2016 Season Thread
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2015 6:23 pm
A co-op community for Arizona Fans
http://beardownwildcats.com/
Saw a couple tweets stating that the PAC will give UA a bye week THE VERY FIRST WEEK!azgreg wrote:BYE WEEK!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The game is in Glendale.Merkin wrote:Can't imagine the fair weather fans loving the Grambling and Hawaii games.
BYU should be a good game between 2 middling programs. Maybe the Mormons from Mesa will come on down.
Prediction: if we're 4-4 at some point next season, then RichRod's seat is going to be warm.azcat49 wrote:Start the conference against the best coach (IMO) and defense in Washington. Follow that up with UCLA and Utah on the road, USC and Furd. My goodness it could get ugly early even with an improved team
It would seem like there's a pretty decent chance that, after those first eight games, we're basically 4-4 plus or minus one. So if the reality is that 4-4 warms the seat, it would seem like there's a pretty decent chance that will occur.Puerco wrote:Prediction: if we're 4-4 at some point next season, then RichRod's seat is going to be warm.
AgreeSCCats wrote:It would seem like there's a pretty decent chance that, after those first eight games, we're basically 4-4 plus or minus one. So if the reality is that 4-4 warms the seat, it would seem like there's a pretty decent chance that will occur.Puerco wrote:Prediction: if we're 4-4 at some point next season, then RichRod's seat is going to be warm.
Now I also think how it occurs will be important. For example if, during that tough four game stretch (ucla, Utah, usc, furd) we're giving up 42-56 points a game having retained Casteel as our DC, then that might well be hotter than just warm. That might already be moving toward riot zone.
And it should...SCCats wrote:It would seem like there's a pretty decent chance that, after those first eight games, we're basically 4-4 plus or minus one. So if the reality is that 4-4 warms the seat, it would seem like there's a pretty decent chance that will occur.Puerco wrote:Prediction: if we're 4-4 at some point next season, then RichRod's seat is going to be warm.
Now I also think how it occurs will be important. For example if, during that tough four game stretch (ucla, Utah, usc, furd) we're giving up 42-56 points a game having retained Casteel as our DC, then that might well be hotter than just warm. That might already be moving toward riot zone.
Agree w/ SCCat - I think style points do matter in those games if we lose them. If we lose 3-4 heartbreakers, I don't think anybody's seat should be warm. If we get our doors blown off in more than one game....yeah, something needs to change in a big way.Harvey Specter wrote:And it should...SCCats wrote:It would seem like there's a pretty decent chance that, after those first eight games, we're basically 4-4 plus or minus one. So if the reality is that 4-4 warms the seat, it would seem like there's a pretty decent chance that will occur.Puerco wrote:Prediction: if we're 4-4 at some point next season, then RichRod's seat is going to be warm.
Now I also think how it occurs will be important. For example if, during that tough four game stretch (ucla, Utah, usc, furd) we're giving up 42-56 points a game having retained Casteel as our DC, then that might well be hotter than just warm. That might already be moving toward riot zone.
For fucks sake, give it a rest. Yes, it is a business, just like any other. The sport of football in college only made $3.4 billion in revenue last year. They don't fire coaches for school pride, they fire them because they cost the schools money.MrMeow wrote:I haven't taken the time to look at each Pac12 team's 2016 schedule, however, I doubt UA's in-conference schedule is any more or less difficult than anyone else's. In 2016 UA will have the coveted bye week, three OOC cupcakes for warm- up, a team made of RR's recruits, and a coaching staff put together (and kept together) by RR. So, 2016 should be an excellent measure of RR's abilities as a coach. He's had the time he complained Michigan didn't give him. He has the facilities GB promised. He has his $1mm artificial playing surface. RR hasn't been slighted anywhere, not even by the Conference (no bye week). So, it's all on RR now. It will be interesting to see how he does ... or doesn't. It's just a business, right?
What did I spin?Fishclamps wrote:For fucks sake, give it a rest. Yes, it is a business, just like any other. The sport of football in college only made $3.4 billion in revenue last year. They don't fire coaches for school pride, they fire them because they cost the schools money.MrMeow wrote:I haven't taken the time to look at each Pac12 team's 2016 schedule, however, I doubt UA's in-conference schedule is any more or less difficult than anyone else's. In 2016 UA will have the coveted bye week, three OOC cupcakes for warm- up, a team made of RR's recruits, and a coaching staff put together (and kept together) by RR. So, 2016 should be an excellent measure of RR's abilities as a coach. He's had the time he complained Michigan didn't give him. He has the facilities GB promised. He has his $1mm artificial playing surface. RR hasn't been slighted anywhere, not even by the Conference (no bye week). So, it's all on RR now. It will be interesting to see how he does ... or doesn't. It's just a business, right?
We get it, you don't like him and want him gone. Sadly for you, he's here one more year at least.
I get the feeling no matter what he does this year, good or bad, you'll be able to spin it that he's a giant piece of shit that needs to pack his bags and go.
looks like you haven't had your enema yet.ASUHATER! wrote:I'm absolutely positive that mrmeow has some kind of personal vendetta against RR
I'd love for someone to highlight (in boldface text) the parts of the post above that are "spin".MrMeow wrote:I haven't taken the time to look at each Pac12 team's 2016 schedule, however, I doubt UA's in-conference schedule is any more or less difficult than anyone else's. In 2016 UA will have the coveted bye week, three OOC cupcakes for warm- up, a team made of RR's recruits, and a coaching staff put together (and kept together) by RR. So, 2016 should be an excellent measure of RR's abilities as a coach. He's had the time he complained Michigan didn't give him. He has the facilities GB promised. He has his $1mm artificial playing surface. RR hasn't been slighted anywhere, not even by the Conference (no bye week). So, it's all on RR now. It will be interesting to see how he does ... or doesn't. It's just a business, right?
Fine... So the University contributes 7% of revenues to pay his salary, which is >10% of them altogether; the point remains the same.wyo-cat wrote:Harv, the U is on the hook for about 2 Mil of RR's money, so he's paid closer to 6% than 10, if 30 is the gross. I'm not sure what the gross is, quite honestly it doesn't matter. RR is paid on a national market, not in regard to what the U makes on FB.
No one expects anyone to shed a tear over any FBS coaches salary. They get paid to do a job, and if they suck at it, they get fired. Apparently GB felt RR had fuck all for luck this year, and feels like he deserves another chance. Deal with it, save your hate for next season cause this one is done.Harvey Specter wrote:Fine... So the University contributes 7% of revenues to pay his salary, which is >10% of them altogether; the point remains the same.wyo-cat wrote:Harv, the U is on the hook for about 2 Mil of RR's money, so he's paid closer to 6% than 10, if 30 is the gross. I'm not sure what the gross is, quite honestly it doesn't matter. RR is paid on a national market, not in regard to what the U makes on FB.
I am not singling out RR with that view on coaching salaries as a % of revenues; the amount that coaches are paid relative to the revenue they are responsible for generating is completely ridiculous.
It is because - to the constituency that coaches serve - there is an emotional investment in the product. Nothing in life is free; they all get paid more than they are worth, and have to deal with added scrutiny and criticism on a variety of fronts as a result; they also get ridiculous sums of money when they are terminated for poor performance. Don't expect me to shed a tear for any of them.
Umm... machina is kneeling beside you worshipping Rich Rod. #BirdsOfAFeatherFishclamps wrote:No one expects anyone to shed a tear over any FBS coaches salary. They get paid to do a job, and if they suck at it, they get fired. Apparently GB felt RR had fuck all for luck this year, and feels like he deserves another chance. Deal with it, save your hate for next season cause this one is done.Harvey Specter wrote:Fine... So the University contributes 7% of revenues to pay his salary, which is >10% of them altogether; the point remains the same.wyo-cat wrote:Harv, the U is on the hook for about 2 Mil of RR's money, so he's paid closer to 6% than 10, if 30 is the gross. I'm not sure what the gross is, quite honestly it doesn't matter. RR is paid on a national market, not in regard to what the U makes on FB.
I am not singling out RR with that view on coaching salaries as a % of revenues; the amount that coaches are paid relative to the revenue they are responsible for generating is completely ridiculous.
It is because - to the constituency that coaches serve - there is an emotional investment in the product. Nothing in life is free; they all get paid more than they are worth, and have to deal with added scrutiny and criticism on a variety of fronts as a result; they also get ridiculous sums of money when they are terminated for poor performance. Don't expect me to shed a tear for any of them.
Couple people on here approaching Machina levels of disgust with our coach.
So wait RR interviews with SC and on the way back decides he wants Arizona.Harvey Specter wrote:Umm... machina is kneeling beside you worshipping Rich Rod. #BirdsOfAFeatherFishclamps wrote:No one expects anyone to shed a tear over any FBS coaches salary. They get paid to do a job, and if they suck at it, they get fired. Apparently GB felt RR had fuck all for luck this year, and feels like he deserves another chance. Deal with it, save your hate for next season cause this one is done.Harvey Specter wrote:Fine... So the University contributes 7% of revenues to pay his salary, which is >10% of them altogether; the point remains the same.wyo-cat wrote:Harv, the U is on the hook for about 2 Mil of RR's money, so he's paid closer to 6% than 10, if 30 is the gross. I'm not sure what the gross is, quite honestly it doesn't matter. RR is paid on a national market, not in regard to what the U makes on FB.
I am not singling out RR with that view on coaching salaries as a % of revenues; the amount that coaches are paid relative to the revenue they are responsible for generating is completely ridiculous.
It is because - to the constituency that coaches serve - there is an emotional investment in the product. Nothing in life is free; they all get paid more than they are worth, and have to deal with added scrutiny and criticism on a variety of fronts as a result; they also get ridiculous sums of money when they are terminated for poor performance. Don't expect me to shed a tear for any of them.
Couple people on here approaching Machina levels of disgust with our coach.
I don't think he deserves to get fired after this season, and have never even suggested it. Another season like this one, however...
Machina hates Miller, I love him. I judge coaches on what they actually (and consistently) accomplish.
Apples and oranges. My loyalty to RR dropped when it was confirmed he has none to us. But my judgment of his effectiveness is based on the numbers. He is what his record says he is IMO... But then again I am not a cuckold.
It's an easier schedule than this yearPieceOfMeat wrote:I thought 8 wins (prior to bowl game) was goingto happen this year....but it looks worse than that to me for next year.
One of the worst defenses in all of FBS football against that schedule? Not good.
Totally different circumstances, reasons, and places. Apples to oranges. You would do well to educate yourself before you further embarrass yourself.Fishclamps wrote:So wait RR interviews with SC and on the way back decides he wants Arizona.Harvey Specter wrote:Umm... machina is kneeling beside you worshipping Rich Rod. #BirdsOfAFeatherFishclamps wrote:No one expects anyone to shed a tear over any FBS coaches salary. They get paid to do a job, and if they suck at it, they get fired. Apparently GB felt RR had fuck all for luck this year, and feels like he deserves another chance. Deal with it, save your hate for next season cause this one is done.Harvey Specter wrote:Fine... So the University contributes 7% of revenues to pay his salary, which is >10% of them altogether; the point remains the same.wyo-cat wrote:Harv, the U is on the hook for about 2 Mil of RR's money, so he's paid closer to 6% than 10, if 30 is the gross. I'm not sure what the gross is, quite honestly it doesn't matter. RR is paid on a national market, not in regard to what the U makes on FB.
I am not singling out RR with that view on coaching salaries as a % of revenues; the amount that coaches are paid relative to the revenue they are responsible for generating is completely ridiculous.
It is because - to the constituency that coaches serve - there is an emotional investment in the product. Nothing in life is free; they all get paid more than they are worth, and have to deal with added scrutiny and criticism on a variety of fronts as a result; they also get ridiculous sums of money when they are terminated for poor performance. Don't expect me to shed a tear for any of them.
Couple people on here approaching Machina levels of disgust with our coach.
I don't think he deserves to get fired after this season, and have never even suggested it. Another season like this one, however...
Machina hates Miller, I love him. I judge coaches on what they actually (and consistently) accomplish.
Apples and oranges. My loyalty to RR dropped when it was confirmed he has none to us. But my judgment of his effectiveness is based on the numbers. He is what his record says he is IMO... But then again I am not a cuckold.
Miller interviews with Maryland and on the way back decides he wants Arizona.
One is an unloyal piece of shit, the other is the savior of Arizona sports?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Or we could just keep 1 OC.UAEebs86 wrote:Might need a new OC:
I actually don't think it's that bad. We have to play some tough teams because there are tough teams in the Pac. That said, we have a lot of home games early, OSU and WSU are winnable road games against the North and we get ASU at home.PieceOfMeat wrote:I thought 8 wins (prior to bowl game) was goingto happen this year....but it looks worse than that to me for next year.
One of the worst defenses in all of FBS football against that schedule? Not good.
I agree he has done a great job in Tucson during his time here. Especially with Denker - and Scott, too.Merkin wrote:That's going to be a tough loss, not so much as OC since RR handles that, but as QB coach. He has done amazing work in Tucson, and also Ann Arbor.
To be fair, both Pat White and Denard Robinson are in the top 5 for rushing yards career by a qb. He did very good things with qbs that couldn't throw for shit. A qb can still be a very good FBS qb if they substitute their lack of passing ability with a rushing ability.Harvey Specter wrote:I agree he has done a great job in Tucson during his time here. Especially with Denker - and Scott, too.Merkin wrote:That's going to be a tough loss, not so much as OC since RR handles that, but as QB coach. He has done amazing work in Tucson, and also Ann Arbor.
I disagree on Ann Arbor; most here point to Shoelaces. He was an amazing athlete who made some great plays, but I thought he was (at best) a sub-standard BCS-level QB.
Anu has been inconsistent, good at times, awful at others. He has good numbers partially due to RR's system, however, he has been nobody's idea of a polished QB. Is this on Anu, or is it on Smith, or a little of each?Harvey Specter wrote:I agree he has done a great job in Tucson during his time here. Especially with Denker - and Scott, too.Merkin wrote:That's going to be a tough loss, not so much as OC since RR handles that, but as QB coach. He has done amazing work in Tucson, and also Ann Arbor.
I disagree on Ann Arbor; most here point to Shoelaces. He was an amazing athlete who made some great plays, but I thought he was (at best) a sub-standard BCS-level QB.
Ummm... that should have absolutely zero bearing on his decision to return or declare, but it's his decision and he can use whatever criteria he wants.UAEebs86 wrote:Cayleb Jones tweeted yesterday that if his brother Isaiah stays another year at East Carolina (he's a junior) he will come back as well.