Official Bracketology Thread
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
- Alieberman
- Posts: 13841
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
- Reputation: 2885
- Location: I can't find my pants
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
On Saturday the NCAA will reveal it's top 16.
With our metrics it will be interesting to see if we make the list. I'm guessing we land at #15.
With our metrics it will be interesting to see if we make the list. I'm guessing we land at #15.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
That would be nice. Definitely possible.
It’s so painful to think if we just held on versus Oregon and AsU we’d be ranked top10 right now with a 4-2 road record.* Oh well just keep notching victories.
*other teams could definitely say this too and maybe we wouldn’t have learned some painful lessons for the long haul. I guess no point thinking of “what if”
It’s so painful to think if we just held on versus Oregon and AsU we’d be ranked top10 right now with a 4-2 road record.* Oh well just keep notching victories.
*other teams could definitely say this too and maybe we wouldn’t have learned some painful lessons for the long haul. I guess no point thinking of “what if”
-
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 1:02 pm
- Reputation: 0
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Metric wise, Arizona should be in the top 16.Alieberman wrote:On Saturday the NCAA will reveal it's top 16.
With our metrics it will be interesting to see if we make the list. I'm guessing we land at #15.
Overall resume, I just don't think they meet that criteria.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
We actually moved down in KenPom after last nights win. I think we could move down farther without a big win on Saturday
- Longhorned
- Posts: 14758
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:04 pm
- Reputation: 975
- Location: In a guayabera at The Sands Club, Arizona Stadium
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
We need to get back on the losing track.84Cat wrote:We actually moved down in KenPom after last nights win. I think we could move down farther without a big win on Saturday
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
the ASU loss specifically is painful...and even in that, if Arizona continues its hot play could come back from the Bay winners of eight of its last nine games including its last four on the road hosting the Oregon schools in what could be a revenge weekend to get to eight straight.pokinmik wrote:That would be nice. Definitely possible.
It’s so painful to think if we just held on versus Oregon and ASU we’d be ranked top10 right now with a 4-2 road record.* Oh well just keep notching victories.
*other teams could definitely say this too and maybe we wouldn’t have learned some painful lessons for the long haul. I guess no point thinking of “what if”
im a broken record, i know, but Arizona's schedule has set up perfect this year, thats why the loss to ASU hurts so much - legitimately Arizona could play its way to the two line if it continues this hot streak and capitalizes on the oft mentioned favorable schedule by some annoying guy on here.
my expectation is for Arizona to win its next four games
- Alieberman
- Posts: 13841
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
- Reputation: 2885
- Location: I can't find my pants
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
That's my expectation too I just don't trust this team to not fuck it up.97cats wrote:the ASU loss specifically is painful...and even in that, if Arizona continues its hot play could come back from the Bay winners of eight of its last nine games including its last four on the road hosting the Oregon schools in what could be a revenge weekend to get to eight straight.pokinmik wrote:That would be nice. Definitely possible.
It’s so painful to think if we just held on versus Oregon and ASU we’d be ranked top10 right now with a 4-2 road record.* Oh well just keep notching victories.
*other teams could definitely say this too and maybe we wouldn’t have learned some painful lessons for the long haul. I guess no point thinking of “what if”
im a broken record, i know, but Arizona's schedule has set up perfect this year, thats why the loss to ASU hurts so much - legitimately Arizona could play its way to the two line if it continues this hot streak and capitalizes on the oft mentioned favorable schedule by some annoying guy on here.
my expectation is for Arizona to win its next four games
-
- Posts: 8595
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Not to overlook UCLA, who we all know will have their best shooting game of the season tomorrow, but Stanford did beat Oregon in Palo Alto, so I’d be pleasantly surprised to win that one. Going forward we just need to avoid any more bad losses and beat Oregon at McKale.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
doesnt matter, they are dog shit awful this year - dog shitBeachcat97 wrote:Not to overlook UCLA,
wont matterBeachcat97 wrote:who we all know will have their best shooting game of the season tomorrow,
Arizona is comfortable in Palo AltoBeachcat97 wrote: but Stanford did beat Oregon in Palo Alto,
did you know, Sean Miller is 9-0 at Stanford while head man at Arizona and 18-0 overallBeachcat97 wrote:so I’d be pleasantly surprised to win that one.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
If our perimeter guys play smart, we can beat anybody. Unfortunately, we haven't done that yet. They fall in love with the 3 and our offense falls apart for large stretches allowing teams to get back into the game. Play smart and we should win the rest of our conference games.
-
- Posts: 8595
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
All good points, 97. Glad to see your confidence in this team is enduring.97cats wrote:doesnt matter, they are dog shit awful this year - dog shitBeachcat97 wrote:Not to overlook UCLA,
wont matterBeachcat97 wrote:who we all know will have their best shooting game of the season tomorrow,
Arizona is comfortable in Palo AltoBeachcat97 wrote: but Stanford did beat Oregon in Palo Alto,
did you know, Sean Miller is 9-0 at Stanford while head man at Arizona and 18-0 overallBeachcat97 wrote:so I’d be pleasantly surprised to win that one.
- Chicat
- Posts: 46631
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3978
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
It’s not hard to be confident in this team due to their talent in relation to the rest of the league and the rest of D1.
It is hard to be confident at times though when you look at things like execution down the stretch and how young our core is.
We can certainly win our next four games. We are also some tired legs and a late game Dylan Smith turnover fest away from 2-2 or worse.
It is hard to be confident at times though when you look at things like execution down the stretch and how young our core is.
We can certainly win our next four games. We are also some tired legs and a late game Dylan Smith turnover fest away from 2-2 or worse.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
-
- Posts: 8595
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Last night's game was the first, maybe all season, where my prediction was pretty close. The spread was around 10, some were expecting we'd win by 20, but I thought it would be closer. No particular reason. USC is decent, and we've struggled to play good basketball for 40 full minutes.Chicat wrote:It’s not hard to be confident in this team due to their talent in relation to the rest of the league and the rest of D1.
It is hard to be confident at times though when you look at things like execution down the stretch and how young our core is.
We can certainly win our next four games. We are also some tired legs and a late game Dylan Smith turnover fest away from 2-2 or worse.
I hear ya, Chi. The talent and potential is there. Every year there are teams that click at the right time and surprise everyone late in the season. One of these years, it's going to be us. I actually think it's more likely that one of our more marginal teams (ranked in the 15-25 range) reaches the FF than one of our preseason top 10 teams.
I do think we'll beat UCLA tomorrow. We've played our best ball at McKale, and even though UCLA has played better lately, I think they're going to struggle guarding Zeke. Just gotta keep them off the offensive boards. USC got waaaaaay too many second chances.
Beyond that, here's how I think the remaining reg season games will go:
@Cal (W)
@Stanford (W)
OSU (W)
ORE (W)
@USC (L)
@UCLA (W)
WSU (W)
UW (W)
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
97cats wrote:the ASU loss specifically is painful...and even in that, if Arizona continues its hot play could come back from the Bay winners of eight of its last nine games including its last four on the road hosting the Oregon schools in what could be a revenge weekend to get to eight straight.pokinmik wrote:That would be nice. Definitely possible.
It’s so painful to think if we just held on versus Oregon and ASU we’d be ranked top10 right now with a 4-2 road record.* Oh well just keep notching victories.
*other teams could definitely say this too and maybe we wouldn’t have learned some painful lessons for the long haul. I guess no point thinking of “what if”
im a broken record, i know, but Arizona's schedule has set up perfect this year, thats why the loss to ASU hurts so much - legitimately Arizona could play its way to the two line if it continues this hot streak and capitalizes on the oft mentioned favorable schedule by some annoying guy on here.
my expectation is for Arizona to win its next four games
I'm only confident of winning 3/4. I will be pleasantly surprised if we beat Stanford in Palo Alto but I'm not expecting it. The one road sweep we have is over the 10/12th place teams in the conference.......and the #12 team nearly beat us. We have still not defeated any team of note on the road.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Is that good? Asking for a friend.97cats wrote:did you know, Sean Miller is 9-0 at Stanford while head man at Arizona and 18-0 overall
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
azgreg wrote:Is that good? Asking for a friend.97cats wrote:did you know, Sean Miller is 9-0 at Stanford while head man at Arizona and 18-0 overall
decent - if Arizona loses on the NorCal trip, history would say its at Cal...we will see.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
84Cat wrote:If our perimeter guys play smart, we can beat anybody. Unfortunately, we haven't done that yet. They fall in love with the 3 and our offense falls apart for large stretches allowing teams to get back into the game. Play smart and we should win the rest of our conference games.
I'm not disagreeing with this -- but also consider the type of players that are settling for jump shots.
Miller has touched on the concern about not getting to the FT line enough -- attacking the rim. Mannion & Green have the skill set to do this and they did so last night. Both got to the FT line quite a bit. They need to do that more often.
But Baker, Hazzard and Smith are not good at attacking the rim. It's just not a strength.
On another note, Miller and the staff really needs to evaluate playing time in tight games, especially involving Dylan Smith.
His conference stats are really poor -- in 9 games he's shooting 35% FG, 31% 3 pt.FG, and 59% FT. But in tight games he's been more of a liability.
Against Oregon, ASU and UW (in which Arizona went 1-2) Dylan Smith shot 1-6 from the FT line. A number of those misses were in the final minutes in which the pressure was greater. He missed the front end of a 1 and 1 at Oregon with 1:28 remaining, which would've given Arizona potentially a six point lead.
Against ASU he missed two FTs with 3:25 remaining and Arizona trailing by two.
Against UW, he went 1-3 (one of the misses was a front end so a potential for 2 points).
Last night, Smith went 3-4 from the line but 1-2 in the final :25 as Arizona looked to ice the game.
1-6 FTs in crunch time is a big deal and presents a problem for the coaching staff that understands Smith is a best choice for defense late in the game but also a big liability on offense because of his poor decision-making.
Last edited by zonagrad on Fri Feb 07, 2020 2:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 10:14 pm
- Reputation: 4
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Beachcat97 wrote:Last night's game was the first, maybe all season, where my prediction was pretty close. The spread was around 10, some were expecting we'd win by 20, but I thought it would be closer. No particular reason. USC is decent, and we've struggled to play good basketball for 40 full minutes.Chicat wrote:It’s not hard to be confident in this team due to their talent in relation to the rest of the league and the rest of D1.
It is hard to be confident at times though when you look at things like execution down the stretch and how young our core is.
We can certainly win our next four games. We are also some tired legs and a late game Dylan Smith turnover fest away from 2-2 or worse.
I hear ya, Chi. The talent and potential is there. Every year there are teams that click at the right time and surprise everyone late in the season. One of these years, it's going to be us. I actually think it's more likely that one of our more marginal teams (ranked in the 15-25 range) reaches the FF than one of our preseason top 10 teams.
I do think we'll beat UCLA tomorrow. We've played our best ball at McKale, and even though UCLA has played better lately, I think they're going to struggle guarding Zeke. Just gotta keep them off the offensive boards. USC got waaaaaay too many second chances.
Beyond that, here's how I think the remaining reg season games will go:
@Cal (W)
@Stanford (W)
OSU (W)
ORE (W)
@USC (L)
@UCLA (W)
WSU (W)
UW (W)
I think we lose 2 more. Split road games v usc and tree and prob lose in conf tourney. Or lose both and win tourney.
That’s 26-8 and prob a 4 seed. Whether it’s out west or not likely depends on where Oregon finishes.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Good stuff ZG, thanks for the breakdown!
-
- Posts: 1324
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 10:08 am
- Reputation: 130
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Starting to sound more like the '97 Cats...PennZona20 wrote:
...That’s 26-8 and prob a 4 seed....
No Bandwagon Here! Always a Cat!
- Chicat
- Posts: 46631
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3978
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
I thought we promised each other we weren’t going to do that anymore.MountainCat wrote:Starting to sound more like the '97 Cats...PennZona20 wrote:
...That’s 26-8 and prob a 4 seed....
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
NCAA TOP 16 is out......AZ not in it
Oregon is the only PAC12 team represented........4 seed in the West
https://collegebasketball.nbcsports.com ... right-now/" target="_blank
Oregon is the only PAC12 team represented........4 seed in the West
https://collegebasketball.nbcsports.com ... right-now/" target="_blank
Last edited by dmjcat on Sat Feb 08, 2020 10:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
dmjcat wrote:NCAA TOP 16 is out......AZ not in it
https://collegebasketball.nbcsports.com ... right-now/" target="_blank
- Alieberman
- Posts: 13841
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
- Reputation: 2885
- Location: I can't find my pants
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
They have as a #6 right now.
- Merkin
- Posts: 43385
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
- Reputation: 1580
- Location: UA basketball smells like....victory
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Wasn't that long ago when the UA was in trouble of not making the tourney at all, so I will take it. Still not convinced they will make it out of the first weekend.
Just quit blowing leads.
Just quit blowing leads.
- Chicat
- Posts: 46631
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3978
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
I’m ok with Arizona not being top-16.
I’m NOT ok with Michigan State being included.
I’m NOT ok with Michigan State being included.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
- Alieberman
- Posts: 13841
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
- Reputation: 2885
- Location: I can't find my pants
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Yeah... it's hard to get a grasp of these Big 10 teams. I thought nobody eats their own like the Pac 12... but the Big 10 teams are just killing each other.Chicat wrote:I’m ok with Arizona not being top-16.
I’m NOT ok with Michigan State being included.
-
- Posts: 30196
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:41 pm
- Reputation: 1849
- Location: Mohave Dorm Room 417 Buzz 2
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Well Sparty is getting whooped by unranked Michigan today so probably already out of the top 16.Alieberman wrote:Yeah... it's hard to get a grasp of these Big 10 teams. I thought nobody eats their own like the Pac 12... but the Big 10 teams are just killing each other.Chicat wrote:I’m ok with Arizona not being top-16.
I’m NOT ok with Michigan State being included.
- Chicat
- Posts: 46631
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3978
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Hilariously it is probably their win over then-ranked #12 Michigan that put them there in the first place.UAEebs86 wrote:Well Sparty is getting whooped by unranked Michigan today so probably already out of the top 16.Alieberman wrote:Yeah... it's hard to get a grasp of these Big 10 teams. I thought nobody eats their own like the Pac 12... but the Big 10 teams are just killing each other.Chicat wrote:I’m ok with Arizona not being top-16.
I’m NOT ok with Michigan State being included.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Yea funny how they look at things. Our conference last place team is the only team to beat #1 and we thrashed the B1G leader
Waiting at the Rose Bowl patiently for the cats to arrive
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Last season?Merkin wrote:Wasn't that long ago when the UA was in trouble of not making the tourney at all, so I will take it. Still not convinced they will make it out of the first weekend.
Just quit blowing leads.
At no point this season have the Cats been anywhere close to the bubble
2018 Bear Down Wildcats Conference Championship Challenge Champion
-
- Posts: 8595
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Totally. Each week we add another good loss or two to our record cementing our status as a lock for a tourney bid.PHXCATS wrote:Last season?Merkin wrote:Wasn't that long ago when the UA was in trouble of not making the tourney at all, so I will take it. Still not convinced they will make it out of the first weekend.
Just quit blowing leads.
At no point this season have the Cats been anywhere close to the bubble
-
- Posts: 8595
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Arizona Wildcats
"Pencil this group in for a potential No. 6 seed," the Watch said with customary bravado when last we discussed Arizona. "All bets are off with this sporadically hapless group," the Watch now says with newfound concern regarding the Wildcats. Sean Miller's group went out and lost 65-52 at home to UCLA, adding to a growing body of work under the heading of weirdly troubling defeats. With losses to the non-tournament likes of St. John's, Oregon State and now the Bruins, the men from Tucson are looking more and more like a middle seed that will be feared by few.
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-baske ... bble-years" target="_blank
"Pencil this group in for a potential No. 6 seed," the Watch said with customary bravado when last we discussed Arizona. "All bets are off with this sporadically hapless group," the Watch now says with newfound concern regarding the Wildcats. Sean Miller's group went out and lost 65-52 at home to UCLA, adding to a growing body of work under the heading of weirdly troubling defeats. With losses to the non-tournament likes of St. John's, Oregon State and now the Bruins, the men from Tucson are looking more and more like a middle seed that will be feared by few.
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-baske ... bble-years" target="_blank
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
first, boy was I wrong and in that so disappointed.
Arizona will make the tournament barring a colossal collapse down the stretch, but is will be a middle(ish) seed in March, IMO ...and I can’t argue, as of Saturday strikes fear into few.
**two points from bumping the blowout loses thread
Arizona will make the tournament barring a colossal collapse down the stretch, but is will be a middle(ish) seed in March, IMO ...and I can’t argue, as of Saturday strikes fear into few.
**two points from bumping the blowout loses thread
- Alieberman
- Posts: 13841
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
- Reputation: 2885
- Location: I can't find my pants
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
ESPN has ASU listed as a play-in team right now.... everything is lining up perfectly!
- Chicat
- Posts: 46631
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3978
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Everything feels right with the world.Alieberman wrote:ESPN has ASU listed as a play-in team right now.... everything is lining up perfectly!
Have fun getting spanked by Rutgers, scummies...
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket ... acketology" target="_blank
2019 & 2021 Basketball RAP Winner/2022 Football RAP Winner
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
AZ:
Oregon:
Oregon:
-
- Posts: 8595
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Think our worst possible seed is 6, best is 4. I mean, if we run the table from here to Selection Sunday, maybe 3. Somebody get Nico some spinach.
-
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:37 pm
- Reputation: -148
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Maybe the more we lose the higher seed we'll get! But then we'd be Duke.Beachcat97 wrote:Totally. Each week we add another good loss or two to our record cementing our status as a lock for a tourney bid.PHXCATS wrote:Last season?Merkin wrote:Wasn't that long ago when the UA was in trouble of not making the tourney at all, so I will take it. Still not convinced they will make it out of the first weekend.
Just quit blowing leads.
At no point this season have the Cats been anywhere close to the bubble
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Our worst seed is a like play in 11 seed. If we collapse down the stretch and go like 1-6 and lose our first PAC 12 game we could still even miss the tournament.Beachcat97 wrote:Think our worst possible seed is 6, best is 4. I mean, if we run the table from here to Selection Sunday, maybe 3. Somebody get Nico some spinach.
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
https://www.cbssports.com/college-baske ... cketology/" target="_blank
2019 & 2021 Basketball RAP Winner/2022 Football RAP Winner
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket ... acketology" target="_blank
2019 & 2021 Basketball RAP Winner/2022 Football RAP Winner
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Well that is unrealistic so what is the point of even discussing it?ASUHATER! wrote:Our worst seed is a like play in 11 seed. If we collapse down the stretch and go like 1-6 and lose our first PAC 12 game we could still even miss the tournament.Beachcat97 wrote:Think our worst possible seed is 6, best is 4. I mean, if we run the table from here to Selection Sunday, maybe 3. Somebody get Nico some spinach.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
It's a fair correction to the previous postDosia wrote:Well that is unrealistic so what is the point of even discussing it?ASUHATER! wrote:Our worst seed is a like play in 11 seed. If we collapse down the stretch and go like 1-6 and lose our first PAC 12 game we could still even miss the tournament.Beachcat97 wrote:Think our worst possible seed is 6, best is 4. I mean, if we run the table from here to Selection Sunday, maybe 3. Somebody get Nico some spinach.
We can certainly finish worse than a 6 seed, but beat Oregon and we'll be in a good spot with the last weekend at home vs the Washington schools
- Chicat
- Posts: 46631
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3978
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
We are up to #7 in the NET rankings.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Even with this handy dandy NCAA tweet I still don't understand NET rankings.