Game 9, at Washington (2015)

SCCats · Post by **SCCats** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:02 pm

Newportcat wrote:Their offense is not good

Our defense is so f@cking bad though

You can see their offense and know they aren't any good...

...yet there the points go!!!

Coop Cat · Post by **Coop Cat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:02 pm

Enough of the QB carousel. Pick one and stick with it. Fear is how much is this nonsense gonna hurt Anu moving forward?

cordera89 · Post by **cordera89** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:02 pm

Newportcat wrote:Their offense is not good

Our defense is so f@cking bad though

That why our Defense is making them look good because of all this miss alignment within 3-3-5.

Gladiator Cat · Post by **Gladiator Cat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:02 pm

michcat wrote:AZ can make any offense look great.

Whats surprising is that people are still surprised.

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:02 pm

Fishclamps wrote:
BearDown89 wrote:Offense better get something fucking going.
Would help if the receivers didn't have the dropsies and we could get a running game going.

And the QBs don't throw into coverage.

Keep the passes at 8-10 yards.

michcat · Post by **michcat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:02 pm

When the last time AZ had a takeaway?? UTSA game?

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:02 pm

There's the arizona defense we all know and love. With their defense this game is over.

Coop Cat · Post by **Coop Cat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:03 pm

wyo-cat wrote:
Newportcat wrote:We need to put Randall in

Both of those runs ANU should have kept it but he never does

The Rich rod offense has to have a QB who is a threat to run
Correct, he made a couple of bad reads. Randall will shred them.

Really?

SCCats · Post by **SCCats** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:04 pm

Merkin wrote:
Fishclamps wrote:
BearDown89 wrote:Offense better get something fucking going.
Would help if the receivers didn't have the dropsies and we could get a running game going.
And the QBs don't throw into coverage.

Keep the passes at 8-10 yards.

Short rhythm passing

I think they showed a stat last week where when Soloman passed the ball in under 2.6 seconds (so hit the rhythm WR) he had a 70% completion rate.

When he held the ball for over 2.6 seconds his completion rate dropped to like 26%.

That's a hell of a thing

carolinacat · Post by **carolinacat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:04 pm

I've never seen a defense so "unphysical." We must lead the nation in yards allowed after initial contact (i.e. missed tackles).

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:04 pm

michcat wrote:When the last time AZ had a takeaway?? UTSA game?

Seems like it. Think we've only caused 2 tos in our last 6 games....against Colorado and Oregon state... Which will be the only games we win in that 6 game period.

Fishclamps · Post by **Fishclamps** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:05 pm

Coop Cat wrote:
wyo-cat wrote:
Newportcat wrote:We need to put Randall in

Both of those runs ANU should have kept it but he never does

The Rich rod offense has to have a QB who is a threat to run
Correct, he made a couple of bad reads. Randall will shred them.

Really?

Randall is a nice change of pace back, but he's NEVER gonna be our starting QB, I dunno why people expect him to play like one.

You can't make a comparison to the year Denker started because he had Arizona's best RB of all time backing him up.

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:05 pm

Let's keep running up the middle for 1 and 2 yards.

AZCatGirl · Post by **AZCatGirl** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:06 pm

What a terrible possession.

dmjcat · Post by **dmjcat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:06 pm

UW has a physical front 7 and CB's/Safeties with real speed (unlike ours). Our WR's
can't get any separation.

On D the UW WR's are getting wide open. That wheel route is exposing Magliores lack of speed.

Fishclamps · Post by **Fishclamps** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:06 pm

Merkin wrote:Let's keep running up the middle for 1 and 2 yards.

That's the most frustrating part. Our offense is keyed around a running back like Carey, Wilson, or Bradford.

We need to be using a thunder back, not a lightning one.

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:07 pm

ASUHATER! wrote:
CalStateTempe wrote:Is it basketball season yet?

When is the first exhibition game?
Week from tomorrow against Chico state

Thanks God/Allah/Yahweh/Gaia

Gladiator Cat · Post by **Gladiator Cat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:07 pm

Your looking at a team that has lost it's confidence. No amount of coach speak or BS will bring it back.

dmjcat · Post by **dmjcat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:07 pm

carolinacat wrote:I've never seen a defense so "unphysical." We must lead the nation in yards allowed after initial contact (i.e. missed tackles).

Tough to be physical when you are lining up 6 small guys up front. The 3-3-5 is designed to stop
spread offenses.........the only problem is that UW isn't running a spread (but don't tell Casteel that).

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:09 pm

Again, at this point all I want is a W vs. Asu and a bowl game. Anything more than 6-6 with an asu win is extra.

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:09 pm

cordera is this sunshine pumper of sunshine pumpers

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:09 pm

Our team sucks.

cordera89 · Post by **cordera89** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:09 pm

Fishclamps wrote:
Coop Cat wrote:
wyo-cat wrote:
Newportcat wrote:We need to put Randall in

Both of those runs ANU should have kept it but he never does

The Rich rod offense has to have a QB who is a threat to run
Correct, he made a couple of bad reads. Randall will shred them.

Really?
Randall is a nice change of pace back, but he's NEVER gonna be our starting QB, I dunno why people expect him to play like one.

You can't make a comparison to the year Denker started because he had Arizona's best RB of all time backing him up.

Plus Denker didn't had Austin Hill to throw too.

Siempre Verde · Post by **Siempre Verde** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:09 pm

Anu needs to run like a boss. Period. If he's unwilling to do so, this team is screwed. If he's unable to do so, our coaching staff is idiotic. Period. Adjust!

Coop Cat · Post by **Coop Cat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:10 pm

Fishclamps wrote:
Coop Cat wrote:
wyo-cat wrote:
Newportcat wrote:We need to put Randall in

Both of those runs ANU should have kept it but he never does

The Rich rod offense has to have a QB who is a threat to run
Correct, he made a couple of bad reads. Randall will shred them.

Really?
Randall is a nice change of pace back, but he's NEVER gonna be our starting QB, I dunno why people expect him to play like one.

You can't make a comparison to the year Denker started because he had Arizona's best RB of all time backing him up.

Never mentioned Denker but you also need to have a QB that is a threat to throw the ball. Randall is definitely not that for sure.

Fishclamps · Post by **Fishclamps** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:10 pm

Siempre Verde wrote:Anu needs to run like a boss. Period. If he's unwilling to do so, this team is screwed. If he's unable to do so, our coaching staff is idiotic. Period. Adjust!

They can adjust. The offense was designed around Anu and Nick. Nick is out. The closest back comparison wise to Nick is Orlando. PUT HIS ASS IN.

SCCats · Post by **SCCats** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:12 pm

It looks like he's struggling with possession so I dont know how you can have conclusive proof.

Which means conclusive proof will certainly be found.

Fishclamps · Post by **Fishclamps** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:12 pm

Coop Cat wrote:
Fishclamps wrote:
Coop Cat wrote:
wyo-cat wrote:
Newportcat wrote:We need to put Randall in

Both of those runs ANU should have kept it but he never does

The Rich rod offense has to have a QB who is a threat to run
Correct, he made a couple of bad reads. Randall will shred them.

Really?
Randall is a nice change of pace back, but he's NEVER gonna be our starting QB, I dunno why people expect him to play like one.

You can't make a comparison to the year Denker started because he had Arizona's best RB of all time backing him up.
Never mentioned Denker but you also need to have a QB that is a threat to throw the ball. Randall is definitely not that for sure.

No but people have made comparison of Randall to Denker with their run first mentality. Denker actually also had a really nice short-intermediate throw on the run whenever they ran a bootleg.

AZCatGirl · Post by **AZCatGirl** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:12 pm

Hurry it up already.

SCCats · Post by **SCCats** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:14 pm

USC, Utah, Sun Devils

I'm sure that will go good

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:14 pm

Denker makes better reads than Randall, and perhaps even Solomon.

wyo-cat · Post by **wyo-cat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:14 pm

Big surprise.

SCCats · Post by **SCCats** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:14 pm

SCCats wrote:It looks like he's struggling with possession so I dont know how you can have conclusive proof.

Which means conclusive proof will certainly be found.

Of course.

michcat · Post by **michcat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:15 pm

Lol. PAC 12 refs.

carolinacat · Post by **carolinacat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:15 pm

If we are going to run the read option, then the QB needs to read the play and make the defense pay.

I wonder if during our play calling RR or the QB bothers to take notice of where the ball is placed between the hashes. Running the read option to the short side of the field with a receiver in the slot isn't creating a lot of space. I don't get it.

Fishclamps · Post by **Fishclamps** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:15 pm

Merkin wrote:Denker makes better reads than Randall, and perhaps even Solomon.

I wouldn't say he made better receiver reads than Solomon, but he fuckin ran that zone read like no ones business.

dmjcat · Post by **dmjcat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:16 pm

Get the FVCK out of the 3-3-5 Casteel you FVcking idiot. Washington is running a power offense, NOT a spread.

UALoco · Post by **UALoco** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:16 pm

we suck..it would help if our receivers would catch balls that hit them in the hands, if our QB would run the ball, if our LB could stop a run, if our DB's could cover receivers...we suck

cordera89 · Post by **cordera89** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:17 pm

Defense is lucky he drop the ball.

wyo-cat · Post by **wyo-cat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:17 pm

Lotsa drops by both teams...

Fishclamps · Post by **Fishclamps** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:17 pm

Thank god their receivers decided to stop catching passes.

SCCats · Post by **SCCats** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:17 pm

UALoco wrote:we suck..it would help if our receivers would catch balls that hit them in the hands, if our QB would run the ball, if our LB could stop a run, if our DB's could cover receivers...we suck

We have many issues.

I have complete confidence we can work out the offensive issues.

I have zero confidence we can work out the defensive issues.

AZCatGirl · Post by **AZCatGirl** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:17 pm

Nice to see other teams drop catchable passes.

UALoco · Post by **UALoco** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:18 pm

thank god for dropped passes

wyo-cat · Post by **wyo-cat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:18 pm

Randall will probably see the field, and maybe try running for a change.

UALoco · Post by **UALoco** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:18 pm

ok...96 yard drive..lets go

dmjcat · Post by **dmjcat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:20 pm

cordera89 wrote:Defense is lucky he drop the ball.

Lucky indeed.......and we still can't stop the over the middle pass. Its not like we didn't
get plenty of practice against WSU

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:20 pm

wyo-cat · Post by **wyo-cat** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:21 pm

Welp, at least we gained a few yards

SCCats · Post by **SCCats** » Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:21 pm

2.6 seconds

Login • Register