UALoco wrote:This team is bad, real bad. No chemistry, no flow. Bad shooting. Bad D. Alkins will help but will not turn this into a final 4 team. They are athletic, just not good basketball players. It is such a shame to see that Ayton will waste a year in Tucson..he is a once in a generation player. This, along with the FBI investigation, should turn any half decent recruits away. Miller might have the be let go.
Sorry, but there is no way I would dump Miller that fast.
I do want to see how Miller recruits going forward without Book. Has our past
recruiting been real or did we just $pay$ more than the other guy?
Well what do you mean by "real"?
I mean I bet we can keep picking up guys ranked 15-35 that want to be one and doners.
UALoco wrote:This team is bad, real bad. No chemistry, no flow. Bad shooting. Bad D. Alkins will help but will not turn this into a final 4 team. They are athletic, just not good basketball players. It is such a shame to see that Ayton will waste a year in Tucson..he is a once in a generation player. This, along with the FBI investigation, should turn any half decent recruits away. Miller might have the be let go.
Sorry, but there is no way I would dump Miller that fast.
I do want to see how Miller recruits going forward without Book. Has our past
recruiting been real or did we just $pay$ more than the other guy?
Well what do you mean by "real"?
I mean I bet we can keep picking up guys ranked 15-35 that want to be one and doners.
By "real" I mean above board. The recruits came here because of the Program/Miller and not $$$$$$$$$$$$$$
UALoco wrote:This team is bad, real bad. No chemistry, no flow. Bad shooting. Bad D. Alkins will help but will not turn this into a final 4 team. They are athletic, just not good basketball players. It is such a shame to see that Ayton will waste a year in Tucson..he is a once in a generation player. This, along with the FBI investigation, should turn any half decent recruits away. Miller might have the be let go.
Sorry, but there is no way I would dump Miller that fast.
I do want to see how Miller recruits going forward without Book. Has our past
recruiting been real or did we just $pay$ more than the other guy?
Well what do you mean by "real"?
I mean I bet we can keep picking up guys ranked 15-35 that want to be one and doners.
By "real" I mean above board. The recruits came here because of the Program/Miller and not $$$$$$$$$$$$$$
I actually think a chunk of those guys were coming here because of Miller and the program. Like we were their best offer.
Because other "higher tier" programs (there are only a few) hear them talk about being ranked 15-35 and really wanting to be a one and done and those programs say "thanks for stopping by."
UALoco wrote:This team is bad, real bad. No chemistry, no flow. Bad shooting. Bad D. Alkins will help but will not turn this into a final 4 team. They are athletic, just not good basketball players. It is such a shame to see that Ayton will waste a year in Tucson..he is a once in a generation player. This, along with the FBI investigation, should turn any half decent recruits away. Miller might have the be let go.
Sorry, but there is no way I would dump Miller that fast.
I do want to see how Miller recruits going forward without Book. Has our past
recruiting been real or did we just $pay$ more than the other guy?
Well what do you mean by "real"?
I mean I bet we can keep picking up guys ranked 15-35 that want to be one and doners.
By "real" I mean above board. The recruits came here because of the Program/Miller and not $$$$$$$$$$$$$$
I actually think a chunk of those guys were coming here because of Miller and the program. Like we were their best offer.
Because other "higher tier" programs (there are only a few) hear them talk about being ranked 15-35 and really wanting to be a one and done and those programs say "thanks for stopping by."
You may be 100% correct but I'm not sure. Its hard to believe that Book was clean as a whistle up until the PAC12 tournament last year. Its more likely he's been pulling that crap for years.
UALoco wrote:are we winning this...or they losing it?
Just asked myself the same thing. It's been a very fast paced game. We have a little more depth. Especially with more contributions in the second half. Good game...hope we win.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
UALoco wrote:Just glad to be in this game with Ayton to go to at the end.
Yup, at least it's not a blowout.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
Last edited by dovecanyoncat on Sat Dec 02, 2017 10:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
“The reality is that the hardest games to win are over teams on their home court. Teams that don’t play those games can spin it however they want, but what they’re saying is, ‘We don’t want to lose in our non conference season.’" - Sean Miller
Confusion. total confusion to start our last offensive set.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
They said that??
