TucsonClip wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 2:44 pm
Spaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 11:40 am
I go back and forth on some of this.
There was an intersting tidbit in the article about Koloko's draft stock that he was almost exclusively playing drop coverage in the pick and roll to keep him closer to the rim. That's a change from hedge and recover for bigs.
That said, one of the aspects that killed me last year was sloppy closeouts. The first year guys were maddeningly inconsistent in sometimes closing out without active feet and getting blown by. Miller used the phrase "straight line drive" more than I've ever heard it.
I think it's fair to say Lloyd has taken more of an approach of tweaking the system to highlight what his players do instead of trying to teach them into a system as Miller did with packline. To me, that approach has upsides and downsides, but it fits well with this team because this roster is fairly loaded with physical ability.
Some of the overall improvements are just that players learned lessons as freshmen and continued as sophs. You aren't seeing the straight line drives off sloppy closeouts like last year, and that's a direct result of now having two years of drilling, IMO.
I don't see it as a Miller vs Lloyd issue either. I see it as, if Miller doesn't do good work last year, we're not as far along as we are. If Lloyd doesn't do good work this year, we're not as far along as we are. It's a product of two years of good coaching applied to a roster with high level physical ability.
And its not a full drop. Its a more modern NBA style half drop. In addition, Lloyd has allowed Koloko to switch out onto guards more often, which was something I thought he should have been allowed to do last year as well.
Regarding the straight line drives, that goes into my breakdown of the differences between Lloyd's base scheme and Millers. Ill find it and post it after this, but essentially, Lloyd has guys playing up the line, versus Miller having guys sit in gaps. Both apply ball pressure, but Lloyd isnt having guys help one pass away (NBA style), they will dig, but there are very few close outs, compared to Miller, because guys are staying home off the ball due to our ball screen coverages.
First, thanks for the analysis you bring to the board.
My take on Lloyd, he has done a great job fitting defensive scheme to personnel. I do think there's an ongoing question about how he will be fitting future rosters into schemes or how he recruits to fill out his schemes, but for right now, he's fit a system to personnel quite well.
His scheme fits two big assets of this team. First, every starter but Kerr is longer/bigger than average for college. Combining that with being up the line creates a disincentive to aggressively swing the ball, as you're passing into a congested lane clogged by a long, athletic player. It also minimizes closeouts as you note, which was not a strong suit last year. Closeouts will always happen, and I feel like players have improved in that area, but minimizing them helps this roster.
Same with drop and or switching. They're both designed to keep the ball in front of a defender with less influence than hedge and recover. Again, this is well suited for bigger, longer defenders. My only caveat here is I wonder the sustainability vs a team with dynamic and quick scoring guards, which we haven't really seen yet.
Lastly, Koloko is an elite rim protector in the college game. A lot of what Lloyd is doing seems predicated on not needing team efforts to control penetration but instead counting on Koloko to erase things. This again plays to a strength of having an eraser...it's also why I wonder what the future holds when we may not have a elite rim protector.
On the whole it's interesting. I'm intrigued to see how Lloyd handles the developmental aspect of players, since one of the great advantages of this team is all the major guys had significant teaching and playing time when he stepped in. Do Bal, Ballo and Nowell develop to take the places of Mathurin, Koloko and Terry or does Lloyd restructure?