Maybe a second #1 v #2 match up in the one season?
The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
- RichardCranium
- Posts: 3583
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 5:53 pm
- Reputation: 180
- Location: The Wonderful Land Of Oz
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Any sufficiently advanced troll is indistinguishable from a genuine kook.
-
- Posts: 8595
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
My projection for the remainder of the season (wins in bold):
vs SAC
vs WASH
@ ORST
vs WYO
@ 14 ILL
vs UNCO
vs CBU
@ 15 TENN
@ 2 UCLA
@ 24 USC
@ ASU
vs COLO
vs UTAH
@ STAN
@ CAL
vs ASU
vs 2 UCLA
vs 24 USC
@ WSU
@ WASH
vs ORST
vs ORE
@ UTAH
@ COLO
vs STAN
vs CAL
vs SAC
vs WASH
@ ORST
vs WYO
@ 14 ILL
vs UNCO
vs CBU
@ 15 TENN
@ 2 UCLA
@ 24 USC
@ ASU
vs COLO
vs UTAH
@ STAN
@ CAL
vs ASU
vs 2 UCLA
vs 24 USC
@ WSU
@ WASH
vs ORST
vs ORE
@ UTAH
@ COLO
vs STAN
vs CAL
- Longhorned
- Posts: 14758
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:04 pm
- Reputation: 975
- Location: In a guayabera at The Sands Club, Arizona Stadium
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
That's why we have power rankings. Until we realize that they do power rankings just like they do the AP rankings.YoDeFoe wrote: ↑Mon Nov 22, 2021 10:29 amTennessee and Texas got BLOWN OUT in their losses. Kentucky has a loss and no top-100 wins, same with Illinois. Memphis, Alabama, and Baylor haven't played anyone.loomer wrote: ↑Mon Nov 22, 2021 10:03 am #17 in the AP https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-colleg ... oll?week=3
The stickiness of preseason rankings is incredibly stupid. "We ranked you low because you have to show us you're legit. But also we can't rank you high (despite what you've shown us) because we previously ranked you low. This is rational."
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
https://theathletic.com/2970814/2021/11 ... he-middle/
Was this already posted? Because I absolutely love it.
Was this already posted? Because I absolutely love it.
- Chicat
- Posts: 46632
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3978
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Awesome article.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
He did not
2018 Bear Down Wildcats Conference Championship Challenge Champion
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
First I'm extremely happy with our performance but let's not over rotate on this. First Michigan is not a top 10 or 20 team. They are benefiting from the preseason bs rankings that also underestimated us. Our Defense is really good right now along with our inside game. Koloko is taking and making shots that last year he did not have the strength to make. Benn has started to click but was quite frankly average until the last two games. Our offense is better than I thought in the half court but quite frankly we have not demonstrated any ability against decent teams to hit any outside shot. You wont win if you can't do this in close games. We also do not handle pressure well and two recent examples to that leading to our downfall were in the tourney against Wichita State and Buffalo. Strong guards with decent size like Houston has will feast on this team if not erased by Koloko.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves. I think we have a huge task in conference with UCLA/USC/Oregon. If we improve our outside shooting and tighten up under pressure this could be a very exciting year and draw the eyes of many recruits. Hit some shots guys and make us believe.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves. I think we have a huge task in conference with UCLA/USC/Oregon. If we improve our outside shooting and tighten up under pressure this could be a very exciting year and draw the eyes of many recruits. Hit some shots guys and make us believe.
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Yep it is only November and there is a lot of basketball to be played.
Now, with that said, do you think that we will be a one or a two seed?
Now, with that said, do you think that we will be a one or a two seed?
- EastCoastCat
- Posts: 6531
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 11:25 am
- Reputation: 1949
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Wouldn’t it be funny if we were the 2 seed out west and had to face the Zags to go to the FF?
- U.P. Zona Fan
- Posts: 2654
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 9:57 pm
- Reputation: 414
- Location: Big bay, MI
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
That would be incredible if we made the elite 8 in year one of CTL.EastCoastCat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 23, 2021 7:03 pm Wouldn’t it be funny if we were the 2 seed out west and had to face the Zags to go to the FF?
If we faced the zags, I'd have to say CTL has a little advantage, he coached those kids and knows their schemes. And Drew timme is Hunter Dickinson with a little better range who can jump over a bar of soap, plus Ballo must have practiced against him all last year, gotta know his moves.
I think we have a shot.
Arizona State might have the most surprisingly anemic history in men's basketball of any program that you might think is better than it is.
-Norlander.
-Norlander.
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Ugh not sure where you got your info on Timme but that guy is nails. Not slow or can't shoot like Dickerson. If we left him open at the foul line like we did Dickerson he would get 40.
Last edited by TheCat on Tue Nov 23, 2021 10:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I'll be a bit surprised if the committee doesn't put us in Gonzaga's bracket. They know that matchup will get a lot of eyeballs.
“The reality is that the hardest games to win are over teams on their home court. Teams that don’t play those games can spin it however they want, but what they’re saying is, ‘We don’t want to lose in our non conference season.’" - Sean Miller
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
YoDeFoe wrote: ↑Tue Nov 16, 2021 11:16 pm...YoDeFoe wrote: ↑Sun Oct 31, 2021 1:49 pmI love the inclusion of Arizona, but I'm a firm non-believer in Oregon.
Having faith in Oregon means believing in point guard Will Richardson. The senior was excellent in 2019-20, averaging 11 points on a 48/47/85 shooting split. But he didn't take a leap forward last season after missing the first 12 games of the campaign. Now that he's the clear leader, look for Richardson to make a push for Pac-12 Player of the Year.
Will Richardson is not that guy. He's not Pac-12 POY material and I'm wondering what is going on with folks who see a superstar in him. He's a fine player - he's good - he's just not that guy. And part of the reason is that the next three guys believe they're the guy...
Additionally, coach Dana Altman used the transfer portal to add several high-level pieces, including guards De'Vion Harmon (Oklahoma) and Jacob Young (Rutgers), as well as forward Quincy Guerrier (Syracuse). This is all before mentioning five-star big man Nate Bittle, who should play a role from the jump.
Guerrier is a good and productive PF who wants to be a SF this year to show scouts that he has more to his game. The trouble is two fold: 1) he's not going to get that much run at the SF position with this guard-heavy roster, 2) he doesn't have more to his game. He's successful because he beats post players to the rim with his quickness and motor. He either needs to change his dreams or change his game and I don't know which is more unlikely.
Harmon is nice - he's a shorter two guard but he's got a lengthy wingspan and good toughness. But he's another guy who deeply believes he's an NBA player and has joined Oregon to show it and 1) I'm just not there with him, and 2) I think being desperate to show your individual skills (especially when maybe truthfully those skills aren't fully there) doesn't lend itself to team success. He developed some nice mid-range scoring last season and I like his intangibles so there's some merit to believing in him. But despite thinking he's a lead guard he hasn't shown the ability to shoot from distance and he's got 62 assists to 81 turnovers in his career so far... his family has blamed that on Oklahoma's system but maybe it's just him.
And Jacob Young... he's a high usage low efficiency small and not long back-up two guard. That's it. There's so very little to merit to even mentioning this dude as a meaningful piece of a basketball team that if he's being mentioned, that's a red flag for the roster.
Nathan Bittle might get some extra run this season only because potential star center N'Fale Dante is still recovering from a torn ACL. Read that again and let me know what level of confidence you get from it.
- Chicat
- Posts: 46632
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3978
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
- Alieberman
- Posts: 13841
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
- Reputation: 2885
- Location: I can't find my pants
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I really think this is a special team.
The players certainly have a great chemistry and they all seem to love their 1st year coach.
This is a recipe for success.
The players certainly have a great chemistry and they all seem to love their 1st year coach.
This is a recipe for success.
- EastCoastCat
- Posts: 6531
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 11:25 am
- Reputation: 1949
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
More of this please...
-
- Posts: 8595
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
It's morning for the proud tradition. Feels like we're gearing up for a nice long run of dominance in the coming years. Are there questions about recruiting and possible NCAA penalties? Sure. But it matters much more to have the right guy as coach.Alieberman wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:14 am I really think this is a special team.
The players certainly have a great chemistry and they all seem to love their 1st year coach.
This is a recipe for success.
- IndianaZonaFan
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:14 pm
- Reputation: 183
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I don’t think Dalen is getting enough respect for his improvement. He is being overshadowed by Koloko’s jump. But he looks like the leader of this team. And his game is suited so much better to this style.
He has a much better bounce than I saw last year. He is stronger and so important to the success of the team. I see a strong correlation to us struggling against Wichita and him being in foul trouble. Am I wrong here? Or is it just not getting talked about enough?
He has a much better bounce than I saw last year. He is stronger and so important to the success of the team. I see a strong correlation to us struggling against Wichita and him being in foul trouble. Am I wrong here? Or is it just not getting talked about enough?
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
His distance shooting has not been great, but every other aspect of his game has gone in the right direction. Rebound % is up, assist % is up, turnover % is down, win shares and BPM are up, specifically on D.IndianaZonaFan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 10:20 am I don’t think Dalen is getting enough respect for his improvement. He is being overshadowed by Koloko’s jump. But he looks like the leader of this team. And his game is suited so much better to this style.
He has a much better bounce than I saw last year. He is stronger and so important to the success of the team. I see a strong correlation to us struggling against Wichita and him being in foul trouble. Am I wrong here? Or is it just not getting talked about enough?
His total win shares (it's an accruing stat) were 0.4 on offense and 0.8 on D last year. He's matched the 0.4 on offense and is halfway to last year on D with 0.4 in just 5 games vs 26 last year. His Dbpm is 5 full points higher than last year.
I doubt his game will ever be sexy, but he's a stat sheet stuffer that will complement others well, which is exactly what we need out of him.
- Longhorned
- Posts: 14758
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:04 pm
- Reputation: 975
- Location: In a guayabera at The Sands Club, Arizona Stadium
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Yeah but not in a "we're proud of you for your hard work and sportsmanship" way. More like a "you overwhelmed and embarrassed our adversaries" way.Alieberman wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:14 am I really think this is a special team.
The players certainly have a great chemistry and they all seem to love their 1st year coach.
This is a recipe for success.
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Yeah I'm a bit worried about Dalen's ability to score beyond the rim. But he's been a massive part of the flow and fun of the offense and a super effective and enthusiastic defender this season. And oh yeah, that reboundingSpaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 11:08 amHis distance shooting has not been great, but every other aspect of his game has gone in the right direction. Rebound % is up, assist % is up, turnover % is down, win shares and BPM are up, specifically on D.IndianaZonaFan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 10:20 am I don’t think Dalen is getting enough respect for his improvement. He is being overshadowed by Koloko’s jump. But he looks like the leader of this team. And his game is suited so much better to this style.
He has a much better bounce than I saw last year. He is stronger and so important to the success of the team. I see a strong correlation to us struggling against Wichita and him being in foul trouble. Am I wrong here? Or is it just not getting talked about enough?
His total win shares (it's an accruing stat) were 0.4 on offense and 0.8 on D last year. He's matched the 0.4 on offense and is halfway to last year on D with 0.4 in just 5 games vs 26 last year. His Dbpm is 5 full points higher than last year.
I doubt his game will ever be sexy, but he's a stat sheet stuffer that will complement others well, which is exactly what we need out of him.
For his future he needs to dial in his shooting but for the team's success right now he's been fantastic.
- dovecanyoncat
- Posts: 16750
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:16 pm
- Reputation: 2144
- Location: Old Farts and Golf Carts
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Dalen can Ben Simmons his way to paint points and defense and if he boards and dimes like he has been I'll be happy as a clam.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
~ Wilhoit's Law
~ Wilhoit's Law
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
He needs to be better than 28% from 3 (where he is now) to be a real scoring option. He isn't dynamic enough off the bounce to be a subpar shooter and still score consistently.YoDeFoe wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 12:50 pmYeah I'm a bit worried about Dalen's ability to score beyond the rim. But he's been a massive part of the flow and fun of the offense and a super effective and enthusiastic defender this season. And oh yeah, that reboundingSpaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 11:08 amHis distance shooting has not been great, but every other aspect of his game has gone in the right direction. Rebound % is up, assist % is up, turnover % is down, win shares and BPM are up, specifically on D.IndianaZonaFan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 10:20 am I don’t think Dalen is getting enough respect for his improvement. He is being overshadowed by Koloko’s jump. But he looks like the leader of this team. And his game is suited so much better to this style.
He has a much better bounce than I saw last year. He is stronger and so important to the success of the team. I see a strong correlation to us struggling against Wichita and him being in foul trouble. Am I wrong here? Or is it just not getting talked about enough?
His total win shares (it's an accruing stat) were 0.4 on offense and 0.8 on D last year. He's matched the 0.4 on offense and is halfway to last year on D with 0.4 in just 5 games vs 26 last year. His Dbpm is 5 full points higher than last year.
I doubt his game will ever be sexy, but he's a stat sheet stuffer that will complement others well, which is exactly what we need out of him.
For his future he needs to dial in his shooting but for the team's success right now he's been fantastic.
But that's it. The rest of his game has all trended in the right direction. The bottom line about this year is every returner took a step forward and got better. That's a credit to Miller for leaving them in a good place and Lloyd for enabling the growth to happen. I give credit to both coaches because I don't think there's any way it would be basically a 100% success rate for returners improving significantly without both the front and back end done right.
-
- Posts: 3488
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:25 pm
- Reputation: 340
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I’d prefer to see us eliminate Fduke in the tournament.
That Chet Holmgrem dude was impressive last night. Not sure who guards him.
That Chet Holmgrem dude was impressive last night. Not sure who guards him.
- Chicat
- Posts: 46632
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:19 pm
- Reputation: 3978
- Location: Your mother's basement
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Dalen TerryPostmaster wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 2:57 pm That Chet Holmgrem dude was impressive last night. Not sure who guards him.
Of the 12 coaches, Rush picked the one whose fans have the deepest passion, the longest memories, the greatest lung capacity and … did I mention deep passion?
- Longhorned
- Posts: 14758
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:04 pm
- Reputation: 975
- Location: In a guayabera at The Sands Club, Arizona Stadium
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Why doesn't Chet Holmgren grow a really long beard and just go for it?
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
It runs counter to every preconception I have that a guy named Chet would be good at basketball.
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
There's a paywall for me - can you post it?YoDeFoe wrote: ↑Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:51 am https://theathletic.com/2970814/2021/11 ... he-middle/
Was this already posted? Because I absolutely love it.
- Longhorned
- Posts: 14758
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:04 pm
- Reputation: 975
- Location: In a guayabera at The Sands Club, Arizona Stadium
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Shoplift for me one of those frozen turkeys and send me some pictures of your wife.
- Alieberman
- Posts: 13841
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
- Reputation: 2885
- Location: I can't find my pants
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I know its really early in the season and I shouldn't be thinking such things----
But who in the Pac-12 are we overmatched by?
But who in the Pac-12 are we overmatched by?
- RichardCranium
- Posts: 3583
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 5:53 pm
- Reputation: 180
- Location: The Wonderful Land Of Oz
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
As prone as I am to all things Aussie, I cant say I'm comfortable with any Wildcat in the same sentence as Ben Simmons.dovecanyoncat wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 1:13 pm Dalen can Ben Simmons his way to paint points and defense and if he boards and dimes like he has been I'll be happy as a clam.
Any sufficiently advanced troll is indistinguishable from a genuine kook.
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Thanks Longhorned. I'll take it anyway I can get it... PM maybe?Longhorned wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 3:59 pm Shoplift for me one of those frozen turkeys and send me some pictures of your wife.
-
- Posts: 8595
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I think UCLA’s guards/wings are the best in the league. They’re deep at those positions and can hurt you in a lot of ways.Alieberman wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 4:08 pm I know its really early in the season and I shouldn't be thinking such things----
But who in the Pac-12 are we overmatched by?
Aside from them, though, I don’t see another team I’d say we’re “overmatched” by. Oregon got killed again tonight. USC and Colorado have been solid so far.
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
It sucks seeing KJ Simpson contributing for Colorado.Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:35 pmI think UCLA’s guards/wings are the best in the league. They’re deep at those positions and can hurt you in a lot of ways.Alieberman wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 4:08 pm I know its really early in the season and I shouldn't be thinking such things----
But who in the Pac-12 are we overmatched by?
Aside from them, though, I don’t see another team I’d say we’re “overmatched” by. Oregon got killed again tonight. USC and Colorado have been solid so far.
-
- Posts: 8595
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Sorta feel like we have the same advantage vs. UCLA that Gonzaga has (size, defense), just not sure we can unleash the kind of onslaught Gonzaga can from time to time. Lute’s teams would occasionally have their “death runs” where we’d go on like a 15-0 run and basically impose our will on an opponent. Does our current team have that kind of explosiveness?Spaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:44 pmIt sucks seeing KJ Simpson contributing for Colorado.Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:35 pmI think UCLA’s guards/wings are the best in the league. They’re deep at those positions and can hurt you in a lot of ways.Alieberman wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 4:08 pm I know its really early in the season and I shouldn't be thinking such things----
But who in the Pac-12 are we overmatched by?
Aside from them, though, I don’t see another team I’d say we’re “overmatched” by. Oregon got killed again tonight. USC and Colorado have been solid so far.
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
KJ Simpson would be fighting with Adama Bal for minutes here. I'm not going to try and extinguish your flame for him / your ire for Lloyd's recruiting for not retaining him, but let's be real about the impact he could make for Arizona this season.Spaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:44 pmIt sucks seeing KJ Simpson contributing for Colorado.Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:35 pmI think UCLA’s guards/wings are the best in the league. They’re deep at those positions and can hurt you in a lot of ways.Alieberman wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 4:08 pm I know its really early in the season and I shouldn't be thinking such things----
But who in the Pac-12 are we overmatched by?
Aside from them, though, I don’t see another team I’d say we’re “overmatched” by. Oregon got killed again tonight. USC and Colorado have been solid so far.
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
It's more about who's next. Kier is definitely gone and I expect Mathurin will be as well. Backup PG and perimeter depth is a big question next year and not addressed in our recruiting class to date.YoDeFoe wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 12:40 pmKJ Simpson would be fighting with Adama Bal for minutes here. I'm not going to try and extinguish your flame for him / your ire for Lloyd's recruiting for not retaining him, but let's be real about the impact he could make for Arizona this season.Spaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:44 pmIt sucks seeing KJ Simpson contributing for Colorado.Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:35 pmI think UCLA’s guards/wings are the best in the league. They’re deep at those positions and can hurt you in a lot of ways.Alieberman wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 4:08 pm I know its really early in the season and I shouldn't be thinking such things----
But who in the Pac-12 are we overmatched by?
Aside from them, though, I don’t see another team I’d say we’re “overmatched” by. Oregon got killed again tonight. USC and Colorado have been solid so far.
Simpson wouldn't be doing much this year, but as a developmental prospect who would hopefully be stepping into a more major role as a soph, I think he'd be useful. Maybe Bal or Nowell help, but neither strikes me as a backup PG, which Simpson would be.
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I'm guessing the plan here is to bring in a transfer in 2022 and go all-in on Boswell in 2023Spaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 12:44 pmIt's more about who's next. Kier is definitely gone and I expect Mathurin will be as well. Backup PG and perimeter depth is a big question next year and not addressed in our recruiting class to date.YoDeFoe wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 12:40 pmKJ Simpson would be fighting with Adama Bal for minutes here. I'm not going to try and extinguish your flame for him / your ire for Lloyd's recruiting for not retaining him, but let's be real about the impact he could make for Arizona this season.Spaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:44 pm It sucks seeing KJ Simpson contributing for Colorado.
Simpson wouldn't be doing much this year, but as a developmental prospect who would hopefully be stepping into a more major role as a soph, I think he'd be useful. Maybe Bal or Nowell help, but neither strikes me as a backup PG, which Simpson would be.
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I think we have to start considering the possibility of being without Koloko next year too. Hes playing himself into a draft pick.Spaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 12:44 pmIt's more about who's next. Kier is definitely gone and I expect Mathurin will be as well. Backup PG and perimeter depth is a big question next year and not addressed in our recruiting class to date.YoDeFoe wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 12:40 pmKJ Simpson would be fighting with Adama Bal for minutes here. I'm not going to try and extinguish your flame for him / your ire for Lloyd's recruiting for not retaining him, but let's be real about the impact he could make for Arizona this season.Spaceman Spiff wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:44 pmIt sucks seeing KJ Simpson contributing for Colorado.Beachcat97 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 9:35 pmI think UCLA’s guards/wings are the best in the league. They’re deep at those positions and can hurt you in a lot of ways.Alieberman wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 4:08 pm I know its really early in the season and I shouldn't be thinking such things----
But who in the Pac-12 are we overmatched by?
Aside from them, though, I don’t see another team I’d say we’re “overmatched” by. Oregon got killed again tonight. USC and Colorado have been solid so far.
Simpson wouldn't be doing much this year, but as a developmental prospect who would hopefully be stepping into a more major role as a soph, I think he'd be useful. Maybe Bal or Nowell help, but neither strikes me as a backup PG, which Simpson would be.
-
- Posts: 8595
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Any news on CK’s injury? Like, will he definitely miss games, or is it just a minor thing?
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Lloyd said it was minor and he doesn’t expect Koloko to miss any games.
Waiting at the Rose Bowl patiently for the cats to arrive
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more wildcat sports"
2019 BDW Survivor Pool Champion
-
- Posts: 8595
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Very relieved to hear that. Here’s hoping the hoops gods spare us and let this team get through the entire season free of serious injury. It’s so exciting to think about this team fully healthy, with a lot more games logged, heading into March. No reason this team can’t be playing into the second weekend. This fan base needs it!
- EastCoastCat
- Posts: 6531
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 11:25 am
- Reputation: 1949
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
I’m eager to see this team in a true road game. While we should never look past teams like OSU, who is next, the upcoming consecutive road contests will tell us a lot:
@ 14 Illinois
@ 15 Tennessee
@ 2 UCLA
@ 24 USC
@ ASSU (yes they suck but I expect they will mug us and hope the Refs won’t call anything)
@ 14 Illinois
@ 15 Tennessee
@ 2 UCLA
@ 24 USC
@ ASSU (yes they suck but I expect they will mug us and hope the Refs won’t call anything)
- IndianaZonaFan
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:14 pm
- Reputation: 183
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Didn’t get a chance to watch the game yet, but saw the box score. Looks like our bigs dominated and some good bench performances (Aiken & Pelle) to cover for poor shooting from Kerr, Benn & Dalen? Kerr with 9 dimes, and Benn with 7 boards. Looks like limited minutes for the starters too though.
-
- Posts: 30196
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:41 pm
- Reputation: 1849
- Location: Mohave Dorm Room 417 Buzz 2
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
#5 in Sagarin ratings
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Pretty wild that starters played 20min/g and we scored 100+ and practically doubled the other team up.IndianaZonaFan wrote: ↑Sun Nov 28, 2021 7:38 am Didn’t get a chance to watch the game yet, but saw the box score. Looks like our bigs dominated and some good bench performances (Aiken & Pelle) to cover for poor shooting from Kerr, Benn & Dalen? Kerr with 9 dimes, and Benn with 7 boards. Looks like limited minutes for the starters too though.
- FreeSpiritCat
- Posts: 4572
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:22 pm
- Reputation: 468
- Location: Lebanon, New Hampshire
Re: The 2021-2022 Season Thread
Not sure where to post this so since it relates to Arizona basketball.
I thought I'd add this since we aren't in competition with other site's premium members. All 247 sports sites (owned by CBS) havea Black Friday/Cyber Monday special where you get one year of Premium Membership for 75% off. I thought thought is a really good deal so I subscribed. Of course I used a credit card that I won't have when the subscription expires. And if I do renew Paramount+ is added. I already am subscribing to Paramount+ anyway so might continue the sub.
The other great deal is a subscription to "The Athletic" for $1/month for 12 months. I enjoy reading their articles.
I thought I'd add this since we aren't in competition with other site's premium members. All 247 sports sites (owned by CBS) havea Black Friday/Cyber Monday special where you get one year of Premium Membership for 75% off. I thought thought is a really good deal so I subscribed. Of course I used a credit card that I won't have when the subscription expires. And if I do renew Paramount+ is added. I already am subscribing to Paramount+ anyway so might continue the sub.
The other great deal is a subscription to "The Athletic" for $1/month for 12 months. I enjoy reading their articles.