EastCoastCat wrote:What's been overlooked is we only committed 7 turnovers in a game that was much more fast paced then any game we played this year. That probably has a lot to do with UCLA's non-aggressive defense in general but it allowed us to get back most of the game and made the Bruins work hard in their half court set.
I also think teams are underestimating our offensive prowess - Trier aside - if you heard Alford's postgame comments several times he mentioned how better we are in person versus what they saw on film.
Let's face it this team can shoot the ball and score in a variety of ways. Couple that with the fact that a Miller team will always be strong on defense and on the boards it makes this team very, very dangerous moving forward.
The bar has now been raised on my expectations for this year.
There was a tweet last night mentioning this team has the lowest turnover rate for an Arizona team
In three seasons. One of those teams had TJ, and this team was missing PJC for an extended period and has had three freshmen starting for much of the season. You really dont need that tweet to know that this team takes care of the ball, it is that obvious.
Alieberman wrote:Is it a given that PJC isn't regaining his pg starter role this year?
No. But I honestly like him coming off the bench. We start the game with better size and defense, and we got PJC in to facilitate and create when some of our better offensive players are on the bench resting and Chance and Pinder are in. Less time guarding a teams #1 option at point and even fresher legs in the second when he can play to his strengths against fatigued defenders.
azcat49 wrote:Just dreaming a bit but say we went 18-0 with 2 wins over UCLA and a road win at Oregon and say Gonzage went undefeated in the regular season, who gets the 1 seed out west?
Us. Gonzagas gonna drop a game though, probably on the road to St Marys.
gumby wrote:I'm for keeping Trier as 6th man. I love having firepower come off the bench, especially when we start slow. Could stagger it so Zo and Lauri are never out of the game at the same time. Might be best for chemistry, too.
No disruption to current starters. Zo just happy to play.
I think the end game at this point is a lineup of:
Kadeem
Zo
Rawle
Lauri
Dusan
You get the same firepower from Kobi off the bench, who would still play starter type minutes. Let's be real, Zo wouldn't be just happy to play.
Alieberman wrote:Is it a given that PJC isn't regaining his pg starter role this year?
No. But I honestly like him coming off the bench. We start the game with better size and defense, and we got PJC in to facilitate and create when some of our better offensive players are on the bench resting and Chance and Pinder are in. Less time guarding a teams #1 option at point and even fresher legs in the second when he can play to his strengths against fatigued defenders.
What I like about this strategy, is it gives us two different looks that a team has to prep for. Man up and try to stop the power line, then when they get fatigued as you note, bring in a more uptempo slice and dice offense that you have to keep up with. Then then our first team is rested, we come back at you with the boom.
Forces teams to have to game plan for really two different types of teams, only with the same opponent in Arizona.
Comment I loved in the Miller video "Tonight our offense was a key part of our defense."
Yep. And if teams switch things up and go to zone and we are struggling, he can go in and help with that. I think very highly of PJCs game this year, probably more than most, but it's just hard for me to keep senior Kadeem on the bench, he's a guy I want on the floor as much as I can within reason. What he is to this team gets so underrated because of the sheer talent we have. For as much grief as he gets for not being a true PG, our low turnover rate mentioned above is a testament of his play (along with the rest of the team). And now that Trier is back, the need to "facilitate" isnt as great. Like Spliff said before the season, with all these weapons, he just needs to play D and take care of the ball.
It was nice to see PJC knock down a couple of those outside shots last night. We have been shooting the 3 really well the last several games, and it was clear Alfords plan was to pack the paint and let us shoot from outside. He must have not been paying attention.
Beachcat97 wrote:Great win yesterday. Being wrong never felt so good. Great to have AT back! Go Cats!
Decided I'll be sticking around. It's only a message board. So before you start the "lock hik up!" chants, understand that your energy is probably better spent discussing AZ hoops than hurling personal insults and acting like you're 10 years old. My apologies to any actual 10 year olds here.
Bear down!
Do you ever get tired of being wrong?
Do you ever look in the mirror and think to yourself "I wish I wasn't so reactionary."
Have you ever wondered why you have become this boards punching bag?
If the answers to all these questions are No, then there really isn't any good reason to keep you around
Beachcat97 wrote:Great win yesterday. Being wrong never felt so good. Great to have AT back! Go Cats!
Decided I'll be sticking around. It's only a message board. So before you start the "lock hik up!" chants, understand that your energy is probably better spent discussing AZ hoops than hurling personal insults and acting like you're 10 years old. My apologies to any actual 10 year olds here.
Bear down!
Do you ever get tired of being wrong?
Do you ever look in the mirror and think to yourself "I wish I wasn't so reactionary."
Have you ever wondered why you have become this boards punching bag?
If the answers to all these questions are No, then there really isn't any good reason to keep you around
If he answers "no" to any of those questions, he should be allowed to do his own laundry and eat mashed potatoes and borrow library books and stuff like that, but I don't think he can come back here legally. We'd all be in trouble with the IRS and federal law enforcement and the Albuquerque Sheriff's Office. I'm pretty sure.
I would have agreed with you earlier in the season, but Rawle has won me over with his improved defense and mostly, his rebounding. Kobi and PJC off the bench is lightning! Either way, the fact that one of them is not going to be starting is a testament to how nuts this team is now.
Beachcat97 wrote:Great win yesterday. Being wrong never felt so good. Great to have AT back! Go Cats!
Decided I'll be sticking around. It's only a message board. So before you start the "lock hik up!" chants, understand that your energy is probably better spent discussing AZ hoops than hurling personal insults and acting like you're 10 years old. My apologies to any actual 10 year olds here.
Bear down!
You're the one that made the bet. No one forced you. Welching on it is the ultimate bitch move.
I'm all for you getting a ban for trying to come back after that.
Not to beat a dead horse, but West #2 with Gonzaga as the 1 would be perfect. If they drop a game and we flip spots, that's fine too. I definitely don't want to be a 1 elsewhere with them as the West 1 though, because that's just trading Gonzaga for a team that is probably much more athletic and difficult for us. I'm more concerned about us playing Oregon (with Brooks) or UCLA again than Gonzaga. That #2 could be Baylor or Kentucky. I'm not saying we would lose those, I think we're ready to roll. But I'd much rather play Gonzaga and some random 3 seed.
gumby wrote:I'm for keeping Trier as 6th man. I love having firepower come off the bench, especially when we start slow. Could stagger it so Zo and Lauri are never out of the game at the same time. Might be best for chemistry, too.
No disruption to current starters. Zo just happy to play.
I think the end game at this point is a lineup of:
Kadeem
Zo
Rawle
Lauri
Dusan
You get the same firepower from Kobi off the bench, who would still play starter type minutes. Let's be real, Zo wouldn't be just happy to play.
With you 100% on that lineup.
CSM said a few weeks ago that kobi's good with being the first one off the bench. likes the idea of being our spark guy like rondae a couple of seasons ago.
Beachcat97 wrote:Great win yesterday. Being wrong never felt so good. Great to have AT back! Go Cats!
Decided I'll be sticking around. It's only a message board. So before you start the "lock hik up!" chants, understand that your energy is probably better spent discussing AZ hoops than hurling personal insults and acting like you're 10 years old. My apologies to any actual 10 year olds here.
Bear down!
You're the one that made the bet. No one forced you. Welching on it is the ultimate bitch move.
I'm all for you getting a ban for trying to come back after that.
Preemptively trying to declare anyone who has an issue with bailing on the bet a 10 year old is a fun decision too.
ASUHATER! wrote:I'm already hyperventilating thinking about being in the west and Wisconsin being in our bracket again somehow.
If I was rich, I'd pay off committee members to ensure we're on a collision course with Wisconsin in our bracket. I want to play them this year.
If the Zags slip up and we sneak in the top line, we could conceivably be the 1 out west, with Gonzaga as the 2, and Wisconsin as the 4. I'd take that in a heartbeat
Alieberman wrote:Is it a given that PJC isn't regaining his pg starter role this year?
Would be absurd if it were.
I don't see why it'd be absurd at all.
By whatever measure, he won the starting role at the start of the season. Why would earning it back be barred from him now?
Because things change from the 1st game of the season to the 20th. When PJC was the initial starter the freshmen wings hadn't proved themselves yet. They now have along with Kadeem and it's hard to sit them down for Parker, especially when him coming off the bench has been just as effective for us.
Last edited by ChooChooCat on Sun Jan 22, 2017 3:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I think with the progress of the freshman and Trier returning, it makes far more sense for PJC to come off the bench. At the beginning of the season, we struggled offensively when we sat some starters. Now, we're starting a defensive stopper in Kadeem, plus 4 other guys who can score (Kadeem can too, but I'm fine with him focusing effort on defense). Then, the first set of subs brings PJC and Kobi/Trier, along with how Comanche has progressed, and suddenly we are just as potent on offense (albeit much different) and still sufficient defensively.
Regarding Commanche, I think he is much better suited when PJC is in the game. LM and Dusan are better at creating their own shots, and Chance is really helped by having a playmaker of PJC's style in with him. Chance paired w/ Kadeem/Rawle/Kobi seems like a bit of a drop-off to me.
Last edited by prh on Sun Jan 22, 2017 3:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Alieberman wrote:Is it a given that PJC isn't regaining his pg starter role this year?
Would be absurd if it were.
I don't see why it'd be absurd at all.
By whatever measure, he won the starting role at the start of the season. Why would earning it back be barred from him now?
Because things change from the beginning of the season to the 20th. When PJC was the initial starter the freshmen wings hadn't proved themselves yet. They now have along with Kadeem and it's hard to sit them down for Parker, especially when him coming off the bench has been just as effective for us.
I agree with you fully but PJC needs to practice and play like he's going to beat out Allen. Last year he basically stopped trying. It would be absurd if it were a given that he isn't regaining his starting role.
prh wrote:Guys I'm pretty sure Chi already took care of that. Let's get back to important things like whether or not we get to smack Gonzaga in the tourney
I can confirm, Chi did in fact take care of that.
Banned user for reason “”
» Beachcat97
Although he sure was lazy with not putting any reason in. Sheesh Chi!
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
IMO those top 8 teams plus Duke and Oregon all have legitimate shots at a FF.
I think this might be the most wide open tourney we have ever had. Getting a chubby just thinking about our cats in the FF in Glendale, AZ
Waiting at the Rose Bowl patiently for the cats to arrive
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
prh wrote:Guys I'm pretty sure Chi already took care of that. Let's get back to important things like whether or not we get to smack Gonzaga in the tourney
I can confirm, Chi did in fact take care of that.
Banned user for reason “”
» Beachcat97
Although he sure was lazy with not putting any reason in. Sheesh Chi!
All of the reasons wouldn't fit in the little space they allow you.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
prh wrote:Guys I'm pretty sure Chi already took care of that. Let's get back to important things like whether or not we get to smack Gonzaga in the tourney
I can confirm, Chi did in fact take care of that.
Banned user for reason “”
» Beachcat97
Although he sure was lazy with not putting any reason in. Sheesh Chi!
All of the reasons wouldn't fit in the little space they allow you.
It's long past time to bring this back to the court, let's do it with a small update:
prh wrote:Not to beat a dead horse, but West #2 with Gonzaga as the 1 would be perfect. If they drop a game and we flip spots, that's fine too. I definitely don't want to be a 1 elsewhere with them as the West 1 though, because that's just trading Gonzaga for a team that is probably much more athletic and difficult for us. I'm more concerned about us playing Oregon (with Brooks) or UCLA again than Gonzaga. That #2 could be Baylor or Kentucky. I'm not saying we would lose those, I think we're ready to roll. But I'd much rather play Gonzaga and some random 3 seed.
3 seed is gonna be Duke
Any sufficiently advanced troll is indistinguishable from a genuine kook.
On the front page of the ESPN college basketball section right now, an excited anchorperson asks Goodman if Arizona is a legit Final Four team. He stuffs his cheeks with Lifesavers, shoehorns in a little dig that Arizona wouldn't make it out of the first weekend without Trier, and resists answering her question.
Last edited by Longhorned on Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Longhorned wrote:On the front page of the ESPN college basketball section right now, an excited anchorperson asks Goodman if Arizona is a legit Final Four team. He stuffs his cheeks with Lifesavers, shoehorns in a little dig that Arizona wouldn't make it out of the first weekend with Trier, and resists answering her question.
Longhorned wrote:On the front page of the ESPN college basketball section right now, an excited anchorperson asks Goodman if Arizona is a legit Final Four team. He stuffs his cheeks with Lifesavers, shoehorns in a little dig that Arizona wouldn't make it out of the first weekend with Trier, and resists answering her question.
Haha wtf, he really didn't answer the simple question. Goodman is the definition of a mouth breather. It's a miracle he has the career he has.
I also like how he still kinda questions Trier being cleared by the NCAA. As if the NCAA isn't a bunch of hard asses, and they grant appeal victories every day.
Something happened to Goodman when he was at UA. I'm guessing it was a combination of never getting laid and having to pretend he had to study constantly so that no one knew he had no friends.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
You know, we were flying under the radar and sort of underrated. We win one game and skyrocket.
I love our potential, but we were better than people realized for a while, and now we probably need to pump the brakes a little. We have the ability to make those predictions reality, but right now, UCLA was a big win, but it is only one game.
I think our homestand says a lot. If we continue advancing, we did good things. I could see a significant risk of a hangover and letdown.
gumby wrote:I'm for keeping Trier as 6th man. I love having firepower come off the bench, especially when we start slow. Could stagger it so Zo and Lauri are never out of the game at the same time. Might be best for chemistry, too.
No disruption to current starters. Zo just happy to play.
I think the end game at this point is a lineup of:
Kadeem
Zo
Rawle
Lauri
Dusan
You get the same firepower from Kobi off the bench, who would still play starter type minutes. Let's be real, Zo wouldn't be just happy to play.
Rondae didn't start. Got starter minutes. That's all I'm saying.
You know, we were flying under the radar and sort of underrated. We win one game and skyrocket.
I love our potential, but we were better than people realized for a while, and now we probably need to pump the brakes a little. We have the ability to make those predictions reality, but right now, UCLA was a big win, but it is only one game.
I think our homestand says a lot. If we continue advancing, we did good things. I could see a significant risk of a hangover and letdown.
Word!
This is what I am concerned about. "The Edge" is such a fine line. Beating us will be many of the Cats' opponents National Championship. If the Cats come out unprepared and think any win will come easy, we are going to be taught a lesson. Just keep the chip on your shoulder and play 40 minutes of focused basketball, with the intent to improve and the Cats will be ready come March.
Also, Kadeem, best defender, is starting, regardless of what occurs with PJC and Trier.
If PJC and Trier start, both frosh guards are coming off the bench. Can't see it. Also, agree that PJC and Chance should play at the same time. Miller will tell Alkins and/or Simmons to be really aggressive from the tip, especially on D, knowing two early fouls is no longer fatal.
You know, we were flying under the radar and sort of underrated. We win one game and skyrocket.
I love our potential, but we were better than people realized for a while, and now we probably need to pump the brakes a little. We have the ability to make those predictions reality, but right now, UCLA was a big win, but it is only one game.
I think our homestand says a lot. If we continue advancing, we did good things. I could see a significant risk of a hangover and letdown.
You echo my thoughts and fears to a tee. What gives me hope is that Miller didn't treat the USC game like it was a good win. In fact, it seemed like he treated the team like they had just lost an easy one at home. Makes me think he's not going to allow anyone to get to high or full of themselves now.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
You know, we were flying under the radar and sort of underrated. We win one game and skyrocket.
I love our potential, but we were better than people realized for a while, and now we probably need to pump the brakes a little. We have the ability to make those predictions reality, but right now, UCLA was a big win, but it is only one game.
I think our homestand says a lot. If we continue advancing, we did good things. I could see a significant risk of a hangover and letdown.
You echo my thoughts and fears to a tee. What gives me hope is that Miller didn't treat the USC game like it was a good win. In fact, it seemed like he treated the team like they had just lost an easy one at home. Makes me think he's not going to allow anyone to get to high or full of themselves now.
I agree. Miller absolutely gets the pitfalls of success. How well it translates to the team...that is always the question. Miller will definitely give the right messages, though.
I hope the high of having Trier back will help avoid the hangover. I have to imagine Zo is the least likely guy to lose focus over UCLA because he's gotta be fired up to get out of the NCAA jail.
gumby wrote:I'm for keeping Trier as 6th man. I love having firepower come off the bench, especially when we start slow. Could stagger it so Zo and Lauri are never out of the game at the same time. Might be best for chemistry, too.
No disruption to current starters. Zo just happy to play.
I think the end game at this point is a lineup of:
Kadeem
Zo
Rawle
Lauri
Dusan
You get the same firepower from Kobi off the bench, who would still play starter type minutes. Let's be real, Zo wouldn't be just happy to play.
Rondae didn't start. Got starter minutes. That's all I'm saying.
For half a season, and while he never said anything publicly, he wasn't exactly happy about it. It was an overall error in judgment to bring Rondae off the bench for York and it was corrected at the midway point of the season thankfully. Your more experienced guy gets the start if it's even debatable who is a better player. Between Zo and Kobi it's debatable, between Rondae and York it wasn't.
Last edited by ChooChooCat on Mon Jan 23, 2017 8:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
