Bear Down Wildcats

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:22 pm**

Or has Arizona been playing a lot of teams lately that miss a ton of wide open 3s?

Good god.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:28 pm**

St. Mary's was gassed. We're better conditioned. They wanted a street fight. Sean was game. We all got nervous but he was stone steady in his gameplan and execution. Stone cold killer. Like the coach version of Rawle Alkins.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:30 pm**

basketballgod wrote:Or has Arizona been playing a lot of teams lately that miss a ton of wide open 3s?

Good god.

Not sure they had a ton of wide open threes tonight.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:31 pm**

rgdeuce wrote:
basketballgod wrote:Or has Arizona been playing a lot of teams lately that miss a ton of wide open 3s?

Good god.
Not sure they had a ton of wide open threes tonight.

lol of course you think that. Arizona was also screwed over by the refs again!!!

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:32 pm**

And apparently you missed the game against North Dakota

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:33 pm**

10 for 22 in case u missed it

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:33 pm**

Is it just me, or is this assclown the worst new poster here?

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:34 pm**

UAEebs86 wrote:Is it just me, or is this assclown the worst new poster here?

No way he's an arizona fan

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:35 pm**

Beachcat97 wrote:Or has Arizona been playing a lot of teams lately that miss a ton of wide open 3s?

Good god.

It's just you, Beachcat.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:36 pm**

That better not be beachcat

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:36 pm**

He reminds me of El Chupacabra.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:37 pm**

Catintheheat wrote:He reminds me of El Chupacabra.

He reminds me of a festering boil.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:39 pm**

They do miss a lot. We're 19th in the nation in 3 point D. So, whatever we're doing is working.

https://www.teamrankings.com/ncaa-baske ... -point-pct" target="_blank

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:40 pm**

azgreg wrote:
Catintheheat wrote:He reminds me of El Chupacabra.
He reminds me of a festering boil.

He looks like the piss boy!

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:42 pm**

In the last three games that Arizona has played against quality competition (UCLA, Oregon, and St. Mary's) the opponents three point percentage is ugly...

15/68 or 22%

And that is with A LOT of open looks.

When Arizona actually plays a team that can knock down their open looks...yikes. Just look at the Oregon game from earlier this season and see what happens when teams hit their open shots against the Wildcats.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:44 pm**

And the biggest thing is...Arizona isn't even blowing these teams out! These teams are missing these wide open looks and the games are still going down to the last two minutes. It takes plenty of luck to win a national championship in basketball...will Arizona's continue?

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:44 pm**

Teams that hit a lot of threes win games. You're a fucking genius!

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:45 pm**

It is true... teams are tougher for this Arizona team when they make a lot of shots. We are so much better when opposing teams are missing shots

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:46 pm**

UAEebs86 wrote:Teams that hit a lot of threes win games. You're a fucking genius!

It's not so much as giving up threes, its the fact teams are missing wide open looks that they have been hitting all season. St. Mary's and Oregon are two of the better shooting teams in the country and they went ice cold against Arizona. How much longer will that continue? Who knows?

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:50 pm**

The truth is, KenPom had St. Mary's as a better team for a reason, if they played the way they had all season and hit their open looks (which they had done all season) Arizona is going home tonight.

College basketball is a goofy, goofy sport.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:50 pm**

You just can't get this kind of hard-hitting analysis anywhere else guys.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:51 pm**

basketballgod wrote:The truth is, KenPom had St. Mary's as a better team for a reason, if they played the way they had all season and hit their open looks (which they had done all season) Arizona is probably going home tonight.

College basketball is a goofy, goofy sport.

I mean maybe St. Mary's ridiculously weak schedule contributed to their super duper Kenpom rating or is that a fact hard to fathom?

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:53 pm**

ChooChooCat wrote:
basketballgod wrote:The truth is, KenPom had St. Mary's as a better team for a reason, if they played the way they had all season and hit their open looks (which they had done all season) Arizona is probably going home tonight.

College basketball is a goofy, goofy sport.
I mean maybe St. Mary's ridiculously weak schedule contributed to their super duper Kenpom rating or is that a fact hard to fathom?

I was under the assumption his analysis worked all of those factors into his rankings?

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:55 pm**

basketballgod wrote:
ChooChooCat wrote:
basketballgod wrote:The truth is, KenPom had St. Mary's as a better team for a reason, if they played the way they had all season and hit their open looks (which they had done all season) Arizona is probably going home tonight.

College basketball is a goofy, goofy sport.
I mean maybe St. Mary's ridiculously weak schedule contributed to their super duper Kenpom rating or is that a fact hard to fathom?
I was under the assumption his analysis worked all of those factors into his rankings?

Efficiency is adjusted against the average. SOS is a separate set of categories.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:57 pm**

You cant troll when Arizona played like shit for nearly half the game and still effectively won this game with three minutes left, especially with your shitty angle. Whats next, Blame Landale to trying to play catch with Lauri's right hand in the low post? You have no leverage here.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:59 pm**

Longhorned wrote:
basketballgod wrote:
ChooChooCat wrote:
basketballgod wrote:The truth is, KenPom had St. Mary's as a better team for a reason, if they played the way they had all season and hit their open looks (which they had done all season) Arizona is probably going home tonight.

College basketball is a goofy, goofy sport.
I mean maybe St. Mary's ridiculously weak schedule contributed to their super duper Kenpom rating or is that a fact hard to fathom?
I was under the assumption his analysis worked all of those factors into his rankings?
Efficiency is adjusted against the average. SOS is a separate set of categories.

All of that is besides the point. The truth is St. Mary's was right there all game even with the fact that they missed countless three point looks that they made all season. What the hell does missing an open three pointer have to do with strength of schedule?

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:03 pm**

basketballgod wrote:
Longhorned wrote:
basketballgod wrote:
ChooChooCat wrote:
basketballgod wrote:The truth is, KenPom had St. Mary's as a better team for a reason, if they played the way they had all season and hit their open looks (which they had done all season) Arizona is probably going home tonight.

College basketball is a goofy, goofy sport.
I mean maybe St. Mary's ridiculously weak schedule contributed to their super duper Kenpom rating or is that a fact hard to fathom?
I was under the assumption his analysis worked all of those factors into his rankings?
Efficiency is adjusted against the average. SOS is a separate set of categories.
All of that is besides the point. The truth is St. Mary's was right there all game even with the fact that they missed countless three point looks that they made all season. What the hell does missing an open three pointer have to do with strength of schedule?

St. Mary's shot .39% from 3 as a team this season against the 140th toughest SOS per Kenpom. Arizona shot the very same vs. the 66th SOS. You have no point. You have been weighed, you have been measured, and you have been found wanting. Good day sir and good bye.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:04 pm**

ChooChooCat wrote:St. Mary's shot .39% from 3 as a team this season. Arizona shot the very same. You have no point. You have been weighed, you have been measured, and you have been found wanting. Good day sir and good bye.

One of my favorite movies.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:05 pm**

If a more talented team was running the kind of offense St. Mary's was running tonight, the Wildcats lose the game by 10+ points.

I was so impressed by how that team operated, always sad to see teams that play offense the way it was meant to be played go home early.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:07 pm**

Then go root for them because you're obviously not an Arizona fan.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:08 pm**

Look at their schedule, shitdick. Probably easier when you are chasing 6'3, 2 and 3 star white boys from
Utah and Idaho, rather than 5 star thorobreds. Probably easier to get a shot off and over those guys too, which helps with rhythm alone. Remember how shitty of a defender Marc Tollefsen was? Dude closed out on shooters like he was drunk and was close to worthless at Arizona. He was a stud in St Marys conference.

Make sense?

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:09 pm**

I promise I'll obey next time, but can we just have a rule not to respond to asschalk?

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:13 pm**

Can we just ban this piece of shit troll? I don't care if it's Beachcat or R+F (sounds more like RF actually) but it's hot garbage no matter what

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:30 pm**

prh wrote:Can we just ban this piece of shit troll? I don't care if it's Beachcat or R+F (sounds more like RF actually) but it's hot garbage no matter what

He sounds bitter and obviously has the brains of a radish........Todd Graham perhaps????

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:59 pm**

Something I've noticed over the years...Arizona fans=ASU fans=fans of any big, dumb state university.

I've fought both online and there is no difference. The funny thing is, they really think there is a difference but there isn't any.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:07 pm**

basketballgod wrote:Or has Arizona been playing a lot of teams lately that miss a ton of wide open 3s?

Good god.

"Is it just me...?"

Yeah dude, it's just you.

Teams that miss shots lose games? Holy shit, get that hot take on SportsCenter!

Next, can you tell us your theory on how "teams that score more points than their opponent tend to win"?

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:09 pm**

Yea, time to get this guy the fuck up outta here

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:09 pm**

basketballgod wrote:Something I've noticed over the years...Arizona fans=ASU fans=fans of any big, dumb state university.

I've fought both online and there is no difference. The funny thing is, they really think there is a difference but there isn't any.

Truly a keyboard warrior.

Respond quickly now, before Mommy turns off the internet again!

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:09 pm**

basketballgod wrote:Something I've noticed over the years...Arizona fans=ASU fans=fans of any big, dumb state university.

I've fought both online and there is no difference. The funny thing is, they really think there is a difference but there isn't any.

Just leave. NOBODY wants you here.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:16 pm**

Jwsisliving wrote:
basketballgod wrote:Something I've noticed over the years...Arizona fans=ASU fans=fans of any big, dumb state university.

I've fought both online and there is no difference. The funny thing is, they really think there is a difference but there isn't any.
Just leave. NOBODY wants you here.

Except me. He's kind of dumb and keeps chasing cars and trips. It gets funnier with reps.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:18 pm**

Is it me, or for being an admitted troll does this guy really fucking suck at it?

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:23 pm**

Chicat wrote:Is it me, or for being an admitted troll does this guy really fucking suck at it?

I'm not letting assholes shit on our site.

I've temporarily banned him.

I apparently wasn't the first, as he was banned on the 12 from his user notes.

Not sure how he got to even post this thread.

Trolls can fuck off.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:44 pm**

JMarkJohns wrote:
Chicat wrote:Is it me, or for being an admitted troll does this guy really fucking suck at it?
I'm not letting assholes shit on our site.

I've temporarily banned him.

I apparently wasn't the first, as he was banned on the 12 from his user notes.

Not sure how he got to even post this thread.

Trolls can fuck off.

Good move, thanks POM!

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 10:06 pm**

I should elaborate... my temporary ban is until 2020.

Hopefully in hindsight he sees the error of his ways.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 10:20 pm**

Ah cheers to that

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 10:31 pm**

Executive Order Ban. I like the unilateral move JMark. No need to discuss or poll that one.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:11 pm**

BearDown89 wrote:Executive Order Ban. I like the unilateral move JMark. No need to discuss or poll that one.

Trolls aren't posters. They have no rights.

Real posters get due process.

Posted: **Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:13 pm**

To answer the question. Yes. It's just you.

Posted: **Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:04 am**

Now he's emailing me...lol.

Posted: **Sun Mar 19, 2017 2:06 am**

Seriously, anyone who just comes to talk unfounded shit (like the missing tons of open threes) which cannot be statistically defended and who hides his own fan allegiance needs to be banned immediately. Good move, imo.

Bear Down Wildcats

Is it just me...

Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...

Re: Is it just me...