Page 4 of 6

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:41 pm
by NYCat
Losing by 11 now

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:41 pm
by SCCats
I'd keep Ayton in the game with 9:35 and four fouls (and down by 8 points already)

Dare them to call the 5th

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:42 pm
by WildHolcs
Pathetic. Can't really watch anymore of this soft ass team.

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:42 pm
by PieceOfMeat
SCCats wrote:I'd keep Ayton in the game with 9:35 and four fouls (and down by 8 points already)

Dare them to call the 5th
I'd keep him in as well, but they'll ring him up before the under 8 timeout I'd bet.

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:42 pm
by HiCat
Foul on PJC bs.

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:42 pm
by 84Cat
SCCats wrote:I'd keep Ayton in the game with 9:35 and four fouls (and down by 8 points already)

Dare them to call the 5th
They will call him the next time he gets the ball. He hasn't done anything since the 2nd call

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:42 pm
by PieceOfMeat
lol, "that's FOUR, THAT's FOUR!"

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:43 pm
by loomer
HiCat wrote:Foul on PJC bs.
Absolutely. But given how the game is being called, I'm not sure why he would even attempt to reach in there

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:43 pm
by Postmaster
Did anyone see the backcourt non-call in first half?
If so, could you explain?

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:43 pm
by SunnyAZ
teams aren't generally great at beating it but I hate that we rotate the corner shooter defender all the way across the court every PnR

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:43 pm
by Gilbertcat
Conference refs.... If it's not the calls it's giving them a ball when Stanford blocked it out of bounce. Then pj plays great defense and foul. Hard to be motivated after that

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:43 pm
by PieceOfMeat
Nice three Smith. keep it up

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:44 pm
by NYCat
Miller with the press early

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:44 pm
by loomer
1 timeout left with 9 minutes remaining

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:44 pm
by PieceOfMeat
Ristic shoulda had an and 1 called there.

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:45 pm
by WildHolcs
Man, rawle hasn't given us anything. Guy is struggling.

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:45 pm
by PieceOfMeat
WildHolcs wrote:Man, rawle hasn't given us anything. Guy is struggling.
had some nice boards, but, struggling for sure

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:45 pm
by TatetheGreat
Worst full-court press I've ever seen. No wonder SEEM doesn't run it until the game is over.

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:46 pm
by MountainCat
WildHolcs wrote:Pathetic. Can't really watch anymore of this soft ass team.
Then don't. But I will.

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:46 pm
by Postmaster
Yeah
There was no way trier was going to be able to cross all the way over.

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:46 pm
by Merkin
WildHolcs wrote:Man, rawle hasn't given us anything. Guy is struggling.
Getting no lift on his sore foot.

PJC is shooting even worse than Alkins, and has no excuse.


Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:46 pm
by 84Cat
Postmaster wrote:Did anyone see the backcourt non-call in first half?
If so, could you explain?
Home cooking. I wish we got this treatment at home

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:47 pm
by SunnyAZ
TatetheGreat wrote:Worst full-court press I've ever seen. No wonder SEEM doesn't run it until the game is over.
that was a 'we haven't practiced this but everybody just guard your man full court' lmao

it worked tho

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:48 pm
by PieceOfMeat
lol @ the FT disparity.

we've shot 3, them 17. sheesh

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:48 pm
by NYCat
5 sec call

Let's go

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:48 pm
by jsbowl16
Why is Akot just getting in now? Played 15 minutes last game and I thought he looked like he was playing better.

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:50 pm
by NYCat
Rawle hits a 3

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:50 pm
by PieceOfMeat
damn, there we go. nice shot Rawle

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:50 pm
by WildHolcs
there we go rawle

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:51 pm
by PieceOfMeat
lol Trier what a shot

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:51 pm
by NYCat
Trier 3

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:51 pm
by PieceOfMeat
hey we tied it up. touch foul called on us. so surprising

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:53 pm
by WildHolcs
lmao ristic

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:54 pm
by PieceOfMeat
ristic got blocked by the underside of the rim lol

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:54 pm
by TatetheGreat
And that's why we can't rely on Ristic

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:55 pm
by PieceOfMeat
TatetheGreat wrote:And that's why we can't rely on Ristic
he made the next one nicely

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:55 pm
by PieceOfMeat
good job makin Throws Rawle!

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:56 pm
by PieceOfMeat
lmfao @ the furd guy also getting blocked by the rim

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:57 pm
by NYCat
Need to take the lead by the 2 minute mark.

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:57 pm
by TatetheGreat
PieceOfMeat wrote:
TatetheGreat wrote:And that's why we can't rely on Ristic
he made the next one nicely
Can't rely on him. He misses more easy buckets than anyone I've seen - even Zeus.

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:57 pm
by Postmaster
He has 18 points?

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:58 pm
by PieceOfMeat
TatetheGreat wrote:
PieceOfMeat wrote:
TatetheGreat wrote:And that's why we can't rely on Ristic
he made the next one nicely
Can't rely on him. He misses more easy buckets than anyone I've seen - even Zeus.
you're as bad as 97 is when it comes to PJC....speaking of missing easy buckets .... lol

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:58 pm
by TatetheGreat
Postmaster wrote:He has 18 points?
All hooks and layups. No points off dunks despite being taller than anyone on Furd.

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:00 pm
by MountainCat
Postmaster wrote:He has 18 points?
...And he's the reason why we have come back.

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:01 pm
by 84Cat
We need to play lockdown defense the rest of the game

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:01 pm
by NYCat
Trier missed 2 3s in a row

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:02 pm
by PieceOfMeat
why is trier chuckin 2 3's there

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:02 pm
by catgrad97
NYCat wrote:Trier missed 2 3s in a row
Stone cold down the stretch.

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:02 pm
by NYCat
3 chances to take the lead. Didn't capitalize on jt

Re: Game 20, at Stanford (2017-2018)

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:02 pm
by PieceOfMeat
so after 3 straight bricks from us. maybe we should go inside?