Chicat wrote:Hey Dick. Quick question....
By exactly what method would Pitino have them top 10 instantly?
Thanks you crazy old coot.
Hookers and blow?
Moderators: UAdevil, JMarkJohns
Chicat wrote:Hey Dick. Quick question....
By exactly what method would Pitino have them top 10 instantly?
Thanks you crazy old coot.
Lol. Last time I checked there was like 10 LAX-Tucson flights a day on 3 different airlines..prh wrote:Just read a UCLA fan say they started using charters for places without direct connections to LA, like Pullman and Tucson
Thats dumb. They usually only used charters when flight times on road trips werent ideal. Like late Thursday night flights. Alford had a charter flight for recruiting trips whenever he want.prh wrote:Just read a UCLA fan say they started using charters for places without direct connections to LA, like Pullman and Tucson
Pitino is the only guy on that list that would return UCLA's call, and the administration would never let the AD hire Pitino, so that one won't happen. UCLA will probably not land an established, elite name. They might snag a notable mid-major coach (Marshall), or D1 guys like Matta and Crean, who have decent resumes, but flamed out at the end of their last jobs. UCLA is not getting Kerr or Donovan, let alone Izzo. Why would Izzo leave Michigan State? Dakich is out of his mind. Why not add Coach K to the list?UAEebs86 wrote:
Dakich is good friends with Alford, so that narrative of demanding too much will likely be played over and over by a few agenda driven media headsmidnightx wrote:Pitino is the only guy on that list that would return UCLA's call, and the administration would never let the AD hire Pitino, so that one won't happen. UCLA will probably not land an established, elite name. They might snag a notable mid-major coach (Marshall), or D1 guys like Matta and Crean, who have decent resumes, but flamed out at the end of their last jobs. UCLA is not getting Kerr or Donovan, let alone Izzo. Why would Izzo leave Michigan State? Dakich is out of his mind. Why not add Coach K to the list?UAEebs86 wrote:
Does he have his degree?ghostwhitehorse wrote:Lonzo Ball is pushing for Earl Watson. . .
ghostwhitehorse wrote:Lonzo Ball is pushing for Earl Watson. . .
That’s why I laughed when someone on the Bruinzone board made a big contrarian suggestion/prediction: Kobe Bryant. I can’t remember if he was quoting a media source or if it was his own genius idea.Chicat wrote:Does he have his degree?ghostwhitehorse wrote:Lonzo Ball is pushing for Earl Watson. . .
Shout-out to Arizona for getting the classes to him. I'm assuming that class is why it took forever for him to get clearedByJoveByJingle wrote:The two Pac-12 flagship programs in shocking disarray. I'm just glad we were able to pass on the genital herpes to UCLA. Still trying to figure out how Shareef made it past the impossibly stringent UCLA admissions board.
In any case, he wasn't playing defense in the 2nd half against Utah.
That's why he is a good hire for UCLA, not for Arizona!Beachcat97 wrote:Haha...no way. They'd never hire someone with zero college HC experience.
The difference is that Luke is an AZ alum, and he has first-hand experience with this program. As a player, he won a Pac title and reached a FF. So I think this makes it much more likely he'd get consideration at AZ. Why would UCLA hire a guy with no ties to their program and no HC experience, when they could go and get Matt Painter or Thad Matta or maybe even Rick Barnes?Merkin wrote:That's why he is a good hire for UCLA, not for Arizona!Beachcat97 wrote:Haha...no way. They'd never hire someone with zero college HC experience.
Luke was an assistant to Pastner for a while at Memphis, so I imagine he is well aware of the nightmares of recruiting, along with navigating the maze of NCAA regulations.
There is a reason why Kerr said he will never coach in college.
But if you are out of a job, any job looks good.
I wouldn't say no ties...Beachcat97 wrote: Why would UCLA hire a guy with no ties to their program
That would be my choice right now.azcat49 wrote:UCLA should go after the Texas Tech Coach. They should be able to hire who they want although maybe they might be challenged monetarily. Wonder what Bug is hearing
http://www.espn.com/college-sports/stor ... -admission" target="_blankMrBug708 wrote:Shout-out to Arizona for getting the classes to him. I'm assuming that class is why it took forever for him to get clearedByJoveByJingle wrote:The two Pac-12 flagship programs in shocking disarray. I'm just glad we were able to pass on the genital herpes to UCLA. Still trying to figure out how Shareef made it past the impossibly stringent UCLA admissions board.
In any case, he wasn't playing defense in the 2nd half against Utah.
That's the rumor for a bit. Seth Davis was the first to report it a few days agoBear Down Vegas wrote:Calipari would be some move.
You guys upping your investment ten fold now? If you guys get Calipari I'd immediately fire Miller after the season and pursue a better coach than recruiter.MrBug708 wrote:That's the rumor for a bit. Seth Davis was the first to report it a few days agoBear Down Vegas wrote:Calipari would be some move.
Calipari sure does love the lime light and it doesn't get any bigger than in Hollywood.Beachcat97 wrote:They're not getting Calipari. He's already got (arguably) the best job in the game, including the pros. UK's academic standards are significantly lower than UCLA's and will always pay more. Unless the Calipari/UK relationship has soured, it's inconceivable that he'd leave for another job, especially one that's been trending downward for a while now.
Also a fan base that isn't nuts eitherChooChooCat wrote:Calipari sure does love the lime light and it doesn't get any bigger than in Hollywood.Beachcat97 wrote:They're not getting Calipari. He's already got (arguably) the best job in the game, including the pros. UK's academic standards are significantly lower than UCLA's and will always pay more. Unless the Calipari/UK relationship has soured, it's inconceivable that he'd leave for another job, especially one that's been trending downward for a while now.
Actually, Choo, it does. Way bigger. You must not live in L.A. UCLA hoops is simply one show among many other, more popular ones. Lakers, Dodgers, Kings, Rams, Angels, USC football. I mean, if Calipari wants to become a smaller fish in a bigger ocean, that’s what he’d be getting. Most people in L.A. don’t even know, let alone care, that Lonzo went to UCLA. During the Howland years, Pauley was often half empty.ChooChooCat wrote:Calipari sure does love the lime light and it doesn't get any bigger than in Hollywood.Beachcat97 wrote:They're not getting Calipari. He's already got (arguably) the best job in the game, including the pros. UK's academic standards are significantly lower than UCLA's and will always pay more. Unless the Calipari/UK relationship has soured, it's inconceivable that he'd leave for another job, especially one that's been trending downward for a while now.
Could it happen? Absolutely. UCLA has always gone the cheap route and thats not really the way it works anymore. I'm skeptical it happens as I don't see a fit for Kentucky after Calipari and I think they know this. Bennett and Beard are the two biggest names and I can't imagine that style works. Had keatts had a great year, he would be an obvious choice but he hasn't and would be a hard sell. Donovan has had a rough second half but he would kill it at KentuckyCalStateTempe wrote:Cal to UCLA would be a game changer.
And yeah, we’d have to seriously up our coach game if that happens.