Everyone should be praying KU is the #1 seed in the West and Arizona is the #4 seed - and hope Gonzaga is not the #5 seed.Beachcat97 wrote:Kansas is one of the more undeserving #1s in recent years.
Official Bracketology Thread
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=59&start=10200#p380285" target="_blank
- BE4RDOWN21
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 8:29 am
- Reputation: 0
- Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
You know, I'm not completely sold on the Zags tbh. IMO, they seem pedestrian in the post this year compared to years past (no karnowski or collins). I think Ayton and Dus would have their ways with the Zags in that aspect. The one concern I would have is the length of some of their guards and the range they have. Our Perimeter D has improved but there deep game could pose a problem. I don't think they are as talented as previous years. I think we win that game npNYCat wrote:Everyone should be praying KU is the #1 seed in the West and Arizona is the #4 seed - and hope Gonzaga is not the #5 seed.Beachcat97 wrote:Kansas is one of the more undeserving #1s in recent years.
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Gonzaga is nowhere near the team they were last year, but Tillie is a very good player and their defense is solid. I agree: I think we're clearly the better team this year, but the Zags are as well coached as any team and would be a very tough second round game.BE4RDOWN21 wrote:You know, I'm not completely sold on the Zags tbh. IMO, they seem pedestrian in the post this year compared to years past (no karnowski or collins). I think Ayton and Dus would have their ways with the Zags in that aspect. The one concern I would have is the length of some of their guards and the range they have. Our Perimeter D has improved but there deep game could pose a problem. I don't think they are as talented as previous years. I think we win that game npNYCat wrote:Everyone should be praying KU is the #1 seed in the West and Arizona is the #4 seed - and hope Gonzaga is not the #5 seed.Beachcat97 wrote:Kansas is one of the more undeserving #1s in recent years.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
if they lose they are like the definition of a bubble team to study for the committee as a thought experiment. good wins in ooc, bad conference and conference result. very bubbly SOS and RPI in the 50s/60s.SabinoDrifter wrote:those turds in Tempe would be an interesting case if they were to lose today...
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
- BE4RDOWN21
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 8:29 am
- Reputation: 0
- Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
I'm Pretty sure 90% of ASU's shots have been from 3 point range so far today...live by the 3, die by the 3
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Just about half.BE4RDOWN21 wrote:I'm Pretty sure 90% of ASU's shots have been from 3 point range so far today...live by the 3, die by the 3
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Yeah asu shouldn't be in, they were hovering the 11 line before. Especially if UCLA, Oregon or USC wins the conference tournament. At best ASU should be a play in game.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=59&start=10200#p380285" target="_blank
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
they're either an 11 seed play-in team or like the #1 overall seed in the NITNYCat wrote:Yeah asu shouldn't be in, they were hovering the 11 line before. Especially if UCLA, Oregon or USC wins the conference tournament. At best ASU should be a play in game.
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Please have a camera on them as they announce the field and they're not in.
- ProfessorFate
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 7:00 am
- Reputation: 60
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
I'm thinking they move up to a 9 seed.
2023 Football RAP Champion
2022 Mark Schlabach Memorial Bracket Champion
2017 Bear Down Wildcats Survival Pool Champion
2022 Mark Schlabach Memorial Bracket Champion
2017 Bear Down Wildcats Survival Pool Champion
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
In my mind's eye, they're wearing the Guard U t-shirts when this happens. Then Hurley gives an interview with CBS with his hands behind his back.azgreg wrote:Please have a camera on them as they announce the field and they're not in.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
according to live-rpi.com asu's rpi is 65 with the #72 SOS. only thing that is keeping them in the discussion are those 2 wins. if they had lost to either xavier or kansas they'd be 100% out right now.
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
azgreg wrote:Please have a camera on them as they announce the field and they're not in.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=59&start=10200#p380285" target="_blank
- Longhorned
- Posts: 14758
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:04 pm
- Reputation: 975
- Location: In a guayabera at The Sands Club, Arizona Stadium
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Gonzaga is a tough team for anyone to face. I don’t think a 5 seed is justified, and it makes sense to ship Arizona or Gonzaga.NYCat wrote:Everyone should be praying KU is the #1 seed in the West and Arizona is the #4 seed - and hope Gonzaga is not the #5 seed.Beachcat97 wrote:Kansas is one of the more undeserving #1s in recent years.
- U.P. Zona Fan
- Posts: 2656
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 9:57 pm
- Reputation: 414
- Location: Big bay, MI
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Don't you have to have a winning conf record to make the NIT or at least even?ASUHATER! wrote:they're either an 11 seed play-in team or like the #1 overall seed in the NITNYCat wrote:Yeah asu shouldn't be in, they were hovering the 11 line before. Especially if UCLA, Oregon or USC wins the conference tournament. At best ASU should be a play in game.
Arizona State might have the most surprisingly anemic history in men's basketball of any program that you might think is better than it is.
-Norlander.
-Norlander.
- BE4RDOWN21
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 8:29 am
- Reputation: 0
- Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
They have to have near .500 records and a large fan-base. We'll see how long ASU fans stick around...U.P. Zona Fan wrote:Don't you have to have a winning conf record to make the NIT or at least even?ASUHATER! wrote:they're either an 11 seed play-in team or like the #1 overall seed in the NITNYCat wrote:Yeah asu shouldn't be in, they were hovering the 11 line before. Especially if UCLA, Oregon or USC wins the conference tournament. At best ASU should be a play in game.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
The funny thing about asu's 2 great wins, is I can probably find a team not going to the tournament with 2 wins just as good (though with some bad losses). St. John's immediately comes to mind.
- Longhorned
- Posts: 14758
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:04 pm
- Reputation: 975
- Location: In a guayabera at The Sands Club, Arizona Stadium
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
nm confused myself
Last edited by Longhorned on Wed Mar 07, 2018 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
LH you being sarcastic or already drunk in vegas? if asu is in a play-in game they'd be an 11 seedLonghorned wrote:If ASU is in the play-in game, which #1 seed wants to face them in the first round? Kansas and Xavier would no doubt be spared, but how does Villanova and Virginia feel about that? It's one thing with conference foes that know how to plan for ASU. The one-and-out tourney is another thing. Not out of this world to wonder if this would be the first ever 1-seed eliminated by a 16-seed.
- Longhorned
- Posts: 14758
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:04 pm
- Reputation: 975
- Location: In a guayabera at The Sands Club, Arizona Stadium
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
No, I actually confused myself. Only three drinks in. Thanks, prh.prh wrote:LH you being sarcastic or already drunk in vegas? if asu is in a play-in game they'd be an 11 seedLonghorned wrote:If ASU is in the play-in game, which #1 seed wants to face them in the first round? Kansas and Xavier would no doubt be spared, but how does Villanova and Virginia feel about that? It's one thing with conference foes that know how to plan for ASU. The one-and-out tourney is another thing. Not out of this world to wonder if this would be the first ever 1-seed eliminated by a 16-seed.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Not anymore.U.P. Zona Fan wrote:Don't you have to have a winning conf record to make the NIT or at least even?ASUHATER! wrote:they're either an 11 seed play-in team or like the #1 overall seed in the NITNYCat wrote:Yeah asu shouldn't be in, they were hovering the 11 line before. Especially if UCLA, Oregon or USC wins the conference tournament. At best ASU should be a play in game.
- Alieberman
- Posts: 13841
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
- Reputation: 2885
- Location: I can't find my pants
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Oklahoma was listed in the top 16 when the selection committee put their top 16 out a few weeks ago. They just lost again and finished the season at 18-13. Are they now out? Even a worse collapse than ASU.
- CatFanOneMil
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2016 9:54 pm
- Reputation: 82
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
No way Oklatraema is out, poster child for WTF?Alieberman wrote:Oklahoma was listed in the top 16 when the selection committee put their top 16 out a few weeks ago. They just lost again and finished the season at 18-13. Are they now out? Even a worse collapse than ASU.
- Alieberman
- Posts: 13841
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:50 am
- Reputation: 2885
- Location: I can't find my pants
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Last 15 games they are 4-11CatFanOneMil wrote:No way Oklatraema is out, poster child for WTF?Alieberman wrote:Oklahoma was listed in the top 16 when the selection committee put their top 16 out a few weeks ago. They just lost again and finished the season at 18-13. Are they now out? Even a worse collapse than ASU.
-
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 10:08 am
- Reputation: 130
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
That's sad. But if they are that bad over the past 15 games and Kansas keeps loosing at home like they did ( even against ASU), then that would mean the big 12 is not as good as promoted - and conferences like the PAC-12 are better than being reported.Alieberman wrote:Last 15 games they are 4-11CatFanOneMil wrote:No way Oklatraema is out, poster child for WTF?Alieberman wrote:Oklahoma was listed in the top 16 when the selection committee put their top 16 out a few weeks ago. They just lost again and finished the season at 18-13. Are they now out? Even a worse collapse than ASU.
Can't let that happen.
No Bandwagon Here! Always a Cat!
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Bracket matrix most accurate bracket has Arizona as a #5 in the West.
1. Kansas
2. Duke
3. Michigan
4. Gonzaga
5. Arizona
Arizona/Gonzaga are playing in Boise (since Gonzaga is a #4 seed they would get a choice of where to play, they would choose Boise most likely)
Asu is out. UCLA the only other pac 12 team to make it
https://bracketville.wordpress.com/bracketology/" target="_blank
----
I agree we're a #5 seed and can solidify a #4 seed if we get a couple wins during the conference tournament. #3 seed is out of reach.
Here's the bracket matrix bracket ranking
http://www.bracketmatrix.com/rankings.html" target="_blank
1. Kansas
2. Duke
3. Michigan
4. Gonzaga
5. Arizona
Arizona/Gonzaga are playing in Boise (since Gonzaga is a #4 seed they would get a choice of where to play, they would choose Boise most likely)
Asu is out. UCLA the only other pac 12 team to make it
https://bracketville.wordpress.com/bracketology/" target="_blank
----
I agree we're a #5 seed and can solidify a #4 seed if we get a couple wins during the conference tournament. #3 seed is out of reach.
Here's the bracket matrix bracket ranking
http://www.bracketmatrix.com/rankings.html" target="_blank
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=59&start=10200#p380285" target="_blank
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Lunardi has us as a 4 in the East. ASU and UCLA as play in 11 seeds and USC as a 10 in the West.
i was going to put the ua/asu records here...but i forgot what they were.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
i'll just go with fuck asu.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
bring Duke WEST
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
If we win the Pac12 tourney, there is no way we are not in San Diego and West region. Whatever your thoughts on the strength of the Pac12, you can't ship the regular and tourney champ. If the committee truly does consider missing players like they say, then we should safely be in SD/West anyways. It seems insane that we're wondering if we are geographically protected when we are safely a 4 in the preview bracket, have been winning since, easily won the Pac12 this year, and only have 3 losses at full strength.
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Duke is obviously beatable this year. Lots of good pieces on that team, but it hasn’t worked as well as everyone thought it would back in November. AZ can beat them.
- Longhorned
- Posts: 14758
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:04 pm
- Reputation: 975
- Location: In a guayabera at The Sands Club, Arizona Stadium
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Seeding doesn't matter.
Region doesn't matter.
Match ups do matter, but even there the variables don't add up to match ups mattering for useful projections and hopes.
Region doesn't matter.
Match ups do matter, but even there the variables don't add up to match ups mattering for useful projections and hopes.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Only top 4 seeds win the championship, except for UConn of course
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=59&start=10200#p380285" target="_blank
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
4 to 3 is a huge jump because you get one more round, if you advance, without the 1, and a chance of them losing to the 4.
Getting a 1 or 4 has considerable difference from the nearly interchangeable 2/3. Would love to crawl up to a 3. Then, yes, matchups matter. But with so few elite teams in basketball, it will be hard even filling all the 1s with teams to fear. I'd much rather be staring at the #2 in the 2nd weekend than a #1...if we can get out of the 1st weekend, of course.
Getting a 1 or 4 has considerable difference from the nearly interchangeable 2/3. Would love to crawl up to a 3. Then, yes, matchups matter. But with so few elite teams in basketball, it will be hard even filling all the 1s with teams to fear. I'd much rather be staring at the #2 in the 2nd weekend than a #1...if we can get out of the 1st weekend, of course.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
NYCat wrote:Everyone should be praying KU is the #1 seed in the West and Arizona is the #4 seed - and hope Gonzaga is not the #5 seed.Beachcat97 wrote:Kansas is one of the more undeserving #1s in recent years.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=59&start=10200#p380285" target="_blank
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Yeah Im not seeing how they can get in. Finished tied for 9th in a conference that probably only gets 2 or 3 teams in the tournament. Only won one of their last 6 games, and that was a home game against a brutal Cal team. The Kansas win loses some of its pop when you look at how Kansas was playing (also losing to UW and barely edging another weaker team). As the season has progressed those two wins (incl Xavier) have looked more and more like flukes or getting the right opponent on the wrong night. RPI 62, BPI 47 and Kenpom 44 aren't enough to push them over the edge for the numbers guys either.ASUHATER! wrote:if they lose they are like the definition of a bubble team to study for the committee as a thought experiment. good wins in ooc, bad conference and conference result. very bubbly SOS and RPI in the 50s/60s.SabinoDrifter wrote:those turds in Tempe would be an interesting case if they were to lose today...
-
- Posts: 8596
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:20 pm
- Reputation: 470
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
ASU is not getting in. Next...
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Would sign off on Palm's current bracketology
4 in west vs Buffalo, winner of NMSU/Ohio State, Kansas is the 1, Creighton/FSU 8/9 a legit chance to beat Kansas in the first weekend.
Other (2/3) side of the bracket features Michigan State, North Carolina, TCU, Rhode Island, Texas...
Annnd...no ASU
4 in west vs Buffalo, winner of NMSU/Ohio State, Kansas is the 1, Creighton/FSU 8/9 a legit chance to beat Kansas in the first weekend.
Other (2/3) side of the bracket features Michigan State, North Carolina, TCU, Rhode Island, Texas...
Annnd...no ASU
-
- Posts: 14664
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 am
- Reputation: 1150
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
I'm scared of Michigan State.EVCat wrote:Would sign off on Palm's current bracketology
4 in west vs Buffalo, winner of NMSU/Ohio State, Kansas is the 1, Creighton/FSU 8/9 a legit chance to beat Kansas in the first weekend.
Other (2/3) side of the bracket features Michigan State, North Carolina, TCU, Rhode Island, Texas...
Annnd...no ASU
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Longhorned wrote:
Region doesn't matter.
fast fact: did you know that under the leadership of legendary coach Mike Krzyzewski Duke has been to the Final Four 12 times and that none of those 12 trips came when slotted in the WEST Region.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
If they got through, that would be a tough game. But I could flip KU and MSU and we would be in line to hit them in the S16, and that would be far worse than this design.Spaceman Spiff wrote:I'm scared of Michigan State.EVCat wrote:Would sign off on Palm's current bracketology
4 in west vs Buffalo, winner of NMSU/Ohio State, Kansas is the 1, Creighton/FSU 8/9 a legit chance to beat Kansas in the first weekend.
Other (2/3) side of the bracket features Michigan State, North Carolina, TCU, Rhode Island, Texas...
Annnd...no ASU
Plus, with all of Michigan State's problems, we might not be the focus of all the "they are evil" discussion
But, yeah...I figure we would have to play someone tough somewhere. I'd just rather have MSU on the other side of the regional and Kansas on ours than vice versa. I like the set up if we have to be a 4. I wouldn't want to be a 3 in their 2 region, tho.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
I learned that the last time we met them in the West. Would love to do it again97cats wrote:Longhorned wrote:
Region doesn't matter.
fast fact: did you know that under the leadership of legendary coach Mike Krzyzewski Duke has been to the Final Four 12 times and that none of those 12 trips came when slotted in the WEST Region.
- YoDeFoe
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:35 am
- Reputation: 476
- Location: Costa Mesa, CA
- Contact:
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
I know we all know the NCAA rigs this shit to create TV worthy match-ups instead of "purely" seeding the tournament... I know we know East Coast bias is a thing...97cats wrote:Longhorned wrote:
Region doesn't matter.
fast fact: did you know that under the leadership of legendary coach Mike Krzyzewski Duke has been to the Final Four 12 times and that none of those 12 trips came when slotted in the WEST Region.
But goddamn does it still get under my skin that Duke (and others) get this kind of deference and we're all supposed to act like they're basketball gods.
- Longhorned
- Posts: 14758
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 1:04 pm
- Reputation: 975
- Location: In a guayabera at The Sands Club, Arizona Stadium
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Oh, I know for a fact that Duke has never made it out of the west. And yet I still don't believe that's because of the flight time or time zone or anything else associated with their placement in that region.97cats wrote:Longhorned wrote:
Region doesn't matter.
fast fact: did you know that under the leadership of legendary coach Mike Krzyzewski Duke has been to the Final Four 12 times and that none of those 12 trips came when slotted in the WEST Region.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Sexton scores the last three possessions, including the game winning layup, to win the game vs. A&M.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
When's the last time Arizona made the FF while placed in the West? I honestly don't know the answer, but something tells me it isn't great.97cats wrote:Longhorned wrote:
Region doesn't matter.
fast fact: did you know that under the leadership of legendary coach Mike Krzyzewski Duke has been to the Final Four 12 times and that none of those 12 trips came when slotted in the WEST Region.
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
The best part about all of this is now they get to sit and wait as more and more bids get stolen.rgdeuce wrote:Yeah Im not seeing how they can get in. Finished tied for 9th in a conference that probably only gets 2 or 3 teams in the tournament. Only won one of their last 6 games, and that was a home game against a brutal Cal team. The Kansas win loses some of its pop when you look at how Kansas was playing (also losing to UW and barely edging another weaker team). As the season has progressed those two wins (incl Xavier) have looked more and more like flukes or getting the right opponent on the wrong night. RPI 62, BPI 47 and Kenpom 44 aren't enough to push them over the edge for the numbers guys either.ASUHATER! wrote:if they lose they are like the definition of a bubble team to study for the committee as a thought experiment. good wins in ooc, bad conference and conference result. very bubbly SOS and RPI in the 50s/60s.SabinoDrifter wrote:those turds in Tempe would be an interesting case if they were to lose today...
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Do NOT want to see them til the final four. One of only 3(?) teams who are top 20 in both adjO and adjD, and we have seen far less superior Izzo teams go to final fours. Yeah, no thanks.Spaceman Spiff wrote:I'm scared of Michigan State.EVCat wrote:Would sign off on Palm's current bracketology
4 in west vs Buffalo, winner of NMSU/Ohio State, Kansas is the 1, Creighton/FSU 8/9 a legit chance to beat Kansas in the first weekend.
Other (2/3) side of the bracket features Michigan State, North Carolina, TCU, Rhode Island, Texas...
Annnd...no ASU
Re: Official Bracketology Thread
Making them sweat, then giving them the bad news will be the ultimate timeline. Lmaocats101 wrote:The best part about all of this is now they get to sit and wait as more and more bids get stolen.rgdeuce wrote:Yeah Im not seeing how they can get in. Finished tied for 9th in a conference that probably only gets 2 or 3 teams in the tournament. Only won one of their last 6 games, and that was a home game against a brutal Cal team. The Kansas win loses some of its pop when you look at how Kansas was playing (also losing to UW and barely edging another weaker team). As the season has progressed those two wins (incl Xavier) have looked more and more like flukes or getting the right opponent on the wrong night. RPI 62, BPI 47 and Kenpom 44 aren't enough to push them over the edge for the numbers guys either.ASUHATER! wrote:if they lose they are like the definition of a bubble team to study for the committee as a thought experiment. good wins in ooc, bad conference and conference result. very bubbly SOS and RPI in the 50s/60s.SabinoDrifter wrote:those turds in Tempe would be an interesting case if they were to lose today...