Re: Every. Damn. Time.
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 7:23 am
A co-op community for Arizona Fans
http://beardownwildcats.com/
Last year we recruited Josh Pollack. He's a freshman and was beat out.cpt wrote:Someone explain something to me...every year there is a game where the kicker decides the game. So why don't we put more effort into finding a good one? Skowdon is a walk-on. I want to hear on signing day that we recruited and signed a kicker. Instead we just seem to put our hands to the sky and see what falls out. And this is what we get for that approach.
Then he just got another shot to win the job. If this were the NFL, Skowdon would have a pink slip this morning.TuiTouchdown wrote:Last year we recruited Josh Pollack. He's a freshman and was beat out.cpt wrote:Someone explain something to me...every year there is a game where the kicker decides the game. So why don't we put more effort into finding a good one? Skowdon is a walk-on. I want to hear on signing day that we recruited and signed a kicker. Instead we just seem to put our hands to the sky and see what falls out. And this is what we get for that approach.
https://rivals.yahoo.com/arizona/footba ... ack-153538
cpt wrote:Someone explain something to me...every year there is a game where the kicker decides the game. So why don't we put more effort into finding a good one? Skowdon is a walk-on. I want to hear on signing day that we recruited and signed a kicker. Instead we just seem to put our hands to the sky and see what falls out. And this is what we get for that approach.
cpt wrote:Then he just got another shot to win the job. If this were the NFL, Skowdon would have a pink slip this morning.TuiTouchdown wrote:Last year we recruited Josh Pollack. He's a freshman and was beat out.cpt wrote:Someone explain something to me...every year there is a game where the kicker decides the game. So why don't we put more effort into finding a good one? Skowdon is a walk-on. I want to hear on signing day that we recruited and signed a kicker. Instead we just seem to put our hands to the sky and see what falls out. And this is what we get for that approach.
https://rivals.yahoo.com/arizona/footba ... ack-153538
Ah yes, that kicker was Keenen Crier I think. Was beastly as a freshman and then couldn't punt for his life as a Senior. Until this game Skowron was doing well. His first game, we thought our kicking problems were solved. I think and hope he bounces back. I loved his energy the first few games.Merkin wrote:It's not just not giving any thoughts into recruiting top notch kickers, it's the whole program doesn't even care at all about special teams. The ST coordinator is Charlie Ragle, who was operations director or whatever a couple years ago. High School coach Ragle was primary brought in to bring in kids from Chaparrel.
Joe Rob was SEC ST coach of the year and wanted to return to Arizona. RichRod said thanks, but no thanks.
Reminds me so much of the Stoops' years when Hammerschmidt was ST coordinator, like Ragle with no ST background. Just the low guy on the coaching totem pole so they gave him the kickers and punters.
The Zendejas fiasco was even worse than the Skowron one. The ASU missed PATs will go down as his legacy forever, but who can forget Zendejas' 0 yard punt? Forgot the kid's name, but remember that freshman punter that was really good? Hammerschmidt made him worse every succeeding year. Tried to get him to speed up his time from catch to punt, even thogh he never had one blocked.
Mackovic had Nick Folk (still kicking in the NFL) and Danny Baugher, who was a Ray Guy finalist and headed for the NFL until he messed up his knee.
Well, it's all three. We lost by two points. Improve either one of those three reasons and we win the game.cat77 wrote:Even though the kicking game was beyond madding last night that's not the main reason we lost this game. To me it goes back to not being able to score touchdowns in the red zone and defense being shredded.
Fair enough and I agree. My only point was this was not all on our kicker.Longhorned wrote:Well, it's all three. We lost by two points. Improve either one of those three reasons and we win the game.cat77 wrote:Even though the kicking game was beyond madding last night that's not the main reason we lost this game. To me it goes back to not being able to score touchdowns in the red zone and defense being shredded.
Last night Greg Byrne tweeted how much he supported Skowron. Why did he mention just Skowron? Anu overthrew downfield receivers all night. Saw several drops too by our WRs.cat77 wrote:Fair enough and I agree. My only point was this was not all on our kicker.Longhorned wrote:Well, it's all three. We lost by two points. Improve either one of those three reasons and we win the game.cat77 wrote:Even though the kicking game was beyond madding last night that's not the main reason we lost this game. To me it goes back to not being able to score touchdowns in the red zone and defense being shredded.
Good points. Need more players, especially on defense. We stockpile receivers and quartebacks and play 240 pound linemen.Daryl Zero wrote:I think you guys are/were crazy if you thought this was our year. Arizona does not have the defensive personnel to be a top team. The offense and luck can only take you so far and then the law of averages catches up. Even so with Arizona being over matched on both sides of the line, Arizona had a chance to win this game. They have a ton of heart and fight and that's why they have been doing so well. When is the last time we saw that before RR? The Stoops team that went to the Las Vegas Bowl and that was it.
I was at the game and the crowd was into it and didn't leave. Everything seemed to line up for a miracle but it didn't happen. I am not sure that Arizona beats UCLA or ASU. Arizona could also lose to WSU and Utah. But this offense is good and it will get better when Solomon gets better and can play consistently for most of a game. I'm pretty sure that RR will get his defensive depth within a year or two. That's when Arizona will be a terror. Right now it is still bandages and staples. But there was a lot to be excited about too.
Byrne tweeted support for Skowron because Casey was on the receiving end of a lot of disgusting abuse on Twitter. He missed a kick but he doesn't deserve to be told things like "I hope you get cancer and die." I'm glad to see the program and the players are sticking up for him. Matty D also tweeted about the idiots crucifying Casey. This is how it should be - no matter what, everyone's still got your back.Merkin wrote:Last night Greg Byrne tweeted how much he supported Skowron. Why did he mention just Skowron? Anu overthrew downfield receivers all night. Saw several drops too by our WRs.cat77 wrote:Fair enough and I agree. My only point was this was not all on our kicker.Longhorned wrote:Well, it's all three. We lost by two points. Improve either one of those three reasons and we win the game.cat77 wrote:Even though the kicking game was beyond madding last night that's not the main reason we lost this game. To me it goes back to not being able to score touchdowns in the red zone and defense being shredded.
Definitely a team loss.
azpenguin wrote:
Byrne tweeted support for Skowron because Casey was on the receiving end of a lot of disgusting abuse on Twitter. He missed a kick but he doesn't deserve to be told things like "I hope you get cancer and die." I'm glad to see the program and the players are sticking up for him. Matty D also tweeted about the idiots crucifying Casey. This is how it should be - no matter what, everyone's still got your back.
The Butcher wrote:We were in the red zone 8 times and scored on 4 of them. You really think this is all the kicker?
We should've beat USC by 21 pts. That's how often we camped on their side of the field. Skowron missed it. He shanked it to the right. It happens. Just soul crushing to happen at that point.
The one before on the time out was balls out down the middle. And if you notice the hold was different on the second one. Go back and look. The ball placement angle is different and sucked into the holders leg a little bit.
There is no excuse for missing a 36 yarder, but the hold should've been the same. And your holder should never place the ball and then look up, which is what he did. Keep your head down, man.
That slight placement difference and the pressure coming off the side that Skowron could actually see ended up in a shank.
Heart breaking.
+1The Butcher wrote:We were in the red zone 8 times and scored on 4 of them. You really think this is all the kicker?
We should've beat USC by 21 pts. That's how often we camped on their side of the field. Skowron missed it. He shanked it to the right. It happens. Just soul crushing to happen at that point.
The one before on the time out was balls out down the middle. And if you notice the hold was different on the second one. Go back and look. The ball placement angle is different and sucked into the holders leg a little bit.
There is no excuse for missing a 36 yarder, but the hold should've been the same. And your holder should never place the ball and then look up, which is what he did. Keep your head down, man.
That slight placement difference and the pressure coming off the side that Skowron could actually see ended up in a shank.
Heart breaking.
I think Wilson does make a difference, but I don't know how much of one. Running into the middle against usc wasn't ever going to be that productive. Shoulda got to the edge/outside a lot more.Daryl Zero wrote:
I think a large part of our red zone issues was our inability to run the ball. Left the team with few options. Grisby isn't' a power runner and he had trouble running all night as well as he got really beaten up. Might have done better if Wilson was healthy.
I have been following U of A football for 27 years, and this is the typical disappointing loss that always happens after a big victory. These losses also happen every time there are any expectations of more than just going to some backwater bowl game and beating ASU. I won't ever be "ecstatic" until a conference championship is achieved, and truth be told, I don't see that ever happening in my lifetime.btfd16 wrote:You guys need to chill tf out. We would all be ecstatic if you were told we were gonna be 5-1 in August
Really?? I've been following them about the same amount of time and I gotta say if the U wasn't serious about football they wouldn't have spent 70 something million on the stadium and would have kept Mike Stoops.az91 wrote:I have been following U of A football for 27 years, and this is the typical disappointing loss that always happens after a big victory. These losses also happen every time there are any expectations of more than just going to some backwater bowl game and beating ASU. I won't ever be "ecstatic" until a conference championship is achieved, and truth be told, I don't see that ever happening in my lifetime.btfd16 wrote:You guys need to chill tf out. We would all be ecstatic if you were told we were gonna be 5-1 in August
The U of A is not a football school and never will be. The team has to be competitive enough to sell tickets to generate revenue for the athletic department. The occasional upset of a true contender is good for that at least.
Jeez Ass91...you are definitely not going for "Fan of the year." Maybe this isn't your thing.az91 wrote:I have been following U of A football for 27 years, and this is the typical disappointing loss that always happens after a big victory. These losses also happen every time there are any expectations of more than just going to some backwater bowl game and beating ASU. I won't ever be "ecstatic" until a conference championship is achieved, and truth be told, I don't see that ever happening in my lifetime.btfd16 wrote:You guys need to chill tf out. We would all be ecstatic if you were told we were gonna be 5-1 in August
The U of A is not a football school and never will be. The team has to be competitive enough to sell tickets to generate revenue for the athletic department. The occasional upset of a true contender is good for that at least.
I mainly say that because Baker had much more success and he was more of a power runner.PieceOfMeat wrote:I think Wilson does make a difference, but I don't know how much of one. Running into the middle against usc wasn't ever going to be that productive. Shoulda got to the edge/outside a lot more.Daryl Zero wrote:
I think a large part of our red zone issues was our inability to run the ball. Left the team with few options. Grisby isn't' a power runner and he had trouble running all night as well as he got really beaten up. Might have done better if Wilson was healthy.
This is one of the things that got RR fired at Michigan. His Special Teams were the worse ever they lost a lot of games because of it.Merkin wrote:It's not just not giving any thoughts into recruiting top notch kickers, it's the whole program doesn't even care at all about special teams. The ST coordinator is Charlie Ragle, who was operations director or whatever a couple years ago. High School coach Ragle was primary brought in to bring in kids from Chaparrel.
Joe Rob was SEC ST coach of the year and wanted to return to Arizona. RichRod said thanks, but no thanks.
Reminds me so much of the Stoops' years when Hammerschmidt was ST coordinator, like Ragle with no ST background. Just the low guy on the coaching totem pole so they gave him the kickers and punters.
The Zendejas fiasco was even worse than the Skowron one. The ASU missed PATs will go down as his legacy forever, but who can forget Zendejas' 0 yard punt? Forgot the kid's name, but remember that freshman punter that was really good? Hammerschmidt made him worse every succeeding year. Tried to get him to speed up his time from catch to punt, even thogh he never had one blocked.
Mackovic had Nick Folk (still kicking in the NFL) and Danny Baugher, who was a Ray Guy finalist and headed for the NFL until he messed up his knee.
Baker isn't a power runner. TJG is more of a power runner than him and so is Nick. Baker is our fastest RB and I'm still now sure why we didn't try and get him on the edge more (That's where Boston College got most of their rushing yards). I don't know if Nick would have made much a difference honestly. He didn't do to hot against Cal and USC used the same defensive game plan as them, but with a lot more talent.Daryl Zero wrote:I mainly say that because Baker had much more success and he was more of a power runner.PieceOfMeat wrote:I think Wilson does make a difference, but I don't know how much of one. Running into the middle against usc wasn't ever going to be that productive. Shoulda got to the edge/outside a lot more.Daryl Zero wrote:
I think a large part of our red zone issues was our inability to run the ball. Left the team with few options. Grisby isn't' a power runner and he had trouble running all night as well as he got really beaten up. Might have done better if Wilson was healthy.
I hope he does, since the UA doesn't seem to have anyone else. Going to be all mental after the USC game. Every coach from now on will try to ice him each critical kick.carcassdragger wrote:Casey will bounce back. He missed. He's human, but I think he'll come back and be a great kicker.
As far as what I saw Baker is more of a power runner. Grisby was being slammed right at the line. Baker pushed through initial tackle attempts.catinfl wrote:Baker isn't a power runner. TJG is more of a power runner than him and so is Nick. Baker is our fastest RB and I'm still now sure why we didn't try and get him on the edge more (That's where Boston College got most of their rushing yards). I don't know if Nick would have made much a difference honestly. He didn't do to hot against Cal and USC used the same defensive game plan as them, but with a lot more talent.Daryl Zero wrote:I mainly say that because Baker had much more success and he was more of a power runner.PieceOfMeat wrote:I think Wilson does make a difference, but I don't know how much of one. Running into the middle against usc wasn't ever going to be that productive. Shoulda got to the edge/outside a lot more.Daryl Zero wrote:
I think a large part of our red zone issues was our inability to run the ball. Left the team with few options. Grisby isn't' a power runner and he had trouble running all night as well as he got really beaten up. Might have done better if Wilson was healthy.
RazorsEdgeAZ wrote:
no prob. if we can't laugh, we'd have to cry right?Puerco wrote:Lol, I just saw the gif in the OP. I laughed out loud. For a long time. Thanks, POM. That was great.
Chicat wrote:Wait, people are really blaming Casey? C'mon now...
It's not the kicker's fault that we bog down in the red zone. Turn those FG attempts into TDs and we are 6-0.
Skowron began receiving angry messages via Twitter ... one person wrote that she hopes Casey and his whole family "dies of cancer."
But TMZ Sports has spoken with multiple people from the U of A football program who tell us they have Skowron's back no matter what.
"We stand by him 110% percent," linebacker Scooby Wright III tells us ... "he is our kicker and most of all a great person and a great teammate."
We also spoke with Associate Athletic Director Molly Omara who tells us the people behind the threats are "just cowards who are targeting a 20-year-old student athlete."
She adds, "He knows he’s got the team and his football family’s support."
Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2014/10/13/universit ... z3G34VZqyd
Because it's pretty funny.Merkin wrote:Why did TMZ have to show the Skowron flopping image of all the ones they could have used?
It wasn't a hard find for me, I just read Machina's post two posts above mine who got it from Razorsedge above him. The real thanks is to Dave DeLuca for his video. Great job calling out the internet trash.azpenguin wrote:Great find, ANG. I am horrified at the idiocy that's being sent Skowron's way - and proud as hell to see everyone, from Byrne on down, get his back.
Would have preferred the one that shows the contact.Merkin wrote:Why did TMZ have to show the Skowron flopping image of all the ones they could have used?
It is, that flop was hilariously bad.Chicat wrote:Because it's pretty funny.Merkin wrote:Why did TMZ have to show the Skowron flopping image of all the ones they could have used?