Page 5 of 8
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 5:04 pm
by KillerKlown
A misspost ment for the '23 thread. It's the KJ Lewis post.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:11 am
by UAEebs86
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:57 am
by Merkin
Seem to recall Ced Dempsey did the UA no favors when he was on the committee. Just the opposite.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2022 11:12 am
by azcat49
Don’t they have to exit the room when their school is discussed for seeding, selection or region?
To your point though I Am sure you get no benefits do they make sure they look
Objective as a committee. I think where it might help is with your conference
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2022 1:49 pm
by Merkin
Irish27 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 08, 2022 6:51 pm
It's triathlon. Will be announced this month
Good call, triathlon it is.
http://allsportstucson.com/2022/08/22/a ... 8Ovj06BWdI
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2022 9:10 am
by Carcassdragger
Terrible choice. Another sport that nobody will watch and that adds nothing to campus life. Going to take a few hours in the evening and go watch the triathlete competition on campus-or anywhere else?
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2022 9:11 am
by azcat49
All road competitions? Not like we have a water way they could swim other than up in the Phoenix area
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2022 9:35 am
by gronk4heisman
azcat49 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 23, 2022 9:11 am
All road competitions? Not like we have a water way they could swim other than up in the Phoenix area
Triathlons in Arizona usually use pools.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:24 pm
by UAEebs86
He gone
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:27 pm
by AZCatGirl
Not that I cared for Heeke, but Robbins is really showing his true colors for this. He's going to fire a lot of other people for his blunders.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:29 pm
by Alieberman
Scheer's tweet about Robbins will do whatever it takes to save himself is 10000000% true
He is horrible
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:29 pm
by Chicat
UAEebs86 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:24 pmHe gone
Robbin’s better fucking be next.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:32 pm
by Alieberman
It appears Robbins has run out of women to fire
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:35 pm
by arizonawildcats
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:41 pm
by PHXCATS
I am usually not a 100% for sure promote from within but with Lloyd and Brennan right now I promote Erika Barnes
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:43 pm
by UAEebs86
ChooChooCat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 1:34 pm
Is getting a 1 year contract extension and a 100K because god hates us.
First post in the thread. Paging ChooChooCat, please pick up the white courtesy phone...
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:44 pm
by Postmaster
Are the mods able to put everything here? I see there are posts in other threads.
Anyone know his buyout?
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:46 pm
by Postmaster
What’s the process for taking an AD from a conference opponent?
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:47 pm
by PHXCATS
I don't think he gets one for cause
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:53 pm
by Postmaster
If it’s for cause, why doesn’t it take effect until Feb 2
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:57 pm
by Merkin
Postmaster wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:44 pm
Anyone know his buyout?
It's probably here, but behind a paywall so I can't see it.
https://tucson.com/sports/arizonawildca ... e%20choose.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:05 pm
by Postmaster
I only see what he would owe if he left on his own. $200,000 if he quit before April, 2024.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:13 pm
by CalStateTempe
UAEebs86 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:24 pmHe gone
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:18 pm
by CalStateTempe
I want Robbins next
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:19 pm
by phxcat23
Scheer seemed like Barnes would be the best candidate moving forward because of her relationship with boosters as well. If the athletic department is in financial trouble, it’s not like they are going to shell out big money to steal another AD
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:25 pm
by arizonawildcats
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:30 pm
by arizonawildcats
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:31 pm
by UAEebs86
Can we please put Hansen out to pasture?
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:33 pm
by arizonawildcats
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:34 pm
by dmjcat
Lots of speculation and very little in the way of facts to determine the proper course of action here.
I'll repeat what I said when the $240M first went missing.......The ABOR should bring in independent accountants and audit the books for everything. If it was the CFO's fault, then fire her. If Robbins knew all along then fire his ass. If Heeke did wildly overspend then fire (wait a minute, that already happened).
Bottom line the ABOR had better conduct a very thorough independent audit of the UA's books. I would not trust anyone at the UA. But if heads will roll it needs to be the right heads, not just someone who is unpopular with a lot of professors.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:38 pm
by Chicat
The audit happened. Now the heads are rolling.
I want Robbins gone.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:40 pm
by dmjcat
Chicat wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:38 pm
The audit happened. Now the heads are rolling.
I want Robbins gone.
Based on what??? Yoiu don't know that an outside audit was conducted, and by who. And if the audit shows the CFO royally screwed up and then covered it up then she should be fired.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:46 pm
by Fishclamps
I would argue based on him purchasing a garbage online diploma mill to hang like an albatross on our university's neck
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:51 pm
by dmjcat
Fishclamps wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:46 pm
I would argue based on him purchasing a garbage online diploma mill to hang like an albatross on our university's neck
I doubt that cost $240M
If I was going to take a guess at where the $240M went I would look at all of those tower cranes & construction activity occurring on the NW side of the campus. Construction costs can, and easily do, blow out in spectacular fashion.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:55 pm
by Fishclamps
Oh I'm not saying it wasn't Dave's fault partially, but Robbins has made some bad moves as president and I wouldn't mind seeing him hit the bricks either.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:58 pm
by dmjcat
Fishclamps wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:55 pm
Oh I'm not saying it wasn't Dave's fault partially, but Robbins has made some bad moves as president and I wouldn't mind seeing him hit the bricks either.
I don't know that it was Heekes fault. Hard to believe that the athletic dept. lost $240M.
I just want to see an independent audit with NOBODY from the UA involved. For all we know this audit of the athletic dept. was conducted by the same incompetent idiots that lost the bulk of the $240 and they are throwing Heeke under the bus to save their own ass.
Thats why I want an ABOR lead independent (with full public disclosure) audit. Find out who really screwed up and hold them accountable.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:04 pm
by Irish27
I feel bad for Brennan. Even though he has not coached a game, whoever replaces Heeke will not be the guy who hired him.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:05 pm
by Fishclamps
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:11 pm
by dmjcat
For those that don't live in Tucson the UA has been engaged in a number of large construction projects (mainly centered around the NW side of the campus). These projects are very large and costs lots of $$$$$.
https://wildcat.arizona.edu/134720/unca ... -of-hub-2/
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:14 pm
by arizonawildcats
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:21 pm
by Alieberman
dmjcat wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:34 pm
Lots of speculation and very little in the way of facts to determine the proper course of action here.
I'll repeat what I said when the $240M first went missing.......The ABOR should bring in independent accountants and audit the books for everything. If it was the CFO's fault, then fire her. If Robbins knew all along then fire his ass. If Heeke did wildly overspend then fire (wait a minute, that already happened).
Bottom line the ABOR had better conduct a very thorough independent audit of the UA's books. I would not trust anyone at the UA. But if heads will roll it needs to be the right heads, not just someone who is unpopular with a lot of professors.
Its really not that complicated.
If you are president of a company and $250 million dollars goes "missing" 1 of 2 things must be true:
1-You knew about it which makes you complicit
2- You didn't know about it which makes you incompetent
Take your pick, but the outcome should be the same either way
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:26 pm
by Merkin
dmjcat wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:11 pm
For those that don't live in Tucson the UA has been engaged in a number of large construction projects (mainly centered around the NW side of the campus). These projects are very large and costs lots of $$$$$.
I obviously can't speak for the UA, but at the California university I worked at, Campus Housing used no state funding for their construction projects.
Being a landlord on a state campus is a very lucrative business.
When my son went to Cal Poly before the pandemic, he paid $1050 a month for a private bedroom and a shared bathroom in apartment. However, they did get cleaning done weekly in the common areas.
Not saying that these construction projects are part of the UA's money issues, but I would be surprised if they were.
Just a side note, academic recruiting for the best and brightest students is really a lot more effort than people think. Campus apartments is a big draw. Another of the biggest investments a campus can make is a recreation center, and even these use student funds, no state/academic funds.
Cal Poly and UA both have world class recreation centers.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:44 pm
by mofo
dmjcat wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:11 pm
For those that don't live in Tucson the UA has been engaged in a number of large construction projects (mainly centered around the NW side of the campus). These projects are very large and costs lots of $$$$
There isn't any UA money in the NW side projects unless it's hidden very well, and I don't believe public entities can do that. At one point they might have sold the land to the developers, but that'd be it. North of Speedway by the AME building is a UA structure though (not student housing), as is the recently complete phase 2 of the Optical Sciences building near the library.
UA has also built a lot around the DT Phoenix TGEN campus.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:55 pm
by dmjcat
Alieberman wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:21 pm
dmjcat wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:34 pm
Lots of speculation and very little in the way of facts to determine the proper course of action here.
I'll repeat what I said when the $240M first went missing.......The ABOR should bring in independent accountants and audit the books for everything. If it was the CFO's fault, then fire her. If Robbins knew all along then fire his ass. If Heeke did wildly overspend then fire (wait a minute, that already happened).
Bottom line the ABOR had better conduct a very thorough independent audit of the UA's books. I would not trust anyone at the UA. But if heads will roll it needs to be the right heads, not just someone who is unpopular with a lot of professors.
Its really not that complicated.
If you are president of a company and $250 million dollars goes "missing" 1 of 2 things must be true:
1-You knew about it which makes you complicit
2- You didn't know about it which makes you incompetent
Take your pick, but the outcome should be the same either way
Partially agree. #1 should get him fired. #2 should only get him fired if there is a reasonable expectation that he should have discovered the fiscal mismanagement going on under his nose. There are a number of things that coulc have happened:
1) The CFO could have screwed up and then covered it up
2) Some mid level accountant under the CFO (in charge of those construction projects) could have screwed up and then tried
covering it up as long as they could
3) The UA Engr/Construction dept. could have screwed up and then covered it up
4) We might have someone in the administration embezzling funds
5) Some combination of any or all of the above
Thats why an independent audit is required (with complete public transparency) so the right people are held accountable.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:58 pm
by PHXCATS
Alieberman wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:21 pm
dmjcat wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:34 pm
Lots of speculation and very little in the way of facts to determine the proper course of action here.
I'll repeat what I said when the $240M first went missing.......The ABOR should bring in independent accountants and audit the books for everything. If it was the CFO's fault, then fire her. If Robbins knew all along then fire his ass. If Heeke did wildly overspend then fire (wait a minute, that already happened).
Bottom line the ABOR had better conduct a very thorough independent audit of the UA's books. I would not trust anyone at the UA. But if heads will roll it needs to be the right heads, not just someone who is unpopular with a lot of professors.
Its really not that complicated.
If you are president of a company and $250 million dollars goes "missing" 1 of 2 things must be true:
1-You knew about it which makes you complicit
2- You didn't know about it which makes you incompetent
Take your pick, but the outcome should be the same either way
Not defending Robbins in any way but it is 3-$250 was never missing
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 8:01 pm
by TheCat
dmjcat wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:34 pm
Lots of speculation and very little in the way of facts to determine the proper course of action here.
I'll repeat what I said when the $240M first went missing.......The ABOR should bring in independent accountants and audit the books for everything. If it was the CFO's fault, then fire her. If Robbins knew all along then fire his ass. If Heeke did wildly overspend then fire (wait a minute, that already happened).
Bottom line the ABOR had better conduct a very thorough independent audit of the UA's books. I would not trust anyone at the UA. But if heads will roll it needs to be the right heads, not just someone who is unpopular with a lot of professors.
Scheer is the one that said it was no big deal. I posted that it was a big deal and it probably cost us a football coach and now an AD. Waiting for the audit but Robbins will save his own skin first.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 8:01 pm
by dmjcat
mofo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:44 pm
dmjcat wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:11 pm
For those that don't live in Tucson the UA has been engaged in a number of large construction projects (mainly centered around the NW side of the campus). These projects are very large and costs lots of $$$$
There isn't any UA money in the NW side projects unless it's hidden very well, and I don't believe public entities can do that. At one point they might have sold the land to the developers, but that'd be it. North of Speedway by the AME building is a UA structure though (not student housing), as is the recently complete phase 2 of the Optical Sciences building near the library.
UA has also built a lot around the DT Phoenix TGEN campus.
You may be correct. But I still believe that the "lost" money is in construction projects. Here's a current list of construction projects
and there are some VERY expensive ones going on:
https://www.pdc.arizona.edu/project/list
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 8:02 pm
by Alieberman
PHXCATS wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:58 pm
Alieberman wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:21 pm
dmjcat wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 6:34 pm
Lots of speculation and very little in the way of facts to determine the proper course of action here.
I'll repeat what I said when the $240M first went missing.......The ABOR should bring in independent accountants and audit the books for everything. If it was the CFO's fault, then fire her. If Robbins knew all along then fire his ass. If Heeke did wildly overspend then fire (wait a minute, that already happened).
Bottom line the ABOR had better conduct a very thorough independent audit of the UA's books. I would not trust anyone at the UA. But if heads will roll it needs to be the right heads, not just someone who is unpopular with a lot of professors.
Its really not that complicated.
If you are president of a company and $250 million dollars goes "missing" 1 of 2 things must be true:
1-You knew about it which makes you complicit
2- You didn't know about it which makes you incompetent
Take your pick, but the outcome should be the same either way
Not defending Robbins in any way but it is 3-$250 was never missing
It was not accidental when I put missing in quotes
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 8:06 pm
by Irish27
Gonna have to get a sponsor name for Arizona Stadium and McKale Center. I don't care what people think, it's just a name. When you need money, you sell your prized possessions.
Re: Dave Heeke
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 8:11 pm
by CalStateTempe