cordera89 wrote:qwertyus wrote:cordera89 wrote:So were going to run the 4-2-5 defense then. You know the media really need to stop hyping it up like he a big deal. Sure it a good hired plus he young guys stepping in the shoes of trying to rebuild or let just say remodel our current defense. Question is going to say can he get the job done in the Pac 12 and South Division, Let alone of what accomplish at Boise State against non inferior opponent.
Is English your first language? Your posts are tough to read, for your information.
The question would always be if "insert coach" could get it done in the Pac 12. But, the bar set by Casteel is very low. And, the bar to succeed in the Pac 12 with RR's offense is also low. If he can get us to a 65th ranked defense, aka "average", we'll do very well in the conference.
Tell me this, Is that your best insult of the day is my English. Dude listen, RR gambling on this hired based off his recruiting, It isn't a huge hired it more of what Newport Cats said Walk Off grand slam Hired. Now the competition level is going to be different in what he about to face. This isn't the, MW where his defense was kicking every team ass in., This is PAC 12. He going to be tested in first game and conference play. Ok how long do you think that will take for him to get us at Average Defense. I want a competitive Defense that doesn't get their collective asses handle too on a daily basic. If he cant put a good product on the field then their going to be problem. Unless he like god good at his position because I wouldn't brag about how good of a recruiter he is until the result are in. If he know how to developed talent then that should be his first step.
I wasn't even trying to be insulting. I was just pointing out my difficulties with trying to decipher your posts. I considered a scenario that would explain your terrible sentence structure (or, more accurately, lack-thereof), and I asked a legitimate question. I'm on another message board, with possibly more non-native English speakers than native ones, and I've seen similar issues, which is also why I asked, because I can easily envision that scenario.
Now, to me you seem to have missed the main thrust of my argument. You were wondering why this was a good hire, and why people would hype him up before he's even coached a game. My response was, to put it simply, because he can't be
worse than
Casteel. He's got such a low bar to jump over, I would be very surprised if we don't see at least solid improvement, (e.g overall in the 80's) as early as
next year. As far as where he can take us in the medium-to-long term, that bar is
also low, because of how good the offense will be, year in and year out.