Nico Mannion
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:25 pm
guards, guards, guards -- gotta have guards
That's two better point guards on one roster than all our rosters since TJ.97cats wrote:im trying my best to look forward, not back...with Williams and Mannion in the fold next year, Sean Miller is on to somethin.
Maybe Randolph and/or Akot is back. They're both potential alternate ball handlers too. Barcello, Williams and Mannion could all be legit PG options. Add in some other positions that can also handle, and there's a lot of flexibility.YoDeFoe wrote:Still believe that Barcello will be an impact player as an upperclassmen. A ball-handling core of Barcello (Jr.), Williams (So.), and Mannion (Fr.) would be the best we've fielded since 2001.
I give Hurley two more years before he's canned.Alieberman wrote:Let's not get ahead of ourselves.... remember just a few miles up north is the self titled Guard U.
Future is bright, fo-sho.NYCat wrote:Arizona is finally getting top PGs again, hopefully also add Boogie Ellis, but we'll only have him for a year, Niccolo is likely one and doner. It opens up a solid one year window to make a run at a F4 with a Mannion + a core consisting of..
So. Williams (who is hard to imagine is here for more than 2 yrs)
Sr. Jeter
Jr. Akot and/or Randolph (hopefully at least one returns and massively improves this year for run next year)
hopefully Josh Green, Jaden McDaniels or someone else to put the team over the top (rest of the 2019 recruits, like say Koloko along with the Doutrieve, Thielemans etc, are more long term building for the next next run).
I'm far from convinced Nico is a one and done, although I know that's what he wants to do, but draft stock will ultimately make the final decision for him.NYCat wrote:Arizona is finally getting top PGs again, hopefully also add Boogie Ellis, but we'll only have him for a year, Niccolo is likely one and doner. It opens up a solid one year window to make a run at a F4 with a Mannion + a core consisting of..
So. Williams (who is hard to imagine is here for more than 2 yrs)
Sr. Jeter
Jr. Akot and/or Randolph (hopefully at least one returns and massively improves this year for run next year)
hopefully Josh Green, Jaden McDaniels or someone else to put the team over the top (rest of the 2019 recruits, like say Koloko along with the Doutrieve, Thielemans etc, are more long term building for the next next run).
As long as he lets his draft stock decide, I'm fine with that. He either flashes enough to pump up his stock in one year or stays. That's fair, and it incentivizes his time here.ChooChooCat wrote:I'm far from convinced Nico is a one and done, although I know that's what he wants to do, but draft stock will ultimately make the final decision for him.NYCat wrote:Arizona is finally getting top PGs again, hopefully also add Boogie Ellis, but we'll only have him for a year, Niccolo is likely one and doner. It opens up a solid one year window to make a run at a F4 with a Mannion + a core consisting of..
So. Williams (who is hard to imagine is here for more than 2 yrs)
Sr. Jeter
Jr. Akot and/or Randolph (hopefully at least one returns and massively improves this year for run next year)
hopefully Josh Green, Jaden McDaniels or someone else to put the team over the top (rest of the 2019 recruits, like say Koloko along with the Doutrieve, Thielemans etc, are more long term building for the next next run).
Choo just said draft stock will decide for him. I hope it does.ASUHATER! wrote:Draft stock means nothing anymore on if a kid will go or not. Plenty of kids listed as late 2nd rounders or undrafted leave.
True, but Ball, Fultz, T. Young, Sexton, Fox...I mean, tons of PGs have been OAD lately, so while it may be tough, several players are doing it, making it more likely that others follow.Spaceman Spiff wrote: PG is probably the toughest position to be OAD.
I'm well aware. He won't be here longer than 2 years regardless of the draft stock. Draft stock, however, will dictate whether he stays one year or two. This isn't a Kobi Simmons one and done no matter what situation.ASUHATER! wrote:Draft stock means nothing anymore on if a kid will go or not. Plenty of kids listed as late 2nd rounders or undrafted leave.
All those guys were guaranteed lottery picks by seasons end. If Nico is guaranteed that he will obviously bounce, as he should. The key factor for all those guys you named except maybe Fox was that they were the #1 scoring option for their teams and nobody else was close. That's far from a guarantee for Nico.Beachcat97 wrote:True, but Ball, Fultz, T. Young, Sexton, Fox...I mean, tons of PGs have been OAD lately, so while it may be tough, several players are doing it, making it more likely that others follow.Spaceman Spiff wrote: PG is probably the toughest position to be OAD.
At this point the 2021 kids are the likely first class to be able to go straight to the NBA again. If Nico stays 2 years he'd still avoid that.U.P. Zona Fan wrote:Also, which draft is it that high schoolers might be eligible? 20? 21? I would expect to see more kids go the year before that, so they do not get lost in that crazy mess. Also if you are a freshman that year you might be more likely to stick around. Who knows.
If Nico performs like those guys as a freshman, I'm fine with him leaving. With PG's, they get drafted moreso on production than projection. Ball, Fultz, Young, Sexton and Fox were all dominant college players.Beachcat97 wrote:True, but Ball, Fultz, T. Young, Sexton, Fox...I mean, tons of PGs have been OAD lately, so while it may be tough, several players are doing it, making it more likely that others follow.Spaceman Spiff wrote: PG is probably the toughest position to be OAD.
Spiff those are forwards and they both went in the lottery I'm so confused.Spaceman Spiff wrote:
You don't see PG projects like Chriss or Dragan Bender go in the lottery.
Sorry if I was confusing. Big man projects, maybe even wing projects can go lottery. PG projects don't. Any lottery PG has produced at a good level in college.YoDeFoe wrote:Spiff those are forwards and they both went in the lottery I'm so confused.Spaceman Spiff wrote:
You don't see PG projects like Chriss or Dragan Bender go in the lottery.
Reason being as a good point guard can help those projects develop, while a good wing/post don't necessarily help a point guard develop.Spaceman Spiff wrote:Sorry if I was confusing. Big man projects, maybe even wing projects can go lottery. PG projects don't. Any lottery PG has produced at a good level in college.YoDeFoe wrote:Spiff those are forwards and they both went in the lottery I'm so confused.Spaceman Spiff wrote:
You don't see PG projects like Chriss or Dragan Bender go in the lottery.
Maybe Mudiay and Jennings overseas are exceptions, but overseas.
I was using Chriss and Bender as the examples of projects who go lottery when similarly situated PG's don't. Hope that is clearer.
I also think it's just rarer to find size with elite physical tools. Guys in the 6'0-6'3 range who can run and jump are fairly common. You have to have something else to separate yourself from the pack, and that something else triggers college success.ChooChooCat wrote:Reason being as a good point guard can help those projects develop, while a good wing/post don't necessarily help a point guard develop.Spaceman Spiff wrote:Sorry if I was confusing. Big man projects, maybe even wing projects can go lottery. PG projects don't. Any lottery PG has produced at a good level in college.YoDeFoe wrote:Spiff those are forwards and they both went in the lottery I'm so confused.Spaceman Spiff wrote:
You don't see PG projects like Chriss or Dragan Bender go in the lottery.
Maybe Mudiay and Jennings overseas are exceptions, but overseas.
I was using Chriss and Bender as the examples of projects who go lottery when similarly situated PG's don't. Hope that is clearer.
ChooChooCat wrote:At this point the 2021 kids are the likely first class to be able to go straight to the NBA again. If Nico stays 2 years he'd still avoid that.U.P. Zona Fan wrote:Also, which draft is it that high schoolers might be eligible? 20? 21? I would expect to see more kids go the year before that, so they do not get lost in that crazy mess. Also if you are a freshman that year you might be more likely to stick around. Who knows.
Now I'm reading your sentence correctly, thanks.Spaceman Spiff wrote:I was using Chriss and Bender as the examples of projects who go lottery when similarly situated PG's don't. Hope that is clearer.
It’s a great article. Can’t wait to see him in a UofA uniform.97cats wrote:A 15-YEAR-OLD
(SORTA-MAYBE)
BASKETBALL PRODIGY
BY CHRIS BALLARD
https://www.si.com/longform/2017/nico-m ... index.html
The Athletic is worth every penny. Only downside is Seth Davis owns a part of it.NYCat wrote:Premium?
Great Read.NYCat wrote:Premium?
You are very welcomeNYCat wrote:Thanks Phoechina
Thank you 97Cats. Was at the game and can confirm that. Nico is for real, best guard we've had coming in since Bayless. Not as athletic but much more skilled and higher IQ. I was extremely impressed. He has so much swagger, I loved seeing him go up to Bibby and talk ish to him. He had no fear, and that game winner was unreal.97cats wrote:props to Lando for the live look in from center court - Williams and Mannion, say it out loud...Randolph too.
Im hoping Williams or Randolph don't make a poor decision and try to jump to the league. I could see Randolph trying...probably not Williams.97cats wrote:props to Lando for the live look in from center court - Williams and Mannion, say it out loud...Randolph too.