Page 1 of 1
64 Nathan Eldridge
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2018 6:55 am
by ANGCatFan
Eldridge is 6-3, 292, redshirt Junior from Anthem, AZ. He has started every game for the last 2 years at center and should be one of the leaders on the offensive side of the ball. Last year, Eldridge was named 2nd team all-conference by the AP and an honorable mention by the coaches. This year he has already been named to the Rimington Trophy watch list. With all of the loses we had on the offensive line, returning Eldridge may be the key to building a successful unit this year.
6,3
64 was Arizona's total offensive production last year to lead the conference. By comparison, last year Texas A&M had 5,289 yards of total offense.
Re: 64 Nathan Eldridge
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:26 pm
by dmjcat
Re: 64 Nathan Eldridge
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 9:27 pm
by Carcassdragger
Damn Nathan, we need you. Please reconsider.
Re: 64 Nathan Eldridge
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 9:35 pm
by Merkin
Don't blame him if he is going may be 3rd on the depth chart. I imagine ntOSU promised him a starting position.
Re: 64 Nathan Eldridge
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2018 7:03 am
by Tatanka
He was kicked off the team months ago after failing multiple drug tests.
Re: 64 Nathan Eldridge
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2018 9:29 pm
by tgrumpy2
Carcassdragger wrote:Damn Nathan, we need you. Please reconsider.
No we don't. Quit begging, its pathetic.
Re: 64 Nathan Eldridge
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 10:12 am
by Carcassdragger
Uhh. In case you hadn't noticed, we suck. A veteran second team all conference with the watch lists he was on? Think again.
Re: 64 Nathan Eldridge
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 12:35 pm
by whatisee
He's been replaced already. Sucks if this is over weed. More concerned about replacing Friekh
Re: 64 Nathan Eldridge
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2018 6:21 pm
by tgrumpy2
Carcassdragger wrote:Uhh. In case you hadn't noticed, we suck. A veteran second team all conference with the watch lists he was on? Think again.
I thought again and we still don't need him. Like whatisee said, he's been replaced. Move on and lets worry about what we do have and not what we aren't gonna have. In case you hadn't noticed we led the conference in rushing.
Re: 64 Nathan Eldridge
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 5:52 pm
by ChooChooCat
whatisee wrote:He's been replaced already. Sucks if this is over weed. More concerned about replacing Friekh
I think Laie is going to be a very good LT for us the next few years.
As far as Eldridge goes he was pretty much replaced by McCauley and with Congel being eligible next year he was completely replaced altogether.