Re: Next year...2019-20
Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2019 7:23 am
But..................I want nice things.
A co-op community for Arizona Fans
http://beardownwildcats.com/
I really hope there's some way he can sit out this year, either have surgery or rehab the knee as best as possible, and then have him come back in 2020-2021. I know it's probably not realistic but a man can dream.ChooChooCat wrote:Certainly wouldn't get your hopes up for this season.
I think everyone is perfectly fine with him missing this season if there is something that can be worked on or corrected that will allow him to play basketball in the future safely. At this point in the offseason, I feel like we should just keep him on the roster and see. If there's no way to get him right to play in the future, then so be it. I fucking hate injuries.ChooChooCat wrote:Certainly wouldn't get your hopes up for this season.
I'd love to see him magically get well for this year. If that can't happen, I'd just like to see him not lose his career. Sit a year, whatever. Giving a kid a shot at playing the game he loves to play (and is pretty damn good at) is the biggest thing.StickItInTheyFace wrote:I think everyone is perfectly fine with him missing this season if there is something that can be worked on or corrected that will allow him to play basketball in the future safely. At this point in the offseason, I feel like we should just keep him on the roster and see. If there's no way to get him right to play in the future, then so be it. I fucking hate injuries.ChooChooCat wrote:Certainly wouldn't get your hopes up for this season.
Exactly.Spaceman Spiff wrote:I'd love to see him magically get well for this year. If that can't happen, I'd just like to see him not lose his career. Sit a year, whatever. Giving a kid a shot at playing the game he loves to play (and is pretty damn good at) is the biggest thing.StickItInTheyFace wrote:I think everyone is perfectly fine with him missing this season if there is something that can be worked on or corrected that will allow him to play basketball in the future safely. At this point in the offseason, I feel like we should just keep him on the roster and see. If there's no way to get him right to play in the future, then so be it. I fucking hate injuries.ChooChooCat wrote:Certainly wouldn't get your hopes up for this season.
Dylan Smith has zero PG experience whether it be at Arizona or his junior high school.gronk4heisman wrote:Dylan Smith is the lone returnee with prior PG experience? That will give you nightmares.
Oh wait, Jacob Hazzard's shorter little brother is also on the roster, phew!
Hopefully Nico is ready to play 40+ minutes on average at the point. The only other player I would ever want to see take the ball up is, maybe, Devonaire.
Hopefully this surgery is successful and he recovers. Terrible news for the kid. It sucks a lot for us, but I feel much worse for BWill.ChooChooCat wrote:Dylan Smith has zero PG experience whether it be at Arizona or his junior high school.gronk4heisman wrote:Dylan Smith is the lone returnee with prior PG experience? That will give you nightmares.
Oh wait, Jacob Hazzard's shorter little brother is also on the roster, phew!
Hopefully Nico is ready to play 40+ minutes on average at the point. The only other player I would ever want to see take the ball up is, maybe, Devonaire.
Either way if Williams isn't done playing basketball for the rest of his life it'll be a shocker. Maybe he gets lucky though, fingers crossed for the kid.
I was going off Ryan Kalaperie's article:ChooChooCat wrote:Dylan Smith has zero PG experience whether it be at Arizona or his junior high school.gronk4heisman wrote:Dylan Smith is the lone returnee with prior PG experience? That will give you nightmares.
Oh wait, Jacob Hazzard's shorter little brother is also on the roster, phew!
Hopefully Nico is ready to play 40+ minutes on average at the point. The only other player I would ever want to see take the ball up is, maybe, Devonaire.
Either way if Williams isn't done playing basketball for the rest of his life it'll be a shocker. Maybe he gets lucky though, fingers crossed for the kid.
Merkin wrote:I wonder if Barcello is kicking himself? Not the first transfer to have regrets. Look how long it took Doutrive to return.
YoDeFoe wrote:Glad I was eased into this news (thanks Choo).
Merkin wrote:YoDeFoe wrote:Glad I was eased into this news (thanks Choo).
Same here, nice work Choo!
I've never heard of an Italian Mormon. What will they invent next? A broth popsicle? How about a toilet with a garbage disposal? That'll flush 'em down.UAEebs86 wrote:Merkin wrote:I wonder if Barcello is kicking himself? Not the first transfer to have regrets. Look how long it took Doutrive to return.
Did he sign an LOI with BYU yet?
He still wouldn't have played all that much at Arizona and he and his circle very much knew Williams's situation. The guy (or really his circle) wanted more playing time (a lot more) and that was never going to come at Arizona.Merkin wrote:I wonder if Barcello is kicking himself? Not the first transfer to have regrets. Look how long it took Doutrive to return.
I don't think distribution will be the issue. We have a lot of unselfish guys on the roster next year. We need a reliable ballhandler so we don't get killed with ball pressure when Nico's out.ghostwhitehorse wrote:Cornell ran a lot of it's offence through Stone Gettings (per https://www.azdesertswarm.com/basketbal ... epth-chart" target="_blank) at the high post so. . . not a true PG (or a Luke Walton) but not nothing.
Hopefully Nico has an inner Mighty Mouse he can channel.
I must give props to you, Choo. You told us all this stuff on Williams long before the news broke.ChooChooCat wrote:He still wouldn't have played all that much at Arizona and he and his circle very much knew Williams's situation. The guy (or really his circle) wanted more playing time (a lot more) and that was never going to come at Arizona.Merkin wrote:I wonder if Barcello is kicking himself? Not the first transfer to have regrets. Look how long it took Doutrive to return.
IndianaZonaFan wrote:Brandon will be heavily missed. He has skill, experience, and I really thought he was our glue guy.
Without him this year, who will slide in to take that 5th starting spot?
Nico
Josh
????
Zeke
Chase
MH- small, good shooter (at lower level)
DD- rebounding, playmaking, turnovers, great in transition
DS- streaky shooter, turnover machine, can’t hit a layup, defends well
SG- passing, size
We clearly have options (none as good as Williams), but the question is: which one is best? Or do we change it up depending on our opponent? Or do we go with whoever has the “hot hand” at practice/games?
I love Ira. However his energy off the bench is amazing. I want him coming in off the bench and getting about 20-25 minutes a game. I’ve heard really good things about his off-season work as well.UAEebs86 wrote:IndianaZonaFan wrote:Brandon will be heavily missed. He has skill, experience, and I really thought he was our glue guy.
Without him this year, who will slide in to take that 5th starting spot?
Nico
Josh
????
Zeke
Chase
MH- small, good shooter (at lower level)
DD- rebounding, playmaking, turnovers, great in transition
DS- streaky shooter, turnover machine, can’t hit a layup, defends well
SG- passing, size
We clearly have options (none as good as Williams), but the question is: which one is best? Or do we change it up depending on our opponent? Or do we go with whoever has the “hot hand” at practice/games?
What about Ira Lee?
Baker and Brown both have to sit, correct?
Nico, Josh, Zeke, and Chase are locked in starters. The only position up for debate is the other wing spot.YoDeFoe wrote:Probably start with:
Nico
Max
Josh
Ira / Stone
Chase
Based on early practice feedback Zeke projects to take the starting PF spot at some point. Maybe DD or Dylan emerge as better starting options over Max but I wouldn't count on it. Would be nice if one of Stone or Ira could take SF reps bc I trust them more than Dylan and DD.
Koloko plays mop minutes. Baker and Brown sit for their transfer penalty.
That's pretty incredible. Says a lot about Zeke that he's beaten out quality upperclassmen already. It also says a lot about Miller's willingness to use the best talent he has rather than deferring to seniority (as many have complained he's done in the past).ChooChooCat wrote:Nico, Josh, Zeke, and Chase are locked in starters. The only position up for debate is the other wing spot.YoDeFoe wrote:Probably start with:
Nico
Max
Josh
Ira / Stone
Chase
Based on early practice feedback Zeke projects to take the starting PF spot at some point. Maybe DD or Dylan emerge as better starting options over Max but I wouldn't count on it. Would be nice if one of Stone or Ira could take SF reps bc I trust them more than Dylan and DD.
Koloko plays mop minutes. Baker and Brown sit for their transfer penalty.
It's still to be determined, there's even a slight and I stress slight possibility Baker could obtain immediate eligibility and compete for that spot too. At this moment gun to my head I'd say Hazzard gets the first crack at it and if he's not up to snuff defensively I'd go Smith.YoDeFoe wrote:That's pretty incredible. Says a lot about Zeke that he's beaten out quality upperclassmen already. It also says a lot about Miller's willingness to use the best talent he has rather than deferring to seniority (as many have complained he's done in the past).ChooChooCat wrote:Nico, Josh, Zeke, and Chase are locked in starters. The only position up for debate is the other wing spot.YoDeFoe wrote:Probably start with:
Nico
Max
Josh
Ira / Stone
Chase
Based on early practice feedback Zeke projects to take the starting PF spot at some point. Maybe DD or Dylan emerge as better starting options over Max but I wouldn't count on it. Would be nice if one of Stone or Ira could take SF reps bc I trust them more than Dylan and DD.
Koloko plays mop minutes. Baker and Brown sit for their transfer penalty.
Choo would you expect Hazz to take it or is it really a three way fight among him, Smith, and DD?
I'd think Smith starts. Miller likes experience and D. I'd figure he defaults to that unless someone else emerges. From there, my thought is Hazzard is our first/only guard off the bench and DD is our first/only wing off the bench.YoDeFoe wrote:That's pretty incredible. Says a lot about Zeke that he's beaten out quality upperclassmen already. It also says a lot about Miller's willingness to use the best talent he has rather than deferring to seniority (as many have complained he's done in the past).ChooChooCat wrote:Nico, Josh, Zeke, and Chase are locked in starters. The only position up for debate is the other wing spot.YoDeFoe wrote:Probably start with:
Nico
Max
Josh
Ira / Stone
Chase
Based on early practice feedback Zeke projects to take the starting PF spot at some point. Maybe DD or Dylan emerge as better starting options over Max but I wouldn't count on it. Would be nice if one of Stone or Ira could take SF reps bc I trust them more than Dylan and DD.
Koloko plays mop minutes. Baker and Brown sit for their transfer penalty.
Choo would you expect Hazz to take it or is it really a three way fight among him, Smith, and DD?
Has Hazzard looked the part so far in practice? Obviously a downgrade from Williams, but I just feel like with with our front court, spacing is exactly what this team needs.ChooChooCat wrote: Nico, Josh, Zeke, and Chase are locked in starters. The only position up for debate is the other wing spot.
I'm hesitant to say the words (lest I get attached) but Baker's immediate eligibility would be a real godsend given his ability to play some point guard.ChooChooCat wrote: It's still to be determined, there's even a slight and I stress slight possibility Baker could obtain immediate eligibility and compete for that spot too. At this moment gun to my head I'd say Hazzard gets the first crack at it and if he's not up to snuff defensively I'd go Smith.
Another point that just came to mind: We really can't expect Nico to be an offensive force and defend the other team's best guard for 35 min a game. Smith's length and experience in the system would certainly put him ahead of the 5'10" Hazzard in that consideration.Spaceman Spiff wrote: I'd think Smith starts. Miller likes experience and D. I'd figure he defaults to that unless someone else emerges. From there, my thought is Hazzard is our first/only guard off the bench and DD is our first/only wing off the bench.
The upside of Smith and Green alongside Nico is Nico only has to be the third best defender in the bunch. Nico doesn't have to be a TJ type leader on D, although it wouldn't hurt.YoDeFoe wrote:Another point that just came to mind: We really can't expect Nico to be an offensive force and defend the other team's best guard for 35 min a game. Smith's length and experience in the system would certainly put him ahead of the 5'10" Hazzard in that consideration.Spaceman Spiff wrote: I'd think Smith starts. Miller likes experience and D. I'd figure he defaults to that unless someone else emerges. From there, my thought is Hazzard is our first/only guard off the bench and DD is our first/only wing off the bench.
Nico needs his energy and his fouls like we need our breath - giving him a defensive focused backcourt mate is the play. Smith can run his ass off on D and then stand in the corner for catch and shoots on the offensive end.
I see it like this. We have a solid 9 man rotation, but DD, Smith and Hazzard have to contribute. No maybes, because we have 5 perimeter players and 4 big guys.baycat93 wrote:not to be a smart ass SS, but those are the ONLY optionsoff the bench. Baker would be huge insurance for both spots though
Over/Under on # of games Nico plays 40+ minutes
I totally agree SS. If this team is going to get to the second weekend and beyond, all 3 of those guys is going to have to perform above expectations.Spaceman Spiff wrote:I see it like this. We have a solid 9 man rotation, but DD, Smith and Hazzard have to contribute. No maybes, because we have 5 perimeter players and 4 big guys.baycat93 wrote:not to be a smart ass SS, but those are the ONLY optionsoff the bench. Baker would be huge insurance for both spots though
Over/Under on # of games Nico plays 40+ minutes
Losing BWill removes a really talented guy and means our perimeter rotation is full of guys who have to step up to the challenge.
Hopefully DD has improved as a defender. If he's solid on D, he'll be a bench asset. I think his nose for the ball could work really well alongside Nico, but I can't see him getting a ton of minutes until his D is where it needs to be.baycat93 wrote:I totally agree SS. If this team is going to get to the second weekend and beyond, all 3 of those guys is going to have to perform above expectations.Spaceman Spiff wrote:I see it like this. We have a solid 9 man rotation, but DD, Smith and Hazzard have to contribute. No maybes, because we have 5 perimeter players and 4 big guys.baycat93 wrote:not to be a smart ass SS, but those are the ONLY optionsoff the bench. Baker would be huge insurance for both spots though
Over/Under on # of games Nico plays 40+ minutes
Losing BWill removes a really talented guy and means our perimeter rotation is full of guys who have to step up to the challenge.
Also agree in finding ways to keep Nico as fresh as possible and on the court. Smith might be the right pairing. In a perfect world, DD somehow figured out how to be an elite defender. Not holding my breath.
Diving deeper: with a Nico, Max, Josh grouping... if the opposing team's best offensive player is a two guard, are we really going to "hide" Nico on a SF? Defending up two positions isn't exactly a respite on the defensive end.Spaceman Spiff wrote:The upside of Smith and Green alongside Nico is Nico only has to be the third best defender in the bunch. Nico doesn't have to be a TJ type leader on D, although it wouldn't hurt.YoDeFoe wrote:Another point that just came to mind: We really can't expect Nico to be an offensive force and defend the other team's best guard for 35 min a game. Smith's length and experience in the system would certainly put him ahead of the 5'10" Hazzard in that consideration.Spaceman Spiff wrote: I'd think Smith starts. Miller likes experience and D. I'd figure he defaults to that unless someone else emerges. From there, my thought is Hazzard is our first/only guard off the bench and DD is our first/only wing off the bench.
Nico needs his energy and his fouls like we need our breath - giving him a defensive focused backcourt mate is the play. Smith can run his ass off on D and then stand in the corner for catch and shoots on the offensive end.
And yes, I fully support telling Smith that his job is to bust ass on D, then ONLY shoot catch and shoot J's on offense. Maybe a putback layup if passing the ball back out isn't an option.
Depends. If the SF is a perimeter guy who doesn't hit the offensive glass, why not?YoDeFoe wrote:Diving deeper: with a Nico, Max, Josh grouping... if the opposing team's best offensive player is a two guard, are we really going to "hide" Nico on a SF? Defending up two positions isn't exactly a respite on the defensive end.Spaceman Spiff wrote:The upside of Smith and Green alongside Nico is Nico only has to be the third best defender in the bunch. Nico doesn't have to be a TJ type leader on D, although it wouldn't hurt.YoDeFoe wrote:Another point that just came to mind: We really can't expect Nico to be an offensive force and defend the other team's best guard for 35 min a game. Smith's length and experience in the system would certainly put him ahead of the 5'10" Hazzard in that consideration.Spaceman Spiff wrote: I'd think Smith starts. Miller likes experience and D. I'd figure he defaults to that unless someone else emerges. From there, my thought is Hazzard is our first/only guard off the bench and DD is our first/only wing off the bench.
Nico needs his energy and his fouls like we need our breath - giving him a defensive focused backcourt mate is the play. Smith can run his ass off on D and then stand in the corner for catch and shoots on the offensive end.
And yes, I fully support telling Smith that his job is to bust ass on D, then ONLY shoot catch and shoot J's on offense. Maybe a putback layup if passing the ball back out isn't an option.
Woh. Played 24 games last year. I wonder what the argument could possibly beChooChooCat wrote:It's still to be determined, there's even a slight and I stress slight possibility Baker could obtain immediate eligibility and compete for that spot too