A co-op community for Arizona Fans
http://beardownwildcats.com/
He did jump over Miller.ChooChooCat wrote:Wow I did not expect that for Rawle at all.Jefe wrote:Max Vertical
Rawle - 40.5"
Kobi - 38.5"
Dillon Brooks 37.5"
Kadeem - 35.5"
Oh gotcha yeah that garbageChooChooCat wrote:It was nbadraft.net, not draftexpress, so anotherwords it's pure garbage and nothing anybody should pay attention to. Comanche is very likely going undrafted.3goggles wrote:I don't know how to post it but on Instagram coachryansilver posted a mock draft which looked like draft express having chance going @ pick 47.
I always added an inch because something so subtle can be a big attention grabber for scouts/recruiting coaches, etc. It doesn't sound like much, but a 6'4" pitcher is going to jump out at a scout or coach before a 6'3 pitcher does. Same applies for basketball. A few other reasons why: 1) Your teammates are adding an inch and the guys who are an inch shorter than you are listed as the same height, so you go up to. 2) It's a way to add more to a male's alpha. Like guys who always add a half inch or inch to the size of their johnson, exaggerating height is next.gumby wrote:Never understood adding height. Like the opponent is playing against the fictional version?
.
At the doctor's earlier this week, I was 6'1 3/4 without shoes. I feel I'm still 6'3, if not 6'4.gumby wrote:Never understood adding height. Like the opponent is playing against the fictional version?
We need Rawle to either suck or say he's gone 100-0 gone.
I'm shrinking too if it makes you feel better. I was right at 6'3 without shoes when I was in college, now I am just around 6'2 1/4. I heard you can lose a half inch each decade once you hit 40.Spaceman Spiff wrote: At the doctor's earlier this week, I was 6'1 3/4 without shoes. I feel I'm still 6'3, if not 6'4.
How else are we supposed to end up little old men? We wouldn't want to miss that.rgdeuce wrote:I'm shrinking too if it makes you feel better. I was right at 6'3 without shoes when I was in college, now I am just around 6'2 1/4. I heard you can lose a half inch each decade once you hit 40.Spaceman Spiff wrote: At the doctor's earlier this week, I was 6'1 3/4 without shoes. I feel I'm still 6'3, if not 6'4.
Spaceman Spiff wrote:At the doctor's earlier this week, I was 6'1 3/4 without shoes. I feel I'm still 6'3, if not 6'4.gumby wrote:Never understood adding height. Like the opponent is playing against the fictional version?
We need Rawle to either suck or say he's gone 100-0 gone.
They had to make a special ramp to make it higher.TucsonClip wrote:Diallo with the 2nd best max vert in combine history and with a 6'11.5" wingspan. Holy shit.
I tell them I just got out of the pool. There was shrinkage!Spaceman Spiff wrote:At the doctor's earlier this week, I was 6'1 3/4 without shoes. I feel I'm still 6'3, if not 6'4.gumby wrote:Never understood adding height. Like the opponent is playing against the fictional version?
We need Rawle to either suck or say he's gone 100-0 gone.
Just seems like you're setting up scouts and girls for disappointment. Not like they've never heard of people doing that.rgdeuce wrote:Rawle picking up right where he left off before the finger injury. Seems like we are always playing the "what if" game when it comes to the tournament.
I always added an inch because something so subtle can be a big attention grabber for scouts/recruiting coaches, etc. It doesn't sound like much, but a 6'4" pitcher is going to jump out at a scout or coach before a 6'3 pitcher does. Same applies for basketball. A few other reasons why: 1) Your teammates are adding an inch and the guys who are an inch shorter than you are listed as the same height, so you go up to. 2) It's a way to add more to a male's alpha. Like guys who always add a half inch or inch to the size of their johnson, exaggerating height is next.gumby wrote:Never understood adding height. Like the opponent is playing against the fictional version?
.
His team played after the Kadeem/Kobi game.Jefe wrote:Both Kadeem and Kobi looked good from what I saw today. Kobi made some great passes and drives. Kadeem went hard all scrimmage
Was Rawle not in the combine today?
Lol until you are getting to a combine where they are anal, it doesnt matter. The 6'5" guy already won getting a scouts attention, once he falls in love he isnt going to be too upset when he finds out he exaggerated an inchgumby wrote: Just seems like you're setting up scouts and girls for disappointment. Not like they've never heard of people doing that.
"Gee, you're 6-5 and only get three rebounds a game?"
No! No! I'm really 6-2!"
Is that what you tell the ladies?rgdeuce wrote:Lol until you are getting to a combine where they are anal, it doesnt matter. The 6'5" guy already won getting a scouts attention, once he falls in love he isnt going to be too upset when he finds out he exaggerated an inchgumby wrote: Just seems like you're setting up scouts and girls for disappointment. Not like they've never heard of people doing that.
"Gee, you're 6-5 and only get three rebounds a game?"
No! No! I'm really 6-2!"
Really? On Mother's Day?rgdeuce wrote:Only your mother, and only because she seemed like the cavernous type.
I wish I could rep RG for dropping that on Mother's Day.whatisee wrote:Really? On Mother's Day?rgdeuce wrote:Only your mother, and only because she seemed like the cavernous type.
rgdeuce wrote:Rawle picking up right where he left off before the finger injury. Seems like we are always playing the "what if" game when it comes to the tournament.
I always added an inch because something so subtle can be a big attention grabber for scouts/recruiting coaches, etc. It doesn't sound like much, but a 6'4" pitcher is going to jump out at a scout or coach before a 6'3 pitcher does. Same applies for basketball. A few other reasons why: 1) Your teammates are adding an inch and the guys who are an inch shorter than you are listed as the same height, so you go up to. 2) It's a way to add more to a male's alpha. Like guys who always add a half inch or inch to the size of their johnson, exaggerating height is next.gumby wrote:Never understood adding height. Like the opponent is playing against the fictional version?
.
Timing is everythingwhatisee wrote:Really? On Mother's Day?rgdeuce wrote:Only your mother, and only because she seemed like the cavernous type.
About 3.50?Beachcat97 wrote:Wonder what Rawle needs to hear to stay in the draft? 1st round guarantee?
Know it's a highlight reel but damn, Rawle looked good.Jefe wrote:Rawle update? Worked out for the Nets and then Toronto next
I get where you are going with late first, but don't follow early second...the order doesn't snake. Early 2nd is full of sucky teams.Jefe wrote:I bet a lot of these guys want to be drafted late 1st or early 2nd round. It almost guarantees you going to a great team
So the question is just whether Rawle and his family are okay with early 2nd round, with a chance (however slight) of not being drafted at all, given the fickle nature of draft day.TucsonClip wrote:Early second round is very desirable from all standpoints, as agents can negotiate a salary, years, ect.
I dont have any info on this, but if I were part of his inner circle, I would want him to get in as many works with different teams as possible before 5/24. I would want to know what each team thinks and where they would consider him in the draft. Most importantly, I would want to know from teams who see him as a late second round pick, how many teams would require he sign a two-way contract.Beachcat97 wrote:So the question is just whether Rawle and his family are okay with early 2nd round, with a chance (however slight) of not being drafted at all, given the fickle nature of draft day.TucsonClip wrote:Early second round is very desirable from all standpoints, as agents can negotiate a salary, years, ect.
......but if he pulls an unexpected Zo maneuver and return, I'll be ecstatic.
. BTFD Team.Wow, thanks for that Choo Choo.....as 84 said, hope it happens!!!ChooChooCat wrote:Some rumors going around that he's likely to come back now, but at the moment still hasn't told Arizona anything either way.
Well, fingers crossed, but as always, it's only final when it's final.ChooChooCat wrote:Some rumors going around that he's likely to come back now, but at the moment still hasn't told Arizona anything either way.
Jason Scheer said it's still 50/50 wether he comes back or not.ChooChooCat wrote:Some rumors going around that he's likely to come back now, but at the moment still hasn't told Arizona anything either way.
That's better than what it was a week ago that's for sure.Irish27 wrote:Jason Scheer said it's still 50/50 wether he comes back or not.ChooChooCat wrote:Some rumors going around that he's likely to come back now, but at the moment still hasn't told Arizona anything either way.
51/49 today?ChooChooCat wrote:That's better than what it was a week ago that's for sure.Irish27 wrote:Jason Scheer said it's still 50/50 wether he comes back or not.ChooChooCat wrote:Some rumors going around that he's likely to come back now, but at the moment still hasn't told Arizona anything either way.
I mean we have post depth, just a matter of how Pinder and Lee performs. PG a much larger concern to me than any other weakness.PennZona20 wrote:Get Rawle back and this team is preseason top 5.
Missing post depth (thanks Chance for this year) and obviously a high leve PG but other than that this team seems pretty stacked if Rawle comes back.
Can I ask those who have a better idea, whether they think Lee can actually provide meaningful minutes his frosh year? Chance certainly didn't, so do we think Lee is further ahead in his development than Chance was coming into college?ChooChooCat wrote:I mean we have post depth, just a matter of how Pinder and Lee performs. PG a much larger concern to me than any other weakness.PennZona20 wrote:Get Rawle back and this team is preseason top 5.
Missing post depth (thanks Chance for this year) and obviously a high leve PG but other than that this team seems pretty stacked if Rawle comes back.
Comanche rarely played hard and more importantly didn't listen much, especially his freshman year. Playing hard and listening aren't issues Lee has, so he certainly has a chance to make the rotation in the post.dcZONAfan wrote:Can I ask those who have a better idea, whether they think Lee can actually provide meaningful minutes his frosh year? Chance certainly didn't, so do we think Lee is further ahead in his development than Chance was coming into college?ChooChooCat wrote:I mean we have post depth, just a matter of how Pinder and Lee performs. PG a much larger concern to me than any other weakness.PennZona20 wrote:Get Rawle back and this team is preseason top 5.
Missing post depth (thanks Chance for this year) and obviously a high leve PG but other than that this team seems pretty stacked if Rawle comes back.
It feels like our post depth is definitely lacking. Whether that ends up a major problem we won't know. I will say that having Rawle back would be huge as I believe he can be a difference maker for both offensive and defensive rebounding, something we will desperately need with Dusan playing so many minutes next year (fuck the last 7 words of that sentence depress me so very much).
I wouldn't question Comanche's effort, it's just that I don't think he knew what playing hard and really battling are all about. Some guys have it. Some don't. Certain players just have that motor and inner drive to battle more on position, possession, etc... A lot of that comes from playing against tough competition your whole life and trial by fire. My best guess is that Comanche was always the best player on the floor during his formative years because he played against inferior competition and really didn't have to battle against better players in practice or in games. Things came easy, up until the point he was hit smack in the face by college basketball and the reality that he needed a ton of work set in.ChooChooCat wrote:Comanche rarely played hard and more importantly didn't listen much, especially his freshman year. Playing hard and listening aren't issues Lee has, so he certainly has a chance to make the rotation in the post.dcZONAfan wrote:Can I ask those who have a better idea, whether they think Lee can actually provide meaningful minutes his frosh year? Chance certainly didn't, so do we think Lee is further ahead in his development than Chance was coming into college?ChooChooCat wrote:I mean we have post depth, just a matter of how Pinder and Lee performs. PG a much larger concern to me than any other weakness.PennZona20 wrote:Get Rawle back and this team is preseason top 5.
Missing post depth (thanks Chance for this year) and obviously a high leve PG but other than that this team seems pretty stacked if Rawle comes back.
It feels like our post depth is definitely lacking. Whether that ends up a major problem we won't know. I will say that having Rawle back would be huge as I believe he can be a difference maker for both offensive and defensive rebounding, something we will desperately need with Dusan playing so many minutes next year (fuck the last 7 words of that sentence depress me so very much).