espn top 50 coaches

Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns

User avatar
ASUHATER!
Posts: 18117
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:21 pm
Reputation: 164
Location: tucson, az

espn top 50 coaches

Post by ASUHATER! »

repost it here

http://espn.go.com/ncb/notebook/_/page/ ... 50-coaches
where will miller end up?
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.

i'll just go with fuck asu.
User avatar
UAdevil
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:32 am
Reputation: 510
Location: LV-426

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by UAdevil »

Top 10 for sure I'd think. But you never know with the talking heads in Bristol.
Love the 've! Stop with the: Would of - Could of - Should of - Must of - Might of
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Olsondogg »

Personally, and I love CSM, but I don't think he deserves top 10.

Elite 8's are nice...but he hasn't been to a Final 4, and so many other coaches have been. I feel the same way about UA frankly...I think we are nearly an elite program, and have literally come from nowhere a few decades ago...but our blood isn't quite blue yet.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
User avatar
JMarkJohns
Posts: 3343
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:28 am
Reputation: 167
Location: VforVindication
Contact:

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by JMarkJohns »

I'm ok with anything in the top-15. He's top-5 young coach, maybe top-3, but it's an odd time in coaching because of the soon-to-be-retiring lot.

I'd put him 8-9, but I can see a bump down since no Final 4s yet.
User avatar
TyAbbottGotOwned
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 3:05 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by TyAbbottGotOwned »

Probably around 10 or 11

I figure that Coach K, Roy Williams, Pitino, Ollie, Self, Calipari, Donovan, Boehim and Izzo will be ahead of him. Then most likely ESPN will blow Greg Marshall too and put him ahead and then comes Miller
Oderint Dum Metuant
User avatar
Alieberman
Posts: 13384
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
Reputation: 2553
Location: I can't find my pants

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Alieberman »

TyAbbottGotOwned wrote:Probably around 10 or 11

I figure that Coach K, Roy Williams, Pitino, Ollie, Self, Calipari, Donovan, Boehim and Izzo will be ahead of him. Then most likely ESPN will blow Greg Marshall too and put him ahead and then comes Miller
Putting Ollie ahead of Miller makes me sick to my stomach.
User avatar
TyAbbottGotOwned
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 3:05 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by TyAbbottGotOwned »

Alieberman wrote:
TyAbbottGotOwned wrote:Probably around 10 or 11

I figure that Coach K, Roy Williams, Pitino, Ollie, Self, Calipari, Donovan, Boehim and Izzo will be ahead of him. Then most likely ESPN will blow Greg Marshall too and put him ahead and then comes Miller
Putting Ollie ahead of Miller makes me sick to my stomach.

I don't entirely disagree, but its just how these kind of yearly offseason rankings work
Oderint Dum Metuant
User avatar
ASUHATER!
Posts: 18117
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:21 pm
Reputation: 164
Location: tucson, az

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by ASUHATER! »

ollie is getting all the love just from that 1 6 game stretch obviously. outside of that, he's 46-14 in his first 1 years with no conference titles and a 22-14 conference record. them getting hot for 6 games makes him a top 10 coach.
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.

i'll just go with fuck asu.
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Olsondogg »

No. The ring does.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
User avatar
ASUHATER!
Posts: 18117
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:21 pm
Reputation: 164
Location: tucson, az

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by ASUHATER! »

still. 6 games don't a coaching career make.
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.

i'll just go with fuck asu.
Spaceman Spiff
Posts: 14664
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
Reputation: 1150

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Spaceman Spiff »

I'm fine if ESPN ranks Ollie over Miller. It doesn't alter the fact that Arizona has the right guy.
Image
User avatar
pokinmik
Posts: 1660
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 4:06 pm
Reputation: 29
Location: Ashburn, VA

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by pokinmik »

Spaceman, did you have another handle at goazcats? Or new poster on the scene? Just curious!
Spaceman Spiff
Posts: 14664
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
Reputation: 1150

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Spaceman Spiff »

pokinmik wrote:Spaceman, did you have another handle at goazcats? Or new poster on the scene? Just curious!
I was Pooh Man. On this new board, I'm here to conquer the galaxy.

And Sean Miller is still #1 on my list of coaches who are best for Arizona.
Image
User avatar
pokinmik
Posts: 1660
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 4:06 pm
Reputation: 29
Location: Ashburn, VA

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by pokinmik »

Spaceman Spiff wrote:
pokinmik wrote:Spaceman, did you have another handle at goazcats? Or new poster on the scene? Just curious!
I was Pooh Man. On this new board, I'm here to conquer the galaxy.

And Sean Miller is still #1 on my list of coaches who are best for Arizona.
Haha sweet.

Yep same here, I seriously wouldn't trade Miller for any other coach.
catgrad97
Posts: 5661
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 9:06 pm
Reputation: 28

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by catgrad97 »

Kevin Ollie's going to be another Altman train wreck at UConn in a couple more seasons.

No enmity here--he just really doesn't have much control over that program.
User avatar
ASUHATER!
Posts: 18117
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:21 pm
Reputation: 164
Location: tucson, az

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by ASUHATER! »

the couple of people that changed their names are confusing to me....i have no context in which to place your posts..
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.

i'll just go with fuck asu.
User avatar
azgreg
Posts: 25768
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:01 pm
Reputation: 1344

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by azgreg »

Maybe have those with different names put their GoAzCats name in their sig.
SCCat
Posts: 950
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:54 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by SCCat »

Laughing at UCLA with the 36th best coach. I'd probably put him a little bit higher, but the neighborhood is correct.

Miller is top 10. Can he crack top 5? I'd guess they go with guys with more historical final fours in comparison to a "who is the best coach right at this moment" kind of analysis.
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Olsondogg »

I wouldn't want a coach over Miller. However, I could rattle off 10 coaches with more accomplishments...today.

Now in a year?

Well that's a different story...
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
User avatar
UAGreg
Posts: 806
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 6:40 am
Reputation: 0

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by UAGreg »

Sean made the Top 20. Now it's just a matter of seeing how high. I think 7-10 is where he'll end up.

Archie comes in at #26 btw.
midnightx
Posts: 574
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 40

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by midnightx »

Ollie won a title with remnants of the Calhoun era, but it is hard to put him up there with the elite coaches in the game right now. No one really knows if he will ultimately rebuild UConn into a power-house. I certainly wouldn't put him ahead of Larry Brown.
cats101
Posts: 1034
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:48 pm
Reputation: 12
Location: Washington, DC

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by cats101 »

I don't see how you justify Thad Matta at #20.
arzcatz3
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 10:55 am
Reputation: 0

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by arzcatz3 »

If you're going off of accomplishments he's probably 10-15 range but if you asked any program who they would want to coach their program for the long run Miller is top 5 easy - maybe top 3
thenewazcats
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:37 am
Reputation: 0

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by thenewazcats »

They're basing the rankings on a coach's value right now. It's not about career accomplishments. I'm more interested in where they place K than Miller. There aren't 5 better coaches in the country right now than CSM. If someone misses that, I don't give a damn. We dealt with an unappreciated coach for 25+ years. CSM will win at least 1 title in the next 5 years.
User avatar
Salty
Posts: 2093
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:02 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: The internets

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Salty »

UAdevil wrote:Top 10 for sure I'd think. But you never know with the talking heads in Bristol.
No Final Fours makes a top 10 coach?

I'm all about Coach Miller, but post season success is needed.
User avatar
salim'sheadband
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:02 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by salim'sheadband »

I find ESPN's rankings...unsatisfactory.
User avatar
84Cat
Posts: 18788
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:17 pm
Reputation: 944
Location: Boise

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by 84Cat »

salim'sheadband wrote:I find ESPN's rankings...unsatisfactory.
When are we going to see the annual SHB's coaches rankings? Looking forward to it as always!
User avatar
salim'sheadband
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:02 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by salim'sheadband »

Image
User avatar
Coop Cat
Posts: 965
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:28 am
Reputation: 0
Location: On the Tee Box

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Coop Cat »

User avatar
ghostwhitehorse
Posts: 15627
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 12:29 pm
Reputation: 135
Location: Jupiter Trojan: 3317 Paris

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by ghostwhitehorse »

salim'sheadband wrote:I find ESPN's rankings...unsatisfactory.
Have you been reading Nero Wolfe?


If so. . . very satisfactory.
cats101
Posts: 1034
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:48 pm
Reputation: 12
Location: Washington, DC

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by cats101 »

Jim placed at #12
Beachcat97
Posts: 8528
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 462
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Beachcat97 »

cats101 wrote:Jim placed at #12
Boeheim at 12?? Behind Shaka?? These rankings are quickly losing credibility. But then, Eammon Brennan is one of the voters, so I guess credibility was strained from the get go.
midnightx
Posts: 574
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 40

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by midnightx »

These rankings are odd to say the least. It is not clear what the criteria is. ESPN's love affair with Shaka is comical; yes he lead a mid-major to a final four, but it isn't like the guy is running a major program in a major conference who needs to recruit 5-star talent every year to stay relevant. Boeheim and Williams are top-ten coaches. Seriously, putting aside personal likes and dislikes on this board towards opposing coaches and teams; does anyone in the coaching world truly hold Shaka in higher regard than Williams? On one hand, you have a coach with huge winning percentages at both Kansas and North Carolina, multiple final fours, national championships, deep tournament runs, coached in countless major games against other major programs, who has put a large amount of players in the NBA -- on another hand, you have a young coach at a mid-major caliber program in VCU with one final four run with nowhere near the same resume and ongoing program demands. ESPN has lost it.
User avatar
ElGatoBlanco
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:40 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by ElGatoBlanco »

midnightx wrote:These rankings are odd to say the least. It is not clear what the criteria is. ESPN's love affair with Shaka is comical; yes he lead a mid-major to a final four, but it isn't like the guy is running a major program in a major conference who needs to recruit 5-star talent every year to stay relevant. Boeheim and Williams are top-ten coaches. Seriously, putting aside personal likes and dislikes on this board towards opposing coaches and teams; does anyone in the coaching world truly hold Shaka in higher regard than Williams? On one hand, you have a coach with huge winning percentages at both Kansas and North Carolina, multiple final fours, national championships, deep tournament runs, coached in countless major games against other major programs, who has put a large amount of players in the NBA -- on another hand, you have a young coach at a mid-major caliber program in VCU with one final four run with nowhere near the same resume and ongoing program demands. ESPN has lost it.
While I sure don't agree with Shaka over Roy as things stand today, but they're making these rankings based on who are the best coaches today not who were the best coaches. Resumes are pretty much put to the side in these rankings. If you're a school would you hire Roy Williams over Sean Miller today for instance? I didn't use Shaka as an example because I'm still far from sold on him as a coach. It's going to be comical that Kevin Ollie will be ranked as highly as he is when the door is more than wide open on him right now. I've seen Tubby Smith and Mike Davis do wonders with another coach's players only to fall off in a matter of years.
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Olsondogg »

ElGatoBlanco wrote:
midnightx wrote:These rankings are odd to say the least. It is not clear what the criteria is. ESPN's love affair with Shaka is comical; yes he lead a mid-major to a final four, but it isn't like the guy is running a major program in a major conference who needs to recruit 5-star talent every year to stay relevant. Boeheim and Williams are top-ten coaches. Seriously, putting aside personal likes and dislikes on this board towards opposing coaches and teams; does anyone in the coaching world truly hold Shaka in higher regard than Williams? On one hand, you have a coach with huge winning percentages at both Kansas and North Carolina, multiple final fours, national championships, deep tournament runs, coached in countless major games against other major programs, who has put a large amount of players in the NBA -- on another hand, you have a young coach at a mid-major caliber program in VCU with one final four run with nowhere near the same resume and ongoing program demands. ESPN has lost it.
While I sure don't agree with Shaka over Roy as things stand today, but they're making these rankings based on who are the best coaches today not who were the best coaches. Resumes are pretty much put to the side in these rankings. If you're a school would you hire Roy Williams over Sean Miller today for instance? I didn't use Shaka as an example because I'm still far from sold on him as a coach. It's going to be comical that Kevin Ollie will be ranked as highly as he is when the door is more than wide open on him right now. I've seen Tubby Smith and Mike Davis do wonders with another coach's players only to fall off in a matter of years.
The term "another coaches players" always cracks me up. Sure, coaches inherit players...but to say that Tubby didn't do a hell of a job getting that team over a hump to win a natty, when Pitino couldn't do that over a 4 seed, says something. I get that Kevin Ollie did what he did with "Calhoun's players" and that we can wait to see how good he is when he has to coach his "own players". But, he did a hell of a job with a team that absolutely nobody picked to win it all...it's not like anyone looked at the team that was on probation in UConn and said "That's a championship team right there in a few years..."

Its one thing to be a Roy or Coach K and have some clout just by being who you are over the years. It's another thing to take something over that is in disarray and do something with it. People still knock Miller for his first Elite 8 at UA, cause he did it with "Floyd's players"...which is an absolute fucking joke.

Speaking of Miller, If there is one reason, and one reason alone that Miller shouldn't be considered a top coach right now, today, it's because he hasn't gotten to that last weekend in the tourney. Once that is accomplished...watch out.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
User avatar
loomer
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:02 am
Reputation: 21

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by loomer »

Boeheim is too high imo
User avatar
ElGatoBlanco
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:40 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by ElGatoBlanco »

Olsondogg wrote:
ElGatoBlanco wrote:
midnightx wrote:These rankings are odd to say the least. It is not clear what the criteria is. ESPN's love affair with Shaka is comical; yes he lead a mid-major to a final four, but it isn't like the guy is running a major program in a major conference who needs to recruit 5-star talent every year to stay relevant. Boeheim and Williams are top-ten coaches. Seriously, putting aside personal likes and dislikes on this board towards opposing coaches and teams; does anyone in the coaching world truly hold Shaka in higher regard than Williams? On one hand, you have a coach with huge winning percentages at both Kansas and North Carolina, multiple final fours, national championships, deep tournament runs, coached in countless major games against other major programs, who has put a large amount of players in the NBA -- on another hand, you have a young coach at a mid-major caliber program in VCU with one final four run with nowhere near the same resume and ongoing program demands. ESPN has lost it.
While I sure don't agree with Shaka over Roy as things stand today, but they're making these rankings based on who are the best coaches today not who were the best coaches. Resumes are pretty much put to the side in these rankings. If you're a school would you hire Roy Williams over Sean Miller today for instance? I didn't use Shaka as an example because I'm still far from sold on him as a coach. It's going to be comical that Kevin Ollie will be ranked as highly as he is when the door is more than wide open on him right now. I've seen Tubby Smith and Mike Davis do wonders with another coach's players only to fall off in a matter of years.
The term "another coaches players" always cracks me up. Sure, coaches inherit players...but to say that Tubby didn't do a hell of a job getting that team over a hump to win a natty, when Pitino couldn't do that over a 4 seed, says something. I get that Kevin Ollie did what he did with "Calhoun's players" and that we can wait to see how good he is when he has to coach his "own players". But, he did a hell of a job with a team that absolutely nobody picked to win it all...it's not like anyone looked at the team that was on probation in UConn and said "That's a championship team right there in a few years..."

Its one thing to be a Roy or Coach K and have some clout just by being who you are over the years. It's another thing to take something over that is in disarray and do something with it. People still knock Miller for his first Elite 8 at UA, cause he did it with "Floyd's players"...which is an absolute fucking joke.

Speaking of Miller, If there is one reason, and one reason alone that Miller shouldn't be considered a top coach right now, today, it's because he hasn't gotten to that last weekend in the tourney. Once that is accomplished...watch out.
Got that team over the hump? That main group of players went to 3 straight national championship games and won the year before that 4 seed beat them. Spare me that talk as if Tubby did something astounding. The hump...that's funny.

I don't get the Floyd/Miller comparison seeing as Miller coached all those players from when they were freshmen. Calhoun brought in and coached Boatright, Daniels, and Napier from when they were freshmen and needless to say that was the core of that UCONN team this year. That comparison just falls flat on its face. Tubby Smith won a title with a Pitino team and was never able to get to the Final Four after that. Mike Davis made the NCAA Finals at Indiana with Bobby Knight's players and then couldn't make it past the 2nd round of the tournament after that.

The book is very much wide open on Ollie. Literally the only coach put in that situation that went on to any sort of big success after the fact was Steve Fisher.
UAtrue
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 6:31 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by UAtrue »

UAGreg wrote:Sean made the Top 20. Now it's just a matter of seeing how high. I think 7-10 is where he'll end up.

Archie comes in at #26 btw.

That is pretty cool. All the best to Archie; the future is wide open.
User avatar
Merkin
Posts: 41110
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:31 am
Reputation: 1329
Location: UA basketball smells like....victory

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Merkin »

User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Olsondogg »

ElGatoBlanco wrote:
Got that team over the hump? That main group of players went to 3 straight national championship games and won the year before that 4 seed beat them. Spare me that talk as if Tubby did something astounding. The hump...that's funny.

I don't get the Floyd/Miller comparison seeing as Miller coached all those players from when they were freshmen. Calhoun brought in and coached Boatright, Daniels, and Napier from when they were freshmen and needless to say that was the core of that UCONN team this year. That comparison just falls flat on its face. Tubby Smith won a title with a Pitino team and was never able to get to the Final Four after that. Mike Davis made the NCAA Finals at Indiana with Bobby Knight's players and then couldn't make it past the 2nd round of the tournament after that.

The book is very much wide open on Ollie. Literally the only coach put in that situation that went on to any sort of big success after the fact was Steve Fisher.
Yes, got them over the hump. If you think that replacing a legend at UK, with all the criticism that Tubby endured, and taking that team all the way to a title is something less than astounding, then I'd hate to see what qualifies in your book.

So Tubby Smith...went to the Elite 8 three times after his national championship run. Won 76% of his games at UK, and never missed a tourney. Maybe that wasnt' good enough for UK fans, but then they got this guy:

Image

How'd that work out?


I'm so glad you like to disparage coaches that replace legends at big time programs and act as if it is easy...and that any success should only be attributed to the prior regime.



Book "very much wide open on Ollie"...ok great. Tell him that next time you see him, when he is staring at his ring and counting his $$$. Dude did a hell of a job this past year with what he inherited.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
User avatar
NYCat
Posts: 4167
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:26 pm
Reputation: 1
Location: Scarsdale

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by NYCat »

cats101
Posts: 1034
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:48 pm
Reputation: 12
Location: Washington, DC

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by cats101 »

Best coach without a final four and it looks like ESPN agrees, although this list is still in inconsistent imo. Need to get over the hump this year.
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Olsondogg »

Eamonn is back on my list. Fuckin idiot says OLSEN in his article. Douche.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
User avatar
ElGatoBlanco
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:40 pm
Reputation: 0

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by ElGatoBlanco »

Olsondogg wrote:
ElGatoBlanco wrote:
Got that team over the hump? That main group of players went to 3 straight national championship games and won the year before that 4 seed beat them. Spare me that talk as if Tubby did something astounding. The hump...that's funny.

I don't get the Floyd/Miller comparison seeing as Miller coached all those players from when they were freshmen. Calhoun brought in and coached Boatright, Daniels, and Napier from when they were freshmen and needless to say that was the core of that UCONN team this year. That comparison just falls flat on its face. Tubby Smith won a title with a Pitino team and was never able to get to the Final Four after that. Mike Davis made the NCAA Finals at Indiana with Bobby Knight's players and then couldn't make it past the 2nd round of the tournament after that.

The book is very much wide open on Ollie. Literally the only coach put in that situation that went on to any sort of big success after the fact was Steve Fisher.
Yes, got them over the hump. If you think that replacing a legend at UK, with all the criticism that Tubby endured, and taking that team all the way to a title is something less than astounding, then I'd hate to see what qualifies in your book.

So Tubby Smith...went to the Elite 8 three times after his national championship run. Won 76% of his games at UK, and never missed a tourney. Maybe that wasnt' good enough for UK fans, but then they got this guy:

Image

How'd that work out?


I'm so glad you like to disparage coaches that replace legends at big time programs and act as if it is easy...and that any success should only be attributed to the prior regime.



Book "very much wide open on Ollie"...ok great. Tell him that next time you see him, when he is staring at his ring and counting his $$$. Dude did a hell of a job this past year with what he inherited.
Lol what criticism did Tubby endure exactly his first year? I disparage the Kevin Ollie love and I remain steadfast on my stance that the book is wide open on him and historical evidence is on my side in that regard. Tubby made the Elite 8 a few times after that national title team and went on to accomplish nothing else at Minnesota. The point is would you consider Tubby a top 10 coach at any time of his coaching career like ESPN is apparently ranking Kevin Ollie? Truthfully outside of that one national championship Tubby's time at UK is more similar to Steve Lavin's tenure at UCLA than anything resembling a top 10 coach at any point. I'm truthfully sorry that Tubby got canned for Gillispie, but finishing 6th in the SEC in your 9th year followed by a 4th place finish in your 10th wasn't going to keep that fanbase happy, especially when he finished with double digit losses in half of his 10 seasons there.

Good to know you're friends with Ollie apparently? That at least explains your take completely. Tell him I said hi and he doesn't deserve to be top 10 on any coaching list at this juncture. I hope he doesn't fall the way of Mike Davis or Tubby, but it's more likely he will than not. As it stands Ollie should hang a plaque of Shabazz Napier's face up on his wall and kiss it every day. He and Calhoun made his career.
Beachcat97
Posts: 8528
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 462
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Beachcat97 »

I'm good with SM being ranked 11th. Sounds about right. And I expect him to climb into the top 10 very soon.
User avatar
Longhorned
Posts: 14758
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:04 pm
Reputation: 972
Location: In a guayabera at The Sands Club, Arizona Stadium

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Longhorned »

This one goes to 11.
User avatar
UofAlum05
Posts: 4516
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 8:52 am
Reputation: 304

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by UofAlum05 »

National media outlets can rank him however they want. College Basketball fans can argue about his offense, lack of final fours, and "love" for the east coast. UCLA fans can bitch all they want about his press conferences, #playersprogram propaganda, intensity, and kicking their a$$ in recruiting. Larry Scott can try to ignore him all he wants. Basnight can accuse him of cheating all he wants.

But for me.....as a diehard, well informed, Arizona Basketball fan in 2014. There isn't one man I would rather have as the head coach of Arizona Basketball currently and going forward.
User avatar
97cats
Posts: 3482
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 7:34 am
Reputation: 1035

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by 97cats »

wouldnt trade Sean Miller for two Calipari's and a Krzyzewski

and Greg Marshall ahead of Sean Miller????

bwhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
User avatar
Olsondogg
Posts: 5021
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:33 am
Reputation: 402
Location: Poseur/Phonyland

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Olsondogg »

ElGatoBlanco wrote:
Lol what criticism did Tubby endure exactly his first year? I disparage the Kevin Ollie love and I remain steadfast on my stance that the book is wide open on him and historical evidence is on my side in that regard. Tubby made the Elite 8 a few times after that national title team and went on to accomplish nothing else at Minnesota. The point is would you consider Tubby a top 10 coach at any time of his coaching career like ESPN is apparently ranking Kevin Ollie? Truthfully outside of that one national championship Tubby's time at UK is more similar to Steve Lavin's tenure at UCLA than anything resembling a top 10 coach at any point. I'm truthfully sorry that Tubby got canned for Gillispie, but finishing 6th in the SEC in your 9th year followed by a 4th place finish in your 10th wasn't going to keep that fanbase happy, especially when he finished with double digit losses in half of his 10 seasons there.

Good to know you're friends with Ollie apparently? That at least explains your take completely. Tell him I said hi and he doesn't deserve to be top 10 on any coaching list at this juncture. I hope he doesn't fall the way of Mike Davis or Tubby, but it's more likely he will than not. As it stands Ollie should hang a plaque of Shabazz Napier's face up on his wall and kiss it every day. He and Calhoun made his career.
"Outside of that one national championship"....wait, let me laugh at that while Lute is praised endlessly and rightfully so throughout the UA fanbase. Then you go on to compare Tubby to Lavin, who has only made 1 Elite 8 ever, and has never won ...classic. To defend Tubby, yet again, his 1998 national championship is unique in modern times, as being the only team in over twenty years to win without a first-team All-American or future NBA lottery pick. Also, he went to Minnesota--a team that made the NCAA's exactly once since 1999 and took them 3 times in the next 6 years...

So sorry Gato, that national champs don't matter when you "inherit players". Keep your book open, keep reading it...and let me know when some national championship winning coaches meet your standard.
I fly like a hawk, or better yet an eagle--a seagull. I sniff suckers out like a beagle...My ego is off and running and gone, Cause I'm about the best and if you diss than that's wrong
Beachcat97
Posts: 8528
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
Reputation: 462
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: espn top 50 coaches

Post by Beachcat97 »

97cats wrote:wouldnt trade Sean Miller for two Calipari's and a Krzyzewski

and Greg Marshall ahead of Sean Miller????

bwhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
The only way Marshall is ahead of Miller is alphabetically.
Post Reply