Page 3 of 43

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 10:42 am
by Spaceman Spiff
legallykenny wrote:
Chicat wrote:
legallykenny wrote:
Chicat wrote:I like what's happening here.
Why? I'm not really seeing the logic. But then I guess I think much less of JUCOs and transfers than some others might.
Because we're gaining depth without hurting chemistry.
How do you know these guys won't be chemistry problems?
Only Bo knows, but I seriously doubt that our latest additions were sold on anything other than likely being bench guys who get some exposure at a high profile school. Pinder's not a guy with a dominant profile. Yes, there's always a chance he has an outsized idea of himself, but nothing about the recruitment suggests anything other than him being a depth addition.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2016 9:17 pm
by Chicat

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:25 pm
by Beachcat97
Updated Scout rankings:

http://www.scout.com/college/basketball ... -prospects" target="_blank

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:30 pm
by luteformayor2
McCoy, please

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2016 4:58 pm
by HiCat
Arizona basketball recruiting: Billy Preston, Ira Lee top Wildcats' list of 2017 recruiting targets

@UofAlec on Jun 14, 2016, 4:05p +

http://www.azdesertswarm.com/recruiting ... -2017-list" target="_blank

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:33 pm
by Spaceman Spiff
HiCat wrote:Arizona basketball recruiting: Billy Preston, Ira Lee top Wildcats' list of 2017 recruiting targets

@UofAlec on Jun 14, 2016, 4:05p +

http://www.azdesertswarm.com/recruiting ... -2017-list" target="_blank
Billy Preston went to API just like Ferguson. What could go wrong?

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 12:25 pm
by Jefe
Thornton to USC

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 5:22 pm
by Beachcat97
Jefe wrote:Thornton to USC
Is Thornton in the class of '17?

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 7:53 pm
by Zero
He is a transfer from Duke and will play in 2017.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2016 4:55 pm
by legallykenny
Jefe wrote:Thornton to USC
I dislike PJC even more now.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 10:06 pm
by ChooChooCat
Alex Barcello definitely seems to be a name we need to be paying much more attention to in this thread. Staff was literally at every one of his games in Vegas it sounded like.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 1:54 pm
by Main Event
Sounds like he and Ira Lee could be the first 2 members of this class

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 2:34 pm
by Beachcat97
Main Event wrote:Sounds like he and Ira Lee could be the first 2 members of this class
Not exactly the kind of class Miller's been putting together the last few seasons.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:17 pm
by ChooChooCat
Beachcat97 wrote:
Main Event wrote:Sounds like he and Ira Lee could be the first 2 members of this class
Not exactly the kind of class Miller's been putting together the last few seasons.
Time to fire Miller then I guess.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:26 pm
by Beachcat97
No, but maybe time to target some guys rated higher?

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:39 am
by ChooChooCat
Beachcat97 wrote:No, but maybe time to target some guys rated higher?
They have.

You prioritize those you can actually land.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:01 am
by Chicat
Beachcat97 wrote:
Main Event wrote:Sounds like he and Ira Lee could be the first 2 members of this class
Not exactly the kind of class Miller's been putting together the last few seasons.
Do you remember what our '16 class looked like at this point last year? Were you able to judge it "Miller-worthy"?

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 7:15 am
by Spaceman Spiff
Beachcat97 wrote:No, but maybe time to target some guys rated higher?
I'd assume Miller has considered this idea. If not, we should drive over to his house and camp out front with signs that say it.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 7:48 am
by Puerco
To be honest, I wouldn't mind signing a couple of solid 4*'s who will hang around for four years.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:17 am
by Beachcat97
Chicat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:
Main Event wrote:Sounds like he and Ira Lee could be the first 2 members of this class
Not exactly the kind of class Miller's been putting together the last few seasons.
Do you remember what our '16 class looked like at this point last year? Were you able to judge it "Miller-worthy"?
We all remember. But for the past two years we've failed to land our top target (Rabb, JJ). We seem to be trending downward at the moment. And of course not getting TF hurts.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:21 am
by Alieberman
Beachcat97 wrote:
Chicat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:
Main Event wrote:Sounds like he and Ira Lee could be the first 2 members of this class
Not exactly the kind of class Miller's been putting together the last few seasons.
Do you remember what our '16 class looked like at this point last year? Were you able to judge it "Miller-worthy"?
We all remember. But for the past two years we've failed to land our top target (Rabb, JJ). We seem to be trending downward at the moment. And of course not getting TF hurts.
We are trending downward? Do you even listen to yourself?

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:12 am
by rgdeuce
Beachcat97 wrote: Not exactly the kind of class Miller's been putting together the last few seasons.
Do you remember what our '16 class looked like at this point last year? Were you able to judge it "Miller-worthy"?[/quote]

We all remember. But for the past two years we've failed to land our top target (Rabb, JJ). We seem to be trending downward at the moment. And of course not getting TF hurts.[/quote]

You realize you can say this for pretty much everyone not named Kentucky or Duke (the last few years). Rabb stayed home (and who else knows what was going on). JJ spoke more highly of Miller than any of the other coaches and there appears to be strong evidence that says his decision was based on other outside "factors." Miller swung for the fences with JJ and was there until the very end. He was a prize that is not seen in every class and everyone wanted him. Had he had different people around him, maybe he's a Wildcat.

Losing TF doesn't hurt. I thought very highly of him, but he would have been a luxury on a crowded corp of wings, not a necessity. He left here after Miller had him. That has no bearing on Miller and actually works in Miller's favor if you are looking at trends. At the end of the day, Miller pulled the 3rd best class in the country and that was after what everyone called a slow start and losing Leaf to factors beyond Miller's control. Miller is still one of the top 5 recruiters in the country, we are still one of the 5 best programs for recruiting and we are still one of the top 5 "It" programs right now. Duke and Kentucky are doing what they want right now, so that is saying quite a bit for us. Coach K and Calipari aren't going to be around forever; who do you think is EASILY going to jump into the top 3 when they are gone? Depending how things shake out, Miller will probably replace one of them down the road.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:13 am
by Chicat
Beachcat97 wrote:
Chicat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:
Main Event wrote:Sounds like he and Ira Lee could be the first 2 members of this class
Not exactly the kind of class Miller's been putting together the last few seasons.
Do you remember what our '16 class looked like at this point last year? Were you able to judge it "Miller-worthy"?
We all remember. But for the past two years we've failed to land our top target (Rabb, JJ). We seem to be trending downward at the moment. And of course not getting TF hurts.
So you remember we had one committed guy in TJ Leaf who in a couple of weeks was about to decommit?

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:39 am
by Spaceman Spiff
If landing only 3 five star players this year is a downwards trend, we may continue trending downwards for a bit.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:40 am
by Main Event
We're still gonna land another top 10 class that'll more than likely feature another top 10 player in it. Really only an issue if we suffer a mass exodus to the draft which could happen never know

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 11:09 am
by catgrad97
Beachcat97 wrote:
Chicat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:
Main Event wrote:Sounds like he and Ira Lee could be the first 2 members of this class
Not exactly the kind of class Miller's been putting together the last few seasons.
Do you remember what our '16 class looked like at this point last year? Were you able to judge it "Miller-worthy"?
We all remember. But for the past two years we've failed to land our top target (Rabb, JJ). We seem to be trending downward at the moment. And of course not getting TF hurts.
See, this is the kind of thinking, in the age of Internet forums and social media, that sows intolerance of necessary blue-collar, four-year players in Top 10 programs. No other program can be Kentucky, or should try.

Sure, every national championship contender needs its star. Perhaps two. But it also needs the four-year glue, hustle three- to four-star guys just as much, if not more.

Anyone who judges a class simply by the stars next to our commits' names wouldn't have stuck with Lute past the Tucson Skyline. How many five-star kids got Arizona to the Final Four in 1994? I'll wait.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 11:15 am
by Spaceman Spiff
Plus, at this point (pending anyone leaving early) we have five guys rated as 5 stars on our 2017 roster. It isn't like 2017 will necessarily only be a bunch of plucky underdogs.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:19 pm
by Beachcat97
Spaceman Spiff wrote:Plus, at this point (pending anyone leaving early) we have five guys rated as 5 stars on our 2017 roster. It isn't like 2017 will necessarily only be a bunch of plucky underdogs.
The roster's looking good for the upcoming season. No question. I was only noting that we've whiffed on our last two top targets (Rabb in '15 and JJ in '16), whereas we actually landed our top targets the previous three years (Tarc/Jerrett/Ashley in '12, AG in '13, and SJ in '14).

It's not always about landing your top guy, but as we've seen, these elite players tend to produce conference titles, tourney runs, and all the stuff we crave. KS and RA were late additions to the '16 class, and it looks like CSM has his backcourt secure for at least the next two seasons. Had we gotten TF as well, we'd be starting the season ranked in the top 5. Even without TF, though, we're probably a top 15 team, which is good. For '17, it'll likely be several months before we know the actual composition of this class. The top 10-15 guys are waiting longer and longer to commit, it seems, and I believe we're involved with McCoy, Knox, Preston, O'Bannon, Brown, and at least a few others. We'll see how it goes.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:15 pm
by ChooChooCat
Beachcat97 wrote:
Spaceman Spiff wrote:Plus, at this point (pending anyone leaving early) we have five guys rated as 5 stars on our 2017 roster. It isn't like 2017 will necessarily only be a bunch of plucky underdogs.
The roster's looking good for the upcoming season. No question. I was only noting that we've whiffed on our last two top targets (Rabb in '15 and JJ in '16), whereas we actually landed our top targets the previous three years (Tarc/Jerrett/Ashley in '12, AG in '13, and SJ in '14).

It's not always about landing your top guy, but as we've seen, these elite players tend to produce conference titles, tourney runs, and all the stuff we crave. KS and RA were late additions to the '16 class, and it looks like CSM has his backcourt secure for at least the next two seasons. Had we gotten TF as well, we'd be starting the season ranked in the top 5. Even without TF, though, we're probably a top 15 team, which is good. For '17, it'll likely be several months before we know the actual composition of this class. The top 10-15 guys are waiting longer and longer to commit, it seems, and I believe we're involved with McCoy, Knox, Preston, O'Bannon, Brown, and at least a few others. We'll see how it goes.
Our top guy in this class is McCoy. If we strike out on him by all means go ahead and induce panic.

I think an influx of 4 star long term players can only be good for this program going forward. We can't recruit like Duke/Kentucky, so build for a long term run isn't a bad route to go. Mix multiple 4 stars with a one and done here and there and that's a recipe for success.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:54 pm
by PennZona20
One needs to look no farther than last years title team to see what 3 and four year players mean ..... Jenkins , Hart , Archie, Ochefu, Reynolds and co are guys vital to getting where we want to go.

For all of UKs recruiting dominance , only the Brows class cut down the nets.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 6:29 pm
by Beachcat97
ChooChooCat wrote: We can't recruit like Duke/Kentucky
Maybe not, but we've had a steady run of top 5 classes for a while now, so while we're not getting Okafor and Wall and JJ, we're definitely getting our share of elite talent, certainly more than other Pac programs in recent years.

Miller has shown again and again that he can get guys being courted by UK, KU, and other elite programs.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 9:50 am
by Chicat

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 10:01 am
by Spaceman Spiff
Chicat wrote:
If Miller doesn't land him, is he on the hot seat?

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 10:20 am
by baycat93
Chicat wrote:
supposedly Duke leads... but there cannot be another top 10 program that can offer more playing time... we are likely to have only Dylan Smith at the 2/3. Our '17 recruiting looks very odd (caveat to it is early)

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 11:37 am
by Beachcat97
Is Trent our top target in '17? Haven't been doing so well with top targets lately. Granted, Miller always has a contingency plan.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 11:53 am
by Chicat
Beachcat97 wrote:Haven't been doing so well with top targets lately.
Just keep beating that drum...

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 2:12 pm
by ChooChooCat
Beachcat97 wrote:Is Trent our top target in '17? Haven't been doing so well with top targets lately. Granted, Miller always has a contingency plan.
Lol this guy....

Brandon McCoy is our top target for the class. Trent moved from Minnesota to play for Findlay, so we have a better shot than before.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 2:18 pm
by Beachcat97
ChooChooCat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:Is Trent our top target in '17? Haven't been doing so well with top targets lately. Granted, Miller always has a contingency plan.
Lol this guy....

Brandon McCoy is our top target for the class. Trent moved from Minnesota to play for Findlay, so we have a better shot than before.
So hopefully we can get McCoy and change our recent luck with top targets.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 2:54 pm
by EOCT
Beachcat97 wrote:
ChooChooCat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:Is Trent our top target in '17? Haven't been doing so well with top targets lately. Granted, Miller always has a contingency plan.
Lol this guy....

Brandon McCoy is our top target for the class. Trent moved from Minnesota to play for Findlay, so we have a better shot than before.
So hopefully we can get McCoy and change our recent luck with top targets.
Geez, I finally get it. Duh. It's taken all this time.

Beach is a ficty trolling tool of Dev, JMJ, the mods----all those guys who are working us so hits and responses will skyrocket. Putin is behind the whole thing.

Unh, just kidding. I can't follow through with this cheesy post. Not after all the terrific work our sponsor-leaders do for us. Thank you guys!

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 3:23 pm
by Chicat
Wish we could still access the old GoAZCats message boards so I could post all of BC's Howland tongue baths.

In those long ago halcyon days UA was the worst, UCLA the best, and BC was known as RiversideBruin. Good times...

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 3:54 pm
by rgdeuce
So is 97Cats not coming around anymore to tell us about perfect fits and Arizona being right where they want to be?

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:49 pm
by Beachcat97
rgdeuce wrote:So is 97Cats not coming around anymore to tell us about perfect fits and Arizona being right where they want to be?
Probably not after he missed on Rabb and JJ.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:54 pm
by KaibabKat
That is not the reason he doesn't come around very often anymore.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:59 pm
by Chicat
KaibabKat wrote:That is not the reason he doesn't come around very often anymore.
You should enlighten us.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 5:01 pm
by Alieberman
We are right where we want to be with 97cats

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2016 9:29 pm
by Beachcat97
KaibabKat wrote:That is not the reason he doesn't come around very often anymore.
He used to be the most in-the-know insider, but it got to be less so recently.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 1:30 am
by Puerco
Beachcat97 wrote: We all remember. But for the past two years we've failed to land our top target (Rabb, JJ). We seem to be trending downward at the moment. And of course not getting TF hurts.
Beachcat97 wrote: Maybe not, but we've had a steady run of top 5 classes for a while now, so while we're not getting Okafor and Wall and JJ, we're definitely getting our share of elite talent, certainly more than other Pac programs in recent years.

Miller has shown again and again that he can get guys being courted by UK, KU, and other elite programs.
Forget your meds again?

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 3:18 am
by Chicat
Beachcat97 wrote:
KaibabKat wrote:That is not the reason he doesn't come around very often anymore.
He used to be the most in-the-know insider, but it got to be less so recently.
It might be better if you didn't comment on things you know nothing about, but then again that would likely cause you to never post again...

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 3:38 am
by Chicat

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 9:22 am
by rgdeuce
Beachcat97 wrote:
He used to be the most in-the-know insider, but it got to be less so recently.
So a dude who has a proven track record is at fault because two kids, who were both influenced by things beyond Miller's and Arizona Basketball's control, made decisions at the last minute that were not Arizona? You saw what JJ said about CSM up til the end based on everything he said (and we obsessed over his interviews), substantively, Arizona looked like the school he adored most. 97 never said anything outside of perfect fit, which certainly was not incorrect. It made perfect sense for both parties.

If you think the Rabb thing was on the up and up, you're crazy. Cuonzo swoops in outta nowhere and steals him from us? Then brings in Brown outta nowhere and then Swanigan gives them a last minute hard look? Sometimes you're gonna lose guys to shady crap, or for shoe company reasons. It is what it is.

97 was making comments on both recruits when their recruitments had boat loads of teams. Arizona ended up in the final 3 for the top recruit and the final 2 for Rabb. Never look a gift horse in the mouth. I'll take 97s word any day. I don't know the circumstances of why he is posting less, but now we got nothing, so maybe that works better for you?