Page 4 of 43

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 9:34 am
by Chicat
I haven't seen 97 post much over at Scout either. Maybe there isn't much to say, or maybe he's busy with his own life.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 9:53 am
by KaibabKat
Chicat wrote:I haven't seen 97 post much over at Scout either. Maybe there isn't much to say, or maybe he's busy with his own life.
Image

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 10:29 am
by Spaceman Spiff
Beachcat97 wrote:
KaibabKat wrote:That is not the reason he doesn't come around very often anymore.
He used to be the most in-the-know insider, but it got to be less so recently.
That is really wrong. That's also not the sort of allegation you toss out as a casual fan. On the whole, I would advise ceasing to beat the drum about Rabb and JJ. It's not a good look for you.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 10:31 am
by Chicat
KaibabKat wrote:
Chicat wrote:I haven't seen 97 post much over at Scout either. Maybe there isn't much to say, or maybe he's busy with his own life.
Image
Are you going to enlighten us? Or just keep pretending you know something?

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:37 am
by Jefe
Beachcat97 wrote:He used to be the most in-the-know insider, but it got to be less so recently.
:? Our roster is set and its too soon for '17

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 12:11 pm
by Beachcat97
Jefe wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:He used to be the most in-the-know insider, but it got to be less so recently.
:? Our roster is set and its too soon for '17
Left and right, guys are declaring their "favorites," trimming their "lists," etc. So '17 is very much upon us. Most likely, we're not "leading" or likely to get commitments from some of these top 20-ish guys. Miller will get a few, but they probably won't be AG or SJ level talent. We'll see.

And as for 97, I wish him well and pray he's healthy. Lots in life more important than hoops. Or maybe he just feels the discourse level here has sunken so low that he's lost interest.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 12:15 pm
by Spaceman Spiff
Beachcat97 wrote:
Jefe wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:He used to be the most in-the-know insider, but it got to be less so recently.
:? Our roster is set and its too soon for '17
Left and right, guys are declaring their "favorites," trimming their "lists," etc. So '17 is very much upon us. Most likely, we're not "leading" or likely to get commitments from some of these top 20-ish guys. Miller will get a few, but they probably won't be AG or SJ level talent. We'll see.

And as for 97, I wish him well and pray he's healthy. Lots in life more important than hoops. Or maybe he just feels the discourse level here has sunken so low that he's lost interest.
Is the second paragraph in reference to the first paragraph?

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 12:22 pm
by pokinmik
Bashing 97 after we didn't land Rabb or JJ is stupid BC. 97 gave us great info that we'd be right in the mix up until the end for both of those guys, and we were. These are teenagers getting pulled in a hundred directions...knowing early on that AZ is going to be there right until the final decision is made, with a damn good chance, is good enough info for me. 97 isn't a fucking oracle. He never said they were locks to us.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 12:28 pm
by PennZona20
So why isn't 97 posting as often as normal?? Why all the secrecy and vague implications? Is this an Ace related thing?

I always valued his info even if it was vague and repetitive and some of his takes (PJC, York, etc) were kind of "dig your heels in" even when they played well.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 1:47 pm
by Fishclamps
This thread seems to have gone right off the rails.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 2:24 pm
by Main Event
Why is everyone losing it around here? lol chill

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:58 pm
by 97cats
i think you all are a bunch of jerks

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 5:13 pm
by IndianaZonaFan
:lol: :lol:

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 5:15 pm
by Longhorned
Ever wonder what would happen if you dressed like this and ran for mayor?

Image

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2016 6:36 pm
by Chicat
97cats wrote:i think you all are a bunch of jerks
A bunch of jerks who need football to start.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 4:41 am
by Puerco
97cats wrote:i think you all are a bunch of jerks
Shut up, you. We want to hear what Kaibab has to say.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 11:18 am
by Beachcat97
Are we right where we want to be with anyone in the '17 class? Think that's sort of the point of this thread.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 12:56 pm
by ChooChooCat
Beachcat97 wrote:Are we right where we want to be with anyone in the '17 class? Think that's sort of the point of this thread.
Were we ever where we wanted to be with a single one of our commitments in the 2016 class until they committed to us?

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 1:15 pm
by Spaceman Spiff
Beachcat97 wrote:Are we right where we want to be with anyone in the '17 class? Think that's sort of the point of this thread.
Image

Chill out on getting where we want to be with minors. They're children.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 2:46 pm
by Beachcat97
ChooChooCat wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:Are we right where we want to be with anyone in the '17 class? Think that's sort of the point of this thread.
Were we ever where we wanted to be with a single one of our commitments in the 2016 class until they committed to us?
Nope. The '16 class came together in a way that was very different from Miller's previous classes.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 3:28 pm
by Chicat

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 3:42 pm
by Alieberman
That's creepy

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 7:51 pm
by az91
Alieberman wrote:That's creepy
I'm just glad to see he doesn't have ASU or UCLA in his top 5.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:27 pm
by Beachcat97
az91 wrote:
Alieberman wrote:That's creepy
I'm just glad to see he doesn't have ASU or UCLA in his top 5.
When was the last time Miller lost a recruit to UCLA or ASU? We own them lately.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 6:46 am
by Spaceman Spiff
Beachcat97 wrote:
az91 wrote:
Alieberman wrote:That's creepy
I'm just glad to see he doesn't have ASU or UCLA in his top 5.
When was the last time Miller lost a recruit to UCLA or ASU? We own them lately.
TJ Leaf.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 8:33 am
by Beachcat97
Spaceman Spiff wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:
az91 wrote:
Alieberman wrote:That's creepy
I'm just glad to see he doesn't have ASU or UCLA in his top 5.
When was the last time Miller lost a recruit to UCLA or ASU? We own them lately.
TJ Leaf.
No. He chose us first because we were his top school, so you can't really say they beat us, especially when we ended up with a better player in LM. Keep trying, though.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 8:42 am
by Chicat
So we beat them for his services even though he'll suit up for them this year?

That is some impressive logic, even for you.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 8:48 am
by threenumberones
Chicat wrote:So we beat them for his services even though he'll suit up for them this year?

That is some impressive logic, even for you.
Apparently BC applies sloppy seconds logic to recruiting.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 9:26 am
by Spaceman Spiff
Beachcat97 wrote:
Spaceman Spiff wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:
az91 wrote:
Alieberman wrote:That's creepy
I'm just glad to see he doesn't have ASU or UCLA in his top 5.
When was the last time Miller lost a recruit to UCLA or ASU? We own them lately.
TJ Leaf.
No. He chose us first because we were his top school, so you can't really say they beat us, especially when we ended up with a better player in LM. Keep trying, though.
I don't really get how we didn't lose a recruit to UCLA when he committed here, decommitted, and wound up going to UCLA. I am a huge fan of Lauri's, but hey, we lost Leaf.

The world keeps spinning, though.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 9:32 am
by Chicat
BC must consider himself married to his college sweetheart even though they broke up and she married some other dude.

"Look, I didn't lose her to that guy . . . we just consciously uncoupled . . . but I still won in the end. See?"

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 10:07 am
by ChooChooCat
Beachcat97 wrote:
az91 wrote:
Alieberman wrote:That's creepy
I'm just glad to see he doesn't have ASU or UCLA in his top 5.
When was the last time Miller lost a recruit to UCLA or ASU? We own them lately.
Ummmm really?

Jaylen Hands
Jalen Hill
TJ Leaf
Ike Anigbogu

All Compton Magic guys, but yeah...

Trevon Duval likely added to this list soon, but that's an UnderArmour thing.

Now that ASU is the only west coast Adidas school I'm sure they'll land a guy over us that they absolutely shouldn't due to shoe politics in the near future.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 10:22 am
by Spaceman Spiff
Chicat wrote:BC must consider himself married to his college sweetheart even though they broke up and she married some other dude.

"Look, I didn't lose her to that guy . . . we just consciously uncoupled . . . but I still won in the end. See?"
The Leaf/Lauri thing is why it's silly to be freaking out about '17 recruiting early. Here's the timeline:

Leaf commits to AZ. We are super happy. We start threads about him being a stud.
Leaf decommits. We are devastated. We lose our respective minds.
Lauri commits. We don't really know him, so we kind of note it and move on.
Lauri starts displaying the talent Miller saw. We get really happy and start threads. Certain fans recast TJ decommitting as a happy thing where we moved onto something better.

Recruiting is a volatile world. Miller doesn't consistently land top 5 classes by accident. We need to let the man work.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 1:19 pm
by Beachcat97
I stand corrected. UCLA isn't just beating us recruiting-wise. They own us and it isn't close. It's surpsing how few players prefer AZ to UCLA.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 1:58 pm
by Chicat
Image

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 8:10 pm
by Fishclamps
Beachcat97 wrote:I stand corrected. UCLA isn't just beating us recruiting-wise. They own us and it isn't close. It's surpsing how few players prefer AZ to UCLA.
This guy, I love this guy.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2016 12:13 am
by RichardCranium
Fishclamps wrote:
Beachcat97 wrote:I stand corrected. UCLA isn't just beating us recruiting-wise. They own us and it isn't close. It's surpsing how few players prefer AZ to UCLA.
This guy, I love this guy.
Don't forget to tip the waitress.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 12:50 pm
by EVCat
I really don't get this "not getting his top target" bullshit...because that really is what it is...

Should Miller only make offers to 30-80 level players he knows he has? Would that make someone happy because he is then pulling in his top target?

The absurdity of this is really staggering...he made a run at the best player or top 5 player the last couple of years, and he wound up in the final race but didn't win it. So he is supposed to pull the top player in the country any time we are among the final 5? What about the teams that didn't get Josh Jackson and weren't even among his final schools? Did they fail even worse? Or do they get some weird pass from this line of thinking because they weren't even in the mix?

One school got JJ. Others didn't. Some big time names. Are they failures, or is this insane line of thinking only applicable to our head coach? We have a roster full of McD's AAs, top 5 national classes, and I am supposed to think lesser of the coach because he didn't get his top target along with about 100 other coaches?

Maybe I am not even expressing this right, because the absurdity of the entire concept is one I cannot even properly put into words. You are a failure for being successful, and successful if you don't even play, and despite the program having top 5 classes year in and year out, they are failures because the coach who did that didn't get the #1 overall player that also didn't go to 99% of the other schools, including 80% of the schools in the top 5?

It is just, absolutely the worst thing about today's college hoops fan and this masturbatory obsession with recruiting...

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 8:51 am
by HiCat
Ira Lee

Arizona
92%
http://247sports.com/Player/Ira-Lee-36577" target="_blank

list down to 5
http://www.azdesertswarm.com/2016/8/16/ ... final-five" target="_blank

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:58 am
by Beachcat97
Would be a nice start to our '17 class.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 5:43 pm
by ChooChooCat
He's a west coast Craig Victor.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 7:18 pm
by Frybry02
I'm curious how the recruiting of Duval and Preston shakes out since both attend Advanced Prepatory International.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 7:20 pm
by Spaceman Spiff
Frybry02 wrote:I'm curious how the recruiting of Duval and Preston shakes out since both attend Advanced Prepatory International.
Kind of funny how all the words in Advanced Preparatory Academy are pretty much the opposite of what the "school" actually is or does.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 9:58 pm
by az91
ChooChooCat wrote:He's a west coast Craig Victor.
Is that a good or a bad thing?

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 8:17 am
by Spaceman Spiff
az91 wrote:
ChooChooCat wrote:He's a west coast Craig Victor.
Is that a good or a bad thing?
Good...assuming he does not transfer. Victor is a good player.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 3:35 pm
by Jefe
Nova is leading but...

http://www.vuhoops.com/2016/8/25/126445 ... alker-list" target="_blank
5-star guard Lonnie Walker has cut his list to 5 schools. Villanova, Syracuse, Kentucky, Arizona and Miami (FL) remain in contention for Lonnie Walker per the Reading Eagle.

Walker has previously said he plans to make decision in the early signing period in November. The Reading (Pa.) product had a productive summer playing for Team Final (Pa.) on the Nike EYBL circuit which led to increased interest from the traditional powers in college basketball.

Now we wait for Walker’s official visit schedule, which should begin sometime in September. Villanova’s annual Hoops Mania event will likely be on Friday October 28, so that’s a good bet for when we might see him visit.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:02 pm
by ChooChooCat
Only chance we got is if he goes outside of PA for his senior year.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 5:08 pm
by Main Event

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 5:32 pm
by whatisee
Fantastic get IMO. Should be a star at Arizona

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 5:44 pm
by ChooChooCat
Early leader for most hated white bball player nationally in 2021 lol. Great get.

Re: let's talk '17

Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 5:59 pm
by Spaceman Spiff
Barcello is one of those 4 year guys that can build stability in a program.