Re: lets talk '16
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 1:41 pm
Simmons is really starting to grow on me. He is like the Khalil Tate of basketballrgdeuce wrote:We get just JJ out of that and its probably the best class Arizona has ever had. Simmons on Twitter pushin the Ferguson thing
Chicat wrote:How many of our games coming down the stretch were on ESPN/ESPN2? And how many post game interviews have our guys done on Sportscenter? Wasn't that Gabe York I just saw talking to Neil Everett?
Josh, Rawle, Terrance . . . take note. When you come to Arizona you play on the big stage and you get every opportunity to shine.
Interesting.......hope you are right rgdeuce, thanks.rgdeuce wrote:The 2017 draft class is loaded. Supposed to be one of the top classes of the last 20 years. So JJ would be the only for sure. Which is why if Trier returns for his soph season, he may as well stick around til his junior year... I wouldnt sweat losing a lot of guys to the draft after next season. If Miller finished this class like we think, we'll be very strong the next two seasons
That was excellent. Though I winced when Gabe answered their "name the top 4 teams in the PAC other than Arizona?" question. He went by the book, but that is best answered with a "I can't do that" or a "you know, we have a really strong conference top to bottom which is what makes winning here so difficult" answer.Chicat wrote:How many of our games coming down the stretch were on ESPN/ESPN2? And how many post game interviews have our guys done on Sportscenter? Wasn't that Gabe York I just saw talking to Neil Everett?
Josh, Rawle, Terrance . . . take note. When you come to Arizona you play on the big stage and you get every opportunity to shine.
And it would appear that we lead...Main Event wrote:
Which is stupidFightWildcatsFight wrote:Lots of people still hanging on to the notion that if we get Atkins then that means no JJ.
Yeah, and if that's the case the Ferguson decommit really was perfect timing. Before we were salivating at the prospect of getting BOTH RA and JJ. Now it feels almost inevitable that we will get two more top 20 recruits, one way or anotherrgdeuce wrote:Alkins undoubtedly has nothing to do with JJ; however, I am wondering if Alkins announcing right now (and should he choose Arizona) has anything to do with him seeing things with Ferguson. Like, I better give him my commitment right now before this other cat sneaks in.
Sean supposedly wants all 3. Obviously convincing the 3rd guy would the hardest, but he's in fuck it i'm loading up mode right nowrgdeuce wrote:Alkins undoubtedly has nothing to do with JJ; however, I am wondering if Alkins announcing right now (and should he choose Arizona) has anything to do with him seeing things with Ferguson. Like, I better give him my commitment right now before this other cat sneaks in.
If we are still alive with JJ, I don't know how we could squeeze in him and Ferguson. If Zo returns and we get Simon, we're 4 deep of McD's AA level guys on the wing plus Simon. I don't think Alkins influences JJ negatively, but unless Trier is gone, I don't see how it isn't him or Ferguson.rgdeuce wrote:Alkins undoubtedly has nothing to do with JJ; however, I am wondering if Alkins announcing right now (and should he choose Arizona) has anything to do with him seeing things with Ferguson. Like, I better give him my commitment right now before this other cat sneaks in.
True statement after the Leaf decommited people were losing there minds!Spaceman Spiff wrote:This is the weirdest recruiting year ever.
Pundits on Twitter says there is no relationship.FightWildcatsFight wrote:Lots of people still hanging on to the notion that if we get Atkins then that means no JJ.
Yeah, multiple outlets are saying the same thing, so that must be what's coming from inside the program.Merkin wrote:Pundits on Twitter says there is no relationship.FightWildcatsFight wrote:Lots of people still hanging on to the notion that if we get Atkins then that means no JJ.
That's how I see it too. And Miller may be all in for all three like some have said, but I'm sure Alkins is looking at it like we are. Ferguson too. It either tells me that Miller knows Trier is taking his shot at the next level no matter what, he is uncertain about landing JJ and/or Trier leaving and wants the backup plan in place before those decisions are made, or that absolutely no "F's" are given on his part. Even looking at it like this, in absolutes, guys playing the below define positions and not using the versatility we have to play a Kadeem off ball, or Zo at the 3 and Simon at the 2, Comanche at 4, etc.Spaceman Spiff wrote:If we are still alive with JJ, I don't know how we could squeeze in him and Ferguson. If Zo returns and we get Simon, we're 4 deep of McD's AA level guys on the wing plus Simon. I don't think Alkins influences JJ negatively, but unless Trier is gone, I don't see how it isn't him or Ferguson.rgdeuce wrote:Alkins undoubtedly has nothing to do with JJ; however, I am wondering if Alkins announcing right now (and should he choose Arizona) has anything to do with him seeing things with Ferguson. Like, I better give him my commitment right now before this other cat sneaks in.
I highly doubt an official visit to a school in Jackson's home state is going to change anything. This isn't a case of a guy coming from back east and saying, wow, the atmosphere in McKale is insane, the weather is gorgeous, the locker rooms and facilities are top of the line, and the women are beautiful. While Michigan State does have nice facilities, he has probably already been in that arena for a game, if not seen all of it before. Everything else he has experienced in his home state. What could Michigan State give him outside of a suitcase full of money to suddenly change his opinion or make it final?gronk4heisman wrote:No one thinks that the timing of this is at all weird? Word was he was planning on waiting, and then the Monday after JJ's MSU official he decides he is announcing. Maybe I am a pessimist, but I do believe that the staff is doubtful they will get JJ after hearing things post visit and told Alkins such. Alkin's was probably reluctant to commit when JJ was likely because, although they play different positions it would be naive to think JJ would not effect Alkins minutes. I hope I am way off base here because I want JJ more than any recruit I can remember.
He doesn't play the same position as Jackson, and he cannot swing to the 4. JJ is a natural 3, who if we want additional minutes for, we can play small with him at 4.gronk4heisman wrote:No one thinks that the timing of this is at all weird? Word was he was planning on waiting, and then the Monday after JJ's MSU official he decides he is announcing. Maybe I am a pessimist, but I do believe that the staff is doubtful they will get JJ after hearing things post visit and told Alkins such. Alkin's was probably reluctant to commit when JJ was likely because, although they play different positions it would be naive to think JJ would not effect Alkins minutes. I hope I am way off base here because I want JJ more than any recruit I can remember.
My point was that JJ would effect Alkins minutes, not the other way around. Alkins will not effect JJ's minutes. Which is why I think it would take Alkin's hearing something for him to change his mind and commit early. Alkins would be toward the bottom of the totum pole. JJ would be at the top.Spaceman Spiff wrote:He doesn't play the same position as Jackson, and he cannot swing to the 4. JJ is a natural 3, who if we want additional minutes for, we can play small with him at 4.gronk4heisman wrote:No one thinks that the timing of this is at all weird? Word was he was planning on waiting, and then the Monday after JJ's MSU official he decides he is announcing. Maybe I am a pessimist, but I do believe that the staff is doubtful they will get JJ after hearing things post visit and told Alkins such. Alkin's was probably reluctant to commit when JJ was likely because, although they play different positions it would be naive to think JJ would not effect Alkins minutes. I hope I am way off base here because I want JJ more than any recruit I can remember.
If J backs up Lauri at the 4, even if Chance plays both 4 and 5, JJ can easily get 10 mpg at the 4. Add a 20/20 split or even 24/16 with JJ getting the 16 and you're left with JJ pulling 26-30 mpg.
I agree with RG that Ferguson and potentially Trier have a far larger effect on Alkins's minutes. Although we may still want Ferguson, I think Alkins is smart enough to know that if we land him and JJ, Ferguson probably isn't coming to Tucson.
The Goat wrote:Markanen, Simmons, and Alkins. Swoon. Add Jackson and it turns into a cleanup time. Add Ferguson and well we all better go check our lease because we're living in fuck city.
I think there are still questions out there.Longhorned wrote:In case you hear the repeated assertion that it's questionable that Alkins will meet Initial Eligibility requirements and be cleared to play by the NCAA, just shut down the conversation right there. There's nothing to it. His qualifications are no more at issue than any student athlete.
Yeah there will be questions until the NCAA says ok.Chicat wrote:I think there are still questions out there.Longhorned wrote:In case you hear the repeated assertion that it's questionable that Alkins will meet Initial Eligibility requirements and be cleared to play by the NCAA, just shut down the conversation right there. There's nothing to it. His qualifications are no more at issue than any student athlete.
It's questionable JJ will even play the 2 though and there probably isnt a need, at least at this point. This isnt a Stanley Johnson situation, where you have Zeus, Ashley and Rondae, so Stanley moves to the 2 so you can have your five best players starting/finishing games. And remember, some of that season involved Rondae coming off the bench too. Its going to take a lot from Ristic, a freshman Lauri, and a RS freshman coming off two years of missed ball to make that happen. JJ only affects his minutes if he was hoping for a three guard lineup/Trier at the 3. If Trier doesnt come back, Alkins has a good shot at starting no matter what decision JJ makes and there will also be a lot of PT if he does what he needs to do.gronk4heisman wrote:
My point was that JJ would effect Alkins minutes, not the other way around. Alkins will not effect JJ's minutes. Which is why I think it would take Alkin's hearing something for him to change his mind and commit early. Alkins would be toward the bottom of the totum pole. JJ would be at the top.
The big effect for Alkins is Trier. If Trier returns, Alkins isn't starting at the 2. If Trier leaves, Alkins is the presumptive guy there.rgdeuce wrote:It's questionable JJ will even play the 2 though and there probably isnt a need, at least at this point. This isnt a Stanley Johnson situation, where you have Zeus, Ashley and Rondae, so Stanley moves to the 2 so you can have your five best players starting/finishing games. And remember, some of that season involved Rondae coming off the bench too. Its going to take a lot from Ristic, a freshman Lauri, and a RS freshman coming off two years of missed ball to make that happen. JJ only affects his minutes if he was hoping for a three guard lineup/Trier at the 3. If Trier doesnt come back, Alkins has a good shot at starting no matter what decision JJ makes and there will also be a lot of PT if he does what he needs to do.gronk4heisman wrote:
My point was that JJ would effect Alkins minutes, not the other way around. Alkins will not effect JJ's minutes. Which is why I think it would take Alkin's hearing something for him to change his mind and commit early. Alkins would be toward the bottom of the totum pole. JJ would be at the top.
I want them all, and I think Miller is in "gloves off" mode now too after the Rabb recruitment.The Goat wrote:Markanen, Simmons, and Alkins. Swoon. Add Jackson and it turns into a cleanup time. Add Ferguson and well we all better go check our lease because we're living in fuck city.