14 Khalil Tate (Aug 2017-Aug 2018)

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Sun Oct 08, 2017 2:10 pm

Rr still probably won't start him, you know wants to keep the options open and make ucla game plan.

MrBug708 · Post by **MrBug708** » Sun Oct 08, 2017 2:53 pm

Mora doesn't game plan, so the jokes on RR...haha

ghostwhitehorse · Post by **ghostwhitehorse** » Sun Oct 08, 2017 3:26 pm

Tech note. . .

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:55 am

BearDown89 · Post by **BearDown89** » Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:17 am

Pretty sweet.

gumby · Post by **gumby** » Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:43 pm

Watched a ton of football in my time. Thought I'd seen it all. That was incredible.

PHXCATS · Post by **PHXCATS** » Mon Oct 09, 2017 2:35 pm

whatisee wrote:
Merkin wrote:And fuck RichRod, still won't say Tate is his QB.
Why would you tell UCLA your plans for the next game? Relax tiger

Seriously, on this board some people can do no wrong and some can do no right no matter what they do

PHXCATS · Post by **PHXCATS** » Mon Oct 09, 2017 2:37 pm

SCCats wrote:
whatisee wrote:Right. And everybody in here said we would be 2-3 after this game, so who to believe...

Ok. You're also assuming Rich actually wants to get to 6 or 7 wins and come back next year instead of getting paid to move on.

We'll see if Tate starts the next game or not.

I cant believe someone actually thinks RR is losing on purpose

azcat49 · Post by **azcat49** » Mon Oct 09, 2017 2:49 pm

PHXCATS wrote:
whatisee wrote:
Merkin wrote:And fuck RichRod, still won't say Tate is his QB.
Why would you tell UCLA your plans for the next game? Relax tiger
Seriously, on this board some people can do no wrong and some can do no right no matter what they do

I think what Merkin is alluding to is that many of the players family don't like the fact that RR is slow to name starters, regardless of the position. Even when it is clear that Tate has earned the start and we all know (including the bruins) he will start he is still using the "or".

Just a lot of fans who have great disdain for RR and most of it is self inflicted

PHXCATS · Post by **PHXCATS** » Mon Oct 09, 2017 2:57 pm

azcat49 wrote:
PHXCATS wrote:
whatisee wrote:
Merkin wrote:And fuck RichRod, still won't say Tate is his QB.
Why would you tell UCLA your plans for the next game? Relax tiger
Seriously, on this board some people can do no wrong and some can do no right no matter what they do
I think what Merkin is alluding to is that many of the players family don't like the fact that RR is slow to name starters, regardless of the position. Even when it is clear that Tate has earned the start and we all know (including the bruins) he will start he is still using the "or".

Just a lot of fans who have great disdain for RR and most of it is self inflicted

RR has not performed well and made mistakes, but some of our fans just take everything the worst possible way they can and run with it. If Miller did not name starters everyone would praise him.

I really like what I saw the other day, and while the defense wasnt great they did not get a ton of rest with UA scoring so often and so quickly. The D has been serviceable this year and I think we will see the same on Saturday.

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Mon Oct 09, 2017 3:02 pm

It's so lame. Skulduggery, except not unique or even surprising. How RR handles it confers no competitive advantage whatsoever especially when it's clear as day with the talent (and relative lack thereof) who should be starting.

Just name your starters, strap em on, and go play ball.

Interesting comment on miller. I think the results for miller allow him a bit more latitude and bb is so much more a matchup dependent game relative to football, especially when in basketball we have the problem of riches and plug and play vs a dearth of talent except for Tate and other established starters.

What do you say about Peterson complaining about late start times? Even you said east coasters don't care about late west coast starts in basketball, why should football be any different right?

PHXCATS · Post by **PHXCATS** » Mon Oct 09, 2017 3:13 pm

CalStateTempe wrote:It's so lame. Skulduggery, except not unique or even surprising. How RR handles it confers no competitive advantage whatsoever especially when it's clear as day with the talent (and relative lack thereof) who should be starting.

Just name your starters, strap em on, and go play ball.

Interesting comment on miller. I think the results for miller allow him a bit more latitude and bb is so much more a matchup dependent game relative to football, especially when in basketball we have the problem of riches and plug and play vs a dearth of talent except for Tate and other established starters.

What do you say about Peterson complaining about late start times? Even you said east coasters don't care about late west coast starts in basketball, why should football be any different right?

I am not sure what you are asking exactly or thinking I said. I dont remember ever saying that east coasters dont care about late starts. I just get the fact that when you are on the west coast and there being only so many slots for games in the day, that west coast games are going to start late. Especially when you factor in that the PAC-12 does not draw as well on TV vs the SEC Big 10 and Big 12.

I get Petersen's frustration but unless you go to a network outside of ESPN and Fox who have contracts with the SEC Big 10 Big 12 that this is what you have to deal with. Sign a deal with NBC and we can get earlier games.

BearDown89 · Post by **BearDown89** » Mon Oct 09, 2017 3:20 pm

PHXCATS wrote:
azcat49 wrote:
PHXCATS wrote:
whatisee wrote:
Merkin wrote:And fuck RichRod, still won't say Tate is his QB.
Why would you tell UCLA your plans for the next game? Relax tiger
Seriously, on this board some people can do no wrong and some can do no right no matter what they do
I think what Merkin is alluding to is that many of the players family don't like the fact that RR is slow to name starters, regardless of the position. Even when it is clear that Tate has earned the start and we all know (including the bruins) he will start he is still using the "or".

Just a lot of fans who have great disdain for RR and most of it is self inflicted
RR has not performed well and made mistakes, but some of our fans just take everything the worst possible way they can and run with it. If Miller did not name starters everyone would praise him.

I really like what I saw the other day, and while the defense wasnt great they did not get a ton of rest with UA scoring so often and so quickly. The D has been serviceable this year and I think we will see the same on Saturday.

The Defense has been much improved I think, but Colorado was a tall order on the road against a talented Philip Lindsey. Colorado should have come out pounding the rock in the second half. Agree, however, the productive quick-scoring offense didn't give them any rest whatsoever.

SCCats · Post by **SCCats** » Mon Oct 09, 2017 3:42 pm

PHXCATS wrote:
SCCats wrote:
whatisee wrote:Right. And everybody in here said we would be 2-3 after this game, so who to believe...

Ok. You're also assuming Rich actually wants to get to 6 or 7 wins and come back next year instead of getting paid to move on.

We'll see if Tate starts the next game or not.
I cant believe someone actually thinks RR is losing on purpose

It creates a fun juxtaposition to have to say 'I mean really! Rich was trying to win all those games he lost!"

Or how about "Rich is the competent professional that knows what he's doing. It's his plan to play the shittier QB that gives us a significantly worse chance of winning."

PHXCATS · Post by **PHXCATS** » Mon Oct 09, 2017 3:53 pm

SCCats wrote:
PHXCATS wrote:
SCCats wrote:
whatisee wrote:Right. And everybody in here said we would be 2-3 after this game, so who to believe...

Ok. You're also assuming Rich actually wants to get to 6 or 7 wins and come back next year instead of getting paid to move on.

We'll see if Tate starts the next game or not.
I cant believe someone actually thinks RR is losing on purpose
It creates a fun juxtaposition to have to say 'I mean really! Rich was trying to win all those games he lost!"

Or how about "Rich is the competent professional that knows what he's doing. It's his plan to play the shittier QB that gives us a significantly worse chance of winning."

Maybe it is Foles vs Scott where Tate sucks at practice so RR did not trust him in the games at this point. The difference between Tate and BD was not this big last year or thus far this year until Saturday.

azgreg · Post by **azgreg** » Mon Oct 09, 2017 8:29 pm

97cats · Post by **97cats** » Tue Oct 10, 2017 3:53 pm

ASUHATER! wrote: Indeed he is. Only people that say that are the ones that need to get laid in my experience.

Bug: When have you ever gotten laid?

Hater: I've laid lots of times.

Bug: Name-one.

Hater: She lives in Canada. I met her at Niagra Falls; you wouldn't know her.

Bug: You ever laid anyone around here? [Hater, nervous that UAStacy might hear, motions for Bug to quiet down.] Oh...you and UAStacy did it...

UAStacy: What are you talking about?

Hater: Nothing, nothing. [to Bug] Let's just talk about it later, just drop it--

UAStacy: --No, drop what? What are you talking about?

Bug: Well, in addition the number of girls in the Niagra Falls area, that currently you and he are riding the hobby horse.

UAStacy: Little pig!

Hater: No, I'm not, I'm--Bug said I was I cherry, I said I wasn't! That's it! That's all that was said!

Bug: Well, then what were you motioning to UAStacy for?

UAStacy: You know, I don't appreciate this, Hater.

Hater: He is lying!

Bug: Oh, you weren't motioning to UAStacy ?

Hater: [hesitantly] You know he's lying, right?

Bug: Were you, or were you not, motioning to UAStacy ?

Hater: Yeah, but it's...it's because I didn't want her to know I was a virgin. [Bug and UAStacy stare at him for a moment.] Excuse me for being a virgin, I'm sorry!

UAStacy: Why didn't you to want me to know you were a virgin?

Hater: 'Cause it's personal business! It's my personal, private business!

Bug: Well, Hater, it doesn't look like you have any business.

UAStacy: I think it's OK for a guy to be a virgin.

[Bug and Hater stare at UAStacy]

Hater: Really?

[UAStacy nods yes]

MrBug708 · Post by **MrBug708** » Tue Oct 10, 2017 4:14 pm

Sit down Johnson.

To be fair, that wasn't me getting involved in the "you need to get laid" conversation.

threenumberones · Post by **threenumberones** » Tue Oct 10, 2017 5:52 pm

97cats wrote:
ASUHATER! wrote: Indeed he is. Only people that say that are the ones that need to get laid in my experience.
Bug: When have you ever gotten laid?

Hater: I've laid lots of times.

Bug: Name-one.

Hater: She lives in Canada. I met her at Niagra Falls; you wouldn't know her.

Bug: You ever laid anyone around here? [Hater, nervous that UAStacy might hear, motions for Bug to quiet down.] Oh...you and UAStacy did it...

UAStacy: What are you talking about?

Hater: Nothing, nothing. [to Bug] Let's just talk about it later, just drop it--

UAStacy: --No, drop what? What are you talking about?

Bug: Well, in addition the number of girls in the Niagra Falls area, that currently you and he are riding the hobby horse.

UAStacy: Little pig!

Hater: No, I'm not, I'm--Bug said I was I cherry, I said I wasn't! That's it! That's all that was said!

Bug: Well, then what were you motioning to UAStacy for?

UAStacy: You know, I don't appreciate this, Hater.

Hater: He is lying!

Bug: Oh, you weren't motioning to UAStacy ?

Hater: [hesitantly] You know he's lying, right?

Bug: Were you, or were you not, motioning to UAStacy ?

Hater: Yeah, but it's...it's because I didn't want her to know I was a virgin. [Bug and UAStacy stare at him for a moment.] Excuse me for being a virgin, I'm sorry!

UAStacy: Why didn't you to want me to know you were a virgin?

Hater: 'Cause it's personal business! It's my personal, private business!

Bug: Well, Hater, it doesn't look like you have any business.

UAStacy: I think it's OK for a guy to be a virgin.

[Bug and Hater stare at UAStacy]

Hater: Really?

[UAStacy nods yes]

well done

It’s ok hater put the flare gun down for christ’s sake.

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Wed Oct 11, 2017 9:16 am

97cats wrote:
ASUHATER! wrote: Indeed he is. Only people that say that are the ones that need to get laid in my experience.
Bug: When have you ever gotten laid?

Hater: I've laid lots of times.

Bug: Name-one.

Hater: She lives in Canada. I met her at Niagra Falls; you wouldn't know her.

Bug: You ever laid anyone around here? [Hater, nervous that UAStacy might hear, motions for Bug to quiet down.] Oh...you and UAStacy did it...

UAStacy: What are you talking about?

Hater: Nothing, nothing. [to Bug] Let's just talk about it later, just drop it--

UAStacy: --No, drop what? What are you talking about?

Bug: Well, in addition the number of girls in the Niagra Falls area, that currently you and he are riding the hobby horse.

UAStacy: Little pig!

Hater: No, I'm not, I'm--Bug said I was I cherry, I said I wasn't! That's it! That's all that was said!

Bug: Well, then what were you motioning to UAStacy for?

UAStacy: You know, I don't appreciate this, Hater.

Hater: He is lying!

Bug: Oh, you weren't motioning to UAStacy ?

Hater: [hesitantly] You know he's lying, right?

Bug: Were you, or were you not, motioning to UAStacy ?

Hater: Yeah, but it's...it's because I didn't want her to know I was a virgin. [Bug and UAStacy stare at him for a moment.] Excuse me for being a virgin, I'm sorry!

UAStacy: Why didn't you to want me to know you were a virgin?

Hater: 'Cause it's personal business! It's my personal, private business!

Bug: Well, Hater, it doesn't look like you have any business.

UAStacy: I think it's OK for a guy to be a virgin.

[Bug and Hater stare at UAStacy]

Hater: Really?

[UAStacy nods yes]

qwertyus · Post by **qwertyus** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 9:48 am

97cats wrote:
ASUHATER! wrote: Indeed he is. Only people that say that are the ones that need to get laid in my experience.
Bug: When have you ever gotten laid?

Hater: I've laid lots of times.

Bug: Name-one.

Hater: She lives in Canada. I met her at Niagra Falls; you wouldn't know her.

Bug: You ever laid anyone around here? [Hater, nervous that UAStacy might hear, motions for Bug to quiet down.] Oh...you and UAStacy did it...

UAStacy: What are you talking about?

Hater: Nothing, nothing. [to Bug] Let's just talk about it later, just drop it--

UAStacy: --No, drop what? What are you talking about?

Bug: Well, in addition the number of girls in the Niagra Falls area, that currently you and he are riding the hobby horse.

UAStacy: Little pig!

Hater: No, I'm not, I'm--Bug said I was I cherry, I said I wasn't! That's it! That's all that was said!

Bug: Well, then what were you motioning to UAStacy for?

UAStacy: You know, I don't appreciate this, Hater.

Hater: He is lying!

Bug: Oh, you weren't motioning to UAStacy ?

Hater: [hesitantly] You know he's lying, right?

Bug: Were you, or were you not, motioning to UAStacy ?

Hater: Yeah, but it's...it's because I didn't want her to know I was a virgin. [Bug and UAStacy stare at him for a moment.] Excuse me for being a virgin, I'm sorry!

UAStacy: Why didn't you to want me to know you were a virgin?

Hater: 'Cause it's personal business! It's my personal, private business!

Bug: Well, Hater, it doesn't look like you have any business.

UAStacy: I think it's OK for a guy to be a virgin.

[Bug and Hater stare at UAStacy]

Hater: Really?

[UAStacy nods yes]

Funny, but also kinda sad that you invested the time to write that.... and sorta sad that I invested the time to read it...

PHXCATS · Post by **PHXCATS** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 9:54 am

qwertyus wrote:
97cats wrote:
ASUHATER! wrote: Indeed he is. Only people that say that are the ones that need to get laid in my experience.
Bug: When have you ever gotten laid?

Hater: I've laid lots of times.

Bug: Name-one.

Hater: She lives in Canada. I met her at Niagra Falls; you wouldn't know her.

Bug: You ever laid anyone around here? [Hater, nervous that UAStacy might hear, motions for Bug to quiet down.] Oh...you and UAStacy did it...

UAStacy: What are you talking about?

Hater: Nothing, nothing. [to Bug] Let's just talk about it later, just drop it--

UAStacy: --No, drop what? What are you talking about?

Bug: Well, in addition the number of girls in the Niagra Falls area, that currently you and he are riding the hobby horse.

UAStacy: Little pig!

Hater: No, I'm not, I'm--Bug said I was I cherry, I said I wasn't! That's it! That's all that was said!

Bug: Well, then what were you motioning to UAStacy for?

UAStacy: You know, I don't appreciate this, Hater.

Hater: He is lying!

Bug: Oh, you weren't motioning to UAStacy ?

Hater: [hesitantly] You know he's lying, right?

Bug: Were you, or were you not, motioning to UAStacy ?

Hater: Yeah, but it's...it's because I didn't want her to know I was a virgin. [Bug and UAStacy stare at him for a moment.] Excuse me for being a virgin, I'm sorry!

UAStacy: Why didn't you to want me to know you were a virgin?

Hater: 'Cause it's personal business! It's my personal, private business!

Bug: Well, Hater, it doesn't look like you have any business.

UAStacy: I think it's OK for a guy to be a virgin.

[Bug and Hater stare at UAStacy]

Hater: Really?

[UAStacy nods yes]
Funny, but also kinda sad that you invested the time to write that.... and sorta sad that I invested the time to read it...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMtNNBf_1KQ" target="_blank

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 9:58 am

qwertyus wrote: Funny, but also kinda sad that you invested the time to write that

I must be showing my age, but surprised anyone didn't get that reference.

Is the Breakfast Club no longer iconic?

EVCat · Post by **EVCat** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 10:59 am

Merkin wrote:
qwertyus wrote: Funny, but also kinda sad that you invested the time to write that
I must be showing my age, but surprised anyone didn't get that reference.

Is the Breakfast Club no longer iconic?

I think a lot of us who just laughed but didn't comment got it. And pictured the movie as we read along...

My change in life is metaphorically noted in my reaction to this movie. As a teen, I pumped my fist with Bender. Now...? I think the principal is on the money...a large portion of this group are a bunch of little shits.

wyo-cat · Post by **wyo-cat** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:31 am

Mess with the bull, you get the horns.

qwertyus · Post by **qwertyus** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 12:14 pm

Merkin wrote:
qwertyus wrote: Funny, but also kinda sad that you invested the time to write that
I must be showing my age, but surprised anyone didn't get that reference.

Is the Breakfast Club no longer iconic?

I've never seen it.

I'm well-versed in spaghetti westerns, not iconic 80's movies, because Dad controlled the Netflix queue. I only saw the Goonies last year, for example.

azcat49 · Post by **azcat49** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 12:19 pm

wyo-cat wrote:Mess with the bull, you get the horns.

That is "some kind of wonderful" of a post Watts, I mean Wyo

whatisee · Post by **whatisee** » Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:31 pm

qwertyus wrote:
Merkin wrote:
qwertyus wrote: Funny, but also kinda sad that you invested the time to write that
I must be showing my age, but surprised anyone didn't get that reference.

Is the Breakfast Club no longer iconic?
I've never seen it.

I'm well-versed in spaghetti westerns, not iconic 80's movies, because Dad controlled the Netflix queue. I only saw the Goonies last year, for example.

What a horrible childhood you must have had

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Fri Oct 13, 2017 7:22 am

qwertyus wrote:
Merkin wrote:
qwertyus wrote: Funny, but also kinda sad that you invested the time to write that
I must be showing my age, but surprised anyone didn't get that reference.

Is the Breakfast Club no longer iconic?
I've never seen it.

I'm well-versed in spaghetti westerns, not iconic 80's movies, because Dad controlled the Netflix queue. I only saw the Goonies last year, for example.

Need to chill with your dad!

One of my all time favorite movie lines:

Tuco: When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk.

Sid · Post by **Sid** » Fri Oct 13, 2017 8:04 am

Merkin wrote:
qwertyus wrote:
Merkin wrote:
qwertyus wrote: Funny, but also kinda sad that you invested the time to write that
I must be showing my age, but surprised anyone didn't get that reference.

Is the Breakfast Club no longer iconic?
I've never seen it.

I'm well-versed in spaghetti westerns, not iconic 80's movies, because Dad controlled the Netflix queue. I only saw the Goonies last year, for example.
Need to chill with your dad!

One of my all time favorite movie lines:

Tuco: When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk.

One of the greatest films ever created!

Tuco: I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Fri Oct 13, 2017 8:31 am

If you have seen the extended edition with the restored "only in the Italian release" scenes check it out. Explains a lot, like how Angel Eyes ended up in the Union Army. The lines were recently redubbed in English.

Sid · Post by **Sid** » Fri Oct 13, 2017 8:59 am

Merkin wrote:If you have seen the extended edition with the restored "only in the Italian release" scenes check it out. Explains a lot, like how Angel Eyes ended up in the Union Army. The lines were recently redubbed in English.

Must see! Thanks Merkin

qwertyus · Post by **qwertyus** » Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:31 am

Sid wrote:
Merkin wrote:
qwertyus wrote:
Merkin wrote:
qwertyus wrote: Funny, but also kinda sad that you invested the time to write that
I must be showing my age, but surprised anyone didn't get that reference.

Is the Breakfast Club no longer iconic?
I've never seen it.

I'm well-versed in spaghetti westerns, not iconic 80's movies, because Dad controlled the Netflix queue. I only saw the Goonies last year, for example.
Need to chill with your dad!

One of my all time favorite movie lines:

Tuco: When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk.
One of the greatest films ever created!

Tuco: I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!

Tuco (reading the note): "See you soon, id...idi..."
Blondie:"Idiots". It's for you.

catgrad97 · Post by **catgrad97** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 6:48 am

Why work for a living when you kill yourselves working?

MrBug708 · Post by **MrBug708** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 10:04 pm

27 rushes for over 500 yards the past two games?

Crushing it.

azgreg · Post by **azgreg** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 10:25 pm

It's clear what he does with his legs but in the last 2 games he was 21 of 26 for 302 yards, 2 td's and zero picks thru the air.

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 10:55 pm

In Tate I trust!

As impressive as his run game is I was more impressive by Some of the tosses he has tonight!

wyo-cat · Post by **wyo-cat** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 10:59 pm

CalStateTempe wrote:In Tate I trust!

As impressive as his run game is I was more impressive by Some of the tosses he has tonight!

His pass down the sideline to Shun was amazing.

scumdevils86 · Post by **scumdevils86** » Sat Oct 14, 2017 11:17 pm

First qb since 1997 to rush for 200 yards in consecutive games

PieceOfMeat · Post by **PieceOfMeat** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 7:01 am

I do worry for his health since he seems to have a liking for taking the hard hit, but it sure is fun to watch him play.

Alieberman · Post by **Alieberman** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 8:01 am

I'm no head coach, but I think if I were I would name him our starter

azgreg · Post by **azgreg** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 9:44 am

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:26 am

Is he the starter yet or does RR continue the competitive advantage of not naming one yet?

scumdevils86 · Post by **scumdevils86** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:35 am

16.5 yards per carry

UAEebs86 · Post by **UAEebs86** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:44 am

CalStateTempe wrote:Is he the starter yet or does RR continue the competitive advantage of not naming one yet?

If I was an opposing team I'd be praying he starts Dawkins.

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:59 am

azgreg wrote:It's clear what he does with his legs but in the last 2 games he was 21 of 26 for 302 yards, 2 td's and zero picks thru the air.

Passing and the no turnovers is huge. It's been clear he's a dynamic athlete, but being a legit passing threat who avoids TO's takes him from Jerrard Randall to a dominant player.

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 12:02 pm

Just hope he can stay healthy since he doesn't shy from contact and isn't really big and built to take hits.

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 2:00 pm

Robert A Booey · Post by **Robert A Booey** » Sun Oct 15, 2017 7:10 pm

PieceOfMeat wrote:I do worry for his health since he seems to have a liking for taking the hard hit, but it sure is fun to watch him play.

Yep, I'm afraid that we're going to see Dawkins again if Tate doesn't start sliding.

BearDown89 · Post by **BearDown89** » Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:54 am

Yeah, he definitely needs to get down or out of bounds when warranted. That leaping and flipping over defenders along the sidelines has to stop. Just get out. Gives me a heart attack.

His arm has been surprising and impressive thus far. He's made some really nice throws at a variety of ranges. If that remains consistent then he's a real threat and defenses will have to account for everything.

Whose defense is a threat to contain him on the remaining schedule - Cal, WSU, SC, as the competition stiffens?

Login • Register