For the most part Arizona teams under Miller have looked looked really, really good in the first two rounds of the tournament. Then outside of Duke 2011, have looked mediocre in the Sweet 16 game and then play fairly well in the Elite 8 game until they run out of gas with a few minutes left.
This year we have looked pretty good in the first two rounds (but not dominating like in years past). I'm hoping this saved some effort/energy for these next two games. I'm hoping for a 2003 Sweet 16 Notre Dame kind of stomping. I really need a night of lower anxiety.
Re: Sweet 16!
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 4:36 pm
by Jefe
Team gifts from Nike
Re: Sweet 16!
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:29 pm
by YoDeFoe
I got goosebumps seeing those team gifts. Keep it going Cats!!!
Re: Sweet 16!
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:49 pm
by Jefe
From Kokoskie:
Didnt know we had a plane
Re: Sweet 16!
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 4:55 pm
by Bangkok Wildcat
Man, are we still 'Point Guard U'?
Re: Sweet 16!
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:47 pm
by HiCat
Zags feeling the heat. Tied at the half 30 all.
Re: Sweet 16!
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:25 pm
by luteformayor2
Bangkok Wildcat wrote:Man, are we still 'Point Guard U'?
Really we are "wing player u" or something like that
Re: Sweet 16!
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:30 pm
by Bangkok Wildcat
luteformayor2 wrote:
Bangkok Wildcat wrote:Man, are we still 'Point Guard U'?
Really we are "wing player u" or something like that
Yeah, was thinking the same thing but we've got the #1 big coming in and Lauri going lotto.....maybe we should stick with only 'A Player's Program'.....that is such a cool name....but good argument for 'Wing U' too these days under CSM?
Re: Sweet 16!
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:32 pm
by prh
Bangkok posted this in the game thread, but really deserves a wider audience:
Re: Sweet 16!
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:57 pm
by UAEebs86
Re: Sweet 16!
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:18 pm
by rgdeuce
Xavier got shrugged off quite a bit on page 1. I saw it coming but I still never expected us to lose in a million years.
This game was the little guy who wanted it a 100x more than the silver spoon giants. All that needs to be said.
Re: Sweet 16!
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:24 pm
by catgrad97
Thing of it, we're not really Silver Spoon. Recruit like it, but don't have the big game pedigree to boast it for more than two generations.
Again, it's show cause time for Miller next season.
Re: Sweet 16!
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 12:06 am
by CalStateTempe
rgdeuce wrote:Xavier got shrugged off quite a bit on page 1. I saw it coming but I still never expected us to lose in a million years.
This game was the little guy who wanted it a 100x more than the silver spoon giants. All that needs to be said.
Referring to your earlier analogy, did we contract chlamydia or syphillis this game, certainly was not the best sex of our lives.
Re: Sweet 16!
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 12:15 am
by rgdeuce
We were pumping away with only half wood for 33 minutes and it was terrible and she was about ready to leave. Then out of nowhere, we got rock hard and she was convinced it was the real deal. Then we went completely soft and it ended horribly and we didnt even finish. Then we found out we got chlamydia and genital herpes and lost our health insurance
