4Chan

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:52 pm

So... who's got the celebrity nudez?

Longhorned · Post by **Longhorned** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:54 pm

Is this like one of those adult stores next to the gas station in the corn fields?

NYCat · Post by **NYCat** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:59 pm

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 6:49 pm

UPDATE: 7:31 p.m., ET: A spokesperson for Jennifer Lawrence released a statement to BuzzFeed confirming the pictures.

“This is a flagrant violation of privacy. The authorities have been contacted and will prosecute anyone who posts the stolen photos of Jennifer Lawrence,” they said in an email.

NYCat · Post by **NYCat** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 6:55 pm

I hope they do, but just like when Beyonce threatened to go after everyone on the internet for posting an unflattering picture of her during her performance at the super bowl, its just impossible to do.

PS: Justin Verlander is a legend, cheating on Kate Upton.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:22 pm

The Upton & Lawrence stuff seems to be the best of the bunch (even with Verlander 's fat ass in one of the pics).

So, supposedly there are videos too.

Main Event · Post by **Main Event** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:33 pm

@ the fappening

Longhorned · Post by **Longhorned** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:41 pm

This is kind of sad and pathetic.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:43 pm

Longhorned wrote:This is kind of sad and pathetic.

Don't talk about Upton's midsection that way!!!

Alieberman · Post by **Alieberman** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:58 pm

Longhorned wrote:This is kind of sad and pathetic.

I agree. Some of the links aren't working.

scumdevils86 · Post by **scumdevils86** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:24 pm

Interesting

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:26 pm

The Verlander Upton pic is hilarious.

She also has a wee-wee shot of Justin in one of her albums.

unnecessary commentary omitted.

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:29 pm

Hilary Duff, MILF!

Nice looking cooter on Kate. She should def be a porn star.

Dick alert, you have been warned.

Longhorned · Post by **Longhorned** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:45 pm

So basically the worst kind of nerds invade people's cell phones and take images never conceived for public consumption to post all over the internet? This is like that sociopath who hid the camera in whatshername's hotel room, which somehow almost cost her her career. There's a difference between porn and this, even if it looks similar once it's passed around and linked at urinal.com or whatever.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 8:50 pm

Longhorned wrote:So basically the worst kind of nerds invade people's cell phones and take images never conceived for public consumption to post all over the internet? This is like that sociopath who hid the camera in whatshername's hotel room, which somehow almost cost her her career. There's a difference between porn and this, even if it looks similar once it's passed around and linked at urinal.com or whatever.

Yes, all of this.

Reydituto · Post by **Reydituto** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:08 pm

Main Event wrote: @ the fappening

Name made me laugh too.

I think know what Killervibe is doing right about now ... he loved him some Jennifer Lawrence even more than I did ...

Also, now I know what it could have been like to be like "Chuck" ...

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:19 pm

Longhorned wrote:So basically the worst kind of nerds invade people's cell phones and take images never conceived for public consumption to post all over the internet?

As a general rule, I never put anything on my cellphone that I is not met for public consumption.

I only use vintage polaroid cameras to send dick pix to my girlfriend just in case my wife figures out my cell phone unlock code.

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:23 pm

Apparently the iCloud encryption was down when the nerd attacked and obtained all these photos.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:27 pm

Apple has to be shitting in its collective pants.

PieceOfMeat · Post by **PieceOfMeat** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:31 pm

CalStateTempe wrote:Apparently the iCloud encryption was down when the nerd attacked and obtained all these photos.

Not being a super-geek-techy person....I wonder how the hell can that even happen?

Chicat wrote:Apple has to be shitting in its collective pants.

One would assume so.

CalStateTempe · Post by **CalStateTempe** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:47 pm

http://www.businessinsider.com/4chan-nu ... eak-2014-8

I don't know if it was hack or breach of defenses, but iCloud is implicated.

http://mashable.com/2014/08/31/how-safe-is-icloud/

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Sun Aug 31, 2014 10:01 pm

Upton is even hotter now (if you crop out verlander) and jlaw is very nice

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:32 am

Is it weird that I have no real desire to look? Other than being celebrities, it isn't like this isn't available all over the rest of the internet. Then there's kind of a skeevy factor.

Plus, I don't know who Victoria Justice, etc. are? I know Upton, have heard of Lawrence (don't think I've seen her in a movie) but beyond that I'm drawing some blanks.

Yet pretty much every internet site has an article or thread devoted.

Merkin · Post by **Merkin** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:34 am

Spaceman Spiff wrote: have heard of Lawrence (don't think I've seen her in a movie)

Check out Winter's Bone and Silver Linings Playbook.

scumdevils86 · Post by **scumdevils86** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:34 am

I looked. Not bad. Dem titties tho

ASUCatFan · Post by **ASUCatFan** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:20 pm

Is it weird that I have no real desire to look? Other than being celebrities, it isn't like this isn't available all over the rest of the internet. Then there's kind of a skeevy factor.

I'm in the same boat. I suppose there is some curiosity, but looking doesn't seem right to me given that these pictures were stolen and released without consent. Not going to look.

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 2:30 pm

ASUCatFan wrote:
Is it weird that I have no real desire to look? Other than being celebrities, it isn't like this isn't available all over the rest of the internet. Then there's kind of a skeevy factor.
I'm in the same boat. I suppose there is some curiosity, but looking doesn't seem right to me given that these pictures were stolen and released without consent. Not going to look.

You're the .01% outlier then haha.

People are always going to try to get to celebrities...these celebrities are just dumb enough to take all these pictures of themselves and keep them available when they know this stuff could happen.

Go ahead and take a look.

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 3:55 pm

ASUCatFan wrote:
Is it weird that I have no real desire to look? Other than being celebrities, it isn't like this isn't available all over the rest of the internet. Then there's kind of a skeevy factor.
I'm in the same boat. I suppose there is some curiosity, but looking doesn't seem right to me given that these pictures were stolen and released without consent. Not going to look.

Yeah, it just seems wrong, so add in the minimal desire I have to see them and no thanks. There are plenty of 100% willing ladies on the internet if you want, and plenty as attractive, just not "celebrities."

Puerco · Post by **Puerco** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 8:03 pm

Bah, it's just a few boobies. What's the big deal? For me, the biggest thing that came out of this whole scandal (besides Apple's incompetence) is that Alexandra Daddario is most definitely hot:

http://i.imgur.com/VWrjQ8C.png

Sorry for posting the link. Image format doesn't seem to work embedded.

KOQSTRONG · Post by **KOQSTRONG** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 8:47 pm

Puerco wrote:Bah, it's just a few boobies. What's the big deal? For me, the biggest thing that came out of this whole scandal (besides Apple's incompetence) is that Alexandra Daddario is most definitely hot:

http://i.imgur.com/VWrjQ8C.png

Sorry for posting the link. Image format doesn't seem to work embedded.

Did you vote? I'm still amazed she didn't get #1.

http://forum.prodigaleyelid.com/viewtop ... f=13&t=709

Kate Upton has the sloppy titties of a 40 year old. Yes they look good on a 40 year old. But not a 21 year old. Sloppy.

Salty · Post by **Salty** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 8:53 pm

Upton is sloppy

catgrad97 · Post by **catgrad97** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:18 pm

"Aren't celebrities entitled to their privacy?" the common refrain echoes across the Internet in response to this.

I don't know. The simpler question to answer would be, aren't celebrities endowed with more of a brain than to take nude photos and videos of every crack of themselves on their cell phones?

You want something to be private, keep it private. Seems simple enough as long as you're willing to shut off the damn technology. Too many celebs aren't, and this is what happens.

scumdevils86 · Post by **scumdevils86** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:21 pm

Show me a 40 with these tits. Not happening. Always love when someone who can't get laid judges hot 22 year old girls about their looks.

KOQSTRONG · Post by **KOQSTRONG** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:38 pm

There are tons of 40 year olds with tits like that.

Edited....

21

http://25.media.tumblr.com/8ef15e17bd09 ... o1_250.gif

28

Sloppy.

ASUHATER! · Post by **ASUHATER!** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:47 pm

KOQSTRONG wrote:
Puerco wrote:Bah, it's just a few boobies. What's the big deal? For me, the biggest thing that came out of this whole scandal (besides Apple's incompetence) is that Alexandra Daddario is most definitely hot:

http://i.imgur.com/VWrjQ8C.png

Sorry for posting the link. Image format doesn't seem to work embedded.
Did you vote? I'm still amazed she didn't get #1.

http://forum.prodigaleyelid.com/viewtop ... f=13&t=709

Kate Upton has the sloppy titties of a 40 year old. Yes they look good on a 40 year old. But not a 21 year old. Sloppy.

99% of 21 year olds wish theirs were like that

scumdevils86 · Post by **scumdevils86** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:08 pm

I would love to do a poll of this site to honestly show who has a 40 year old wife who looks better than Upton at 21.

Salty · Post by **Salty** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:16 pm

At 21 those monsters have way too much sag.

Upton has the strangest body.

J-Law on the other hand. Oh yes!

catgrad97 · Post by **catgrad97** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:48 pm

Jesus. The people who would take Jennifer Lawrence over Kate Upton...

And the people who critique the bodies of either...

I just happen to think that Lawrence has no personality. Upton at least doesn't look bored to be wherever she happens to be.

Either way, the people who were all over their pics like they contained the secret of sex clearly haven't seen enough naked bodies in their lifetimes.

You'd swear Kate's naughty bits were LSD and reddit posters were Timothy Leary in '64. Gateway to another world, they ain't.

NYCat · Post by **NYCat** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:54 pm

Busty girls don't age well, doubt any 40 year old looks as good as when they were in their 20s.

Upton is a winner BTW, did you see Verlander finish on her? Looks like she likes to get down

apparently there's a ton of leaks not yet released.

Salty · Post by **Salty** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:55 pm

catgrad97 wrote:Jesus. The people who would take Jennifer Lawrence over Kate Upton...

And the people who critique the bodies of either...

I just happen to think that Lawrence has no personality. Upton at least doesn't look bored to be wherever she happens to be.

Either way, the people who were all over their pics like they contained the secret of sex clearly haven't seen enough naked bodies in their lifetimes.

You'd swear Kate's naughty bits were LSD and reddit posters were Timothy Leary in '64. Gateway to another world, they ain't.

Besides the bodies... Lawrence is worth more than twice as much as Upton and will continue to make money. Upton passed her prime two years ago.

Lawrence has an ass to die for. Upton has an alien body.

catgrad97 · Post by **catgrad97** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:00 pm

And both the ass and the earning power would be dragging your d*ck in the dust for decades until you gave up whatever you had of yourself to give her whatever she wanted.

The more mature you get, the better you'll understand how much more attractive personality is than blow-up doll fantasy scenarios. You can't make the owner of that ass do anything she doesn't want to do to you, man.

Salty · Post by **Salty** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:01 pm

catgrad97 wrote:And both the ass and the earning power would be dragging your d*ck in the dust for decades until you gave up whatever you had of yourself to give her whatever she wanted.

The more mature you get, the better you'll understand how much more attractive personality is than blow-up doll fantasy scenarios. You can't make the owner of that ass do anything she doesn't want to do to you, man.

Three words my friends.

Buttcheek. Lube. Sex.

catgrad97 · Post by **catgrad97** » Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:05 pm

Salty wrote:
catgrad97 wrote:And both the ass and the earning power would be dragging your d*ck in the dust for decades until you gave up whatever you had of yourself to give her whatever she wanted.

The more mature you get, the better you'll understand how much more attractive personality is than blow-up doll fantasy scenarios. You can't make the owner of that ass do anything she doesn't want to do to you, man.
Three words my friends.

Buttcheek. Lube. Sex.

Sigh...the things you'll never know I truly wish you did, Salty.

Salty · Post by **Salty** » Tue Sep 02, 2014 12:12 am

Yes. Super model hotness ratings is just the wisdom I need.

UofACat23 · Post by **UofACat23** » Tue Sep 02, 2014 12:51 am

catgrad97 wrote:"Aren't celebrities entitled to their privacy?" the common refrain echoes across the Internet in response to this.

I don't know. The simpler question to answer would be, aren't celebrities endowed with more of a brain than to take nude photos and videos of every crack of themselves on their cell phones?

You want something to be private, keep it private. Seems simple enough as long as you're willing to shut off the damn technology. Too many celebs aren't, and this is what happens.

The answer to the "common refrain" is obviously yes celebrities are entitled to their privacy. To claim otherwise is just a ridiculous. What happened to these people is just as appalling as if it had happened to one of your closest friends. Hacking and posting those pictures was an incredibly f*cked up thing to do, I don't know how any decent person could argue otherwise.

Yes, celebrities should probably be more careful because they are more commonly the target of creeps like the person who stole those photos, but that's like blaming the homeowner for not buying a security system when their house was robbed. Besides, it's not that crazy to think that your personal computer files are safe from public view. Celebrities are people too and I feel just as bad for them as I would for anyone who had their privacy violated like that.

Reydituto · Post by **Reydituto** » Tue Sep 02, 2014 1:23 am

UofACat23 wrote:
catgrad97 wrote:"Aren't celebrities entitled to their privacy?" the common refrain echoes across the Internet in response to this.

I don't know. The simpler question to answer would be, aren't celebrities endowed with more of a brain than to take nude photos and videos of every crack of themselves on their cell phones?

You want something to be private, keep it private. Seems simple enough as long as you're willing to shut off the damn technology. Too many celebs aren't, and this is what happens.

The answer to the "common refrain" is obviously yes celebrities are entitled to their privacy. To claim otherwise is just a ridiculous. What happened to these people is just as appalling as if it had happened to one of your closest friends. Hacking and posting those pictures was an incredibly f*cked up thing to do, I don't know how any decent person could argue otherwise.

Yes, celebrities should probably be more careful because they are more commonly the target of creeps like the person who stole those photos, but that's like blaming the homeowner for not buying a security system when their house was robbed. Besides, it's not that crazy to think that your personal computer files are safe from public view. Celebrities are people too and I feel just as bad for them as I would for anyone who had their privacy violated like that.

Well that post was a weenie-shrinker ...

Puerco · Post by **Puerco** » Tue Sep 02, 2014 1:36 am

In the grand scheme of things, a few people (yes, people. Who cares if they're celebrities or not?) had some boob pics stolen and put on the internet. Big deal. I think we can mostly all agree that they were nice boobies, so that's a positive.

I mean, really. Nothing has changed. When I was growing up, no girl would let you take a nudie photo of her because you could keep the negatives. Once the photo is taken, the risk of it getting out is always there. Now these girls let themselves be photographed in compromising situations. They certainly knew the risk was there. The guy who did it? Scum bag for sure, but I don't really have much sympathy for the poor 'victims'.

Chicat · Post by **Chicat** » Tue Sep 02, 2014 4:47 am

I'm torn on this. On the one hand, yes they are people who deserve privacy if they desire it. On the other, most of these women were already publicly sexualized by their movie studios, agents, photographers, managers and themselves. I mean, if you didn't already know what Kate Uptons tits looked like, you must have been living under a rock.

Macho Grande · Post by **Macho Grande** » Tue Sep 02, 2014 5:14 am

ASUCatFan wrote:
Is it weird that I have no real desire to look? Other than being celebrities, it isn't like this isn't available all over the rest of the internet. Then there's kind of a skeevy factor.
I'm in the same boat. I suppose there is some curiosity, but looking doesn't seem right to me given that these pictures were stolen and released without consent. Not going to look.

Same here. If they want to get nude for a movie scene, then I'll watch and enjoy the hell out of it. But this just seems...pervish. Kinda like going through someone's bedroom dresser and nightstand when they aren't home, or climbing a tree with a pair of binoculars. You're actively seeking out stuff that they don't want anyone to see. Gotta draw the line somewhere.

Spaceman Spiff · Post by **Spaceman Spiff** » Tue Sep 02, 2014 8:57 am

Just a PSA about the picture post earlier. I don't know if that's one of the leaks, but there are a ton of threats of legal action for anyone who posts them right now.

Login • Register