damn rightWildcatStunner wrote:Arizona chants echoing in the arena.
Game 20, at California (2014-2015)
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
-
PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 20, at California
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
-
PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 20, at California
chanting "nobel prizes" now.
yikes
yikes
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
Re: Game 20, at California
It's like they think they're Harvard or something. Pretty ridiculous.PieceOfMeat wrote:chanting "nobel prizes" now.
yikes
“The reality is that the hardest games to win are over teams on their home court. Teams that don’t play those games can spin it however they want, but what they’re saying is, ‘We don’t want to lose in our non conference season.’" - Sean Miller
Re: Game 20, at California
23 point win. Not bad considering how horrid the 1st half was.
“The reality is that the hardest games to win are over teams on their home court. Teams that don’t play those games can spin it however they want, but what they’re saying is, ‘We don’t want to lose in our non conference season.’" - Sean Miller
-
PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 20, at California
73-50 is the final, Cats win 
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
-
ghostwhitehorse
- Posts: 15631
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:29 pm
- Reputation: 135
- Location: Jupiter Trojan: 3317 Paris
Re: Game 20, at California
73-50 'Cats.
-
PieceOfMeat
- Posts: 14080
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 pm
- Reputation: 337
Re: Game 20, at California
it's pretty sadAZCatGirl wrote:It's like they think they're Harvard or something. Pretty ridiculous.PieceOfMeat wrote:chanting "nobel prizes" now.
yikes
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
-
UAEebs86
- Posts: 29203
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:41 pm
- Reputation: 1669
- Location: Mohave Dorm Room 417 Buzz 2
Re: Game 20, at California
UAEebs86 wrote:51 points might be enough the way Cal is playing on the offensive end.
Nailed it.
We are the people our parents warned us about.
-JB
2022 Survival Pool Co-Champion
-JB
2022 Survival Pool Co-Champion
-
WildcatStunner
- Posts: 3462
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 1:07 am
- Reputation: 117
Re: Game 20, at California
Held cal to 43%
-
WildcatStunner
- Posts: 3462
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 1:07 am
- Reputation: 117
Re: Game 20, at California
Great to hear Stanley talking about honoring the process.
Re: Game 20, at California
Bought in Stanley=other teams are screwed.WildcatStunner wrote:Great to hear Stanley talking about honoring the process.
“The reality is that the hardest games to win are over teams on their home court. Teams that don’t play those games can spin it however they want, but what they’re saying is, ‘We don’t want to lose in our non conference season.’" - Sean Miller
-
Katzenfreund
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 7:02 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: Game 20, at California
.
Last edited by Katzenfreund on Thu May 07, 2015 2:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
dirtbags
Re: Game 20, at California
some of that might just be old-school pac mentality. consider the conference's history: when the pac was exploring expansion from 8 to 10 with the AZ schools way back when, there was tremendous pushback from UW, 'Furd, and Cal due to the quality of academics at UA and asu. it took quite a bit of wrangling and finagling to get the presidents to ratify the arizona schools (a unanimous vote was required).
similarly, look at the way the pac schools balked during the expansion craziness a few years ago when the oklahoma schools and some other dumbo texas schools / byu / sdsu were being tossed around as possibilities. i know the 10 to 12 to possibly-14-or-16 expansion talks then were about media revenues and such, but the academics and AAU membership was also a pretty big part of it. the pac has historically been an eggheadish conference. college sports was a much different animal back then, but even still, the quality and level of competition in basketball outside of UCLA (and OSU) back then was an afterthought at a lot of these schools.
similarly, look at the way the pac schools balked during the expansion craziness a few years ago when the oklahoma schools and some other dumbo texas schools / byu / sdsu were being tossed around as possibilities. i know the 10 to 12 to possibly-14-or-16 expansion talks then were about media revenues and such, but the academics and AAU membership was also a pretty big part of it. the pac has historically been an eggheadish conference. college sports was a much different animal back then, but even still, the quality and level of competition in basketball outside of UCLA (and OSU) back then was an afterthought at a lot of these schools.
Re: Game 20, at California
With all respect, Cal approaches Harvard. Stronger, even, in its Ph.D. programs. BTFD.AZCatGirl wrote:It's like they think they're Harvard or something. Pretty ridiculous.PieceOfMeat wrote:chanting "nobel prizes" now.
yikes
Re: Game 20, at California
I've never heard of undergrads bragging about their school's graduate programs, and most graduate students don't adopt their graduate school's teams anyways, so it's a pretty strange thing to chant.1560s Guy wrote:With all respect, Cal approaches Harvard. Stronger, even, in its Ph.D. programs. BTFD.AZCatGirl wrote:It's like they think they're Harvard or something. Pretty ridiculous.PieceOfMeat wrote:chanting "nobel prizes" now.
yikes