Page 1 of 1

pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 3:44 pm
by ASUHATER!
Actually not that even. We skip cal and Stanford 4 times from 2011-2018 and the Washington/Oregon schools only twice. Ucla and usc skip Oregon 4 times though. Is it because the rotations were messed up when ucla and usc insisted on playing cal and Stanford every year? Our "skips"

2011/12: California and Washington state
2013/14: Stanford and Oregon state
2015/16: Oregon and California
2017/18: Stanford and Washington

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 3:54 pm
by jollything
ASUHATER! wrote:Actually not that even. We skip cal and Stanford 4 times from 2011-2018 and the Washington/Oregon schools only twice. Ucla and usc skip Oregon 4 times though. Is it because the rotations were messed up when ucla and usc insisted on playing cal and Stanford every year? Our "skips"

2011/12: California and Washington state
2013/14: Stanford and Oregon state
2015/16: Oregon and California
2017/18: Stanford and Washington

Our sched gets somewhat tougher in 15/16 it seems. Hope RR has this train rolling.

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 4:01 pm
by ASUHATER!
jollything wrote:
ASUHATER! wrote:Actually not that even. We skip cal and Stanford 4 times from 2011-2018 and the Washington/Oregon schools only twice. Ucla and usc skip Oregon 4 times though. Is it because the rotations were messed up when ucla and usc insisted on playing cal and Stanford every year? Our "skips"

2011/12: California and Washington state
2013/14: Stanford and Oregon state
2015/16: Oregon and California
2017/18: Stanford and Washington

Our sched gets somewhat tougher in 15/16 it seems. Hope RR has this train rolling.
As far as I can tell in 2015 our schedule will be nau, utsa, @Nevada, Utah, ucla, @usc, @Colorado, @asu, Washington state, @Washington, Stanford, @Oregon state.

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 4:15 pm
by jollything
ASUHATER! wrote:
jollything wrote:
ASUHATER! wrote:Actually not that even. We skip cal and Stanford 4 times from 2011-2018 and the Washington/Oregon schools only twice. Ucla and usc skip Oregon 4 times though. Is it because the rotations were messed up when ucla and usc insisted on playing cal and Stanford every year? Our "skips"

2011/12: California and Washington state
2013/14: Stanford and Oregon state
2015/16: Oregon and California
2017/18: Stanford and Washington

Our sched gets somewhat tougher in 15/16 it seems. Hope RR has this train rolling.
As far as I can tell in 2015 our schedule will be nau, utsa, @Nevada, Utah, ucla, @usc, @Colorado, @asu, Washington state, @Washington, Stanford, @Oregon state.
Skipping Ore is good (not sure if Stan is a 1 for 1 replacement for Ore), missing another somewhat cupcake game in Cal, and replacing them with a team we have had trouble with in the last few years kinda sucks.

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 4:40 pm
by BearDown89
I don't know jack about scheduling, but missing a team two years in a row really sucks. Especially marquee conference teams like Stanford and Oregon. Lame.

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 5:07 pm
by ASUHATER!
Yeah for 6 straight years we'll be missing either Stanford or Oregon.

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 5:42 pm
by ElGatoBlanco
The California schools demanded their rivalries remain in tact every season in football. It is what it is.

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 5:57 pm
by MountainCat
So from what I am seeing - we MUST beat Oregon at their place this year to make it two years in a row. That way they will have to wait three years to play us again. It will eat them alive.

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:13 pm
by Irish27
Missing Stanford and Oregon State this year is a plus.

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 6:15 pm
by azgreg
I miss the round robin schedule.

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 2:39 pm
by azgreg

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:03 pm
by Merkin
Didn't Cal make a cool mil going down under?

Might be some good recruits down there.

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:04 pm
by ASUHATER!
as long as it's a road game and not a home game we'd give up i'd be fine with it.

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:28 pm
by dirtbags
Merkin wrote:Didn't Cal make a cool mil going down under?

Might be some good recruits down there.
it was over a mil after expenses. i know RR hates long trips, but he should suck it up and take the opportunity. gotta narrow that gap with ucla's gigantic pile of endorsement cash, no matter how marginally

and if RR is clever, maybe he could suit kor and ferg up for us :D

ImageImage

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:24 pm
by Irish27
I hope they don't go to Australia. In 1986 the Cats travelled to Japan after beating asu and lost to Stanford on a field where the lines were hard to see.

Re: pac 12 schedule rotations

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2016 8:08 pm
by MrBug708
ASUHATER! wrote:Actually not that even. We skip cal and Stanford 4 times from 2011-2018 and the Washington/Oregon schools only twice. Ucla and usc skip Oregon 4 times though. Is it because the rotations were messed up when ucla and usc insisted on playing cal and Stanford every year? Our "skips"

2011/12: California and Washington state
2013/14: Stanford and Oregon state
2015/16: Oregon and California
2017/18: Stanford and Washington
I hate it too, but Cal/Stanford wanted the LA market. I don't think USC and UCLA cared enough to hold things up, but California brothers in arms I guess. Unless you had a different source?

I only found this blurb from Miller about who wanted it.
Second, Stanford and Cal need to end this silly "We must play USC and UCLA every year!" deal. Hey, I get it. Some fans enjoy the weekender. But -- come closer, because I want to whisper to you an embarrassing truth -- IT"S STUPID TO INSIST ON PLAYING USC EVERY YEAR! (Whoops... did I just yell that?) And, heck, UCLA should eventually get back into the top-25.
http://cdn.espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/ ... -schedules" target="_blank