Lauri already 2nd all time in PPG for UA Pros

https://basketball.realgm.com/ncaa/conf ... ba-players" target="_blank
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
At the half, Rondae has 12 points in 14 minutes and Aaron has 24 points in 17 minutes in the Nets/Magic game. It is a good night for our recent alums.dcZONAfan wrote:Lauri is destroying the Cavs tonight
Rondae finished with 18 and AG had 41 on 14-18 shooting, 5-5 from 3 pt. Great night.Spaceman Spiff wrote:At the half, Rondae has 12 points in 14 minutes and Aaron has 24 points in 17 minutes in the Nets/Magic game. It is a good night for our recent alums.dcZONAfan wrote:Lauri is destroying the Cavs tonight
I have high hopes this is the year Aaron really breaks through.prh wrote:Rondae finished with 18 and AG had 41 on 14-18 shooting, 5-5 from 3 pt. Great night.Spaceman Spiff wrote:At the half, Rondae has 12 points in 14 minutes and Aaron has 24 points in 17 minutes in the Nets/Magic game. It is a good night for our recent alums.dcZONAfan wrote:Lauri is destroying the Cavs tonight
https://youtu.be/5HIjvidyshE" target="_blankMerkin wrote:
Even Lebron complains about our start times.pokinmik wrote:Once Lauri becomes a full grown man he’s gonna be a major force in the league. Love it!
http://www.espn.com/blog/chicago/bulls/ ... -impressed" target="_blank
“Very confident," James said of Markkanen. "Watched him a lot at Arizona. Watched him a lot. He wore my shoe a couple times ... he wore my retro Brons a couple times. I like that. I had to stay up very late to watch those Arizona games. A very confident kid, shoot the heck out of the ball. He's going to continue to get better. The best thing about it is he's getting an opportunity. If he makes mistakes, he can learn on the fly, but he's going to play a lot. He's good. It seems like he's learning. He's a good player."
If LeBron had named Larry Scott specifically, he would become my favorite NBA player.Chicat wrote:Even Lebron complains about our start times.pokinmik wrote:Once Lauri becomes a full grown man he’s gonna be a major force in the league. Love it!
http://www.espn.com/blog/chicago/bulls/ ... -impressed" target="_blank
“Very confident," James said of Markkanen. "Watched him a lot at Arizona. Watched him a lot. He wore my shoe a couple times ... he wore my retro Brons a couple times. I like that. I had to stay up very late to watch those Arizona games. A very confident kid, shoot the heck out of the ball. He's going to continue to get better. The best thing about it is he's getting an opportunity. If he makes mistakes, he can learn on the fly, but he's going to play a lot. He's good. It seems like he's learning. He's a good player."
Funny, I didnt see LeBron refer to Lauri as another Channing Frye type player.pokinmik wrote:Once Lauri becomes a full grown man he’s gonna be a major force in the league. Love it!
http://www.espn.com/blog/chicago/bulls/ ... -impressed" target="_blank
“Very confident," James said of Markkanen. "Watched him a lot at Arizona. Watched him a lot. He wore my shoe a couple times ... he wore my retro Brons a couple times. I like that. I had to stay up very late to watch those Arizona games. A very confident kid, shoot the heck out of the ball. He's going to continue to get better. The best thing about it is he's getting an opportunity. If he makes mistakes, he can learn on the fly, but he's going to play a lot. He's good. It seems like he's learning. He's a good player."
The Euro big man level of Nowitzki, Bargnani and Gallinari is the orbit I see Lauri in. Bargnani is the low end, Dirk the high end. Lauri probably falls in between somewhat.TucsonClip wrote:Funny, I didnt see LeBron refer to Lauri as another Channing Frye type player.pokinmik wrote:Once Lauri becomes a full grown man he’s gonna be a major force in the league. Love it!
http://www.espn.com/blog/chicago/bulls/ ... -impressed" target="_blank
“Very confident," James said of Markkanen. "Watched him a lot at Arizona. Watched him a lot. He wore my shoe a couple times ... he wore my retro Brons a couple times. I like that. I had to stay up very late to watch those Arizona games. A very confident kid, shoot the heck out of the ball. He's going to continue to get better. The best thing about it is he's getting an opportunity. If he makes mistakes, he can learn on the fly, but he's going to play a lot. He's good. It seems like he's learning. He's a good player."
That was the most ridiculous, lazy, and maddingly regurgitated, take on Lauri's game. Im still mad people were spreading that shit around the country.
NOT. EVEN. CLOSE.
Needs to be more physical in the post when they go small against him. The Cavs put Jeff Green on him instead of Love and switched every pick so he (and the rest of the Bulls) couldn't get open and then he kinda just floats on the perimeter. Unfortunately the Bulls don't have a player that can break down defenses right now to get Lauri looks and they rely heavily on executing their offense perfectly, which is pretty easy for teams to stop when they start trying. Hopefully Lavine coming back can help Lauri be more effective.Jefe wrote:Hell of a 1H but he was non-existent in the 2H. He needs to put on some lbs. The Cavs did a great job on him in the 2H but the bigger problem was Hoiberg benching him for so long. Coaching lost that game
Bulls fans have gone from “We traded Butler for some euro stiff who only shoots college threes” to “See ya Mirotic! We drafted the future!” in three games.Jefe wrote:Ya he looked pretty comfortable with Gasol on him.
You can't bring Lopez off the bench. I wonder if Lauri keeps this starting spot once Mirotic is ready
I said the same about him at Arizona. Lauri is dynamite off the pick and pop or catch and shoot. The next iteration that takes him to another level is when he is able to create his own shots, either by putting it on the floor against big guys or using his frame to impose on smaller guys.SunnyAZ wrote:Needs to be more physical in the post when they go small against him. The Cavs put Jeff Green on him instead of Love and switched every pick so he (and the rest of the Bulls) couldn't get open and then he kinda just floats on the perimeter. Unfortunately the Bulls don't have a player that can break down defenses right now to get Lauri looks and they rely heavily on executing their offense perfectly, which is pretty easy for teams to stop when they start trying. Hopefully Lavine coming back can help Lauri be more effective.Jefe wrote:Hell of a 1H but he was non-existent in the 2H. He needs to put on some lbs. The Cavs did a great job on him in the 2H but the bigger problem was Hoiberg benching him for so long. Coaching lost that game
Exactly, EV----beautifully summed up. Coach Miller was on this right from the start, and pushed Lauri in the growth direction during the second half of our season. Sure, Lauri may have gotten a bit nervous when Coach pushed him off the spot-up only game, but the reward for Lauri was starting his growth arc to a complete player using his remarkable all-around skillsetEVCat wrote:He's only showing the most pro-ready part of his game, too.
He is still a 7 footer with amazing handle for a 7 footer, who can drive left, spin right and finish at 19 years old. As his body matures into a 23, 24 year old athlete with nutritionists, continued weights, and full-time work, he is going to be able to take away aggressive close outs with additional offensive tools. If he just stays a spot up shooting 7 footer for his career, a great gift has been wasted.
He is not a point forward, but he is a legit passer. His pullup game has always been excellent. From 15-17 feet, he's basically automatic.TucsonClip wrote:Ive been on Lauri's creation potential since early last season when Miller ran him off double staggers, PNR ball handler going left, and DHOs. Channing Frye he is NOT.
He needs a right hand or his creation ability is going to be sapped in the coming weeks.Spaceman Spiff wrote:He is not a point forward, but he is a legit passer. His pullup game has always been excellent. From 15-17 feet, he's basically automatic.TucsonClip wrote:Ive been on Lauri's creation potential since early last season when Miller ran him off double staggers, PNR ball handler going left, and DHOs. Channing Frye he is NOT.
He needs to acclimate and learn how to create those shots for himself on the pro level. When he does, knocking them down will not be the issue.
Being a part of the Bulls hurts. They don't exactly have a lot of options to take heat off Lauri.TucsonClip wrote:He needs a right hand or his creation ability is going to be sapped in the coming weeks.Spaceman Spiff wrote:He is not a point forward, but he is a legit passer. His pullup game has always been excellent. From 15-17 feet, he's basically automatic.TucsonClip wrote:Ive been on Lauri's creation potential since early last season when Miller ran him off double staggers, PNR ball handler going left, and DHOs. Channing Frye he is NOT.
He needs to acclimate and learn how to create those shots for himself on the pro level. When he does, knocking them down will not be the issue.
Yes but some may say Arizona bb only has a regional following, east coasters be damned, and therefore game should start at 8pm. Cause larger market share in prime time in the west.Chicat wrote:Even Lebron complains about our start times.pokinmik wrote:Once Lauri becomes a full grown man he’s gonna be a major force in the league. Love it!
http://www.espn.com/blog/chicago/bulls/ ... -impressed" target="_blank
“Very confident," James said of Markkanen. "Watched him a lot at Arizona. Watched him a lot. He wore my shoe a couple times ... he wore my retro Brons a couple times. I like that. I had to stay up very late to watch those Arizona games. A very confident kid, shoot the heck out of the ball. He's going to continue to get better. The best thing about it is he's getting an opportunity. If he makes mistakes, he can learn on the fly, but he's going to play a lot. He's good. It seems like he's learning. He's a good player."
If you would've told me Jaylen Brown would be that much better than SJ, I wouldn't have believed it. He's definitely a guy who benefits from the pro style. In college, he would barrel into people and get called for it. As opposed to Harden, who would barrel into people and get the call.SunnyAZ wrote:Aaron, Rondae, and Lauri are balling this year. TJ is solid. Stanley is struggling. Then all the old heads being old heads.
I would've. Coming out I compared JB to Stanley except that JB was more agile/athletic and had more dribble ability.gumby wrote:If you would've told me Jaylen Brown would be that much better than SJ, I wouldn't have believed it. He's definitely a guy who benefits from the pro style. In college, he would barrel into people and get called for it. As opposed to Harden, who would barrel into people and get the call.SunnyAZ wrote:Aaron, Rondae, and Lauri are balling this year. TJ is solid. Stanley is struggling. Then all the old heads being old heads.
C'est la vie, say the old folks, it goes to show you never can tell.
Yep. I expected this offense, not rebounding.Spaceman Spiff wrote:The part of Lauri's game I love so far is the double digit rebounding.
Stanley shot 0-13 opening game. Wipe that game from the records and he is 21-43 (49%) from the floor and 8 for 21 (38%) from 3. The biggest thing to me though is the minutes Van Gundy has been giving him - approximately 36, 31 and 41 in his last three games. Van Gundy has been on the record multiple times expressing frustration about Stanley, because he knows how good the kid can really be if he gets things right between the ears.SunnyAZ wrote:Aaron, Rondae, and Lauri are balling this year. TJ is solid. Stanley is struggling. Then all the old heads being old heads.
It was never a given that Stanley was going to make it in the NBA. He doesn't have the athleticism that those other guys do. He muscled people around in college and that isn't going to get it done in the league. From what I've seen he has become a spot shooter. Dude needs to be a better finisher within 5ft and develop a mid-range game, otherwise that ceiling isn't going anywhere.rgdeuce wrote:Stanley shot 0-13 opening game. Wipe that game from the records and he is 21-43 (49%) from the floor and 8 for 21 (38%) from 3. The biggest thing to me though is the minutes Van Gundy has been giving him - approximately 36, 31 and 41 in his last three games. Van Gundy has been on the record multiple times expressing frustration about Stanley, because he knows how good the kid can really be if he gets things right between the ears.SunnyAZ wrote:Aaron, Rondae, and Lauri are balling this year. TJ is solid. Stanley is struggling. Then all the old heads being old heads.
It seems to be an understanding has been reached in Detroit...Stanley is good enough to help Van Gundy win, and Stanley has come a little closer to listen and not act like he knows it all, and has probably learned a bit from VG once the "feud" cooled to a simmer. VG not destroying Stanley after the o-fer was likely an opportunity for VG, and he took it...he offered an hand, and Stanley clearly took it. They will never be besties, but there is a lot to learn from that man, and if Stanley will just be as mature as he was here his one season, he will be fine.rgdeuce wrote:Stanley shot 0-13 opening game. Wipe that game from the records and he is 21-43 (49%) from the floor and 8 for 21 (38%) from 3. The biggest thing to me though is the minutes Van Gundy has been giving him - approximately 36, 31 and 41 in his last three games. Van Gundy has been on the record multiple times expressing frustration about Stanley, because he knows how good the kid can really be if he gets things right between the ears.SunnyAZ wrote:Aaron, Rondae, and Lauri are balling this year. TJ is solid. Stanley is struggling. Then all the old heads being old heads.
Stanley isn't an elite athlete alone, no, but when you factor in size and strength, his athleticism becomes an asset. He is also a very intelligent player when he wants to be. I see it like this: If Stanley never figures out the shooting and his head holds him back, he is still a nice piece off the bench if you have other shooters in the rotation. There is always a spot for a guy who can guard opponents 2s, 3s and 4s, and more in a pinch, even if he shoots 38% from the floor. If he marginally improves as a shooter, he is Ron Artest-lite (absent the few years Artest was really really good), if he figures it all out, he is or is close to a Ron Artest (when he was really really good). He could also be a guy who really takes off once he gets a change of scenery, be it he and Van Gundy aren't the best match personality wise, or alleviating the pressure of reaching expectations from the team who drafted him, and their fans.threenumberones wrote:It was never a given that Stanley was going to make it in the NBA. He doesn't have the athleticism that those other guys do. He muscled people around in college and that isn't going to get it done in the league. From what I've seen he has become a spot shooter. Dude needs to be a better finisher within 5ft and develop a mid-range game, otherwise that ceiling isn't going anywhere.rgdeuce wrote:Stanley shot 0-13 opening game. Wipe that game from the records and he is 21-43 (49%) from the floor and 8 for 21 (38%) from 3. The biggest thing to me though is the minutes Van Gundy has been giving him - approximately 36, 31 and 41 in his last three games. Van Gundy has been on the record multiple times expressing frustration about Stanley, because he knows how good the kid can really be if he gets things right between the ears.SunnyAZ wrote:Aaron, Rondae, and Lauri are balling this year. TJ is solid. Stanley is struggling. Then all the old heads being old heads.
Nice post. I'm not so sure I would rule Lauri out as the number 1 option on teams that win titles though. It is early, but he's had several games this year already where he is essentially putting the Bulls on his back when he is the lone man on the mountain, one of which came against the Cavs. You have to think exposure to that, especially immediately, is going to go a long way in terms of confidence and development. That was my one huge knock on Lauri, and I know many here shared the same sentiment. You look at what he has going for him now, if he further polishes his dribble drive, learns how to play inside/develops a back to the basket game, and gets a nice pick and roll/pop/fade partner, he's the type of guy who could go "Hakeem in the Finals," where it doesn't matter who and want you throw at him, he's scoring.EVCat wrote:It seems to be an understanding has been reached in Detroit...Stanley is good enough to help Van Gundy win, and Stanley has come a little closer to listen and not act like he knows it all, and has probably learned a bit from VG once the "feud" cooled to a simmer. VG not destroying Stanley after the o-fer was likely an opportunity for VG, and he took it...he offered an hand, and Stanley clearly took it. They will never be besties, but there is a lot to learn from that man, and if Stanley will just be as mature as he was here his one season, he will be fine.rgdeuce wrote:Stanley shot 0-13 opening game. Wipe that game from the records and he is 21-43 (49%) from the floor and 8 for 21 (38%) from 3. The biggest thing to me though is the minutes Van Gundy has been giving him - approximately 36, 31 and 41 in his last three games. Van Gundy has been on the record multiple times expressing frustration about Stanley, because he knows how good the kid can really be if he gets things right between the ears.SunnyAZ wrote:Aaron, Rondae, and Lauri are balling this year. TJ is solid. Stanley is struggling. Then all the old heads being old heads.
Lauri? Jeez...I told Bulls fans I know they were not getting fleeced in this deal. No, Lauri won't be a #1 option that wins titles, but you have to be bad to be good in the NBA, and with the size of the market, the history, and a year of being really, really bad, they will add a high profile FA, a high level draft pick, and Lauri will be an amazing complement to that kind of star power. The NBA is, flat out, more suited for his skills than college. The spacing especially.
I'm not certain. I think Lauri's ceiling is a career like Dirk, and Dirk did win a chip as the star. That said, that Mavs team was one of the weakest champs in a while and got helped by the Heat and LeBron self destructing.rgdeuce wrote:Nice post. I'm not so sure I would rule Lauri out as the number 1 option on teams that win titles though. It is early, but he's had several games this year already where he is essentially putting the Bulls on his back when he is the lone man on the mountain, one of which came against the Cavs. You have to think exposure to that, especially immediately, is going to go a long way in terms of confidence and development. That was my one huge knock on Lauri, and I know many here shared the same sentiment. You look at what he has going for him now, if he further polishes his dribble drive, learns how to play inside/develops a back to the basket game, and gets a nice pick and roll/pop/fade partner, he's the type of guy who could go "Hakeem in the Finals," where it doesn't matter who and want you throw at him, he's scoring.EVCat wrote:It seems to be an understanding has been reached in Detroit...Stanley is good enough to help Van Gundy win, and Stanley has come a little closer to listen and not act like he knows it all, and has probably learned a bit from VG once the "feud" cooled to a simmer. VG not destroying Stanley after the o-fer was likely an opportunity for VG, and he took it...he offered an hand, and Stanley clearly took it. They will never be besties, but there is a lot to learn from that man, and if Stanley will just be as mature as he was here his one season, he will be fine.rgdeuce wrote:Stanley shot 0-13 opening game. Wipe that game from the records and he is 21-43 (49%) from the floor and 8 for 21 (38%) from 3. The biggest thing to me though is the minutes Van Gundy has been giving him - approximately 36, 31 and 41 in his last three games. Van Gundy has been on the record multiple times expressing frustration about Stanley, because he knows how good the kid can really be if he gets things right between the ears.SunnyAZ wrote:Aaron, Rondae, and Lauri are balling this year. TJ is solid. Stanley is struggling. Then all the old heads being old heads.
Lauri? Jeez...I told Bulls fans I know they were not getting fleeced in this deal. No, Lauri won't be a #1 option that wins titles, but you have to be bad to be good in the NBA, and with the size of the market, the history, and a year of being really, really bad, they will add a high profile FA, a high level draft pick, and Lauri will be an amazing complement to that kind of star power. The NBA is, flat out, more suited for his skills than college. The spacing especially.
His limitations are somewhat surprising to me. I thought he was more skilled and savvy. Nick Johnson is a fantastic athlete, but McConnell is having the better experience. Wouldn't have predicted that either.threenumberones wrote:It was never a given that Stanley was going to make it in the NBA. He doesn't have the athleticism that those other guys do. He muscled people around in college and that isn't going to get it done in the league. From what I've seen he has become a spot shooter. Dude needs to be a better finisher within 5ft and develop a mid-range game, otherwise that ceiling isn't going anywhere.rgdeuce wrote:Stanley shot 0-13 opening game. Wipe that game from the records and he is 21-43 (49%) from the floor and 8 for 21 (38%) from 3. The biggest thing to me though is the minutes Van Gundy has been giving him - approximately 36, 31 and 41 in his last three games. Van Gundy has been on the record multiple times expressing frustration about Stanley, because he knows how good the kid can really be if he gets things right between the ears.SunnyAZ wrote:Aaron, Rondae, and Lauri are balling this year. TJ is solid. Stanley is struggling. Then all the old heads being old heads.
Spaceman Spiff wrote:I'm not certain. I think Lauri's ceiling is a career like Dirk, and Dirk did win a chip as the star. That said, that Mavs team was one of the weakest champs in a while and got helped by the Heat and LeBron self destructing.rgdeuce wrote:Nice post. I'm not so sure I would rule Lauri out as the number 1 option on teams that win titles though. It is early, but he's had several games this year already where he is essentially putting the Bulls on his back when he is the lone man on the mountain, one of which came against the Cavs. You have to think exposure to that, especially immediately, is going to go a long way in terms of confidence and development. That was my one huge knock on Lauri, and I know many here shared the same sentiment. You look at what he has going for him now, if he further polishes his dribble drive, learns how to play inside/develops a back to the basket game, and gets a nice pick and roll/pop/fade partner, he's the type of guy who could go "Hakeem in the Finals," where it doesn't matter who and want you throw at him, he's scoring.EVCat wrote:It seems to be an understanding has been reached in Detroit...Stanley is good enough to help Van Gundy win, and Stanley has come a little closer to listen and not act like he knows it all, and has probably learned a bit from VG once the "feud" cooled to a simmer. VG not destroying Stanley after the o-fer was likely an opportunity for VG, and he took it...he offered an hand, and Stanley clearly took it. They will never be besties, but there is a lot to learn from that man, and if Stanley will just be as mature as he was here his one season, he will be fine.rgdeuce wrote:Stanley shot 0-13 opening game. Wipe that game from the records and he is 21-43 (49%) from the floor and 8 for 21 (38%) from 3. The biggest thing to me though is the minutes Van Gundy has been giving him - approximately 36, 31 and 41 in his last three games. Van Gundy has been on the record multiple times expressing frustration about Stanley, because he knows how good the kid can really be if he gets things right between the ears.SunnyAZ wrote:Aaron, Rondae, and Lauri are balling this year. TJ is solid. Stanley is struggling. Then all the old heads being old heads.
Lauri? Jeez...I told Bulls fans I know they were not getting fleeced in this deal. No, Lauri won't be a #1 option that wins titles, but you have to be bad to be good in the NBA, and with the size of the market, the history, and a year of being really, really bad, they will add a high profile FA, a high level draft pick, and Lauri will be an amazing complement to that kind of star power. The NBA is, flat out, more suited for his skills than college. The spacing especially.
That said, I don't think it's crazy to see Lauri as a regular all-star and a building block of a team. If he could get surrounded with some Warriors type pieces, I think that would be ideal. Lauri is made to be a modern big guy on a team that plays positionless offense.