2017/2018 PG
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:05 pm
means so much this year -- sticky this thread
Arizona is loaded
Arizona is loaded
"We have the talent to win it all as long as our pg doesn't fuck it up"YoDeFoe wrote:97 been drinkin or can someone interpret?
i did too, even moreso than I anticipated, he has a physical quality that suprised me.ChooChooCat wrote:I liked what I saw out of Barcello last night fwiw.
Interested to see how many minutes he gets before Sean whittles down the rotation to his core 8-9 players.97cats wrote:i did too, even moreso than I anticipated, he has a physical quality that suprised me.ChooChooCat wrote:I liked what I saw out of Barcello last night fwiw.
but it's a long freshman season -- i don't put a ton of stock in him leading AZ to a title in March this year.
however, as a Jr&Sr he's gonna be a heck of a player.
I am pretty sure that Barcello will be part of the rotation for sure - he gives Arizona depth at the PG position, and also can play off the ball as well. He will probably be a 10-12 minute per game guy, which is a good amount for a freshman with a senior PG on the roster.Chicat wrote:Interested to see how many minutes he gets before Sean whittles down the rotation to his core 8-9 players.97cats wrote:i did too, even moreso than I anticipated, he has a physical quality that suprised me.ChooChooCat wrote:I liked what I saw out of Barcello last night fwiw.
but it's a long freshman season -- i don't put a ton of stock in him leading AZ to a title in March this year.
however, as a Jr&Sr he's gonna be a heck of a player.
I want to see him get a ton of experience right out of the gate to hedge against injuries down the road.
PRH, Akot looked good. Handles, passes and plays long, confrontive D. Strong PG potential in my view.prh wrote:I liked what I saw from Barcello too, although I didn't get to see as much of the game as I would have liked. Was it just me, or did Akot handle the ball quite a bit too? It might have just been the parts I saw.
no it doesn'tKaibabKat wrote:3 points, 2 assists, and 4 turnovers from a point guard in a scrimmage stinks. That sort of performance from a senior starter does not bode well for a team becoming a juggernaut down the road.
Given our '18 recruiting situation, if he was a legit option as a soph, that would be awesome too.97cats wrote:i did too, even moreso than I anticipated, he has a physical quality that suprised me.ChooChooCat wrote:I liked what I saw out of Barcello last night fwiw.
but it's a long freshman season -- i don't put a ton of stock in him leading AZ to a title in March this year.
however, as a Jr&Sr he's gonna be a heck of a player.
So what are you implying?97cats wrote:no it doesn'tKaibabKat wrote:3 points, 2 assists, and 4 turnovers from a point guard in a scrimmage stinks. That sort of performance from a senior starter does not bode well for a team becoming a juggernaut down the road.
Arizona will have zero problem winning 30 games again this year regardless, but "Juggernaut down the road" and potential national champ status is very much in limbo, imo.
this is going to be a developing topic from where I see it for sure -- it seems more fluid to me than ever before.
the 'all eggs' in that basket might have a short shelf life in Feb/March.
Make no mistake, Trier is the guy with the ball at the top of the key late in games.Longhorned wrote:I’d be very grateful if someone who knows more about basketball can explain to me why this team needs a true point guard as opposed to Trier at the 1. I know Trier is looking to shoot, and to score. But Miller has run with that before. It’s hard for me to understand leaving 20% of your otherwise elite team on the floor to a mid-major backup.
Akot's handle, Barcello's poise and flash, along with Lee's seemingly polished game which includes incredible hops for a 4, not to mention Randolph's shooting, makes me wish we had one less player on the roster.prh wrote:I liked what I saw from Barcello too, although I didn't get to see as much of the game as I would have liked. Was it just me, or did Akot handle the ball quite a bit too? It might have just been the parts I saw.
Much appreciated, TC. I can picture all that.TucsonClip wrote:Make no mistake, Trier is the guy with the ball at the top of the key late in games.Longhorned wrote:I’d be very grateful if someone who knows more about basketball can explain to me why this team needs a true point guard as opposed to Trier at the 1. I know Trier is looking to shoot, and to score. But Miller has run with that before. It’s hard for me to understand leaving 20% of your otherwise elite team on the floor to a mid-major backup.
However, to your point... Imagine this team with a PG capable of getting everyone easy looks off dribble penetration. Imagine someone getting Trier easy looks on the wing. Imagine a defense being stressed by Trier on the wing and Ayton on the block/elbow, and then a PG capable of beating his man off the bounce and finishing at the rim. As I posted previously, if you want to see an improved PJC (you, as the general person on this board), we better be able to get stops so he can push the ball in transition. Thats where he is at his best.
I think PJC will be fine, but, as others have noted, fine can easily be the difference between a Final Four and another early exit.
Match ups will decide Parker Jackson Cartwright's minutes. If he's outmanned and the weakest link on the floor, it will force Miller's hand. At least we have depth to create problems for opponents. In crunch time, Trier may be the de facto point guard if PJC can't get the job done.97cats wrote:![]()
also, Cartwright bullied nothing and nobody last night, nothing.
I'm hopeful like everybody else, but PG and who ultimately plays it is the most fluid topic on this years team...and just wait til Alkins gets back.
Arizona is loaded
Miller mentioned in his on court post game talk the disparity between PJC and Barcello and referenced experience and nerves as factors. PJC ripped Barcello multiple times. First half more than the second.97cats wrote:![]()
also, Cartwright bullied nothing and nobody last night, nothing.
I'm hopeful like everybody else, but PG and who ultimately plays it is the most fluid topic on this years team...and just wait til Alkins gets back.
Arizona is loaded
This post is a treasure.Hank of sb wrote:So what are you implying?97cats wrote:no it doesn'tKaibabKat wrote:3 points, 2 assists, and 4 turnovers from a point guard in a scrimmage stinks. That sort of performance from a senior starter does not bode well for a team becoming a juggernaut down the road.
Arizona will have zero problem winning 30 games again this year regardless, but "Juggernaut down the road" and potential national champ status is very much in limbo, imo.
this is going to be a developing topic from where I see it for sure -- it seems more fluid to me than ever before.
the 'all eggs' in that basket might have a short shelf life in Feb/March.
It seems you are suggesting that come February, with Arizona potentially undefeated, the university may impose severe sanctions which includes no post season. All this with a nod from the NCAA endorsing the sanctions, noting the program is responsible for Book's actions even if it is determined Book acted solely on his own, solely for his personal gain.
That if no further revelations come to fore-- from any/all investigation(s)-- Arizona may proceed as if this episode is behind them.
OR are you saying, Barcello, by then, clearly the more talented PG, subtly finds himself gettting more minutes, especially at crunch time? Making the team lethal from all five spots.
im not sure this meant what you think it meantYoDeFoe wrote: Miller mentioned in his on court post game talk the disparity between PJC and Barcello and referenced experience and nerves as factors. PJC ripped Barcello multiple times. First half more than the second.
PJC: 1-6 for 3 pts, 2 asst and 4 toYoDeFoe wrote:PJC bullied the shit out of Barcello last night. He's a senior who's played in the E8 and Barcello is a teenager stepping onto McKale under the lights for the first time - so not a level playing field. But yeah, bullied. I loved the toughness and fight I saw out of PJC - especially his very active hands.
to justify the merge, this thread would have to be ALL about PJC or Sean Miller -- clearly the PG position this year is not ALL about PJC, and wont be as the season progresses.gumby wrote:Shouldn't a mod just combine this with the other PJC-bashing thread? If it's indeed "all eggs," then combine with the Sean Miller thread, too. I'm assuming he runs the program. Perhaps I'm naive.
PJC looked very tough on defense the first five minutes. Wouldn’t give Barcello an inch.Puerco wrote:PJC: 1-6 for 3 pts, 2 asst and 4 toYoDeFoe wrote:PJC bullied the shit out of Barcello last night. He's a senior who's played in the E8 and Barcello is a teenager stepping onto McKale under the lights for the first time - so not a level playing field. But yeah, bullied. I loved the toughness and fight I saw out of PJC - especially his very active hands.
Barcello: 1-1 for 2 pts, 3 asst and 2 to
Who bullied whom?
Yep, I saw. But neither of those stat lines imply either player bullying anyone. If anything, PJC going 1-6 with a 0.5 A:TO ratio is pretty disappointing for a bully.Chicat wrote:PJC looked very tough on defense the first five minutes. Wouldn’t give Barcello an inch.Puerco wrote:PJC: 1-6 for 3 pts, 2 asst and 4 toYoDeFoe wrote:PJC bullied the shit out of Barcello last night. He's a senior who's played in the E8 and Barcello is a teenager stepping onto McKale under the lights for the first time - so not a level playing field. But yeah, bullied. I loved the toughness and fight I saw out of PJC - especially his very active hands.
Barcello: 1-1 for 2 pts, 3 asst and 2 to
Who bullied whom?
The caveat is that the defense of a senior should be well ahead of a freshman’s offense, especially after practicing and scrimmaging against each other.
I feel like the defense should be ahead of the offense at this point in an intra-team scrimmage. They know the plays and should know each other’s tendencies. I’m not going to put too much stock in anyone’s stat lines. No one got hurt and they put on a good show for the fans. Mission accomplished all the way around.Puerco wrote:Yep, I saw. But neither of those stat lines imply either player bullying anyone. If anything, PJC going 1-6 with a 0.5 A:TO ratio is pretty disappointing for a bully.Chicat wrote:PJC looked very tough on defense the first five minutes. Wouldn’t give Barcello an inch.Puerco wrote:PJC: 1-6 for 3 pts, 2 asst and 4 toYoDeFoe wrote:PJC bullied the shit out of Barcello last night. He's a senior who's played in the E8 and Barcello is a teenager stepping onto McKale under the lights for the first time - so not a level playing field. But yeah, bullied. I loved the toughness and fight I saw out of PJC - especially his very active hands.
Barcello: 1-1 for 2 pts, 3 asst and 2 to
Who bullied whom?
The caveat is that the defense of a senior should be well ahead of a freshman’s offense, especially after practicing and scrimmaging against each other.
Yeah. For a senior vs freshman matchup, PJC gave Barcello trouble early, but then he did very little after that. There was a lot of the disappearing act, and once Barcello seemed to get his footing, the D wasn't nearly as noticeable.Chicat wrote:PJC looked very tough on defense the first five minutes. Wouldn’t give Barcello an inch.Puerco wrote:PJC: 1-6 for 3 pts, 2 asst and 4 toYoDeFoe wrote:PJC bullied the shit out of Barcello last night. He's a senior who's played in the E8 and Barcello is a teenager stepping onto McKale under the lights for the first time - so not a level playing field. But yeah, bullied. I loved the toughness and fight I saw out of PJC - especially his very active hands.
Barcello: 1-1 for 2 pts, 3 asst and 2 to
Who bullied whom?
The caveat is that the defense of a senior should be well ahead of a freshman’s offense, especially after practicing and scrimmaging against each other.
Nah, Duval is a crazy athlete. He needs to be a consistent shooter, but that tweet after an intrasquad scrimmage is just fishing for controversy.gumby wrote:Dodged another Mustafa Josiah Cartwright?
Thornton, too.
Jeff Goodman? Fishing for clicks??Spaceman Spiff wrote:Nah, Duval is a crazy athlete. He needs to be a consistent shooter, but that tweet after an intrasquad scrimmage is just fishing for controversy.gumby wrote:Dodged another Mustafa Josiah Cartwright?
Thornton, too.
Seriously.Frybry02 wrote:It was a scrimmage... Pump the brakes.
me toobillk78 wrote:I really liked what I saw from Trier when he was running the point last night.
i dont think there is any question about itbillk78 wrote:Could we possibly see more minutes from him there than expected?
maybe, but what about the other part(s)?billk78 wrote:Maybe that's part of our answer?