Game 7, vs USC (2016)

In Game Discussions

Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns

gman4gov
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 11:11 am
Reputation: 0

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by gman4gov »

USC is not a very good team. Were just a horribad team in general. Unsure if its the coaches or just the players. Need to possibly look at revamping the whole program.
User avatar
ghostwhitehorse
Posts: 15937
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:29 pm
Reputation: 172
Location: Jupiter Trojan: 3317 Paris

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by ghostwhitehorse »

Hey. . . a goodish punt.
User avatar
TyrantCat
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 6:22 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by TyrantCat »

PieceOfMeat wrote:do we keep usc under 50 points for the game?
RichRod will yell at halftime. And it will make all the difference. Right?
SCCats
Posts: 9073
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:35 am
Reputation: 226

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by SCCats »

PieceOfMeat wrote:do we keep usc under 50 points for the game?
I would take the over
User avatar
3goggles
Posts: 2183
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:54 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by 3goggles »

Jesus that coach on the USC sideline needs to simmer down!
cordera89
Posts: 1802
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:30 am
Reputation: 1

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by cordera89 »

3goggles wrote:
cordera89 wrote:
3goggles wrote:
cordera89 wrote:why not take the three points
What's the point? Go for the touchdown just a bad play call and Tate stumbled while rolling out of the pocket
What the point? uh put some point on the board and fight another day. And right now were about to get blasted.
Exactly and a fucking field goal is going to make that any better???
It 27-7 right now. if we would of, 27-10. We just need to put point on the board.
User avatar
CalStateTempe
Posts: 16649
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:46 pm
Reputation: 582
Location: The Right to Self-Determination: FREEDOM!!!!

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by CalStateTempe »

Well this is going about as well as I thought it would.

So glad I'm out enjoying my day and not watching the flaming turd of a game.
User avatar
scumdevils86
Posts: 11663
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:34 pm
Reputation: 232
Location: t-town

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by scumdevils86 »

PieceOfMeat wrote:do we keep usc under 50 points for the game?
That's appears unlikely
uacat540
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:10 am
Reputation: 0

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by uacat540 »

Honestly, maybe SC dodged a bullet and RR game back to fuck Arizona.
User avatar
PieceOfMeat
Posts: 14080
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
Reputation: 337

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by PieceOfMeat »

SCCats wrote:
PieceOfMeat wrote:do we keep usc under 50 points for the game?
I would take the over
As would I, sadly.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:

Image
User avatar
3goggles
Posts: 2183
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:54 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by 3goggles »

SCCats wrote:62 owes us points

I will be watching to see when he makes it happen
LOL
cordera89
Posts: 1802
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:30 am
Reputation: 1

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by cordera89 »

gman4gov wrote:USC is not a very good team. Were just a horribad team in general. Unsure if its the coaches or just the players. Need to possibly look at revamping the whole program.
We don't have our playmaker on the field against nor that fact were no heathy team. So said that USC isn't good football team in which your trying to say We should be beating their USC @@@ right now. RIght. Dude it cant be help that were that so many of our good player are hurt.
User avatar
TyrantCat
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 6:22 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by TyrantCat »

CalStateTempe wrote:Well this is going about as well as I thought it would.

So glad I'm out enjoying my day and not watching the flaming turd of a game.
Sounds nice. Maybe we all should go out and enjoy our lives.
cordera89
Posts: 1802
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:30 am
Reputation: 1

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by cordera89 »

TyrantCat wrote:
CalStateTempe wrote:Well this is going about as well as I thought it would.

So glad I'm out enjoying my day and not watching the flaming turd of a game.
Sounds nice. Maybe we all should go out and enjoy our lives.
Support the team regardless of them getting their collective butt kick.
uacat540
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:10 am
Reputation: 0

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by uacat540 »

cordera89 wrote:
gman4gov wrote:USC is not a very good team. Were just a horribad team in general. Unsure if its the coaches or just the players. Need to possibly look at revamping the whole program.
We don't have our playmaker on the field against nor that fact were no heathy team. So said that USC isn't good football team in which your trying to say We should be beating their USC @@@ right now. RIght. Dude it cant be help that were that so many of our good player are hurt.
I'll bite on this one, what good players are hurt?
SCCats
Posts: 9073
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:35 am
Reputation: 226

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by SCCats »

gman4gov wrote:USC is not a very good team. Were just a horribad team in general. Unsure if its the coaches or just the players. Need to possibly look at revamping the whole program.
We knew the defense was going to have problems. Not too much surprise there.

The collapse of the offense in year five is the head scratcher and potentially very troubling. Sure injuries have played an important part, but we were able to score points and win 8 games with BJ Denker as our QB, so how can things suddenly be SO much worse than those times?

Again injuries explain some of it, but not all of it. (Imo)
User avatar
ghostwhitehorse
Posts: 15937
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:29 pm
Reputation: 172
Location: Jupiter Trojan: 3317 Paris

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by ghostwhitehorse »

Bruno out. . . *sigh*
User avatar
3goggles
Posts: 2183
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:54 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by 3goggles »

Defense just gave up on this game
User avatar
PieceOfMeat
Posts: 14080
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
Reputation: 337

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by PieceOfMeat »

no tackling. ever.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:

Image
User avatar
TyrantCat
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 6:22 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by TyrantCat »

cordera89 wrote:
TyrantCat wrote:
CalStateTempe wrote:Well this is going about as well as I thought it would.

So glad I'm out enjoying my day and not watching the flaming turd of a game.
Sounds nice. Maybe we all should go out and enjoy our lives.
Support the team regardless of them getting their collective butt kick.
May have to support the team while I enjoy some sunshine. Because, you know, this one is kinda out of hand now.
User avatar
ghostwhitehorse
Posts: 15937
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:29 pm
Reputation: 172
Location: Jupiter Trojan: 3317 Paris

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by ghostwhitehorse »

h''ldaf jg;qejr
py
qep
y jqe;l

peqjy qep
yj pe
yj
qjy qp
uyp
3quy p
q3y
p uyp
p
yu ;
q ;
wej p
wey p
w y
catgrad97
Posts: 5661
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:06 pm
Reputation: 28

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by catgrad97 »

Well, that TD summed up the rather shytyness of this Arizona team.
cordera89
Posts: 1802
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:30 am
Reputation: 1

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by cordera89 »

uacat540 wrote:
cordera89 wrote:
gman4gov wrote:USC is not a very good team. Were just a horribad team in general. Unsure if its the coaches or just the players. Need to possibly look at revamping the whole program.
We don't have our playmaker on the field against nor that fact were no heathy team. So said that USC isn't good football team in which your trying to say We should be beating their USC @@@ right now. RIght. Dude it cant be help that were that so many of our good player are hurt.
I'll bite on this one, what good players are hurt?
You said you want to bite on this comment so figure it out what were missing so far this season.
User avatar
WildcatStunner
Posts: 3484
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 1:07 am
Reputation: 137

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by WildcatStunner »

Awesome year 5
User avatar
PieceOfMeat
Posts: 14080
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
Reputation: 337

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by PieceOfMeat »

3goggles wrote:Defense just gave up on this game
usually they tire out in the 2nd, but they've tired out in the 1st half today.

the D is years away from being good.

lack of recruiting will do that to you.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:

Image
dirtbags

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by dirtbags »

ghostwhitehorse wrote:h''ldaf jg;qejr
py
qep
y jqe;l

peqjy qep
yj pe
yj
qjy qp
uyp
3quy p
q3y
p uyp
p
yu ;
q ;
wej p
wey p
w y
what he said...
User avatar
ghostwhitehorse
Posts: 15937
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:29 pm
Reputation: 172
Location: Jupiter Trojan: 3317 Paris

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by ghostwhitehorse »

dirtbags wrote:
ghostwhitehorse wrote:h''ldaf jg;qejr
py
qep
y jqe;l

peqjy qep
yj pe
yj
qjy qp
uyp
3quy p
q3y
p uyp
p
yu ;
q ;
wej p
wey p
w y
what he said...
Heh. . . :(
User avatar
PieceOfMeat
Posts: 14080
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
Reputation: 337

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by PieceOfMeat »

cordera89 wrote:
uacat540 wrote:
cordera89 wrote:
gman4gov wrote:USC is not a very good team. Were just a horribad team in general. Unsure if its the coaches or just the players. Need to possibly look at revamping the whole program.
We don't have our playmaker on the field against nor that fact were no heathy team. So said that USC isn't good football team in which your trying to say We should be beating their USC @@@ right now. RIght. Dude it cant be help that were that so many of our good player are hurt.
I'll bite on this one, what good players are hurt?
You said you want to bite on this comment so figure it out what were missing so far this season.
so your answer to the question is to tell the other person to figure it out?

keep your incoherent bullshit out of the game thread please.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:

Image
User avatar
3goggles
Posts: 2183
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:54 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by 3goggles »

SCCats wrote:
gman4gov wrote:USC is not a very good team. Were just a horribad team in general. Unsure if its the coaches or just the players. Need to possibly look at revamping the whole program.
We knew the defense was going to have problems. Not too much surprise there.

The collapse of the offense in year five is the head scratcher and potentially very troubling. Sure injuries have played an important part, but we were able to score points and win 8 games with BJ Denker as our QB, so how can things suddenly be SO much worse than those times?

Again injuries explain some of it, but not all of it. (Imo)
We the best running back in the country that year was running 150 yards a game. We are on our 3rd QB and like our 4 and 5 th running back and injured lineman
User avatar
ghostwhitehorse
Posts: 15937
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:29 pm
Reputation: 172
Location: Jupiter Trojan: 3317 Paris

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by ghostwhitehorse »

And now to be completely awful. . . In a parallel universe RR has a Final Four under his belt. At least.
User avatar
TyrantCat
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 6:22 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by TyrantCat »

WildcatStunner wrote:Awesome year 5
According to RichRod, we lose big, lose small, win small, win big. So must cycle around to lose big again?
User avatar
KillerKlown
Posts: 1094
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 5:55 pm
Reputation: 206
Location: South Tucson

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by KillerKlown »

Recruting with coaching sprinkled in. 8-5, 8-5, 10-3 with stoops recruits. 7-6, 2-5(and counting) with his own.
I remember year 1, 2 and 3 our final win totals were predicted to be 4, 6, and 8.
Mike Luke's burner account.
User avatar
ASUHATER!
Posts: 18158
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:21 pm
Reputation: 194
Location: tucson, az

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by ASUHATER! »

On track for our worst home loss in 12 years
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.

i'll just go with fuck asu.
catgrad97
Posts: 5661
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:06 pm
Reputation: 28

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by catgrad97 »

Keep in mind this was a SC team that wasn't in the same league with Alabama earlier this season.

Arizona is that far behind the rest of Division I college football. If I was a parent, I'd leave at half. This team doesn't even have the anything to stay close and look good for the families.
User avatar
Main Event
Posts: 2756
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:29 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by Main Event »

Rich is somehow gonna squeeze another extension outta this
User avatar
scumdevils86
Posts: 11663
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:34 pm
Reputation: 232
Location: t-town

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by scumdevils86 »

Yep we haven't lost by more than 4 scores at home since Oregon St in 2004.
catgrad97
Posts: 5661
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:06 pm
Reputation: 28

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by catgrad97 »

Dave Wannstedt just got laughed at for "trying to give Rich Rodriguez and Arizona some love."

Byrne was rooked on Rich Rodriguez. Sorry, no two ways about it.
michcat
Posts: 314
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:08 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by michcat »

They may drop 70 on them today.
User avatar
PieceOfMeat
Posts: 14080
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
Reputation: 337

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by PieceOfMeat »

catgrad97 wrote:Keep in mind this was a SC team that wasn't in the same league with Alabama earlier this season.

Arizona is that far behind the rest of Division I college football. If I was a parent, I'd leave at half. This team doesn't even have the anything to stay close and look good for the families.
well then you'd be a pretty shitty parent.

speaking as a parent, you stay there till the end for your kids, no matter how bad whatever it is you're attending is.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:

Image
User avatar
ghostwhitehorse
Posts: 15937
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:29 pm
Reputation: 172
Location: Jupiter Trojan: 3317 Paris

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by ghostwhitehorse »

Main Event wrote:Rich is somehow gonna squeeze another extension outta this
Adia Barnes cut off his potential basketball coach carrier so . . .
dirtbags

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by dirtbags »

i think he's referring to the parents in attendance for fam wknd
User avatar
PieceOfMeat
Posts: 14080
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
Reputation: 337

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by PieceOfMeat »

dirtbags wrote:i think he's referring to the parents in attendance for fam wknd
yeah, i know, and speaking as a parent you're a pretty shitty parent if you leave your kids football game at the half cause the team sucks.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:

Image
SCCats
Posts: 9073
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:35 am
Reputation: 226

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by SCCats »

KillerKlown wrote:Recruting with coaching sprinkled in. 8-5, 8-5, 10-3 with stoops recruits. 7-6, 2-5(and counting) with his own.
I remember year 1, 2 and 3 our final win totals were predicted to be 4, 6, and 8.
Those are the trend lines that are difficult to explain and should give one pause

By year: Significantly overachieve, overachieve, overachieve, underachieve, significantly underachieve

That is...one hell of a thing.
catgrad97
Posts: 5661
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:06 pm
Reputation: 28

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by catgrad97 »

PieceOfMeat wrote:
catgrad97 wrote:Keep in mind this was a SC team that wasn't in the same league with Alabama earlier this season.

Arizona is that far behind the rest of Division I college football. If I was a parent, I'd leave at half. This team doesn't even have the anything to stay close and look good for the families.
well then you'd be a pretty shitty parent.

speaking as a parent, you stay there till the end for your kids, no matter how bad whatever it is you're attending is.
And if my kid is in the stands texting where the party at out of sheer boredom at this team's shytyness?

I'd be a better parent to spend the waste of a second half talking with my kid, frankly. I would never measure my child's college choice by this awful football program. Thank God.
Last edited by catgrad97 on Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
scumdevils86
Posts: 11663
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:34 pm
Reputation: 232
Location: t-town

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by scumdevils86 »

PieceOfMeat wrote:
dirtbags wrote:i think he's referring to the parents in attendance for fam wknd
yeah, i know, and speaking as a parent you're a pretty shitty parent if you leave your kids football game at the half cause the team sucks.
He's not talking about the parents of players...
User avatar
TyrantCat
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 6:22 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by TyrantCat »

catgrad97 wrote:Dave Wannstedt just got laughed at for "trying to give Rich Rodriguez and Arizona some love."

Byrne was rooked on Rich Rodriguez. Sorry, no two ways about it.
This is why I expect Byrne to take cratering very seriously. Won't want to be embarrassed. He has his own rep to protect.
User avatar
Chicat
Posts: 46645
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
Reputation: 3983
Location: Your mother's basement

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by Chicat »

Haha we suck.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
User avatar
PieceOfMeat
Posts: 14080
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
Reputation: 337

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by PieceOfMeat »

TyrantCat wrote:
catgrad97 wrote:Dave Wannstedt just got laughed at for "trying to give Rich Rodriguez and Arizona some love."

Byrne was rooked on Rich Rodriguez. Sorry, no two ways about it.
This is why I expect Byrne to take cratering very seriously. Won't want to be embarrassed. He has his own rep to protect.
RR isn't going anywhere after this year, even if we go winless the rest of the year
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:

Image
catgrad97
Posts: 5661
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:06 pm
Reputation: 28

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by catgrad97 »

TyrantCat wrote:
catgrad97 wrote:Dave Wannstedt just got laughed at for "trying to give Rich Rodriguez and Arizona some love."

Byrne was rooked on Rich Rodriguez. Sorry, no two ways about it.
This is why I expect Byrne to take cratering very seriously. Won't want to be embarrassed. He has his own rep to protect.
True, but he has to balance that with the AD taking its first loss ever because of the buyout he'd have to pay if this team goes in the tank.

I fully expect Byrne to give RR one more year, no matter what.

But this program is back to where it was after the two straight Alamo Bowl losses under Stoops. Two generations away, at least, from being contenders again.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 43406
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1584
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: Game 7, vs USC (2016)

Post by Merkin »

I don't think I ever left a game at half during my time as a student.

Today I might have made an exception.

When the team quits, maybe it's time the fans do to.
Post Reply