That would probably be a length that would give Christian Koloko shorts that would make John Stockton blush.
The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Well for me anyway it works since I'm 5'10" haha.
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
- Longhorned
- Posts: 14758
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:04 pm
- Reputation: 975
- Location: In a guayabera at The Sands Club, Arizona Stadium
-
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm
- Reputation: 338
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
The guy in background of Memphis pic seems to have normal length shorts.
- UAEebs86
- Posts: 30177
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:41 pm
- Reputation: 1841
- Location: Mohave Dorm Room 417 Buzz 2
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Yeah, I think #11 is just doing the Chase Jeter thing on both legs.Postmaster wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 8:01 pm The guy in background of Memphis pic seems to have normal length shorts.
We are the people our parents warned us about.
-JB
2022 Survival Pool Co-Champion
-JB
2022 Survival Pool Co-Champion
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Bunch of Dalen Terry snippet videos from his recent workouts with his training coach (click the link and you'll see the replies with the rest).
Touch looks great. Someone better at basketball than me: wouldn't he want to be doing these drills at game speed, at least once he has the rhythm of it down?
Touch looks great. Someone better at basketball than me: wouldn't he want to be doing these drills at game speed, at least once he has the rhythm of it down?
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
My two cents on the game speed thing.YoDeFoe wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 10:21 am Bunch of Dalen Terry snippet videos from his recent workouts with his training coach (click the link and you'll see the replies with the rest).
Touch looks great. Someone better at basketball than me: wouldn't he want to be doing these drills at game speed, at least once he has the rhythm of it down?
It's hard to do repetitive drills for skill development at true game speed. When I played, I my toenails would go black and blue and sometimes fall off the beginning of every season. You have to push hard in a way that you can't really replicate.
These teaching drills are about establishing motor patterns that you hope hold at the higher intensities. First, it's just hard to get the necessary # of reps in at game speed. Doing this 100 times helps motor skill, but doing this 100 times at game speed is gonna burn a guy out after 20 and his form goes to shit and compromises motor skill.
Second, you don't win games in July. The time Terry needs to translate this to game speed begins in November. Right now I think it's reasonable to just try to build his motor skill and confidence. The time to make that transition will come, but lay the foundation for now, then push harder closer to the season.
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Awesome!
- Merkin
- Posts: 43223
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
- Reputation: 1550
- Location: UA basketball smells like....victory
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Lloyd doing all the right things. Very good move.
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Glad to get Gardner back with the team - all time great Cat.
Seems we're still going to lose Terry to the Mavs, so does Gardner stick in this role and we have another coaching vacancy? Or does he move to the sidelines? He was a head coach (with limited success) previously.
Additionally, are we bringing in Riccardo Fois from the Suns now that their run is complete, as had previously been rumored?
Still a lot of flux for Lloyd to work through...
Seems we're still going to lose Terry to the Mavs, so does Gardner stick in this role and we have another coaching vacancy? Or does he move to the sidelines? He was a head coach (with limited success) previously.
Additionally, are we bringing in Riccardo Fois from the Suns now that their run is complete, as had previously been rumored?
Still a lot of flux for Lloyd to work through...
-
- Posts: 8585
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 468
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I'm not buying Kansas or Baylor.
-
- Posts: 8585
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 468
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
What's wrong with Baylor? Seems they earned some respect last season. But yeah, Kansas is usually fool's gold.
Interesting that AZ is nowhere near these preseason forecasts. There's a sizable gulf between AZ fan's expectations with Lloyd in year one and national media's predictions. The reality is probably in the middle somewhere.
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
It just sucks to see us go to not mentioned at all. That was not where we left last season.Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 10:16 amWhat's wrong with Baylor? Seems they earned some respect last season. But yeah, Kansas is usually fool's gold.
Interesting that AZ is nowhere near these preseason forecasts. There's a sizable gulf between AZ fan's expectations with Lloyd in year one and national media's predictions. The reality is probably in the middle somewhere.
Michigan at #7 is surprisingly low. They have some good returners and the #1 recruiting class. I'd have them and Zaga at the top.
-
- Posts: 8585
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 468
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I'm usually pretty bullish on Gonzaga, but I actually think losing Suggs, Ayayi and Kispert is more significant than most are recognizing. I know they're gaining some excellent players, but I'm not as confident that this team can get to the FF.Spaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 10:34 amIt just sucks to see us go to not mentioned at all. That was not where we left last season.Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 10:16 amWhat's wrong with Baylor? Seems they earned some respect last season. But yeah, Kansas is usually fool's gold.
Interesting that AZ is nowhere near these preseason forecasts. There's a sizable gulf between AZ fan's expectations with Lloyd in year one and national media's predictions. The reality is probably in the middle somewhere.
Michigan at #7 is surprisingly low. They have some good returners and the #1 recruiting class. I'd have them and Zaga at the top.
Agree completely on Michigan. They're loaded, and Juwan is a good coach.
It kills me to say it, but UCLA should be right there in the mix for national contention. They return their entire team and add outstanding new players. Hard to overstate their potential.
And yeah, AZ is largely forgotten nationally at the moment. There's surely some skepticism surrounding Lloyd, and there are question marks about our roster.
- IndianaZonaFan
- Posts: 1030
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:14 pm
- Reputation: 182
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
It’s year one with a new coach. My expectations are tempered. I want to see this new system play out with this roster as is. And obviously want to see improvement through the year. I think more of our roster than most…and I expect us to make the tournament in the 7-9 seed range.
If we don’t make it…hey it’s year one.
PAC Finish-
1-3 is over achieving (Oregon, UCLA, USC)
4 is where I think we should be
5-6 is acceptable
7 or worse is a disaster
If we don’t make it…hey it’s year one.
PAC Finish-
1-3 is over achieving (Oregon, UCLA, USC)
4 is where I think we should be
5-6 is acceptable
7 or worse is a disaster
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
With Gonzaga, they're just loaded at the top end. I agree with that article that Timme might be the best returning player in the nation and Holmgren is probably the best incoming freshman. Nembhard is solid and Sallis and Hickman are talented. Watson, Harris and Strawther off the bench is legit depth. Yeah, there were big losses, but the replacements are pretty darn good.Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 11:41 amI'm usually pretty bullish on Gonzaga, but I actually think losing Suggs, Ayayi and Kispert is more significant than most are recognizing. I know they're gaining some excellent players, but I'm not as confident that this team can get to the FF.Spaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 10:34 amIt just sucks to see us go to not mentioned at all. That was not where we left last season.Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 10:16 amWhat's wrong with Baylor? Seems they earned some respect last season. But yeah, Kansas is usually fool's gold.
Interesting that AZ is nowhere near these preseason forecasts. There's a sizable gulf between AZ fan's expectations with Lloyd in year one and national media's predictions. The reality is probably in the middle somewhere.
Michigan at #7 is surprisingly low. They have some good returners and the #1 recruiting class. I'd have them and Zaga at the top.
Agree completely on Michigan. They're loaded, and Juwan is a good coach.
It kills me to say it, but UCLA should be right there in the mix for national contention. They return their entire team and add outstanding new players. Hard to overstate their potential.
And yeah, AZ is largely forgotten nationally at the moment. There's surely some skepticism surrounding Lloyd, and there are question marks about our roster.
Look at them vs Kansas or UCLA. No disrespect to those teams, but I take Zaga vs either of them without blinking.
If these rankings turn out accurate, it's going to be hard watching Baylor be top 10 with Akinjo while we don't make it.
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
New article from the Athletic on Lloyd... not much fresh insight here but there is a couple of items worth reading:
Also, Lloyd commented on the difficulties in recruiting:
“Recruiting has been a little bit hard,” Lloyd says. “Let’s face it, I’m a first-year head coach, and the NCAA stuff hangs over your head. Hopefully soon the dust will settle and we’ll be able to move through it.”
Also, Lloyd commented on the difficulties in recruiting:
“Recruiting has been a little bit hard,” Lloyd says. “Let’s face it, I’m a first-year head coach, and the NCAA stuff hangs over your head. Hopefully soon the dust will settle and we’ll be able to move through it.”
- BBQ wildcat
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 3:01 pm
- Reputation: 238
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I'm not sure what the average Arizona fan's expectations are, but I am pretty pessimisticon the season. Before Miller was fired, top 20 AT LEAST was a reasonable expecataion. Now, I am not even convinced we will be in the top half of the conference. So far I am not impressed with lloyd's "recruiting" and now he is trying to place a lot of the blame on possible sanctions. We never heard Miller saying how hard it was to recruit because of the Book fiasco. He just put his head down and worked harder.Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 10:16 amWhat's wrong with Baylor? Seems they earned some respect last season. But yeah, Kansas is usually fool's gold.
Interesting that AZ is nowhere near these preseason forecasts. There's a sizable gulf between AZ fan's expectations with Lloyd in year one and national media's predictions. The reality is probably in the middle somewhere.
So, between not being impressed with the recruiting, and not yet having seen what kind of team he will put on the floor, I can't see room for a whole lot of optimism.
I'm not blaming Lloyd, but that's where we are. The blame falls squarely on Robbins and Heeke.
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
That is very impressive on Miller's part, IMO. It's high class to invite Lloyd over when Miller would have every reason to be salty.YoDeFoe wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 1:40 pm New article from the Athletic on Lloyd... not much fresh insight here but there is a couple of items worth reading:
Also, Lloyd commented on the difficulties in recruiting:
“Recruiting has been a little bit hard,” Lloyd says. “Let’s face it, I’m a first-year head coach, and the NCAA stuff hangs over your head. Hopefully soon the dust will settle and we’ll be able to move through it.”
It's hard to know what I think about recruiting difficulties. Yeah, Lloyd is probably right, but we fired Miller while he was struggling with some of those same difficulties and doing better than Lloyd has so far.
- Chicat
- Posts: 46507
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3896
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Sean Miller was always a class act.
No matter what certain never-was wannabe sports reporters might say now.
I always respected that he represented the University of Arizona in a respectful, classy manner.
No matter what certain never-was wannabe sports reporters might say now.
I always respected that he represented the University of Arizona in a respectful, classy manner.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
To be real, Miller probably respects Lloyd in a way he doesn't some reporters. Which, frankly, isn't stunning or even bad. Coach of Arizona Basketball outranks KVOA sports guy in professional success by a large margin.
I use KVOA specifically as a reference to Ari Alexander. Because I don't like subliminal shots.
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Lloyd has his shot now and it sets up nicely for him but its gonna take a few seasons realistically - the style will be complete opposite (top to bottom) both internally and on the floor.
Miller has always been supremely secure with how he views himself and makes no apologies - not surprising he had the thoughtfulness and humility to reach out to Lloyd even given the circumstances.
Miller has always been supremely secure with how he views himself and makes no apologies - not surprising he had the thoughtfulness and humility to reach out to Lloyd even given the circumstances.
-
- Posts: 8585
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 468
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I've been thinking all along that the Lloyd Project is at minimum a 2 to 3 year process. As long as we're trending in the right direction by the end of this season (the team is playing better, recruiting is picking up), I'm good. I'm just hoping that 2021-22 doesn't end up being a lost season. Really need to get some momentum.97cats wrote: ↑Wed Jul 28, 2021 10:32 am Lloyd has his shot now and it sets up nicely for him but its gonna take a few seasons realistically - the style will be complete opposite (top to bottom) both internally and on the floor.
Miller has always been supremely secure with how he views himself and makes no apologies - not surprising he had the thoughtfulness and humility to reach out to Lloyd even given the circumstances.
And yeah, Miller is all class, all the time. It's always been that way. Even while he did lose his cool at times, the larger impression he made while coach is that he's a good leader and a good person.
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Lloyd is getting 2-3 years minimum to show he can do it. In that interim, I'm not really fine with relying on trends and forsaking results.Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 28, 2021 10:48 amI've been thinking all along that the Lloyd Project is at minimum a 2 to 3 year process. As long as we're trending in the right direction by the end of this season (the team is playing better, recruiting is picking up), I'm good. I'm just hoping that 2021-22 doesn't end up being a lost season. Really need to get some momentum.97cats wrote: ↑Wed Jul 28, 2021 10:32 am Lloyd has his shot now and it sets up nicely for him but its gonna take a few seasons realistically - the style will be complete opposite (top to bottom) both internally and on the floor.
Miller has always been supremely secure with how he views himself and makes no apologies - not surprising he had the thoughtfulness and humility to reach out to Lloyd even given the circumstances.
And yeah, Miller is all class, all the time. It's always been that way. Even while he did lose his cool at times, the larger impression he made while coach is that he's a good leader and a good person.
First, 93.6% of college basketball players were in the transfer portal this offseason. If you can't make it work with a crazy quilt of players who may or may not be your guys, you can't coach in today's CBB world.
This isn't CFB where guys stay and you expect it takes 2-3 developmental years to get them primed to play. The onus is to find success while creating a culture.
Second, the raw materials are there. Mathurin and Tubelis are pros in the making. Terry, Kerr and Koloko are returners who are at minimum, solid college players. Everyone you think will get minutes has at least a year of college ball under their belt.
I'm not saying you expect an immediate, flawless transition. I do think as we judge Lloyd, how quickly and successfully he bridges the gap is a big aspect of judgment.
Two years is a long time in the CBB world. For big time programs, it's not unusual to see a situation where every rotation guy is gone from the roster in a two year span.
Look at Gonzaga. Their 21-22 roster will have two rotation players from 2019-20, everyone else is new. For a program that's sold as a big time developmental program...they basically have 50% of their rotation guys turn over on a year to year basis. That's actually pretty stable in today's world.
So, I would peg the expectation as succeeding in 21-22 with Miller's team (i.e., an NCAA tournament along with a respectable Pac record) and then moving toward a Pac title and deep run in 22-23. I think we'd have been Sweet 16 with Miller this year, so there's an element of generosity in me not holding Lloyd to that in 21-22.
-
- Posts: 8585
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 468
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I'm very comfortable with this overview and expectations for the next few seasons.Spaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Wed Jul 28, 2021 11:18 am
So, I would peg the expectation as succeeding in 21-22 with Miller's team (i.e., an NCAA tournament along with a respectable Pac record) and then moving toward a Pac title and deep run in 22-23. I think we'd have been Sweet 16 with Miller this year, so there's an element of generosity in me not holding Lloyd to that in 21-22.
It's crazy that we're coming off the Pac's best NCAA tourney performance in I don't know how long...maybe ever...and yet that did not include Arizona. A lot of pressure on Lloyd to win sooner than later.
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Same thoughts.Spaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Wed Jul 28, 2021 11:18 am So, I would peg the expectation as succeeding in 21-22 with Miller's team (i.e., an NCAA tournament along with a respectable Pac record) and then moving toward a Pac title and deep run in 22-23. I think we'd have been Sweet 16 with Miller this year, so there's an element of generosity in me not holding Lloyd to that in 21-22.
I think we'll be good this season - better than most believe (if you haven't heard me say it 100x by now). My concern is that Lloyd is going to have to "prove it" and we'll need to get the NCAA IARP behind us before Lloyd can recruit at full strength.
So what does that mean? Probably losing three or four guys to pro play after this season and we're already down two guys in scholarships... so assuming no transfers we'll be looking for a 6 man class. We've got one very good recruit right now, but I worry that the IARP won't decide and Lloyd won't be able to prove it in time to secure the necessary talent to replace who we're losing and improve the following season.
So I think we surprise this season, have a lull next season, and then get back to it in his third season and beyond. Somewhat like Miller's start.
-
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm
- Reputation: 338
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Does anyone know who the guy is: he is/was on staff but not a coach. Kind of heavy set. Little bit of a widows peak hairline.
- Merkin
- Posts: 43223
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
- Reputation: 1550
- Location: UA basketball smells like....victory
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Him?Postmaster wrote: ↑Wed Jul 28, 2021 9:14 pm Does anyone know who the guy is: he is/was on staff but not a coach. Kind of heavy set. Little bit of a widows peak hairline.
Still working at the UA, just not on Lloyd's staff like he was on Miller's.
https://arizonawildcats.com/staff-direc ... ynolds/276
-
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm
- Reputation: 338
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Yes.
I see him on tv a lot and never knew who he was.
Saw him last night while I was at dinner.
Thanks
I see him on tv a lot and never knew who he was.
Saw him last night while I was at dinner.
Thanks
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Not to harp, but some of what you describe is why I wish Lloyd had invested more in retaining Miller's class.YoDeFoe wrote: ↑Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:29 pmSame thoughts.Spaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Wed Jul 28, 2021 11:18 am So, I would peg the expectation as succeeding in 21-22 with Miller's team (i.e., an NCAA tournament along with a respectable Pac record) and then moving toward a Pac title and deep run in 22-23. I think we'd have been Sweet 16 with Miller this year, so there's an element of generosity in me not holding Lloyd to that in 21-22.
I think we'll be good this season - better than most believe (if you haven't heard me say it 100x by now). My concern is that Lloyd is going to have to "prove it" and we'll need to get the NCAA IARP behind us before Lloyd can recruit at full strength.
So what does that mean? Probably losing three or four guys to pro play after this season and we're already down two guys in scholarships... so assuming no transfers we'll be looking for a 6 man class. We've got one very good recruit right now, but I worry that the IARP won't decide and Lloyd won't be able to prove it in time to secure the necessary talent to replace who we're losing and improve the following season.
So I think we surprise this season, have a lull next season, and then get back to it in his third season and beyond. Somewhat like Miller's start.
This year's roster has talent, but is paper thin. I could see the talent surprising, but one or two injuries and the whole thing could also fall apart fast.
Going into next year, I would fully expect Mathurin, Tubelis and (of course) Kier to be gone at minimum. So best case, Koloko, Ballo, Terry, Larsson, Nowell and Kerr return as potential contributors and maybe Bal is ready.
It just seems like it would be nice to have a few extra guys both years so it doesn't become a situation where we need EVERY guy to contribute to be good. Plus, a little competition is good.
And another broken record alert, it's another reason I didn't understand bringing in Ballo with Koloko with open scholarships. The limitations of Koloko and Ballo are lack of positional flexibility. Having multiple single position players on a short roster that we are not adding to is just puzzling to me. I'd take Koloko, obviously, as I still think he has a ton of upside, but I just struggle with Ballo.
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Yeah in retrospect, I may have taken the loss of Dezonie and Simpson more lightly than I should have given my current concerns that we'll be unable to fill in talent for 2022-23.Spaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 8:31 am Not to harp, but some of what you describe is why I wish Lloyd had invested more in retaining Miller's class.
This year's roster has talent, but is paper thin. I could see the talent surprising, but one or two injuries and the whole thing could also fall apart fast.
Going into next year, I would fully expect Mathurin, Tubelis and (of course) Kier to be gone at minimum. So best case, Koloko, Ballo, Terry, Larsson, Nowell and Kerr return as potential contributors and maybe Bal is ready.
It just seems like it would be nice to have a few extra guys both years so it doesn't become a situation where we need EVERY guy to contribute to be good. Plus, a little competition is good.
And another broken record alert, it's another reason I didn't understand bringing in Ballo with Koloko with open scholarships. The limitations of Koloko and Ballo are lack of positional flexibility. Having multiple single position players on a short roster that we are not adding to is just puzzling to me. I'd take Koloko, obviously, as I still think he has a ton of upside, but I just struggle with Ballo.
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Basketball analyst CJ Marchesani ranked Benn Mathurin tenth nationally among last year's college freshmen.
-
- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:01 pm
- Reputation: 336
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Not sure what someone's stock portfolio has to do with basketball skills.
-
- Posts: 8585
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 468
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Mathurin is a future pro, no question.
Excited to see my Pistons pick CC tonight!
Excited to see my Pistons pick CC tonight!
- Chicat
- Posts: 46507
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3896
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
He’s got Mathurin at #12 and no other Cats in the top 40.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
-
- Posts: 1320
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 10:08 am
- Reputation: 130
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
So we have 5 of the top 10 returning freshman in the Pac 12, including #1 and #2. I assume then that we should be picked to finish in the lower half of the league. I mean, come on, even Utah and ASU may have better coaches. Coach Lloyd is an untested leader and has never won a game before. Go figure...
No Bandwagon Here! Always a Cat!
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
It's hard for me to pick our fortunes. We have some of the most talented players in the Pac. Benn and Tubs should be all-conference level in a pretty good year for the Pac.MountainCat wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 6:22 amSo we have 5 of the top 10 returning freshman in the Pac 12, including #1 and #2. I assume then that we should be picked to finish in the lower half of the league. I mean, come on, even Utah and ASU may have better coaches. Coach Lloyd is an untested leader and has never won a game before. Go figure...
We also have like no Plan B if an injury happens or someone underperforms. Tubs is our only PF, so our only fallback would be Terry or Benn out of position. Kerr and Kier are our only two PG capable guys, so if one goes down, uh oh.
It's very much a boom or bust scenario.
-
- Posts: 8585
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 468
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I hear you on the injury situation, Spiff. Also, increasingly, injuries seem to happen all. the. time. Not sure if teams are just erring on the side of over-caution with players' bodies, or if there are simply more injuries these days. But at both the pro and college levels, guys seem to get injured more than in the past.
If AZ finishes higher than 4th in the Pac this coming season, I'll be pleasantly surprised.
If AZ finishes higher than 4th in the Pac this coming season, I'll be pleasantly surprised.
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Injuries are tough to predict. To me, the more consistent worry day in and day out is foul trouble. Pac refs blow the whistle a lot, and we don't exactly have a roster built to handle a main cog getting a few early fouls.Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 11:05 am I hear you on the injury situation, Spiff. Also, increasingly, injuries seem to happen all. the. time. Not sure if teams are just erring on the side of over-caution with players' bodies, or if there are simply more injuries these days. But at both the pro and college levels, guys seem to get injured more than in the past.
If AZ finishes higher than 4th in the Pac this coming season, I'll be pleasantly surprised.
A reach in plus a charging call and we're in a tough spot. I say this in part because it is clearly an area we struggled with last year. We fouled waay too much.
-
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm
- Reputation: 338
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Is there any kind of deadline for signing and playing this upcoming season?
School starts in a few weeks.
School starts in a few weeks.
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Terry balled out at the Seattle pro am today alongside five star Duke commit Paolo Banchero.
Terry playing well this season would do… a lot to elevate the floor of this team (not to mention the ceiling).
Terry playing well this season would do… a lot to elevate the floor of this team (not to mention the ceiling).
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I don’t think this is in the Sean Miller playbook lol
- RichardCranium
- Posts: 3571
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 5:53 pm
- Reputation: 179
- Location: The Wonderful Land Of Oz
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I remember calling them ugly at the time. 'Culottes' I called 'em.
You guys shouted me down and said they were great.
Please learn from this incident and respect your elders from now on.
Any sufficiently advanced troll is indistinguishable from a genuine kook.