Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
USC is not a very good team. Were just a horribad team in general. Unsure if its the coaches or just the players. Need to possibly look at revamping the whole program.
- ghostwhitehorse
- Posts: 15937
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:29 pm
- Reputation: 172
- Location: Jupiter Trojan: 3317 Paris
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Hey. . . a goodish punt.
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
RichRod will yell at halftime. And it will make all the difference. Right?PieceOfMeat wrote:do we keep usc under 50 points for the game?
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
I would take the overPieceOfMeat wrote:do we keep usc under 50 points for the game?
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Jesus that coach on the USC sideline needs to simmer down!
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
It 27-7 right now. if we would of, 27-10. We just need to put point on the board.3goggles wrote:Exactly and a fucking field goal is going to make that any better???cordera89 wrote:What the point? uh put some point on the board and fight another day. And right now were about to get blasted.3goggles wrote:What's the point? Go for the touchdown just a bad play call and Tate stumbled while rolling out of the pocketcordera89 wrote:why not take the three points
- CalStateTempe
- Posts: 16649
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:46 pm
- Reputation: 582
- Location: The Right to Self-Determination: FREEDOM!!!!
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Well this is going about as well as I thought it would.
So glad I'm out enjoying my day and not watching the flaming turd of a game.
So glad I'm out enjoying my day and not watching the flaming turd of a game.
- scumdevils86
- Posts: 11663
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:34 pm
- Reputation: 232
- Location: t-town
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
That's appears unlikelyPieceOfMeat wrote:do we keep usc under 50 points for the game?
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Honestly, maybe SC dodged a bullet and RR game back to fuck Arizona.
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
As would I, sadly.SCCats wrote:I would take the overPieceOfMeat wrote:do we keep usc under 50 points for the game?
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
LOLSCCats wrote:62 owes us points
I will be watching to see when he makes it happen
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
We don't have our playmaker on the field against nor that fact were no heathy team. So said that USC isn't good football team in which your trying to say We should be beating their USC @@@ right now. RIght. Dude it cant be help that were that so many of our good player are hurt.gman4gov wrote:USC is not a very good team. Were just a horribad team in general. Unsure if its the coaches or just the players. Need to possibly look at revamping the whole program.
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Sounds nice. Maybe we all should go out and enjoy our lives.CalStateTempe wrote:Well this is going about as well as I thought it would.
So glad I'm out enjoying my day and not watching the flaming turd of a game.
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Support the team regardless of them getting their collective butt kick.TyrantCat wrote:Sounds nice. Maybe we all should go out and enjoy our lives.CalStateTempe wrote:Well this is going about as well as I thought it would.
So glad I'm out enjoying my day and not watching the flaming turd of a game.
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
I'll bite on this one, what good players are hurt?cordera89 wrote:We don't have our playmaker on the field against nor that fact were no heathy team. So said that USC isn't good football team in which your trying to say We should be beating their USC @@@ right now. RIght. Dude it cant be help that were that so many of our good player are hurt.gman4gov wrote:USC is not a very good team. Were just a horribad team in general. Unsure if its the coaches or just the players. Need to possibly look at revamping the whole program.
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
We knew the defense was going to have problems. Not too much surprise there.gman4gov wrote:USC is not a very good team. Were just a horribad team in general. Unsure if its the coaches or just the players. Need to possibly look at revamping the whole program.
The collapse of the offense in year five is the head scratcher and potentially very troubling. Sure injuries have played an important part, but we were able to score points and win 8 games with BJ Denker as our QB, so how can things suddenly be SO much worse than those times?
Again injuries explain some of it, but not all of it. (Imo)
- ghostwhitehorse
- Posts: 15937
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:29 pm
- Reputation: 172
- Location: Jupiter Trojan: 3317 Paris
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Bruno out. . . *sigh*
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Defense just gave up on this game
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
no tackling. ever.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
May have to support the team while I enjoy some sunshine. Because, you know, this one is kinda out of hand now.cordera89 wrote:Support the team regardless of them getting their collective butt kick.TyrantCat wrote:Sounds nice. Maybe we all should go out and enjoy our lives.CalStateTempe wrote:Well this is going about as well as I thought it would.
So glad I'm out enjoying my day and not watching the flaming turd of a game.
- ghostwhitehorse
- Posts: 15937
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:29 pm
- Reputation: 172
- Location: Jupiter Trojan: 3317 Paris
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
h''ldaf jg;qejr
py
qep
y jqe;l
peqjy qep
yj pe
yj
qjy qp
uyp
3quy p
q3y
p uyp
p
yu ;
q ;
wej p
wey p
w y
py
qep
y jqe;l
peqjy qep
yj pe
yj
qjy qp
uyp
3quy p
q3y
p uyp
p
yu ;
q ;
wej p
wey p
w y
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Well, that TD summed up the rather shytyness of this Arizona team.
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
You said you want to bite on this comment so figure it out what were missing so far this season.uacat540 wrote:I'll bite on this one, what good players are hurt?cordera89 wrote:We don't have our playmaker on the field against nor that fact were no heathy team. So said that USC isn't good football team in which your trying to say We should be beating their USC @@@ right now. RIght. Dude it cant be help that were that so many of our good player are hurt.gman4gov wrote:USC is not a very good team. Were just a horribad team in general. Unsure if its the coaches or just the players. Need to possibly look at revamping the whole program.
- WildcatStunner
- Posts: 3484
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 1:07 am
- Reputation: 137
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Awesome year 5
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
usually they tire out in the 2nd, but they've tired out in the 1st half today.3goggles wrote:Defense just gave up on this game
the D is years away from being good.
lack of recruiting will do that to you.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
what he said...ghostwhitehorse wrote:h''ldaf jg;qejr
py
qep
y jqe;l
peqjy qep
yj pe
yj
qjy qp
uyp
3quy p
q3y
p uyp
p
yu ;
q ;
wej p
wey p
w y
- ghostwhitehorse
- Posts: 15937
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:29 pm
- Reputation: 172
- Location: Jupiter Trojan: 3317 Paris
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Heh. . .dirtbags wrote:what he said...ghostwhitehorse wrote:h''ldaf jg;qejr
py
qep
y jqe;l
peqjy qep
yj pe
yj
qjy qp
uyp
3quy p
q3y
p uyp
p
yu ;
q ;
wej p
wey p
w y
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
so your answer to the question is to tell the other person to figure it out?cordera89 wrote:You said you want to bite on this comment so figure it out what were missing so far this season.uacat540 wrote:I'll bite on this one, what good players are hurt?cordera89 wrote:We don't have our playmaker on the field against nor that fact were no heathy team. So said that USC isn't good football team in which your trying to say We should be beating their USC @@@ right now. RIght. Dude it cant be help that were that so many of our good player are hurt.gman4gov wrote:USC is not a very good team. Were just a horribad team in general. Unsure if its the coaches or just the players. Need to possibly look at revamping the whole program.
keep your incoherent bullshit out of the game thread please.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
We the best running back in the country that year was running 150 yards a game. We are on our 3rd QB and like our 4 and 5 th running back and injured linemanSCCats wrote:We knew the defense was going to have problems. Not too much surprise there.gman4gov wrote:USC is not a very good team. Were just a horribad team in general. Unsure if its the coaches or just the players. Need to possibly look at revamping the whole program.
The collapse of the offense in year five is the head scratcher and potentially very troubling. Sure injuries have played an important part, but we were able to score points and win 8 games with BJ Denker as our QB, so how can things suddenly be SO much worse than those times?
Again injuries explain some of it, but not all of it. (Imo)
- ghostwhitehorse
- Posts: 15937
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:29 pm
- Reputation: 172
- Location: Jupiter Trojan: 3317 Paris
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
And now to be completely awful. . . In a parallel universe RR has a Final Four under his belt. At least.
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
According to RichRod, we lose big, lose small, win small, win big. So must cycle around to lose big again?WildcatStunner wrote:Awesome year 5
- KillerKlown
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:55 pm
- Reputation: 206
- Location: South Tucson
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Recruting with coaching sprinkled in. 8-5, 8-5, 10-3 with stoops recruits. 7-6, 2-5(and counting) with his own.
I remember year 1, 2 and 3 our final win totals were predicted to be 4, 6, and 8.
I remember year 1, 2 and 3 our final win totals were predicted to be 4, 6, and 8.
Mike Luke's burner account.
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
On track for our worst home loss in 12 years
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Keep in mind this was a SC team that wasn't in the same league with Alabama earlier this season.
Arizona is that far behind the rest of Division I college football. If I was a parent, I'd leave at half. This team doesn't even have the anything to stay close and look good for the families.
Arizona is that far behind the rest of Division I college football. If I was a parent, I'd leave at half. This team doesn't even have the anything to stay close and look good for the families.
- Main Event
- Posts: 2756
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:29 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Rich is somehow gonna squeeze another extension outta this
- scumdevils86
- Posts: 11663
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:34 pm
- Reputation: 232
- Location: t-town
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Yep we haven't lost by more than 4 scores at home since Oregon St in 2004.
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Dave Wannstedt just got laughed at for "trying to give Rich Rodriguez and Arizona some love."
Byrne was rooked on Rich Rodriguez. Sorry, no two ways about it.
Byrne was rooked on Rich Rodriguez. Sorry, no two ways about it.
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
They may drop 70 on them today.
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
well then you'd be a pretty shitty parent.catgrad97 wrote:Keep in mind this was a SC team that wasn't in the same league with Alabama earlier this season.
Arizona is that far behind the rest of Division I college football. If I was a parent, I'd leave at half. This team doesn't even have the anything to stay close and look good for the families.
speaking as a parent, you stay there till the end for your kids, no matter how bad whatever it is you're attending is.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
- ghostwhitehorse
- Posts: 15937
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:29 pm
- Reputation: 172
- Location: Jupiter Trojan: 3317 Paris
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Adia Barnes cut off his potential basketball coach carrier so . . .Main Event wrote:Rich is somehow gonna squeeze another extension outta this
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
i think he's referring to the parents in attendance for fam wknd
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
yeah, i know, and speaking as a parent you're a pretty shitty parent if you leave your kids football game at the half cause the team sucks.dirtbags wrote:i think he's referring to the parents in attendance for fam wknd
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Those are the trend lines that are difficult to explain and should give one pauseKillerKlown wrote:Recruting with coaching sprinkled in. 8-5, 8-5, 10-3 with stoops recruits. 7-6, 2-5(and counting) with his own.
I remember year 1, 2 and 3 our final win totals were predicted to be 4, 6, and 8.
By year: Significantly overachieve, overachieve, overachieve, underachieve, significantly underachieve
That is...one hell of a thing.
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
And if my kid is in the stands texting where the party at out of sheer boredom at this team's shytyness?PieceOfMeat wrote:well then you'd be a pretty shitty parent.catgrad97 wrote:Keep in mind this was a SC team that wasn't in the same league with Alabama earlier this season.
Arizona is that far behind the rest of Division I college football. If I was a parent, I'd leave at half. This team doesn't even have the anything to stay close and look good for the families.
speaking as a parent, you stay there till the end for your kids, no matter how bad whatever it is you're attending is.
I'd be a better parent to spend the waste of a second half talking with my kid, frankly. I would never measure my child's college choice by this awful football program. Thank God.
Last edited by catgrad97 on Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- scumdevils86
- Posts: 11663
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:34 pm
- Reputation: 232
- Location: t-town
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
He's not talking about the parents of players...PieceOfMeat wrote:yeah, i know, and speaking as a parent you're a pretty shitty parent if you leave your kids football game at the half cause the team sucks.dirtbags wrote:i think he's referring to the parents in attendance for fam wknd
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
This is why I expect Byrne to take cratering very seriously. Won't want to be embarrassed. He has his own rep to protect.catgrad97 wrote:Dave Wannstedt just got laughed at for "trying to give Rich Rodriguez and Arizona some love."
Byrne was rooked on Rich Rodriguez. Sorry, no two ways about it.
- Chicat
- Posts: 46645
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3983
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
Haha we suck.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
RR isn't going anywhere after this year, even if we go winless the rest of the yearTyrantCat wrote:This is why I expect Byrne to take cratering very seriously. Won't want to be embarrassed. He has his own rep to protect.catgrad97 wrote:Dave Wannstedt just got laughed at for "trying to give Rich Rodriguez and Arizona some love."
Byrne was rooked on Rich Rodriguez. Sorry, no two ways about it.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
True, but he has to balance that with the AD taking its first loss ever because of the buyout he'd have to pay if this team goes in the tank.TyrantCat wrote:This is why I expect Byrne to take cratering very seriously. Won't want to be embarrassed. He has his own rep to protect.catgrad97 wrote:Dave Wannstedt just got laughed at for "trying to give Rich Rodriguez and Arizona some love."
Byrne was rooked on Rich Rodriguez. Sorry, no two ways about it.
I fully expect Byrne to give RR one more year, no matter what.
But this program is back to where it was after the two straight Alamo Bowl losses under Stoops. Two generations away, at least, from being contenders again.
- Merkin
- Posts: 43406
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
- Reputation: 1584
- Location: UA basketball smells like....victory
Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)
I don't think I ever left a game at half during my time as a student.
Today I might have made an exception.
When the team quits, maybe it's time the fans do to.
Today I might have made an exception.
When the team quits, maybe it's time the fans do to.