Re: are you SERIOUS?!?!
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:02 pm
...but Michigan TOTALLY made the right call to fire Rich Rod after only three years.
A co-op community for Arizona Fans
http://beardownwildcats.com/
hell yeah!JMarkJohns wrote:Thread that keeps on giving!
Hahahahah same here.AZCatGirl wrote:I've never been so happy to see the team called Zona.
there's the gif!Katzenfreund wrote:
Oh damn do I love this gif.Katzenfreund wrote:
A playoff contender you say......What it means: Good question. Let’s not all act surprised that the Pac-12 is eating itself alive. We’ve seen this year after year, so we shouldn’t be shocked. Obviously, the Wildcats will be ranked. Duh. At 5-0, they clearly have to considered a viable contender in the Pac-12 South and a playoff contender. For Oregon, it has to be back to business. There are plenty of opportunities for them to win the North Division, get to the Pac-12 championship game (maybe a rematch with the Wildcats?) and advance to the playoffs.
Not a shock to the Kool Aid drinkers!!!!PieceOfMeat wrote:hell yeah!JMarkJohns wrote:Thread that keeps on giving!
Yep, after less than 2 1/2 seasons RR has beat 3 top ten teams.azpenguin wrote:...but Michigan TOTALLY made the right call to fire Rich Rod after only three years.
A challenger appears!PieceOfMeat wrote:Just cause it's the first time I've seen it on a sports website (not counting this forum)
http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id ... -oregon-24
A playoff contender you say......What it means: Good question. Let’s not all act surprised that the Pac-12 is eating itself alive. We’ve seen this year after year, so we shouldn’t be shocked. Obviously, the Wildcats will be ranked. Duh. At 5-0, they clearly have to considered a viable contender in the Pac-12 South and a playoff contender. For Oregon, it has to be back to business. There are plenty of opportunities for them to win the North Division, get to the Pac-12 championship game (maybe a rematch with the Wildcats?) and advance to the playoffs.
Pac-12 refs remain the most inventive in the business. Both teams were the subjects of the officiating crew's creativity at various points, to widespread dismay.
Among many other things, each team had a drive-killing defensive stop ruined by a suspect penalty. Oregon got another crack at the end zone early after a Zona player, uh, spoke to a Duck. And the Wildcats punched in the go-ahead TD with three minutes to go after an Oregon player was flagged for celebrating a clutch third-down stop by taking a bow. TAKING A BOW.
No, Pac-12 refs. It is you who should take a bow.
ANGCatFan wrote:Here you go POM. There may be a simpler tech way, but I place the image on a image hosting site and size it for the message board.
USC game is so huge right now. Can't have a let down after beating a top team, like we have the last 2 years.
Now the Wildcats own the best win this season.
...
Arizona will be greeted with some degree of skepticism by pollsters in advance of the selection committee's "Hello, World" moment. The Wildcats 15 days before needed a Hail Mary pass to beat California, which didn't win a Pac-12 game last year, and had not been able to put away UTSA and Nevada until late in the fourth quarter. Yet with USC coming to town on Oct. 11, and road trips to Washington State and UCLA ahead, the Wildcats can quickly prove they are not one-hit wonders and establish legitimacy that would quash any skepticism.
I opened it to post about ASU's sure-to-be fail.... Got a little excited. Have to credit Strong though... never seen someone come in and steal a hail mary like that.PieceOfMeat wrote:what the hell, don't be posting about that team in this thread!
way to ruin good karma!
Or just another example of how ASU loves to copy us.PieceOfMeat wrote:what the hell, don't be posting about that team in this thread!
way to ruin good karma!
Forgive meazcat49 wrote:I agree with POM, get that ASSU Shit out of here and open it in another thread
Amazing!PieceOfMeat wrote:So....the last undefeated team in the pac 12 is....Arizona?!?!
are you SERIOUS?!?!
Who the hell saw this coming before the season started?
I wonder if larry scott is fuming.
it sure is, and awesome.UAdevil wrote:^ Wow. That's unreal to see.
In the first half, we received some BS call from the ref as well - the personal foul on 4th down because of taunting. Oregon continued the drive and got a TD. At least the refs were consistent..PieceOfMeat wrote:http://www.sbnation.com/college-footbal ... in/6659102Pac-12 refs remain the most inventive in the business. Both teams were the subjects of the officiating crew's creativity at various points, to widespread dismay.
Among many other things, each team had a drive-killing defensive stop ruined by a suspect penalty. Oregon got another crack at the end zone early after a Zona player, uh, spoke to a Duck. And the Wildcats punched in the go-ahead TD with three minutes to go after an Oregon player was flagged for celebrating a clutch third-down stop by taking a bow. TAKING A BOW.
No, Pac-12 refs. It is you who should take a bow.
Didn't the Duck player "bow" to the Arizona player? Can't remember if I read it here or elsewhere, but a bow is actually written into the rules as an example of taunting. Easy call actually if that is the case.NorthCtyCat wrote:In the first half, we received some BS call from the ref as well - the personal foul on 4th down because of taunting. Oregon continued the drive and got a TD. At least the refs were consistent..PieceOfMeat wrote:http://www.sbnation.com/college-footbal ... in/6659102Pac-12 refs remain the most inventive in the business. Both teams were the subjects of the officiating crew's creativity at various points, to widespread dismay.
Among many other things, each team had a drive-killing defensive stop ruined by a suspect penalty. Oregon got another crack at the end zone early after a Zona player, uh, spoke to a Duck. And the Wildcats punched in the go-ahead TD with three minutes to go after an Oregon player was flagged for celebrating a clutch third-down stop by taking a bow. TAKING A BOW.
No, Pac-12 refs. It is you who should take a bow.
NO. I think that he ran by the Arizona bench and then took his BOW at midfield. I could be mistaken too!Merkin wrote:Didn't the Duck player "bow" to the Arizona player? Can't remember if I read it here or elsewhere, but a bow is actually written into the rules as an example of taunting. Easy call actually if that is the case.NorthCtyCat wrote:In the first half, we received some BS call from the ref as well - the personal foul on 4th down because of taunting. Oregon continued the drive and got a TD. At least the refs were consistent..PieceOfMeat wrote:http://www.sbnation.com/college-footbal ... in/6659102Pac-12 refs remain the most inventive in the business. Both teams were the subjects of the officiating crew's creativity at various points, to widespread dismay.
Among many other things, each team had a drive-killing defensive stop ruined by a suspect penalty. Oregon got another crack at the end zone early after a Zona player, uh, spoke to a Duck. And the Wildcats punched in the go-ahead TD with three minutes to go after an Oregon player was flagged for celebrating a clutch third-down stop by taking a bow. TAKING A BOW.
No, Pac-12 refs. It is you who should take a bow.