
Greg Byrne, you've got a problem.
Can we put Byrne in the "Way Back" machine and have him hire Leach instead of RRod?
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:11 pm
by 3goggles
Offense looked better with Solomon
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:11 pm
by cordera89
3goggles wrote:cordera89 wrote:3goggles wrote:Merkin wrote:The point of the 3 man rush is what? Didn't that cost Casteel his job, besides not having to recruit.
To not get pressure on the QB and give up touchdowns duh!!!!!!
Does Yates knows how to run and put in the best personal on the field or is RR holding him Handicapp.
This is the best personal cordera your looking at the best we have!!!
I still trying to figure why were still running the 335. Isnt yates suppose to run 425?
I know we have better players on that roster that can play better than the 11 we have on the field.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:12 pm
by 3goggles
ghostwhitehorse wrote:3goggles wrote:I haven't felt this down on a football team since the mackovic days can we bring back stoops?
If you are gonna be nostalgic. . .do it right. TOMEY!!!!!!
Mackovic is the worst coach ever not even debatable
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:12 pm
by 3goggles
cordera89 wrote:3goggles wrote:cordera89 wrote:3goggles wrote:Merkin wrote:The point of the 3 man rush is what? Didn't that cost Casteel his job, besides not having to recruit.
To not get pressure on the QB and give up touchdowns duh!!!!!!
Does Yates knows how to run and put in the best personal on the field or is RR holding him Handicapp.
This is the best personal cordera your looking at the best we have!!!
I still trying to figure why were still running the 335. Isnt yates suppose to run 425?
I know we have better players on that roster that can play better than the 11 we have on the field.
And who's that?
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:13 pm
by ghostwhitehorse
Trey!
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:14 pm
by cordera89
Are you trying to be funny 3goggles
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:14 pm
by TheGreatCatsby
Were Rod's good first 3 years here because he was using the bulk of Stoops players'? Of course Stoops should have been gone far sooner than he was fired, but this is just crazy how bad we are.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:14 pm
by dirtbags
mackovic would tell this team they are a disgrace to their families
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:14 pm
by 3goggles
cordera89 wrote:3goggles wrote:cordera89 wrote:3goggles wrote:Merkin wrote:The point of the 3 man rush is what? Didn't that cost Casteel his job, besides not having to recruit.
To not get pressure on the QB and give up touchdowns duh!!!!!!
Does Yates knows how to run and put in the best personal on the field or is RR holding him Handicapp.
This is the best personal cordera your looking at the best we have!!!
I still trying to figure why were still running the 335. Isnt yates suppose to run 425?
I know we have better players on that roster that can play better than the 11 we have on the field.
Because Rich Rod isn't letting Yates have full control of the defense when clearly RR should only be worrying about the shit show of an offense that we have!
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:14 pm
by Merkin
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:15 pm
by TyrantCat
I think RichRod has lost his wizarding powers. And Greg Byrne is getting tarnished.
Maybe in a few years we will look back on this season and laugh.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:15 pm
by 3goggles
cordera89 wrote:Are you trying to be funny 3goggles
It was an honest question who is better on the defense who isn't playing?
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:16 pm
by 3goggles
That's a fucking catch
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:16 pm
by gman4gov
And least Leech can officially say that we didn't steal his signs!
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:17 pm
by 3goggles
Go for it from now on
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:17 pm
by 3goggles
gman4gov wrote:And least Leech can officially say that we didn't steal his signs!
They could tell us the play before and we still can't stop them
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:17 pm
by Merkin
Cripes go for it.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:18 pm
by ghostwhitehorse
ldfkjh
;dskh
ierh
[ierh
[qker[
e [
ie[
q5yi
q4ek5y
[qi45[
4iy [
iq5
[ i
[iq [
ie5[
iy [
qi [q
i
[q
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:18 pm
by 3goggles
And hey they have better field position after the punt then if they would've failed the 4th down attempt
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:19 pm
by ghostwhitehorse
I could kick better as a kid.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:19 pm
by 3goggles
3goggles wrote:cordera89 wrote:Are you trying to be funny 3goggles
It was an honest question who is better on the defense who isn't playing?
And hey cordera I am still waiting for your list of players?
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:19 pm
by michcat
Can we pull someone out of the stands to punt for us? Can't do any worse.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:20 pm
by Merkin
michcat wrote:Can we pull someone out of the stands to punt for us? Can't do any worse.
The UA women's soccer goalie.
Re: Game 9, at Washington St (2016)
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 2:21 pm
by TyrantCat
Hey Merkin, curious about this painting project of yours. You think it might prohibit you from watching the second half?