Yeah, a big part of it is we need D more than O. Eason is an athletic guy who can defend multiple positions, protect the rim and block shots. Getting that package would immediately give us a tool we lack. Rice/Battle just sort of give us another skillset we already have.BeardownZonaZona wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 11:45 amGood explain, I'd have to agree. We're going to have a lot of great offensive players next year. Defense is going to be the key to our success. If we can play decent defense as a team we're going to be very good. Our defense this year was really poorSpaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 11:28 amNot big into Rice. His offensive game is very 3 point centric in a way I don't think will translate well (10.6 threes shot per game, WTF?). Battle is more balanced offensively, but Eason dwarfs both on D.BeardownZonaZona wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 10:25 am What are your guy's thoughts on Kaiden Rice or Jamison Battle? Both are good shooters and could play the stretch 4 for us. I would still take Eason over both but these two aren't bad
We have more than enough firepower. I'd want a better defender than Rice/Battle, and Eason fits that bill with a developing offensive game.
I like Eason because I think he'll develop a lot on O. What stuck out to me on tape is he would touch the ball and immediately attack instead of being patient. This corresponds with a high (24%) turnover percentage. If he's more patient, his assist % suggests he can pass, he's a good, athletic finisher at the rim and the mechanics on his jumper look good.
It also intuitively makes sense a freshman might be playing too fast. He just looked too sped up. If he can slow down and get his J to fall, no reason he can't be dropping 12-14 per game pretty quickly.
I'm worried about the competition because to me, he stands out vs the rest. I liked Bramah more than Rice and Battle, but Eason has tools and upside that dwarf other transfers.