Re: lets talk '16
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 3:53 pm
Explains why you can't see any teeth. Must have lived in a non-fluoridated area.gumby wrote:Would you believe dental health?
![Image](https://www.usatodaysportsimages.com/image/thumb/250-225/8228875.jpg)
![Image](http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/tucson.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/1/94/1943ba34-8f43-11e5-8cc2-277ed2921f40/564ea80d67ef7.image.jpg?resize=620%2C469)
Explains why you can't see any teeth. Must have lived in a non-fluoridated area.gumby wrote:Would you believe dental health?
Spaceman Spiff wrote:He got to see a great atmosphere in McKale tonight. The crowd was locked in.dirtbags wrote:thanks for not being our home court jinx, rawle. hope you're enjoying your visit
The Oregon loss doesn't seem like such a bad thing now."The first time I went I was there for the Oregon game when they lost at home. Before that game they were 49-0 at home and when they lost I was like man I don't want to be bad luck! Haha!
After the game those guys were in there crying and everything like that because it would've been Coach (Sean) Miller's 300th win.
Coach Miller was saying that he hopes this doesn't affect their recruitment of me, but I told him I love the fact that one loss is like the world ended! I love that because I'm a winner. And winning is the only option. Honestly, seeing their reaction to losing was a high point of the visit for me.
I really hope RA decides to come to Tucson.AZCatGirl wrote:The Oregon loss doesn't seem like such a bad thing now."The first time I went I was there for the Oregon game when they lost at home. Before that game they were 49-0 at home and when they lost I was like man I don't want to be bad luck! Haha!
After the game those guys were in there crying and everything like that because it would've been Coach (Sean) Miller's 300th win.
Coach Miller was saying that he hopes this doesn't affect their recruitment of me, but I told him I love the fact that one loss is like the world ended! I love that because I'm a winner. And winning is the only option. Honestly, seeing their reaction to losing was a high point of the visit for me.
People have been speculating for months and it's never been a problem. Now I posted something with some actual substance and it got deleted. Could it be because it's actually what really happened? If they're going to stay silent on the situation there will be speculation. It's the nature of it. And the program is bringing it on IMO by not sharing anything.Chicat wrote:I understand the curiosity about Elliott's situation, and the natural instinct to speculate, but stop. It does no one (including Pitts and the program) to have a bunch of rumors floating around the Internet. If fans were supposed to know what happened, the AD would announce it.
So quit it. If threads are going to devolve into people playing amateur detective/psychologist and throw out every theory they can come up with, those threads are going to get locked.
Well done, Chi. Agree completely.Chicat wrote:I understand the curiosity about Elliott's situation, and the natural instinct to speculate, but stop. It does no one (including Pitts and the program) to have a bunch of rumors floating around the Internet. If fans were supposed to know what happened, the AD would announce it.
So quit it. If threads are going to devolve into people playing amateur detective/psychologist and throw out every theory they can come up with, those threads are going to get locked.
Actually the Pitts thread got locked due to needless speculation (why do you think people were talking about it here?), and a number of posts got deleted, including yours. If you have something to add to the conversation regarding 2016 recruiting, have at it.billk78 wrote:People have been speculating for months and it's never been a problem. Now I posted something with some actual substance and it got deleted. Could it be because it's actually what really happened? If they're going to stay silent on the situation there will be speculation. It's the nature of it. And the program is bringing it on IMO by not sharing anything.Chicat wrote:I understand the curiosity about Elliott's situation, and the natural instinct to speculate, but stop. It does no one (including Pitts and the program) to have a bunch of rumors floating around the Internet. If fans were supposed to know what happened, the AD would announce it.
So quit it. If threads are going to devolve into people playing amateur detective/psychologist and throw out every theory they can come up with, those threads are going to get locked.
Random posts from 97 about JJ being a perfect fit at AZ are always a pleasure to read97cats wrote:Josh Jackson = perfect fit
Oh, we're beating Cal and Stanford at McKale. Winning two road games this week...that's the tougher challenge.azcat49 wrote:
We need to sweep this road trip then beat Cal to solidify our record. That will get us a 3 or 4 seed for sure
So you finally converted to LM as our starter at the 4. Accept Lauri into your life.Beachcat97 wrote:Random posts from 97 about JJ being a perfect fit at AZ are always a pleasure to read97cats wrote:Josh Jackson = perfect fit
KA
AT
JJ
LM
DR
No one seems to think RS will be the better starter at the 4 spot by November. So be it. Just means we've got an NBA player on the bench.Spaceman Spiff wrote:
So you finally converted to LM as our starter at the 4. Accept Lauri into your life.
If we have Allen, Trier, JJ, LM and DR, we have at least 2 likely pros on the bench, maybe up to 4. If RS starts over LM, we still have that number of pros on the bench.Beachcat97 wrote:No one seems to think RS will be the better starter at the 4 spot by November. So be it. Just means we've got an NBA player on the bench.Spaceman Spiff wrote:
So you finally converted to LM as our starter at the 4. Accept Lauri into your life.
I think our tourney performance may impact AT's decision. If we flame out early, I could see him coming back to play with JJ and improve his draft stock. If we get to the FF, I could see him going pro as his draft stock would presumably be quite strong. Guys who star for teams that go deep in the tourney always get a little bump in their draft stock.ChooChooCat wrote:My totally uninformed gut shot starting 5 next year:
Allen/PJC
Jackson
Smith
Lauri
Ristic
I think Trier goes pro & we land Jackson and keep him away from China. Simmons/Simon provide wing depth, Comanche backs up the 5, grad transfer post to help for depth.
Final Four bound.
Cool, but pretty sure he's not deciding until the summer.
When it gets to 68%, I may be ready to assume he's ours. But not a shade below 68.
After today, I wonder if Comanche should be in the starting five next year rather than Ristic?ChooChooCat wrote:My totally uninformed gut shot starting 5 next year:
Allen/PJC
Jackson
Smith
Lauri
Ristic
I think Trier goes pro & we land Jackson and keep him away from China. Simmons/Simon provide wing depth, Comanche backs up the 5, grad transfer post to help for depth.
Final Four bound.
Our chances at landing Jackson are probably 1 in 3 at best. My guess at a starting 5 (assuming we get Alkins):az91 wrote:After today, I wonder if Comanche should be in the starting five next year rather than Ristic?ChooChooCat wrote:My totally uninformed gut shot starting 5 next year:
Allen/PJC
Jackson
Smith
Lauri
Ristic
I think Trier goes pro & we land Jackson and keep him away from China. Simmons/Simon provide wing depth, Comanche backs up the 5, grad transfer post to help for depth.
Final Four bound.
Well at worst they are 1 in 3...since JJ is down to three schools... Loldmjcat wrote:Our chances at landing Jackson are probably 1 in 3 at best. My guess at a starting 5 (assuming we get Alkins):az91 wrote:After today, I wonder if Comanche should be in the starting five next year rather than Ristic?ChooChooCat wrote:My totally uninformed gut shot starting 5 next year:
Allen/PJC
Jackson
Smith
Lauri
Ristic
I think Trier goes pro & we land Jackson and keep him away from China. Simmons/Simon provide wing depth, Comanche backs up the 5, grad transfer post to help for depth.
Final Four bound.
Point Guard: Allen/PJC
Shooting Guard: Alkins
Small Forward: Simmons
Power Forward: Markkanen
Center: Ristic
Beachcat97 wrote:We're getting JJ.
Yep. The JJ Sweepstakes have huge implications.HiCat wrote:Beachcat97 wrote:We're getting JJ.
FF
Cats are going to be in a world of hurt if KA and PJC are the PGs.dmjcat wrote: Point Guard: Allen/PJC
Isn't KS a PG?Merkin wrote:Cats are going to be in a world of hurt if KA and PJC are the PGs.dmjcat wrote: Point Guard: Allen/PJC
Yes, and I hope he is better than both KA and PJC.Beachcat97 wrote:Isn't KS a PG?Merkin wrote:Cats are going to be in a world of hurt if KA and PJC are the PGs.dmjcat wrote: Point Guard: Allen/PJC
Comparing JS and KS is crazy. One is a talented offensive player with handle, shooting touch, and playmaking abilities. The other is really athletic.Merkin wrote:Justin Simon also came in as a 6'5" PG, although probably both he and Kobi and probably more combo guards.
PJC will probably end up 3rd PG on the floor next year. Perhaps end of the bench.
not sure if the coaching staff would allow it, but PJC should consider redshirting next season. no shame in taking a dev year -- look at kadeem. CSM's concern will probably be that the team will be pretty green. kadeem and dusan will be our upperclassmen leaders if PJC sits things out.Merkin wrote:Justin Simon also came in as a 6'5" PG, although probably both he and Kobi and probably more combo guards.
PJC will probably end up 3rd PG on the floor next year. Perhaps end of the bench.
Will be interesting to see where Simon ends up with us. Coach has used him as a wing, but his background is PG both at Temecula HS and Brewster Academy.ChooChooCat wrote:Justin Simon is a wing. Simmons is a 1,2,3.
At Brewster he primarily played on the wing as well. David Crisp, currently at UW, was the point guard. He's capable of handling the ball, but he's definitely better suited on the wing. The guy just needs to figure out how to play organized basketball.EOCT wrote:Will be interesting to see where Simon ends up with us. Coach has used him as a wing, but his background is PG both at Temecula HS and Brewster Academy.ChooChooCat wrote:Justin Simon is a wing. Simmons is a 1,2,3.
The guy has nice handles and seems to have good court vision. Either Coach sees him as a wing and will develop him that way, or sees him eventually at PG but isn't willing to risk PG time for him so late in the season.. I see him best at the 2.