Official Bracketology Thread
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Anyone know the tip time for Saturday?
- g32knights
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:55 am
- Reputation: 64
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
First game of the day, 12:45 EST, so is that 10:45 in Salt Lake?
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
It is. Utah is an hour ahead of us this time of year.g32knights wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:16 pmFirst game of the day, 12:45 EST, so is that 10:45 in Salt Lake?
“The reality is that the hardest games to win are over teams on their home court. Teams that don’t play those games can spin it however they want, but what they’re saying is, ‘We don’t want to lose in our non conference season.’" - Sean Miller
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Has anyone seen Charles Barkleys NCAA bracket predictions???
https://www.oregonlive.com/collegebaske ... -game.html
https://www.oregonlive.com/collegebaske ... -game.html
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Charles always supports us every year. Nice to have one guy with our back.dmjcat wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 5:54 pm Has anyone seen Charles Barkleys NCAA bracket predictions???
https://www.oregonlive.com/collegebaske ... -game.html
“The reality is that the hardest games to win are over teams on their home court. Teams that don’t play those games can spin it however they want, but what they’re saying is, ‘We don’t want to lose in our non conference season.’" - Sean Miller
- Merkin
- Posts: 43410
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
- Reputation: 1584
- Location: UA basketball smells like....victory
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
His daughter was a student at the UA of memory serves
- Fishclamps
- Posts: 3924
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2015 5:44 pm
- Reputation: 865
- Location: Tucson
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Some might see it as a curseAZCatGirl wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 7:21 pmCharles always supports us every year. Nice to have one guy with our back.dmjcat wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 5:54 pm Has anyone seen Charles Barkleys NCAA bracket predictions???
https://www.oregonlive.com/collegebaske ... -game.html
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Is there a team you've watched in the tourney that you thought to yourself, "yeah, Arizona couldn't beat these guys"?
Of the teams remaining, I feel like UConn and Houston are scariest. The only reason I leave off Purdue is because I can't see Loyer and Smith going 9-16 from 3 again against us. Tommy would have our guys better prepared to watch those shooters. We were within 4 of the Boilermakers with 5 minutes to play. On a "neutral" court in Phoenix, I'd love our chances against them.
Clingan, to me, is the best player remaining in the tournament. He's equally impactful on both ends of the floor, and our only player who'd stand a chance guarding him is Keshad.
And with Houston, I'm just in awe of their steady play and execution. Even as A&M chipped away at Houston's lead yesterday, did anyone ever really feel like the Cougs would lose? Sharp, Shead, Cryer...that's the best backcourt in the country.
Of the teams remaining, I feel like UConn and Houston are scariest. The only reason I leave off Purdue is because I can't see Loyer and Smith going 9-16 from 3 again against us. Tommy would have our guys better prepared to watch those shooters. We were within 4 of the Boilermakers with 5 minutes to play. On a "neutral" court in Phoenix, I'd love our chances against them.
Clingan, to me, is the best player remaining in the tournament. He's equally impactful on both ends of the floor, and our only player who'd stand a chance guarding him is Keshad.
And with Houston, I'm just in awe of their steady play and execution. Even as A&M chipped away at Houston's lead yesterday, did anyone ever really feel like the Cougs would lose? Sharp, Shead, Cryer...that's the best backcourt in the country.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
If we play like we did for most of the first half of the Dayton game, and how we've seen in stretches throughout the season, I think we have a shot against any team in a 1 game scenario.Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 1:17 pm Is there a team you've watched in the tourney that you thought to yourself, "yeah, Arizona couldn't beat these guys"?
Of the teams remaining, I feel like UConn and Houston are scariest. The only reason I leave off Purdue is because I can't see Loyer and Smith going 9-16 from 3 again against us. Tommy would have our guys better prepared to watch those shooters. We were within 4 of the Boilermakers with 5 minutes to play. On a "neutral" court in Phoenix, I'd love our chances against them.
Clingan, to me, is the best player remaining in the tournament. He's equally impactful on both ends of the floor, and our only player who'd stand a chance guarding him is Keshad.
And with Houston, I'm just in awe of their steady play and execution. Even as A&M chipped away at Houston's lead yesterday, did anyone ever really feel like the Cougs would lose? Sharp, Shead, Cryer...that's the best backcourt in the country.
I agree that UCONN and Houston are scary good. Would love for a matchup with either of them to be title game, but unfortunately can't be the case for UCONN!
Houston's guard play is something to see for sure, I didn't think Houston would lose either - felt like anytime A&M made a run or had a chance that it was shut down by a big play from Houston. Even with a bunch of their starters fouling out in OT they still managed to hang on too.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm
- Reputation: 340
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
It’s crazy the path Sampson has traveled.
While at WA ST he was a popular choice to replace Lute if Lute had left for KY.
Instead he goes to OK and things don’t go that well.
He gets in trouble with NCAA. Then he appears at HOU and turns them into a contender for multiple years.
While at WA ST he was a popular choice to replace Lute if Lute had left for KY.
Instead he goes to OK and things don’t go that well.
He gets in trouble with NCAA. Then he appears at HOU and turns them into a contender for multiple years.
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
I'm impressed with the identity he's brought to the Houston program. He's been recruiting the right players for that program, and they're thriving. Can't believe they also had Sasser last year.Postmaster wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2024 11:54 am It’s crazy the path Sampson has traveled.
While at WA ST he was a popular choice to replace Lute if Lute had left for KY.
Instead he goes to OK and things don’t go that well.
He gets in trouble with NCAA. Then he appears at HOU and turns them into a contender for multiple years.
- wyo-cat
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 6:27 pm
- Reputation: 506
- Location: Dusty Mexican Borderlands
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
He got a show cause ban at Indiana. It was really fucked up.Postmaster wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2024 11:54 am It’s crazy the path Sampson has traveled.
While at WA ST he was a popular choice to replace Lute if Lute had left for KY.
Instead he goes to OK and things don’t go that well.
He gets in trouble with NCAA. Then he appears at HOU and turns them into a contender for multiple years.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm
- Reputation: 340
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
I forgot IU. I was thinking he got a “show cause” but I wasn’t positive so I didn’t add it in my post. I was also thinking, if he did , it was at OU.wyo-cat wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2024 2:10 pmHe got a show cause ban at Indiana. It was really fucked up.Postmaster wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2024 11:54 am It’s crazy the path Sampson has traveled.
While at WA ST he was a popular choice to replace Lute if Lute had left for KY.
Instead he goes to OK and things don’t go that well.
He gets in trouble with NCAA. Then he appears at HOU and turns them into a contender for multiple years.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Purdue is 7-0 against Sweet 16 teams.
Crazy stat!
Crazy stat!
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Our 3 transfers from this season came from Alabama, UNC & SDSU . Those teams are all in the Sweet 16
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Here are the 2024 sweet sixteen TEAM rankings. Each and every player is given a "value" determined by his Hollinger PER multiplied by the PERCENT of minutes he has played for the team. The TEAM value is the sum of the player values.
2087 UConn
2051 Gonzaga
1984 Purdue
1927 Houston
1918 Arizona
1916 Duke
1914 Alabama
1884 Illinois
1858 Creighton
1820 Marquette
1806 Iowa State
1789 Tennessee
1788 North Carolina
1729 Clemson
1720 NC State
1682 San Diego State
Arizona should reach the Elite Eight tomorrow.
Don't be surprised if the "Caleb Love" game with North Carolina never happens - Arizona could end up with a worse matchup vs. Alabama.
Don't be surprised if Zach Edey never sees an Elite Eight. Gonzaga was seriously under-seeded this year.
2087 UConn
2051 Gonzaga
1984 Purdue
1927 Houston
1918 Arizona
1916 Duke
1914 Alabama
1884 Illinois
1858 Creighton
1820 Marquette
1806 Iowa State
1789 Tennessee
1788 North Carolina
1729 Clemson
1720 NC State
1682 San Diego State
Arizona should reach the Elite Eight tomorrow.
Don't be surprised if the "Caleb Love" game with North Carolina never happens - Arizona could end up with a worse matchup vs. Alabama.
Don't be surprised if Zach Edey never sees an Elite Eight. Gonzaga was seriously under-seeded this year.
- CalStateTempe
- Posts: 16649
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:46 pm
- Reputation: 582
- Location: The Right to Self-Determination: FREEDOM!!!!
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
I’m good with all those outcomes Kaibab’
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
This is a pretty big boy loaded sweet 16. Cindarella is watching at home
Waiting at the Rose Bowl patiently for the cats to arrive
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
I'm fine with the less heralded "Jaden Bradley" game with Alabama this weekend.KaibabKat wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2024 5:11 pm Here are the 2024 sweet sixteen TEAM rankings. Each and every player is given a "value" determined by his Hollinger PER multiplied by the PERCENT of minutes he has played for the team. The TEAM value is the sum of the player values.
2087 UConn
2051 Gonzaga
1984 Purdue
1927 Houston
1918 Arizona
1916 Duke
1914 Alabama
1884 Illinois
1858 Creighton
1820 Marquette
1806 Iowa State
1789 Tennessee
1788 North Carolina
1729 Clemson
1720 NC State
1682 San Diego State
Arizona should reach the Elite Eight tomorrow.
Don't be surprised if the "Caleb Love" game with North Carolina never happens - Arizona could end up with a worse matchup vs. Alabama.
Don't be surprised if Zach Edey never sees an Elite Eight. Gonzaga was seriously under-seeded this year.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Alabama does make me a little nervous since we beat them before, but with a Final 4 on the line I think our guys will be ready no matter who we play.
Gotta take care of tomorrow first though.
Gotta take care of tomorrow first though.
“The reality is that the hardest games to win are over teams on their home court. Teams that don’t play those games can spin it however they want, but what they’re saying is, ‘We don’t want to lose in our non conference season.’" - Sean Miller
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
UNC will beat Bama in a high scoring game
Our game is going to be close but I do think we win. Clemson is only 8-8 when they score 73 points but 15-3 when the control tempo. Couple that with a brutal travel schedule and they will be walking it up the court all night.
Not sure how they have held their opposition in this tournament to 9-47 from three but since we generally don’t take a lot of three’s (ranked like 250+) this would be another readon thus one should stay close.
Our game is going to be close but I do think we win. Clemson is only 8-8 when they score 73 points but 15-3 when the control tempo. Couple that with a brutal travel schedule and they will be walking it up the court all night.
Not sure how they have held their opposition in this tournament to 9-47 from three but since we generally don’t take a lot of three’s (ranked like 250+) this would be another readon thus one should stay close.
Waiting at the Rose Bowl patiently for the cats to arrive
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
- CalStateTempe
- Posts: 16649
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:46 pm
- Reputation: 582
- Location: The Right to Self-Determination: FREEDOM!!!!
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
When I hear National pundits talk about this game it becomes clear that they really don’t watch Arizona. Just “Caleb love experience” and Clemson with the upset.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Hmmm...CalStateTempe wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:34 am When I hear National pundits talk about this game it becomes clear that they really don’t watch Arizona. Just “Caleb love experience” and Clemson with the upset.
I have yet to see a national pundit pick Clemson. In any case, so the fuck what?
Most of the pundits I've seen focus on Ballo vs Hall; Clemson's lack of forcing TO's, Our offensive rebounding, and our 8-man depth
We're playing the second lowest seed in the Sweet 16.
If we play our game, we adevance.
BTFD!!!!
“If you have the choice between humble and cocky, go with cocky. There's always time to be humble later, once you've been proven horrendously, irrevocably wrong.”
― Kinky Friedman
― Kinky Friedman
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
First thought when I saw Gonzaga that high is that the data isn’t corrected for SOS?KaibabKat wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2024 5:11 pm Here are the 2024 sweet sixteen TEAM rankings. Each and every player is given a "value" determined by his Hollinger PER multiplied by the PERCENT of minutes he has played for the team. The TEAM value is the sum of the player values.
2087 UConn
2051 Gonzaga
1984 Purdue
1927 Houston
1918 Arizona
1916 Duke
1914 Alabama
1884 Illinois
1858 Creighton
1820 Marquette
1806 Iowa State
1789 Tennessee
1788 North Carolina
1729 Clemson
1720 NC State
1682 San Diego State
Arizona should reach the Elite Eight tomorrow.
Don't be surprised if the "Caleb Love" game with North Carolina never happens - Arizona could end up with a worse matchup vs. Alabama.
Don't be surprised if Zach Edey never sees an Elite Eight. Gonzaga was seriously under-seeded this year.
I.e. it’s easier to put up good Hollinger numbers in the WCC than it is the ACC, B1G, B12, etc.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Their defense didn't look outstanding in the Baylor game, I watched the whole thing. Baylor missed a lot of good looks from 3. Not sure about NM as I didn't see much of that game.azcat49 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:58 am UNC will beat Bama in a high scoring game
Our game is going to be close but I do think we win. Clemson is only 8-8 when they score 73 points but 15-3 when the control tempo. Couple that with a brutal travel schedule and they will be walking it up the court all night.
Not sure how they have held their opposition in this tournament to 9-47 from three but since we generally don’t take a lot of three’s (ranked like 250+) this would be another readon thus one should stay close.
As you mentioned with three's not being our primary offense, I think we'll be in a good spot - don't force 3's, drive and kick out for good looks, work the matchups inside with Ballo etc.
- U.P. Zona Fan
- Posts: 2656
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 9:57 pm
- Reputation: 414
- Location: Big bay, MI
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
We are 7 point faves, we've covered our tourney games, if we keep that up we win.
Need to start covering by more than 1 though.
Need to start covering by more than 1 though.
Arizona State might have the most surprisingly anemic history in men's basketball of any program that you might think is better than it is.
-Norlander.
-Norlander.
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Just win. I never bet on AZ, so the line is meaningless to me.U.P. Zona Fan wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:39 am We are 7 point faves, we've covered our tourney games, if we keep that up we win.
Need to start covering by more than 1 though.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
2019 & 2021 Basketball RAP Winner/2022 Football RAP Winner
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Next season feels very unpredictable right now. Roster still has some questions. A 3 seed would be a pretty damn good outcome for the team, given we’ll have earned it in a tougher conference.
- Merkin
- Posts: 43410
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
- Reputation: 1584
- Location: UA basketball smells like....victory
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Cripes, UA overrated again. UA may have an all new starting lineup if Love does not come back.
Hasn't the UA lost to lower seeds 6 tourneys in a row?
Hasn't the UA lost to lower seeds 6 tourneys in a row?
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
I’ve learned to take these very optimistic forecasts as a sign of respect for Tommy and the program. Even with the roster instability, they still think Tommy will ultimately put it all together and earn another high seed.
I’m much less interested in 2025 Bracketology than in what Caleb, K.J. and Jaden are going to do.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
1993 & 2023 - 30 years apart...
... What possible meaningful conclusion could anyone make out of those two unrelated facts???
“If you have the choice between humble and cocky, go with cocky. There's always time to be humble later, once you've been proven horrendously, irrevocably wrong.”
― Kinky Friedman
― Kinky Friedman
- dovecanyoncat
- Posts: 16751
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:16 pm
- Reputation: 2144
- Location: Old Farts and Golf Carts
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
.... that we only need two consecutive 15 year periods in which to prove that we are uniquely special at not having nice things.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
~ Wilhoit's Law
~ Wilhoit's Law
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
OKdovecanyoncat wrote: ↑Sat May 04, 2024 7:45 pm.... that we only need two consecutive 15 year periods in which to prove that we are uniquely special at not having nice things.
...and it's in our culture, because we accomplish this high/low achievement with entirely different personnel in every level of the Athletic Department (Head coaches through all assistants, trainers, support staff, players, administrators, announcers, and McKale personnel.
Only demented boomer fans and Greg Hansen can be relied upon for verbal witness accounts, so you, fine reader, know it's real af!
“If you have the choice between humble and cocky, go with cocky. There's always time to be humble later, once you've been proven horrendously, irrevocably wrong.”
― Kinky Friedman
― Kinky Friedman
- dovecanyoncat
- Posts: 16751
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:16 pm
- Reputation: 2144
- Location: Old Farts and Golf Carts
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
It's hard to argue with that broad input series.pc in NM wrote: ↑Sat May 04, 2024 7:57 pmOKdovecanyoncat wrote: ↑Sat May 04, 2024 7:45 pm.... that we only need two consecutive 15 year periods in which to prove that we are uniquely special at not having nice things.
...and it's in our culture, because we accomplish this high/low achievement with entirely different personnel in every level of the Athletic Department (Head coaches through all assistants, trainers, support staff, players, administrators, announcers, and McKale personnel.
Across any generation recognition of one's nature is the first real step toward reconciling experience with understanding.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
~ Wilhoit's Law
~ Wilhoit's Law
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
No Merk I don't follow U of A basketball. Do you realize that Virginia and Purdue or the only number 1 seeded teams to lose in the first round and in the following year play for the championship? Bad matchups happen or you believe that they just got that much better?
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
What’s your beef, TC? Feel like your tone’s gotten more peevish or aggressive.TheCat wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 6:57 amNo Merk I don't follow U of A basketball. Do you realize that Virginia and Purdue or the only number 1 seeded teams to lose in the first round and in the following year play for the championship? Bad matchups happen or you believe that they just got that much better?
We’re all on the same team.
Bear down!
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
No just think that ole Merk has been a little negative and that most here don't appreciate the luck and skill that it takes to play at a level that is needed to get to a final four. I think if you pulled any statistics it would say teams like Duke or Kentucky or Kansas have lost to teams rated below them more than Arizona in the tourney because they are often one or two seeds. Wasn't it Sean Miller for the longest time that never lost to a lower seed? Well that changed when he became a one or two seed.
If success is measured only by NCAA wins then it will be tough to be happy in life. I appreciate the players and coaches that give their time and effort to be part of Arizona.
If success is measured only by NCAA wins then it will be tough to be happy in life. I appreciate the players and coaches that give their time and effort to be part of Arizona.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
#3 in the Midwest
https://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story ... redictions
https://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story ... redictions
2019 & 2021 Basketball RAP Winner/2022 Football RAP Winner
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
2019 & 2021 Basketball RAP Winner/2022 Football RAP Winner
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Up to #2 in the west.
https://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story ... redictions
https://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story ... redictions
2019 & 2021 Basketball RAP Winner/2022 Football RAP Winner
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Cats drop to a 4 seed.
https://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story ... redictions
https://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story ... redictions
2019 & 2021 Basketball RAP Winner/2022 Football RAP Winner
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Jesus these polls are going to be like the election. Don't matter till it's over. Hopefully we get better win or lose with each game.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
There's zero point to bracketology until the beginning of the year. Any of our opinions are just as valid at this point.
“The reality is that the hardest games to win are over teams on their home court. Teams that don’t play those games can spin it however they want, but what they’re saying is, ‘We don’t want to lose in our non conference season.’" - Sean Miller