Re: 16/17 Schedule
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 10:11 am
" SMU and USC have scheduled a home and home series for the 2016 and 2017 seasons."
I get that, I just don't get the why. This isn't college football, where one non-conference loss could likely mean saying bye bye to a national championship. Teams play 30 plus. It isn't going to kill you with the selection committee. If you lose, it was a tough loss and you tried. It's a resume builder not a destroyer. As we have seen, some metrics will even reward you just for showing up for a road game like that. And in the event you have a great night and win, or Arizona has a really off night and you win, look out. Last year's road win by Oregon was their defining win of the season and in my eyes, the turning point for them. I guarantee you, when the committee sat down, that game jumped out them when they looked at the totality of everything and gave them the seed they did. All this is completely aside from the fact that it is a great test in a hostile environment. If you can hang with Arizona in McKale, you can hang with anyone. It's great experience for the players and gives you a chance to see what you need to do to compete with a top team. And worst case scenario, you lose, well you get them at home the next year.Chicat wrote:Neutral sites are the best we're going to be able to do when it comes to scheduling many top tier teams. Tucson is just too tough a place to play. Not many teams want to fly halfway across the country to go to Tucson (with a few connections if they're flying commercial) to get their ass handed to them on national television. But Vegas, LA, or even Phoenix allows for the coaches to get out and see national prospects and for alumni to get a chance to see that team live. And it's the same for us. I doubt we'd be interested in playing in South Bend or Bloomington, but Chicago or Indy? Absolutely...
Your Oregon example gets at some of the issue. Many coaches look at their conference and say, "I'm going to have 5-6 top 100 RPI road games in conference. Why go all the way to Tucson to get one more?"rgdeuce wrote:I get that, I just don't get the why. This isn't college football, where one non-conference loss could likely mean saying bye bye to a national championship. Teams play 30 plus. It isn't going to kill you with the selection committee. If you lose, it was a tough loss and you tried. It's a resume builder not a destroyer. As we have seen, some metrics will even reward you just for showing up for a road game like that. And in the event you have a great night and win, or Arizona has a really off night and you win, look out. Last year's road win by Oregon was their defining win of the season and in my eyes, the turning point for them. I guarantee you, when the committee sat down, that game jumped out them when they looked at the totality of everything and gave them the seed they did. All this is completely aside from the fact that it is a great test in a hostile environment. If you can hang with Arizona in McKale, you can hang with anyone. It's great experience for the players and gives you a chance to see what you need to do to compete with a top team. And worst case scenario, you lose, well you get them at home the next year.Chicat wrote:Neutral sites are the best we're going to be able to do when it comes to scheduling many top tier teams. Tucson is just too tough a place to play. Not many teams want to fly halfway across the country to go to Tucson (with a few connections if they're flying commercial) to get their ass handed to them on national television. But Vegas, LA, or even Phoenix allows for the coaches to get out and see national prospects and for alumni to get a chance to see that team live. And it's the same for us. I doubt we'd be interested in playing in South Bend or Bloomington, but Chicago or Indy? Absolutely...
Michigan is a perfect example of why scheduling is a crap shoot, they were good when we scheduled them, great when we played them the first time and then they way, way crapped the bed and sucked the second time. Who would have guessed a game with Michigan would hurt our RPI?KaibabKat wrote:"UCLA will play Michigan in a home-and-home basketball series over the next two seasons."
Seriously? UCLA has to be the favorite this upcoming season to win the Pac12.Chicat wrote:Nice winnable game for Michigan in a big recruiting hotbed in front of an apathetic, late-arriving, totally somnambulant crowd. Nice work by Beilein.KaibabKat wrote:"UCLA will play Michigan in a home-and-home basketball series over the next two seasons."
UCLA? Why? You do remember they finished 10th last year, right? Lots of chemistry problems next year for UCLA. Bryce will get minutes that should be going to others, and Stevie will again struggle to figure things out. Their roster looks great, but I'm not sure Alford has shown that he can do much with a loaded roster. It would surprise most of us to see UCLA finish ahead of Arizona or Oregon. Watch out for USC next year, too.enfuego wrote:Seriously? UCLA has to be the favorite this upcoming season to win the Pac12.Chicat wrote:Nice winnable game for Michigan in a big recruiting hotbed in front of an apathetic, late-arriving, totally somnambulant crowd. Nice work by Beilein.KaibabKat wrote:"UCLA will play Michigan in a home-and-home basketball series over the next two seasons."
UCLA
Oregon
Arizona
Ball is a great point guard, move Alford over to the 2g and talent across the board. Alford is a good,not great coach. Shouldn't be able to mess that one up next year.Beachcat97 wrote:UCLA? Why? You do remember they finished 10th last year, right? Lots of chemistry problems next year for UCLA. Bryce will get minutes that should be going to others, and Stevie will again struggle to figure things out. Their roster looks great, but I'm not sure Alford has shown that he can do much with a loaded roster. It would surprise most of us to see UCLA finish ahead of Arizona or Oregon. Watch out for USC next year, too.enfuego wrote:Seriously? UCLA has to be the favorite this upcoming season to win the Pac12.Chicat wrote:Nice winnable game for Michigan in a big recruiting hotbed in front of an apathetic, late-arriving, totally somnambulant crowd. Nice work by Beilein.KaibabKat wrote:"UCLA will play Michigan in a home-and-home basketball series over the next two seasons."
UCLA
Oregon
Arizona
But Bryce has to show PG skills to go League, so Steve will give him every opportunity. Guaranteed.enfuego wrote:Ball is a great point guard, move Alford over to the 2g and talent across the board. Alford is a good,not great coach. Shouldn't be able to mess that one up next year.Beachcat97 wrote:UCLA? Why? You do remember they finished 10th last year, right? Lots of chemistry problems next year for UCLA. Bryce will get minutes that should be going to others, and Stevie will again struggle to figure things out. Their roster looks great, but I'm not sure Alford has shown that he can do much with a loaded roster. It would surprise most of us to see UCLA finish ahead of Arizona or Oregon. Watch out for USC next year, too.enfuego wrote:Seriously? UCLA has to be the favorite this upcoming season to win the Pac12.Chicat wrote:Nice winnable game for Michigan in a big recruiting hotbed in front of an apathetic, late-arriving, totally somnambulant crowd. Nice work by Beilein.KaibabKat wrote:"UCLA will play Michigan in a home-and-home basketball series over the next two seasons."
UCLA
Oregon
Arizona
Can't tell if you're trollin or being sincere, fuego. Look at UCLA's 2015-16 team. They were similarly "loaded," maybe not quite as much as they will be next season, but they were a team who beat UK and Gonzaga before absolutely unraveling over the course of the season. To me, that means this coach failed. Improvement between Nov and Mar is arguably a primary measure of a coach's abilities. UCLA had perhaps the 2nd best backcourt in the Pac and finished in 10th place. So while the influx of talent will help, I'm not sure it boosts them as far as you're envisioning, not with a below-average coach and so much being immediately expected of Ball. I don't think they'll finish 10th, but finishing in the top 3 would surprise me.enfuego wrote:Ball is a great point guard, move Alford over to the 2g and talent across the board. Alford is a good,not great coach. Shouldn't be able to mess that one up next year.Beachcat97 wrote:UCLA? Why? You do remember they finished 10th last year, right? Lots of chemistry problems next year for UCLA. Bryce will get minutes that should be going to others, and Stevie will again struggle to figure things out. Their roster looks great, but I'm not sure Alford has shown that he can do much with a loaded roster. It would surprise most of us to see UCLA finish ahead of Arizona or Oregon. Watch out for USC next year, too.enfuego wrote:Seriously? UCLA has to be the favorite this upcoming season to win the Pac12.Chicat wrote:Nice winnable game for Michigan in a big recruiting hotbed in front of an apathetic, late-arriving, totally somnambulant crowd. Nice work by Beilein.KaibabKat wrote:"UCLA will play Michigan in a home-and-home basketball series over the next two seasons."
UCLA
Oregon
Arizona
Beachcat97 wrote:
Can't tell if you're trollin or being sincere, fuego.
Well, he sort of vacillates between straight-trollin posts and seemingly earnest posts, and yes, I'm giving him some benefit of the doubt.UAEebs86 wrote:Beachcat97 wrote:
Can't tell if you're trollin or being sincere, fuego.
Good one BC97!
Looking at it they'll actually have a pretty damn good team. Return majority of their guards from last year, add a bunch of talented foreigners, also add PF transfer Jonathan Williams & Nigel Williams-Goss.gumby wrote:Karnowski returning to Gonzaga. So there's a schedule upgrade.
And now Jordan Mathews. We're gonna have a battle on our hands in L.A.ChooChooCat wrote:Looking at it they'll actually have a pretty damn good team. Return majority of their guards from last year, add a bunch of talented foreigners, also add PF transfer Jonathan Williams & Nigel Williams-Goss.gumby wrote:Karnowski returning to Gonzaga. So there's a schedule upgrade.
...better than #303 out of 351.Jefe wrote:better than last year...
I was contemplating moving from the upper level down to priority seating. Got my wife hooked and she gave the green light, and my oldest son is a diehard fan in the making. Ultimately, I decided to keep the cheaper seats and the schedule was what did it. I personally find the $900 or so I spend on two season tickets to be a steal, but I don't think it is worth dumping thousands more into lower seats just to watch us beat the pants off these weak teams, maybe get one or two semi-close nonconference games in a season, and then a handful of competitive games in the conference season, especially since our conference doesn't have any other perennial giants in it.97cats wrote:what an absolutely atrocious non-conf home schedule -- Coach Miller and Greg Byrne should be effin ashamed of themselves.
considering what the tickets cost a season ticket holder (including the seat fee) and taking into account how passionate the locals are and how well the games are attended, not to mention the generosity of so many the boosters who go above and beyond to support the program outside the cost of attending the games at McKale, this has to change -- the best OOC home game cant be fucking New Mexico.
i usually come for one OOC home game a year and travel to one away location ive never been to, but not this year. maybe i will come when the LA schools visit but thats it.
embarrassing
I am headed there for the game. Hope we get the time info soon.CalStateTempe wrote:CATS vs Gonzaga dec 3, staples
Tickets are a linked with a game of USC vs BYU.
Anyone know who will go first?
I assume the CATS game is the premier game and would go last, but I also read somewhere that tip off of the CATS was 2:30. Not sure if that was the game time or the time slotted for the set of games to start.
Thinking of flying in and flying out same day and don't want to waste my time on scrub teams.
Merkin wrote:
I didn't say only directional schools, just no one name teams.ASUHATER! wrote:new mexico is a directional school?