Harvey Specter wrote:Are you really that obtuse?dmjcat wrote:I agree completely, its a trend of mine to throw out facts (like KenPom).gumby wrote:It's a trend of yours and you know it.dmjcat wrote:The fact that Kenpom gives us less than a 40% chance to win in SLC isn't a negative or a positive fact....its just a fact. You ,and a few others, seem to be negatively responding to that fact. Perhaps you are depressed???gumby wrote:There are positive facts and negative facts. But the facts you choose say something beyond "just pointing out facts." Maybe sprinkle in the occasional note of enjoyment and pride, just to show you're not really as depressing as you seem.
The FACT may be that KenPom is of the OPINION that we have a 40% chance of winning in SLC. It may be an educated, or even statistically-supported OPINION, but it is still only a forearm-looking OPINION. In the civilized world, one would classify that as a GUESS.
Try following here... reporting a guess that has actually been made by a reputable source does not make it a fact. Either you really are inadequately armed for a battle of wits, or you are a troll who makes pathetic attempts to manipulate facts to suit an agenda.
Obtuse???
Pot, meet Kettle, Kettle meet pot
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
In case you don't know Kenpom's numbers are not based on "Guesses by reputable sources", they are based on statistics and actual game results.
Try again.......harder next time.