Game 9, at USC (2017)
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Ugh all these reviews slow the game down and are unnecessary
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Tate definitely fumbled. But the play was blown immediately dead. Why should USC get the ball?
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
this is gonna be called targeting
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
zonagrad wrote:Tate definitely fumbled. But the play was blown immediately dead. Why should USC get the ball?
prh wrote:Can be overturned with an immediate recovery. Just can't be advanced.SCCats wrote:Ball might have been out
Problem is play was blown dead so my understanding is the play can't be overturned
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
And Sam is pushing for the first down...Sam could have gone down a yard earlier.
-
- Posts: 3488
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm
- Reputation: 340
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
That's the rule
If they decide it was a fumble you don't penalize the recovering team
If they decide it was a fumble you don't penalize the recovering team
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
This is becoming unwatchable. C'mon
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
this is ridiculous. Darhnold starts to lead with his head, then goes into a slide. What the hell is a defender supposed to do?
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
wow, ok, they didn't. i'm quite shockedPieceOfMeat wrote:this is gonna be called targeting
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
OMG...Stop it. It’s like PAC-12 refs get a bonus for each targeting foul...
Formerly Lynx Rufus.
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
These phantom targeting/oops I guess it wasn't -
What a horribly officiated game thus far
What a horribly officiated game thus far
-
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 4:57 pm
- Reputation: 7
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Is there a review every play? ponderous man.....ponderous
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
All of this that has happened has happened over about 12 yards on the fieldcats101 wrote:This is becoming unwatchable. C'mon
- CalStateTempe
- Posts: 16646
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:46 pm
- Reputation: 580
- Location: The Right to Self-Determination: FREEDOM!!!!
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
We need a score...
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
good stop D
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Need the O to put up some points please
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Please, please, please, pretty please try a few 4 receiver sets RRod...........get the freaking safeties out of the middle of the field.
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
No wonder the Pac12 doesn't want to improve P12Net availability or start times-- the rest of the country would realize how awful the games can be.
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
The game flow in this attrocity might be the worst I have ever seen.
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Forget the targeting. USC plays are intentionally extending their hits, rolling over players and then talking shit non-stop. This is by design. I thought only UCLA did this. It's b.s., especially when they stop and review every Arizona player's legal hit for targeting.
- CalStateTempe
- Posts: 16646
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:46 pm
- Reputation: 580
- Location: The Right to Self-Determination: FREEDOM!!!!
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
I want to break things
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
the talent gap is really showing right now
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
-
- Posts: 3488
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm
- Reputation: 340
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Short passes
Why the under thrown deep balls
Why the under thrown deep balls
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
lmao we cant even fuckign punt the ball this game
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Do we not have even 1 intermediate pass play in the entire freaking playbook??? We keep throwing bombs.
-
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2017 7:21 pm
- Reputation: 1
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Pollack, what game are you playing?
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Haha. Bad.PieceOfMeat wrote:lmao we cant even fuckign punt the ball this game
Formerly Lynx Rufus.
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Punter is spooked ever since fumbling that low snap in 1st qtr.
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
USC is clearly physically superior but our play calling leaves much to be desired tonight.
The defense has actually played quite well.
The defense has actually played quite well.
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
This game is showing the lack of creativity on RichRod's napkin.
- scumdevils86
- Posts: 11663
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:34 pm
- Reputation: 232
- Location: t-town
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
This is like the 2009 Holiday bowl. Tate looks pedestrian as fuck.
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
aaaaaand there's the ball game
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
-
- Posts: 3488
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm
- Reputation: 340
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Shin punting
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Not sure if RR can coach these types of games. I can think of only one game that Arizona played well in when Arizona status rose. Each other time has been a big egg, like not even close type of games.dmjcat wrote:USC is clearly physically superior but our play calling leaves much to be desired tonight.
The defense has actually played quite well.
Formerly Lynx Rufus.
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
usc has far superior talent across the board, especially on the lines. Not much Tate is going to be able to do in a game like this.scumdevils86 wrote:This is like the 2009 Holiday bowl. Tate looks pedestrian as fuck.
Just really emphasizes our recruiting woes over the last handful of years.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
-
- Posts: 3488
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm
- Reputation: 340
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Time to switch Tates?
-
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2017 7:21 pm
- Reputation: 1
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
As long as we win vs Oregon St and at ASU, the season will have been a success. If we happen to win the Jack Link's Beef Jerky Bowl against Boise St, even better.
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
I would love to see Debeers punt the next one........he's supposed to be pretty good.zonagrad wrote:Punter is spooked ever since fumbling that low snap in 1st qtr.
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
This will be a blow out. Oh well, we should have known it was a mirage.
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Yup.PieceOfMeat wrote:usc has far superior talent across the board, especially on the lines. Not much Tate is going to be able to do in a game like this.scumdevils86 wrote:This is like the 2009 Holiday bowl. Tate looks pedestrian as fuck.
Just really emphasizes our recruiting woes over the last handful of years.
Formerly Lynx Rufus.
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
this is the truth of the matter. get to a toilet bowl and hopefully win it and call the year a rousing successTatetheGreat wrote:As long as we win vs Oregon St and at ASU, the season will have been a success. If we happen to win the Jack Link's Beef Jerky Bowl against Boise St, even better.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
I don't think its a mirage..........the PAC12 is just mediocre. We beat several mediocre teams in the recent run.jimson wrote:This will be a blow out. Oh well, we should have known it was a mirage.
Oregon State, Oregon and ASU are all quite winnable. We could finish anywhere from 7-5 to 9-3
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Anyone know when was the last time Alabama had a bad snap on a field goal or punt? Peterson? Seems like the best coaches keep those mistakes away.
Formerly Lynx Rufus.
- Merkin
- Posts: 43381
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
- Reputation: 1580
- Location: UA basketball smells like....victory
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
Just beat ASU, I don't care about some shit hole bow.
- PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 9, at USC (2017)
fair enough, but since we're going to a shit hole bowl anyways, we need to win it tooMerkin wrote:Just beat ASU, I don't care about some shit hole bow.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update: